Annual PCE inflation for April was 2.1%, in line with expectations
May 30 (UPI) -- April personal consumption expenditure inflation was up just 0.1% for an annual rate of 2.1%, according to a Friday Bureau of Economic Analysis report.
"From the same month one year ago, the PCE price index for April increased 2.1%," the BEA report said. "Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index increased 2.5% from one year ago."
For the month, PCE inflation met the Dow Jones consensus forecast, but the annual rate was 0.1% lower than expected.
"From the preceding month, the PCE price index for April increased 0.1%. Excluding food and energy, the PCE price index also increased 0.1%.," the BEA said.
Spending on housing and utilities services was up 24.7% in April, heath care services spendingincresed by 20.3%.
Gasoline spending was up 8.1%.
Spending on food and beverages, vehicles, recreational goods, financial services, insurance, clothing, footwear and motor vehicle parts all declined.
The BEA also reported personal income in the United States was up 0.8% in April.
"Disposable personal income (DPI)-personal income less personal current taxes-increased $189.4 billion (0.8%) and personal consumption expenditures (PCE) increased $47.8 billion (0.2%)," the BEA said in a statement.
The income increase reflected both compensation increases and higher government social benefits to individuals, according to the BEA.
In April there was a $47.8 billion increase in current-dollar PCE - comprised of a $55.8 billion rise in spending on services partially offset by an $8 billion decrease in spending for goods.
Personal savings amounted to $1.12 trillion in April while the personal saving rate was 4.9%. That rate is saving as a percentage of disposable personal income.
Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gold's Rally Broke Down in May. It's Still Doing Better Than Stocks.
Gold just wrapped up its worst month since December, but don't count the yellow metal out just yet. Gold futures fell 0.5% to $3,288.90 per troy ounce in May to snap a four-month winning streak, with the metal marking its biggest monthly decline in five months, according to Dow Jones Market Data. Gold is still up 25.1% this year, far outpacing the S&P 500's 0.5% 2025 gain.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Appeals court keeps pauses on Trump's mass firings at 21 agencies
May 31 (UPI) -- An three-judge federal appeals panel has kept in place a lower court's decision to pause the Trump administration's plans to downsize the federal workforce through layoffs. Late Friday, the U.S. 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in a 2-1 decision denied an emergency motion by the federal government to stay U.S. District Judge Susan Illston's order on May 9 that halted terminations at 21 agencies. The layoffs are called reductions in force, or RIFs. In a 45-page ruling, the appeals court in California wrote the challengers likely will win the case on the merits. The appeal panel said the Trump executive order on Feb. 13 "far exceeds the President's supervisory powers under the Constitution." The Trump administration has also asked the Supreme Court to decide and has not acted. "A single judge is attempting to unconstitutionally seize the power of hiring and firing from the Executive Branch," White House spokesman Harrison Fields told CNN in a statement. "The President has the authority to exercise the power of the entire executive branch - singular district court judges cannot abuse the power of the entire judiciary to thwart the President's agenda." Ruling for the plaintiffs were Senior Circuit Judge William Fletcher, an appointee of President Bill Clinton and Lucy Koh, selected by President Joe. Consuelo Maria Callahan, an appointee of President George W. Bush, wrote in her dissent that "the President has the right to direct agencies, and OMB and OPM to guide them, to exercise their statutory authority to lawfully conduct RIFs." Fletcher wrote: "The kind of reorganization contemplated by the Order has long been subject to Congressional approval." Illston, who was nominated by President Bill Clinton and serves in San Francisco, had backed the lawsuit by labor unions and cities filed on April 28, including San Francisco, Chicago, Baltimore and Harris County in Houston. She questioned whether Trump's administration was acting lawfully in reducing the federal workforce and felt Congress should have a role. "The President has the authority to seek changes to executive branch agencies, but he must do so in lawful ways and, in the case of large-scale reorganizations, with the cooperation of the legislative branch," Illston wrote after hearing arguments from both sides. "Many presidents have sought this cooperation before; many iterations of Congress have provided it. Nothing prevents the President from requesting this cooperation -- as he did in his prior term of office. Indeed, the Court holds the President likely must request Congressional cooperation to order the changes he seeks, and thus issues a temporary restraining order to pause large-scale reductions in force in the meantime." The coalition of organizations suing told CNN said after the appeals decision: "We are gratified by the court's decision today to allow the pause of these harmful actions to endure while our case proceeds." After Trump's executive order, the Department of Government Efficiency submitted a Workforce Optimization Initiative and the Office of Personnel Management also issued a memo. During Trump's first 100 days in office, at least 121,000 workers have been laid off or targeted for layoffs, according to a CNN analysis. There are more than 3 million workers among civilian and military personnel. Some of them have taken buyouts, "including those motivated to do so by the threat of upcoming RIFs," according to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities. That includes 10,000 at the Department of Health and Human Services through RIF as part of a plan to cut 20,000 employees. That includes 20% of the workforce of the Food and Drug Administration and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The agencies, run by Cabinet-level personnel, sued were Agriculture, Commerce, Defense, Energy, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Justice, Housing and Urban Development, Interior, Justice, Labor, State and Treasury, Transportation, Veterans Affairs. The Education Department, which Trump wants to dismantle, was not listed, but 50% of the workforce has been let go. Six additional agencies with statutory basis elsewhere in the United States Code were named: AmeriCorps, General Services Administration, National Labor Relations Board, National Science Foundation, Small Business Administration and Environmental Protection Agency. Elon Musk, who officially left Friday as special White House adviser, was named in the suit.
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Nasdaq ends month 9.5% higher, S&P 500 records best May since 1990
US stocks (^DJI, ^IXIC, ^GSPC) close out Friday's trading session mixed, the Nasdaq Composite falling nearly 0.4% while leading monthly gains and closing out May trading over 9.5% higher. Market Domination Overtime's Josh Lipton and Yahoo Finance markets and data editor Jared Blikre eye the past month's market and sector trends. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Domination Overtime here. Trade and tariffs were of course back on the radar for investors today. President Trump going after China on social media, talking tough. We had a new report that the US plans to broaden restrictions on China's tech sector, but if we add it up and we look at our major indices here, we've got the Dow tacking on about a 10th of a percent, up about 50 points. The S&P 500 also basically flat. Your tech heavy Nasdaq down about a third of a percent. Jared, over to you. Well, thank you. Let's check out some of the monthly totals here because the S&P 500, by my calculations, this is the fifth best May ever since 1928, the best since 1990, and also the second best since 1948. And here we go. This is the intraday. We barely climbed into the green by the end of the day, but here is a month to date and you can see we're up 6.15%. The Dow, nothing to write home about, but very positive, almost 4%. And then Nasdaq really outperforming here. That was up 9.5%. And it was a very interesting market month for the bond market. Here's the 30-year T-bond yield, and this is finishing up at 4.93%, a little venture above 5%, caused some consternation for equities for stocks a few weeks ago or last week, but we are in below that critical threshold right now. And then here's the US dollar index almost flat, just slightly to the downside for the month. We were up, we were down and at the end of the day, not really doing too much here. Here is the sector action and we're going to have much more discussion on this. Josh, you and me lipped in in about 30 minutes, but here's what happened today. This is utilities, staples and communication services in the lead, energy and consumer discretionary, throw tech in there and also materials, those were all red into the downside. Over the month though, let's check that out. Everything in the green except for healthcare. Tech was leading the way up almost 10%, followed by industrials up about 9, and consumer discretionary just below that and communication services up 6%. So really the mega cap sectors were the best performing and you can see that behind me here. Apple kind of out of the mix. Apple was down 5.5%, but among the mega caps, we got Microsoft up 16.5%, Nvidia after its earnings finally printed up 24%, most of that came before that. Tesla up 22% and Broadcom also up 25%. So three of those big mega cap names, if you include all eight, Broadcom, three of those were above 20%. And I'm going to leave it on the Dow here. This is what happened in the Dow this month. There's Apple again standing out in the red, but the biggest loser is United Health down here. That was down 26.7%. Salesforce after earnings went to the negative and then Merck down 10%, just underscoring that it was not a great month for healthcare here. Sign in to access your portfolio