logo
The £20 French pharmacy SPF that ticks every box

The £20 French pharmacy SPF that ticks every box

Telegraph20-05-2025
If there's one item in my skincare routine I am particularly fussy about, it's sun protection. I probably wouldn't care so much if it was a product that I only needed to slather on for a sunny holiday. But sun protection should be used daily – yes, even in the UK – so the formula has to be absolute perfection. It shouldn't leave a white cast on the skin, it shouldn't cause your make-up to pill, and it shouldn't leave your skin feeling greasy or clog your pores.
I know that's a lot to ask. But I'm not finished: I also don't want to spend a lot on a product that should be used daily, especially in the quantities dermatologists advise for proper sun protection (two finger-length stripes of sunscreen is about right for your whole face). Creams that cost in their hundreds may work marvellously but not everyone wants to spend that kind of money on a beauty product.
This brings me on to the latest sun protection I've found that ticks all of my fussy skincare boxes. It's £20, which of course isn't cheap but it easily rivals the SPFs I've tried that are three or four times more expensive. It's the Anthelios UVAir SPF50+ by La Roche-Posay, a French pharmacy brand that I reach for time and time again because the formulas are so sophisticated – and, crucially, work well on all skin tones.
Anthelios UVAir SPF50+, £20, La Roche-Posay
The brand designed the UVAir extension of their popular Anthelios range to give a 'no excuses' option for anyone put off from using SPF. It fits the bill. The cream feels more like a lightweight fluid serum, and it sinks in really quickly. The finish on the skin is a little bit glowy but not at all greasy: it simply gives your skin a hydrated, healthy look. And no white cast – hurrah! (This, by the way, is mainly caused by the zinc oxide used in mineral sunscreens, which is naturally white and can give your skin an undesirable 'ghostly' quality.)
The La Roche-Posay product is also excellent for anyone with redness or sensitive skin, and doesn't sting the eyes unlike other sunscreens on the market. I've already bought my second bottle of it.
Super Healthy Skin Featherlight UVA/UVA SPF 50 Sunscreen + Primer, £15, Beauty Pie
Another purse-friendly option, particularly if you are a subscriber to the beauty membership club, Beauty Pie, is the Super Healthy Skin Featherlight UVA/UVA SPF 50 Sunscreen + Primer. It's £15 (£25 for non-subscribers) and has a similarly lightweight, fluid texture to the La Roche-Posay sunscreen. It's designed to work seamlessly with make-up, so leaves a slight grippiness on the skin to help foundation stay in place. This is particularly useful in more humid climates.
Expert Sun Protector Clear Stick SPF 50+ by Shiseido, £32, Boots
It's also a good idea to keep a more portable sun protection with you on the go, for when you need to top up. I've really enjoyed using the new Expert Sun Protector Clear Stick SPF 50+ by Shiseido (another brand, this time Japanese, that creates brilliant sun protection). It's £32 and you can pick it up from Boots. The stick is easy to use and I find it doesn't disrupt any light make-up if you apply it on top. If you suffer from dry skin in the sun, this stick is made up of super-hydrating ingredients like argan oil, which feels more like skincare than suncare. As it should. It's a hit with men, too, because it's invisible and traceless on the skin.
Three other suncare products I love…
Heliocare 360° Pediatrics Stick SPF50+
£19.99, Look Fantastic
OK, strictly this is a children's sun protection that I use on my kids as a top-up while they're playing outside, but I have no qualms in using it myself. It effectively protects the skin from the sun, leaves a transparent finish and has an addictive faint vanilla scent.
The Uniform Tinted Mineral SPF 50
£34, Merit Beauty
This just launched from one of my favourite minimal make-up brands, Merit. It is a fully mineral SPF that protects the skin while evening out the complexion in a variety of shades. If you don't like too many layers of skincare and make-up, consider this your one-and-done SPF and base – just make sure you use enough to get your full SPF 50 protection.
Lip Screen SPF 50 by Raybalm
£5.99, Amazon
I learnt the hard way that you need a separate SPF for your lips after coming back from Greece last month: while my face didn't burn at all, my lips were dry and flaky for weeks after I returned. This lip balm is moisturising and protecting at the same time.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem
The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem

The Guardian

time16 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

The Guardian view on regulating cosmetic procedures: rogue operators must be tackled, but aren't the only problem

The enormous popularity of beauty treatments, including dermatological fillers and Botox injections, is not solely an issue for health regulators. Changing norms and aspirations about appearances, and the way that these are marketed mainly to women and girls, are a cultural and economic phenomenon that requires wider consideration. While attitudes to these procedures and aesthetics vary, many people – including some cosmetic surgeons – are concerned that younger women account for a growing share of a highly lucrative and growing market. The death last year of 33-year-old Alice Webb in Gloucestershire, after a non-surgical Brazilian butt lift, as well as multiple reports of injuries, and the deaths of at least 28 women who have travelled to Turkey for cosmetic treatments, have increased the pressure on ministers to tighten the law. Wes Streeting's announcement of new licence requirements for UK businesses, and tighter regulation of higher-risk treatments, is probably overdue. The Chartered Trading Standards Institute recently warned that untrained people have given cosmetic injections in public toilets and hotels. Altering the law in order to exclude such 'rogue operators' ought to make high streets and the internet – where many clinics advertise – safer. Talking about the risks, as the health secretary has been doing, and holding a consultation on proposed changes, may have the beneficial effect of raising awareness even before changes are introduced. But councils will need resources if they are to be expected to enforce new rules by issuing licences, checking premises and so on. As in many other areas of economic activity, the law on its own is unlikely to be enough. Mechanisms are needed to ensure that businesses comply. It is already illegal to administer Botox or dermal fillers to children in England – although, worryingly, it is still allowed in Wales and Scotland. Mr Streeting's announcement that rules regarding children will be tightened further is particularly welcome. Strenuous efforts should be made to place them off limits for the industry as a whole. The reported preoccupation of some children with anti-ageing products is not healthy and should be discouraged. Mr Streeting did not refer to the cost to the NHS if cosmetic procedures go wrong, when announcing plans to tighten the law. But Karin Smyth, one of his ministers, has raised this. And Prof Sir Stephen Powis, who was NHS England's national medical director until last month, made the same point specifically in relation to butt lifts – the cosmetic procedure with the highest death rate of all. Ministers should expect pushback even though many experts, including plastic surgeons, favour tighter rules. The pro-growth mood of the Treasury means proposals for new regulations are unlikely to be smiled upon there. The more restrictive approach being proposed for England will also do nothing to prevent surgical tourism and could even increase it, if tighter regulation of the domestic industry results in higher prices. The gap in safeguards that allows foreign cosmetic surgery providers to market directly to the public needs to be addressed separately, which the government has begun to recognise. There is no single or instant fix. But by cracking down on cowboy operators, ministers will send a message that appearance-altering injections and other invasive treatments must be treated seriously. They are a different order of activity from applying makeup or painting nails. Do you have an opinion on the issues raised in this article? If you would like to submit a response of up to 300 words by email to be considered for publication in our letters section, please click here.

Sunday Brunch viewers are left in a frenzy just minutes into the show's latest episode
Sunday Brunch viewers are left in a frenzy just minutes into the show's latest episode

Daily Mail​

time2 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Sunday Brunch viewers are left in a frenzy just minutes into the show's latest episode

Sunday Brunch viewers were left in a frenzy just minutes into the show's latest episode, and quickly took to X to share their thoughts. The Channel 4 programme returned on Sunday with Tom Grennan, Caity Baser, Susie Dent, Alfie Allen, Conor MacNeill and Joy Crookes as guests. But despite Tom Grennan headlining Radio 1's Big Weekend and Caity Baser having a huge social media following and touring the UK, viewers were left unhappy as they claimed they barely knew the guests. Aside from Countdown's Susie Dent, many fans were left unsure on who the other guests were and flocked to social media to share their thoughts. Taking to X, formerly known as Twitter, posts included: 'I know 3 of them, its a WR for me. #sundaybrunch.' '#sundaybrunch @sundaybrunch Susie Dent is the only one I have heard of due to Countdown.' ;'I know 2 of them this week #sundaybrunch .' The complaints come after presenter Morgan McGlynn Carr has shared a health update with fans after she revealed she was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. The TV star and author, 38, who has a regular spot as a cheese expert on the show, recently posted a picture of her from her hospital bed as she announced the 'earth shattering' news. In October 2024, Morgan received her diagnosis after finding a lump in her right breast and received six months of weekly chemotherapy. On two occasions doctors told the mother-of-one the lump was breast-feeding related, but after having a gut feeling something still wasn't quite right she went for a third opinion and got her diagnosis - which she says 'saved her life'. Now, Morgan has shared a positive health update with fans as she appeared on the latest episode of the Channel 4 show on Sunday. Speaking to hosts Simon Rimmer and Tim Lovejoy, she broke down in tears as she told the anchors she's been given 'the all clear'. While fighting back tears, she explained: 'As some of you know and some of you don't, I'm already wobbling, I am sorry.' Tim then reached to comfort Morgan before she continued: 'I got diagnosed with breast cancer last October, so we got the all clear, like a week ago.' But despite Tom Grennan headlining Radio 1's Big Weekend and Caity Baser having a huge social media following and touring the UK, viewers were left unhappy as they claimed they barely knew the guests The complaints come after presenter Morgan McGlynn Carr has shared a health update with fans after she revealed she was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer In a touching moment, the entire studio then erupted into applause for Morgan as she was visibly taken aback by the reaction. She added: 'I was just going to say, check your lumps, your bumps and trust your gut and yeah, that's it really.' The Cheese expert added thanked everyone again for the support she's received, saying: 'Yes, I've been taken on surprise trips and I've had the biggest support system including you guys as well.' Morgan has graced the screen alongside Sunday Brunch hosts Tim Lovejoy and Simon Rimmer since 2016. The cheese presenter confirmed she is now 'healing' as she joyfully admitted she received some 'very, very good news' following surgery last month. Sharing her journey, she wrote: 'On the eve of my daughter's first birthday, I found a lump in my right breast. I'd recently stopped breastfeeding and assumed it was related. 'But my husband made me promise to go to the doctor first thing Monday - and, by pure chance it happened to be CoppaFeel! Week. My feed was full of women talking about breast cancer. 'The GP said it was definitely breastfeeding-related. The breast clinic consultant said she was 99% sure it was nothing. 'I got a third opinion and that decision saved my life... Trust your gut. Always. 'After scans, biopsies, mammograms, CTs, MRIs - in October 2024, I was diagnosed with triple-negative breast cancer. It was nothing short of earth-shattering. 'But we've done our best to keep life feeling normal as possible for our daughter. Treatment is different for every person. No two paths are the same. But here's what happened to me: 'I was given a week before chemo to get my ducks in a row, which included chopping my hair off and IVF and egg retrival, something I'm incredibly grateful I was able to do. 'Then came six months of weekly chemotherapy. The hardest thing I've ever done. Some weeks I sat for 13 hours at a time, and I was never alone thanks to my friends who kept me company. On two occasions doctors told the mother-of-one the lump was breast-feeding related, but after having a gut feeling something still wasn't quite right she went for a third opinion and got her diagnosis - which she says 'saved her life 'And those who've been through the cold cap you'll known it's no joke. I had to catch my breath and get through the hardest parts before sharing this. So why now? 'Because if even one person sees this, and it prompts them to check a lump or get a second opinion, it could save a life. Please, trust your gut.' Morgan revealed she had a successful surgery last month and received some 'very good news' a few days ago. She continued: 'Two weeks ago, I had surgery - and a few days later, we got some very, very good news. 'I've not really known how to share this. To be honest, I'm still finding my feet after everything.' Morgan added: 'This year has changed me. There's still a road to recovery to come - but I'm here, I'm healing, and I'm more grateful than I've been.' Morgan is the UK's leading cheese expert and owner of Cheeses of Muswell Hill, an award-winning independent cheese shop in North London. She is also a top judge at the World Cheese Awards. What is triple negative breast cancer? Triple negative breast cancer is a form of the disease that does not have receptors for the hormones oestrogen or progesterone, or the protein HER2. This makes it trickier to treat due to the tumour not responding to these hormonal or protein therapies. Triple negative breast cancer makes up around 10-to-20 per cent of all forms of the disease. It tends to be more aggressive than other breast tumours, with patients having a worse prognosis. The condition is more common in those under 40 and black women. It is diagnosed via a sample of the cancerous cells. Symptoms are similar to other forms of breast cancer. These can include: Lump or thickening in the breast Change in the size, shape or feel of the breast Dimpling of the skin Change in the shape of the nipple Rash or blood-stained discharge coming from the nipple Swelling in the armpit Treatment usually involves surgery, chemo and radiotherapy. Chemo may be given first to shrink the tumour before a patient goes under the knife. It may also be given after the operation to prevent the disease returning.

Pricing people out of using Mounjaro would be bad news for the NHS
Pricing people out of using Mounjaro would be bad news for the NHS

The Independent

time3 hours ago

  • The Independent

Pricing people out of using Mounjaro would be bad news for the NHS

There were scenes of shock in pharmacies across the country when a notice from pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly hit inboxes out of nowhere last week. The wholesale price of their popular weight-loss drug Mounjaro, administered via jabs, was going to more than double from the start of September. While Eli Lilly has struck an, as yet secret, deal with the NHS, this massive increase will hit the vast majority of patients who are prescribed Mounjaro privately. More than a million Britons are estimated to already be taking Mounjaro, and scores more are interested in using it to start their weight-loss journey. So, when the news of this massive price hike went public, it wasn't only pharmacists who were worried and disappointed. The first message to concerned patients is don't panic and don't stop taking your medication; your local pharmacy is ready and willing to talk you through the options going forward. There are alternatives to Mounjaro that, for now at least, remain cheaper. They may be right for you, but it is essential that you get professional advice before you do anything, and your neighbourhood pharmacist is best placed and most on hand to give that advice. The consequences of this unprecedented price hike won't just hit patients; they will also hit the pharmacies on Britain's high streets. The finances of the whole pharmacy sector are already in a state of crisis after years of underfunding. The price hike for Mounjaro will put it under more financial strain. Unless the government steps in and offers the sector a fairer funding settlement for our NHS work, then, inevitably, we are going to see more pharmacies close and more communities robbed of the vital service on their street corner. If the government really wants pharmacies to be the 'front door' of their Neighbourhood Health Service, then it needs to act now. We call on the other weight-loss manufacturers to hold their nerve and hold their prices. The British market for weight-loss jabs was only set to grow, but it will only achieve that growth if treatment remains affordable to the average patient. There is a real danger that patients priced out of Mounjaro, but anxious to maintain treatment, turn to sourcing replacements online. If other manufacturers follow suit and up their prices, that danger will only grow. In their desperation, patients could well end up sourcing counterfeit jabs online, which are completely unregulated and potentially extremely harmful. At the click of a mouse, patients can find themselves buying jabs that they have no idea what they contain, or if they were manufactured in safe conditions, no matter what picture the unscrupulous sites use to tempt them in. We are urging patients to be extremely cautious and vigilant when looking to buy weight loss medication online. If it looks too good to be true, it almost certainly is. Again, talk to your trained and regulated community pharmacy, which is there to help. There is a real risk it won't end here. Although the companies would deny it, tariffs and the noise from the White House would seem to be hitting this side of the Atlantic. British patients must not become pawns in a wider dispute about the costs of medicines arising from President Trump's recent letter to the US drug manufacturers. For now, it seems that weight-loss jabs prescribed privately are the easy win for the pharma giants, but we are concerned that more companies may increase the prices of more medicines as a result of tariffs. Any increases in wholesale prices, even for those drugs prescribed by the NHS, will impact the sustainability of the sector. The Mounjaro price hike came out of the blue. It could prove just the start. Exploding prices for pharmaceuticals risks a genuine and rapid crisis. Ministers need to urgently develop contingency plans; otherwise, we risk the system that keeps vital medicines flowing to patients entering an unprecedented era of uncertainty.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store