Intel layoffs surpass 1,600 across US
Intel Corp. is laying off approximately 1,666 employees across four states this month as part of a company-wide restructuring effort to reduce costs and simplify operations.
'We are taking steps to become a leaner, faster and more efficient company,' Intel said in an email July 9. 'Removing organizational complexity and empowering our engineers will enable us to better serve the needs of our customers and strengthen our execution.'
The job cuts, which begin to take effect July 11, will affect hundreds that work at or report to Intel in California, Oregon, Texas and Arizona, according to recent Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification filings.
About half of those affected — roughly 855 — are based out of Intel's offices and facilities in Santa Clara and Folsom, California. The company is also cutting 529 employees across its four campuses in or near Hillsboro, Oregon, considered to be the heart of the company's research and development operations.
Additionally, Intel has given recent layoff notices to 172 workers in Chandler, Arizona and 110 in Austin, Texas, according to WARN filings as of July 11.
A spokesperson declined to elaborate on which departments or segments of the company will be affected. In late June, Intel said it will 'wind down' its automotive business within its client computing group.
The chipmaker has also started sending layoff notices to hundreds of workers in Israel, where Intel employs roughly 4,000 at its Kiryat Gat campus, Israel-based news outlet Ynet reported.
One of CEO Lip-Bu Tan's priorities since taking over in March has been to refocus Intel's core products for a new era of computing shaped by artificial intelligence and reasoning models.
Intel, known for its personal computer processors, has lagged behind competitors AMD and Nvidia in the evolving semiconductor market. It reported a net loss of $18.8 billion for 2024, driven in part by its struggles to transition to smaller, more efficient chip designs.
'We are seen as too slow, too complex and too set in our ways — and we need to change,' Tan said in a company-wide letter April 24. He detailed plans to become a more engineering-focused company and remove layers of teams, which has created "unnecessary bureaucracy that slows us down.'
Long-term, Tan said he also wants to refine Intel's AI strategy with a focus on emerging areas of interest and to build trust with foundry customers.
'There is no way around the fact that these critical changes will reduce the size of our workforce,' Tan wrote in April. 'This will begin in Q2 and we will move as quickly as possible over the next several months.
More details of the changes are likely to come during Intel's upcoming investor call, which is scheduled for July 24.
The changes will begin to take place July 11, affecting mostly workers in California and Oregon.
Recommended Reading
Intel plans to lay off more than 500 Oregon workers
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
21 minutes ago
- Fox News
This EV has a face, and it talks back with AI
Walking up to your car and seeing it recognize you, light up with a digital smile and respond to your voice used to be something only seen in TV shows and movies. Now, LA-based Faraday Future is making that experience a reality. At its California headquarters, the company recently unveiled the FX Super One, a tech-packed electric vehicle featuring the F.A.C.E., short for Front AI Communication Ecosystem. This expressive LED grille gives the car personality, allowing it to connect through light, sound and even emotional cues. Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my The FX Super One is an electric MPV designed with flexibility and intelligence at its core. It offers two types of powertrains, including a fully electric option and a hybrid setup known as AI Hybrid Extended Range. All-wheel drive comes standard, and the wheelbase is extended to create what Faraday calls Magic Space, a spacious interior that adapts to various needs. Seating configurations vary, but one standout version, called GOAT, features four seats, including luxurious zero-gravity recliners in the back. These are paired with a wide panoramic display and even a built-in refrigerator. Other versions can seat six or seven passengers and include smart cabin lighting, high-end materials and a fully digital infotainment system designed for interaction. Instead of just lighting up like a typical grille, the F.A.C.E. uses AI to sense people nearby and respond with dynamic visuals. It listens to voice commands and reacts with animations that can show emotion or deliver information. It's powered by Faraday's Embodied Intelligence Agent system, which links the grille with other AI-driven features inside the car. The system works when the vehicle is parked and is designed to create a sense of connection between the driver and the machine. Voice recognition, camera input and learned behavior all feed into how the car responds. Over time, it adjusts its reactions based on how you use it. You might see calming patterns after a long day or playful responses when you greet it in the morning. The F.A.C.E. is only part of the story. The FX Super One also comes loaded with smart safety tools powered by the same AI system. These include a 360-degree sensor suite that combines cameras, radar and lidar for full environmental awareness. The cabin features a quick-starting operating system that lets passengers customize their experience on the go. As for driving, the car's architecture supports intelligent assistance that helps reduce risk and make decisions based on both data and context. The goal isn't just automation, it's collaboration between the driver and the vehicle. More than 10,000 people have already pre-ordered the FX Super One, indicating rapidly growing interest in the vehicle. Faraday Future plans to start production in late 2025 at its Hanford, California, plant. This aggressive timeline demonstrates the brand's renewed drive to gain momentum in the competitive EV market. With the FX Super One, Faraday Future delivers bold innovations that go beyond speed, range or luxury. The company envisions a new era of mobility defined by personality and human connection. Faraday Future is targeting a price for the FX Super One of under $100,000. You can reserve your FX Super One now with a refundable $100 deposit on Faraday Future's official website. The FX Super One feels like more than an electric vehicle. It brings personality to the road with its talking grille, adaptive cabin and emotionally aware AI. Faraday Future is leaning into connection and creativity, offering a car that responds to your presence and remembers how you interact with it. Whether the F.A.C.E. becomes a must-have feature or just a fun extra, it adds something fresh to the EV space. Would you drive a car that smiles at you and knows when you're having a bad day? Let us know by writing us at Sign up for my FREE CyberGuy ReportGet my best tech tips, urgent security alerts and exclusive deals delivered straight to your inbox. Plus, you'll get instant access to my Ultimate Scam Survival Guide — free when you join my Copyright 2025 All rights reserved.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key)
Key Points The future of the auto industry lies in electric vehicles and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles. After many years in service, Waymo still can't point to a timeline of profitability. Tesla also faces challenges with its robotaxi offering, but it's well positioned, provided it can demonstrate safety and efficacy. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOG) (NASDAQ: GOOGL) isn't, strictly speaking, an electric vehicle (EV) company. However, its autonomous driving technology company, Waymo, is committed to only using EVs in its fleet. Funnily enough, it could be argued that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) isn't really a pure EV company either. After all, most of its sky–high valuation is attributable to the potential of its robotaxis. However, the comparison of these two as EV companies is valid because the future of the auto industry is EVs, and ridesharing in autonomous vehicles will be a larger part of the industry in the future. But which company is better placed, and which is the better stock? Alphabet vs. Tesla It's entirely possible that Alphabet could decide to spin off Waymo, not least because it reportedly could be valued at more than $45 billion. Meanwhile, one of Tesla's biggest supporters, Cathie Wood's Ark Invest, ascribes 88% of Tesla's enterprise value (market cap plus net debt) to robotaxis in its investment case for the stock, producing an expected value of $2,600 for the stock in 2029. As I have previously discussed, the Ark targets should be taken with a pinch of salt, as its track record on Tesla hasn't been good. However, Ark's core argument is sound and points to Tesla being potentially a far more valuable stock than Waymo ever will be. Pathways to profitability The core argument is that Tesla's business model is scalable to profitability while Waymo's is far less so. The issue of Waymo's profitability arose in a recent CNBC interview with Waymo co-CEO Tekedra Mawakana, where she was asked whether Waymo is profitable. She replied, "We're proving out that it can be a profitable business." When asked when Waymo would be profitable, she replied, "not clear." It's also not clear if Alphabet/Waymo doesn't have an internal forecast for when it will hit profitability, or if Mawakana preferred not to divulge what the company considers an uncertain forecast. However, it's inconceivable that Alphabet is not internally crunching the numbers on this, and if it does decide to spin off Waymo, it's a question that needs to be answered. The point here is that a business that can't be profitable isn't worth anything, let alone $45 billion, so at some point, its management is going to have to set some timelines. Tesla and timelines Whereas investors need to hear more about timelines from Waymo, whose public self-driving ride-hailing service was launched in 2018, there's probably a need for fewer declared timelines from Tesla, or, rather, a need for more accurate ones. For example, in 2019, CEO Elon Musk famously told investors to expect a million self-driving vehicles on the road by mid-2020. In April 2022, he also stated that Tesla aspired to reach volume production of a dedicated robotaxi (Cybercab) in 2024 -- a timeline that has now been pushed back to 2026. These timeline estimates matter because plugging overly optimistic assumptions from them into valuation models can produce dramatically erroneous conclusions. Why Tesla is better positioned With all that said, Tesla has clear advantages over Waymo, provided it can demonstrate safety and reliability and achieve regulatory approvals. Its advantages include: Lower vehicle costs, with Musk aiming for a $30,000 price tag for a dedicated robotaxi, the Cybercab. Meanwhile, Wall Street analysts estimate Waymo's current vehicles cost more than $120,000. In addition, Tesla manufactures its own cars (Waymo does not), and existing Teslas can be converted into robotaxis using Tesla's as-yet-unreleased-to-the-public unsupervised full self-driving (FSD) software, giving Tesla a significant advantage in scaling the robotaxi business. Tesla's use of camera-centric technology is inherently less expensive than Waymo's combination of cameras, light detection and ranging (Lidar) lasers, and high-definition maps. Every Tesla car (robotaxi or not) on the road is effectively a data gatherer, with the data used to improve the AI that powers its AI models. As such, even though Waymo was first, Tesla has significantly more data than Waymo. Which is the better EV stock? Waymo may become profitable in the future, particularly if Lidar costs continue to drop. However, it's challenging to think that it will be a strong competitor to Tesla, provided Musk's company can master safe, unsupervised FSD using a camera-centric approach. That's a big "if" at this stage, but it becomes a smaller "if" as time goes by and Tesla expands its nascent robotaxi offering across new geographies. Tesla's next robotaxi launch is expected to be in Phoenix, as it plans to continue slowly building its robotaxi business. I think Tesla is the better EV stock when comparing Tesla and Alphabet. Should you buy stock in Tesla right now? The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $636,628!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,063,471!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,041% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 183% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 21, 2025 Lee Samaha has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet and Tesla. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Better EV Stock: Alphabet vs. Tesla (Hint: Robotaxis Are the Key) was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
Wall Street Journal
2 hours ago
- Wall Street Journal
America Should Travel Fast
Regarding Allysia Finley's 'California's Bullet Train Is a Model of Progressive Governance' (Life Science, July 21): Every highway and airport in America is subsidized—by billions more than we've ever given to high-speed rail. The $6 billion private line in Florida isn't high-speed, which costs more. But the benefit of true high-speed rail is that more people ride it because it's more convenient than driving or flying. Dozens of other countries, even those with far fewer resources than America, such as Morocco, build it because it's a better return on investment. I conducted a financial analysis of the California high-speed rail with some Harvard Business School colleagues more than a decade ago, and we came to two conclusions: It will cost more than they say, and it will still cost less than expanding highways or airports. The rail project should be reformed, not tanked.
