Spain's ruling party bans officials from paying for sex
Spain's ruling Socialist Party (PSOE) has banned its members from paying for sex and warned that violations could result in expulsion.
The decision, announced by Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez, comes in response to a corruption scandal involving senior party officials and allegations of using public funds for illicit activities, including hiring sex workers.
Santos Cerdan, former organizational secretary of the PSOE and a close ally of Sanchez, was ordered into pre-trial detention without bail by the Spanish Supreme Court in June.
He faces charges of bribery, criminal conspiracy, and influence peddling related to the alleged rigging of public contracts worth over €500 million ($585 million). Prosecutors allege that Cerdan played a central role in orchestrating the scheme, which purportedly involved distributing at least €5 million in kickbacks among senior officials, including former Transport Minister Jose Luis Abalos and his aide Koldo Garcia.
Investigations have uncovered that the officials allegedly used public funds not only for illicit commissions but also for personal expenses, including the procurement of sexual services. Cerdan denies any wrongdoing, claiming he is the target of 'political revenge.'
In response, the PSOE announced a leadership shake-up and strict disciplinary rules. 'Soliciting, accepting, or obtaining sexual acts in exchange for money' will now be punished with 'the maximum sanction, expulsion from the party,' the party stated.
'If we believe a woman's body is not for sale, our party cannot allow behavior contrary to that,' Sanchez said during a meeting in Madrid on Saturday.
Despite mounting criticism and calls for his resignation, Sanchez has refused to step down. 'The captain doesn't look the other way when seas get rough. He stays to steer the ship through the storm,' he told party leaders.
Just hours before his scheduled speech, Sanchez faced fresh turmoil after a new scandal emerged involving one of his close allies. Francisco Salazar, who had been slated for a senior leadership role, resigned following allegations of inappropriate behavior by several women in the PSOE.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
eNCA
5 days ago
- eNCA
Brazil court to rule from 2 September in Bolsonaro coup trial
BRASILIA - Brazil's Supreme Court will begin deciding on 2 September whether former far-right president Jair Bolsonaro is guilty of plotting a coup and whether he should be imprisoned, the court said Friday. Bolsonaro is accused of attempting to hold power despite his 2022 electoral defeat by Brazil's current leftist leader, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. He faces up to 40 years in prison if found guilty. The Supreme Court statement said the ruling would be considered "during extraordinary sessions on September 2, 3, 9, 10 and 12." Thousands of Bolsonaro supporters stormed government buildings in Brasilia on 8 January, 2023, a week after Lula's inauguration, alleging election fraud and calling on the military to intervene. Bolsonaro, who led the Latin American country from 2019 to 2022, has maintained his innocence, calling any coup "abhorrent." The prosecutor's office maintains that Bolsonaro led an "armed criminal organization" that orchestrated the coup attempt and was to be its main beneficiary. The case file also focuses on meetings where draft decrees were allegedly presented, including those involving the possible imprisonment of officials such as Supreme Court judges. However, the defense has stressed that "there is no way to convict" Bolsonaro based on the evidence presented in the case file, which they argued adequately demonstrated that he ordered the transition of power to Lula. His lawyers have questioned the validity of the plea bargain handed to Lieutenant Colonel Mauro Cid, Bolsonaro's former aide, on whose testimony many of the accusations are based. Bolsonaro's legal wranglings are at the center of fizzing diplomatic tensions between Brazil and the United States. President Donald Trump has called the trial a "witch hunt" and the US Treasury Department has sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes, who is overseeing Bolsonaro's trial, in response. Trump has also signed an executive order slapping 50 percent tariffs on many Brazilian imports, citing Bolsonaro's "politically motivated persecution."
eNCA
12-08-2025
- eNCA
Spanish police bust 'spiritual retreat' offering hallucinogenic drugs
MADRID - Spanish police said Monday that they had dismantled a group accused of running a "spiritual retreat" that offered hallucinogenic drugs to clients from around the world. The gang is suspected of operating from a villa in the southeastern town of Pedreguer, charging over 1,000 euros ($1,160) for multi-day stays that included consumption of ayahuasca, San Pedro cactus and a frog venom known as Kambo. "The retreats were held in groups of up to twenty participants, who were attended to by six employees of the organisation during the 'astral journeys'," the Guardia Civil police force said in a statement. A photo released by the force showed a large room with several mattresses on the floor, along with water bottles and tissue boxes and a guitar leaned against a wall. Police say the group held several retreats a week without the means to respond to intoxications, and generated hundreds of thousands of euros in undeclared income last year. It promoted the retreats online with promises of a "mystical" experience and health benefits that drew clients "from around the world, the majority from Europe". Police arrested two men and a woman suspected of leading the group and placed five other people under investigation for allegedly acting as "spiritual guides" at the retreats. They face charges of drug trafficking, money laundering and criminal association. Officers seized 11 litres of ayahuasca, 117 San Pedro cactus plants and several bottles of Kambo, an oozy substance harvested from the skin secretions of the Amazonian giant monkey tree frog. Police said the substances "can have unpredictable, dangerous effects".
Daily Maverick
08-08-2025
- Daily Maverick
Trump asks US Supreme Court to lift limits on immigration raids
In an emergency filing, the Justice Department asked the high court to halt a judge's order that temporarily blocked agents from stopping or detaining people without 'reasonable suspicion' that they are in the country illegally, by relying solely on their race or ethnicity, or if they speak Spanish or English with an accent. The judge's order applied to her court's jurisdiction over much of Southern California. 'The district court's injunction now significantly interferes with federal enforcement efforts across a region that is larger and more populous than many countries and that has become a major epicenter of the immigration crisis,' the Justice Department said in the filing. Trump won back the White House promising record-level deportations. His administration's immigration raids, including in Los Angeles, have sparked panic in immigrant communities as well as widespread protests, and drawn lawsuits over aggressive tactics carried out by masked and armed federal enforcement agents. In May, Stephen Miller, a senior Trump aide and the architect of the Republican president's immigration agenda, demanded Immigration and Customs Enforcement leaders ramp up deportations, setting a goal of 3,000 arrests per day. Trump called National Guard troops and U.S. Marines into Los Angeles in June in response to protests against the immigration raids, marking an extraordinary use of military force to support civilian police operations within the United States. Local officials and California Governor Gavin Newsom, a Democrat, sharply contested the deployment of troops, saying they were not needed and only served to inflame tensions. A group of Latino individuals caught up in the raids, including U.S. citizens, mounted a proposed class action lawsuit against administration officials in Los Angeles federal court in July. One plaintiff, Jason Gavidia, claimed agents roughed him up after disbelieving his pleas that he is a citizen, demanding to know what hospital he was born in. The lawsuit said the 'indiscriminate' raids, interrogations and detentions violate the U.S. Constitution's Fourth Amendment protection against unreasonable searches and seizures. 'Individuals with brown skin are approached or pulled aside by unidentified federal agents, suddenly and with a show of force, and made to answer questions about who they are and where they are from,' the lawsuit stated. U.S. District Judge Maame Frimpong agreed, finding that the officials' actions likely violate the Fourth Amendment. She issued a temporary restraining order halting agents from using race or ethnicity, language, presence at a particular location such as a car wash or tow yard, or type of work, to carry out stops or arrests, as none of those factors alone can establish 'reasonable suspicion' of illegality. The San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals denied the administration's request to lift Frimpong's order on August 1. The American Civil Liberties Union, one of the groups that brought the litigation, said in a statement on Thursday that Frimpong's order merely compelled the federal government to follow the Constitution and that it looks forward to presenting its case to the Supreme Court.
