Slamming 50% Trump tariffs, farmer leader Chaduni urges ban on US firms in India
"The US has imposed heavy tariffs on India and India must hit back in a similar way and ban American companies operating on Indian soil," Chaduni told India Today TV.The farmer leader argued that many American businesses in India, especially large fast-food and retail chains, earn substantial profits and repatriate them to the US."Why are we allowing this when the US is imposing tariffs on us? We must give a similar reply and ban all these companies," he said. "You travel on highways and one can spot the big food giants of the US spreading their business all over. This must stop," Chaduni contended.The farmer leader, who played a prominent role in the 2022 anti-farm laws protests, said the government must take a firm stand to deter future trade pressure from Washington."We cannot allow anyone to dictate things to us like this. If we don't take a stand now, America will continue to do this in the future too and threaten us regularly. The US-based companies should immediately be banned and not allowed to mint money," he stressed.Chaduni's demand also comes against the backdrop of a long-standing flashpoint in India–US trade negotiations.One of the contentious issues has been the proposed entry of US companies into India's dairy and agriculture sectors — a move New Delhi has consistently resisted, citing potential threats to farmers' livelihoods and to the country's self-reliance in these key sectors.With Washington escalating trade tensions through higher tariffs, Chaduni's call to ban US businesses signals growing pressure on the Indian government to respond with stronger retaliatory measures.- EndsMust Watch
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
WhatsApp says Russia is trying to block it: ‘We will keep doing all we can…'
Social media messaging app WhatsApp has alleged that Russia was trying to block its services, saying that the Meta-owned platform protects people's right to secure communication, and it has vowed to continue making encrypted services available in the country. WhatsApp says Russia is trying to block its services, vows to keep encryption.(REUTERS File) Russia has begun limiting some Telegram and WhatsApp calls, accusing the foreign-owned apps of not sharing information with law enforcement in fraud and terrorism cases, news agency Reuters reported. 'WhatsApp is private, end-to-end encrypted, and defies government attempts to violate people's right to secure communication, which is why Russia is trying to block it from over 100 million Russian people,' WhatsApp said in a statement. 'We will keep doing all we can to make end-to-end encrypted communication available to people everywhere, including in Russia,' it added. Meanwhile, Telegram said its moderators use AI tools to monitor public sections of the platform and remove millions of harmful messages daily. In a statement, it said, 'Telegram actively combats harmful use of its platform, including calls for sabotage or violence and fraud.' Russia has been in conflict with foreign tech platforms for years over content and data storage, a dispute that escalated after Moscow sent its army into Ukraine in February 2022, with critics alleging that Russia is seeking greater control over the country's internet space, the report added. Russian President Vladimir Putin has approved the development of a state-backed messaging app integrated with government services, as Moscow pushes for what it calls digital sovereignty by promoting domestic platforms and reducing reliance on foreign-owned services. 'In order to counteract criminals … measures are being taken to partially restrict calls on these foreign messengers,' the communications regulator Roskomnadzor told Interfax. Reuters also reported that since August 11, voice calls on Telegram have been largely disrupted, while WhatsApp calls have become nearly impossible due to intermittent audio and a metallic buzzing.
Hindustan Times
9 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘The best city in India': North Indian man lauds Bengaluru after moving from Delhi. Here's why
A young professional who relocated to Bengaluru in 2022 has taken to Reddit to call the city the 'best in India,' sparking a wave of agreement online. In a detailed post, the man - originally from North India - reflected on how his move from Delhi to Bengaluru completely reshaped his views on work, lifestyle and personal growth. Bengaluru has been hailed as "the best city in India" on social media by a north Indian man who shifted after being in Delhi for three years. (Picture for representational purposes only)(Pexels) READ | Rapido steps into food delivery with 'Ownly' app in Bengaluru, a no-commission challenger to Swiggy, Zomato: Report The Redditor, who spent three years in Delhi before shifting south, admitted that he expected more of the same - tight deadlines, pressure-packed weekdays and the typical weekend escapes to bars or clubs. But Bengaluru had other plans. 'When I first came here for my job, life felt like the same rat race - work 5 days, kill yourself with deadlines, then hit some bar or club on weekends to 'prove' you're chill,' he wrote. READ | Heavy rain in Bengaluru kills three, damages over 800 roads and 1000 homes: Report However, a comment from his local friend over how only few native Kannadigas frequented such spots changed his perception and 'Three years later, I've completely left that scene behind,' he wrote. What also impressed him was Karnataka's approach to governance. From entertainment and employment initiatives to affordable movie tickets, he noted that there's a visible effort to support young people. 'In most other states, the government barely notices you exist,' he wrote. The man also compared the work cultures in Delhi and Bengaluru, writing that bosses are micromanagement champions in Delhi-NCR. 'In Bengaluru? I spend 6 months a year working from home, even though the official policy is '3 days a week in office.' My skills and results matter more than my physical presence,' he said. READ | Bengaluru to go dry for two days; Alcohol sales banned on August 15, 16: Report He also commented on the facilities the city has to offer. From infrastructure to opportunity, he feels Bengaluru offers a rare mix. 'Honestly, you won't find this combination in many other cities in India,' he shared. 'Came for the job, stayed for the growth, respect, and lifestyle upgrade. Bengaluru just hits different,' he concluded. How social media reacted His post quickly gained traction, with many users echoing his sentiment. 'Good weather, jobs, great food, bars, clubs, malls, metro connectivity. Most of the people at the clubs are North Indians,' a commenter said. 'One thing you missed is how nice the people are here. In north Indian cities you find lot of thugs. Also the general treatment of service class people like maids, cook and driver are better,' another user wrote.
Time of India
9 minutes ago
- Time of India
US declines to comment on Pakistan F-16 losses during Operation Sindoor despite IAF Chief's claims
The United States government is silent on whether Pakistan lost F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor. This is unlike previous instances where the US confirmed the status of Pakistan's F-16 fleet. India claims to have shot down Pakistani aircraft and damaged an F-16 hangar. Pakistan denies these claims and suggests a third-party review. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US contractors have access to Pakistani F-16's Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads IAF claims F-16 damage at Jacobabad during airfield strikes Air-to-air claims and Pakistan's rebuttal No response from US to formal information requests The United States government has declined to comment on whether Pakistan lost any of its US-supplied F-16 fighter jets during Operation Sindoor , the 88-hour conflict between India and Pakistan from May 7 to May 10. Responding to NDTV 's queries, the US State Department stated, "We refer you to the Government of Pakistan to discuss its F-16s."This position contrasts with previous disclosures highlighted in an NDTV report, which cited a 2019 article by Foreign Policy magazine. At the time, shortly after India's Balakot air strikes, the magazine reported that two senior US defence officials with direct knowledge of the situation had said all of Pakistan's F-16s were accounted for. The clarification followed India's claim that it had shot down a Pakistani F-16 fleet is governed by detailed end-use agreements with the United States. Under these agreements, American contractors—known as Technical Support Teams (TSTs)—are deployed in Pakistan around the clock to monitor the aircraft. These teams are contractually obligated to ensure that the aircraft are used in compliance with the agreements and to maintain full knowledge of the operational status of each presence of these oversight mechanisms has typically allowed the US to confirm or deny reports of losses, making its silence in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor believes several F-16s may have been lost during the operation, either destroyed on the ground or shot down in aerial combat. On Saturday, Indian Air Force Chief Air Chief Marshal AP Singh said that Shahbaz Jacobabad airfield , which houses an F-16 hangar, was among the major Pakistani air bases targeted."One half of the hangar is gone. And I'm sure there were some aircraft inside which have got damaged there," he to the Air Chief, the IAF carried out strikes on three critical airfield hangars: a UAV hangar at Sukkur, an AEW&C facility at Bholari, and the F-16 hangar at Jacobabad. He said indications pointed to at least one AEW&C aircraft and several F-16s under maintenance being present at the time of the air base is home to Pakistan's 39 Tactical Wing and is located west of Indian Air Force also claims to have shot down six Pakistani aircraft during the operation—five fighters and one larger platform, possibly an electronic intelligence (ELINT) or AEW&C aircraft. The IAF has not disclosed the exact types of fighter jets it believes were shot meanwhile, has rejected India's claims. Defence Minister Khawaja Muhammad Asif challenged India to allow a third-party review of both sides' air force inventories. "If the truth is in question, let both sides open their aircraft inventories to independent verification – though we suspect this would lay bare the reality India seeks to obscure," he said. India has not responded to this also submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the US Department of Defense, asking similar questions to those recently posed to the State Department. The Pentagon replied that the FOIA does not require agencies to 'compile information, conduct research, answer questions, or create new documents in response to FOIA requests.' Subsequent queries to the Pentagon and the office of the Secretary of Defense received no response.
