Intel spars with EU regulators over $421.4 million antitrust fine
LUXEMBOURG :U.S. chipmaker Intel on Friday sparred with EU antitrust regulators over a 376 million euro ($421.4 million) fine levied nearly two years ago for excluding rivals from the market, arguing that it was disproportionate and unfair.
The case dated to 2009 when the European Commission slapped a then-record 1.06 billion euro fine on Intel for blocking rival Advanced Micro Devices.
The tech giant managed to convince the General Court, Europe's second-highest, to scrap the penalty in 2022.
Judges however agreed with one part of the Commission's 2009 decision, prompting the EU competition watchdog to re-impose a 376 million euro fine for payments made by Intel to HP, Acer and Lenovo to halt or delay rival products between November 2002 and December 2006.
Such practices are known as naked restrictions and are frowned on by antitrust regulators. Intel then took its case back to the General Court, asking for the new EU decision and penalty to be annulled.
Intel's lawyer said the EU competition enforcer had not taken into account the limited scope of the violations related to HP, Acer and Lenovo.
"The Commission cannot sustain a finding that there was an overall strategy to foreclose competitors from the entire x86 chips market. These were narrow, tactical moves," Daniel Beard told the panel of five judges.
"The naked restrictions can't be treated as in effect of equal weight to each of the pricing practices which were overturned. Nor do they have the same sort of cumulative effect or strategic weight. They, on their own, don't sustain an overall, market-wide strategy finding," he said.
Beard said the Commission had imposed "a wholly disproportionate and unfair" fine.
The EU watchdog rejected Intel's arguments.
"The Commission correctly applied the finding guidelines, and when in doubt, opted in Intel's favour," its lawyer Pedro Caro de Sousa said.
"The fine is clearly not disproportionate to the seriousness of Intel's conduct, amounting to 1 per cent of its turnover on the last year of the infringement, and about 0.5 per cent of its turnover today," he said.
Both Intel and the Commission called on the court to resolve the issue by setting the size of the fine. A ruling is expected in the coming months.
The case is 09:30 T-1129/23 Intel Corporation v Commission.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
US to require asset divestitures for Keysight purchase of Spirent
The U.S. government on Monday said it will require asset divestitures before allowing Keysight Technologies to complete its all-cash purchase of Spirent Communications. In court filings, the U.S. Department of Justice said the proposed merger of two of the largest global providers of high speed ethernet testing, network security testing and radio frequency channel emulators might otherwise substantially lessen competition and harm customers, violating antitrust law. Keysight, based in Santa Rosa, California, agreed in March 2024 to buy U.K.-based Spirent for 1.16 billion British pounds (now about $1.56 billion).
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Boisson smells success as French hope reaches Paris last eight
PARIS : The last time Lois Boisson talked about getting a big sponsor it was a joke, but now France's new tennis hope might actually land one. In April, Boisson made headlines off the court when Britain's Harriet Dart complained about her body odour during a match. The 20-year-old responded with humour, posting a photoshopped image of herself mid-serve holding a deodorant can and tagging Dove for a 'much-needed collab.' Fast forward to Monday and Boisson is not just making memes, she's making history. The world number 361 stunned third seed Jessica Pegula in front of a roaring home crowd at Roland Garros to book a place in the quarter-finals and secure at least $500,000 in prize money. 'It's already a big achievement to be in the quarters,' Boisson said, still remarkably grounded in her post-match press conference. 'My ranking will open doors to bigger tournaments, and that's what will change my life.' It marked only her second appearance on Court Philippe Chatrier — the first was a single training session four years ago during qualifying. This time, though, she has looked perfectly at home in her first participation in the main draw of a Grand Slam. "When I came in, I didn't feel any more pressure than usual. The more matches I play here, the better I feel,' she said. Boisson had won in three sets against compatriot Elsa Jacquemot in the third round to set up her clash with Pegula. 'Of course, the last two matches were tense. I made a few mistakes because of the pressure, but in the end, it worked out — and that's what counts,' she added. Boisson will next face sixth-seeded Russian Mirra Andreeva in what promises to be another electric showdown on the clay.
CNA
5 hours ago
- CNA
Google to spend $500 million revamping compliance in shareholder settlement
Google agreed to spend $500 million over 10 years to overhaul its compliance structure, to settle shareholder litigation accusing the search engine company of antitrust violations, settlement papers show. The preliminary settlement of so-called derivative litigation against officials at Google parent Alphabet, including Chief Executive Sundar Pichai and Google co-founders Sergey Brin and Larry Page, was filed late Friday. It requires approval by U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco. The changes include creating a standalone board committee to oversee risk and compliance, previously the responsibility of the Alphabet board's audit and compliance committee. Alphabet would also create a senior vice president-level committee to address regulatory and compliance issues, reporting to Pichai, and a compliance committee consisting of Google product team managers and internal compliance experts. Shareholders led by two Michigan pension funds accused Google executives and directors of breaching their fiduciary duties by exposing the company to antitrust liability related to its search, Ad Tech, Android and app distribution businesses. "These reforms, rarely achieved in shareholder derivative actions, constitute a comprehensive overhaul of Alphabet's compliance function," resulting in "deeply rooted culture change," the shareholders' lawyers said. The changes must remain in place at least four years. Shareholders would not be paid. Google denied wrongdoing in agreeing to settle. The Mountain View, California-based company did not immediately respond to requests for comment on Monday. The accord was disclosed the same day U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta in Washington, who last August found Google violated federal antitrust law to maintain dominance in search, completed a hearing to consider how to address the monopoly. Mehta plans to rule by August. The U.S. Department of Justice has proposed requiring Google to sell its Chrome browser and share search data with rivals. A derivative lawsuit is where shareholders sue officials on behalf of a company. The shareholders' lawyers plan to seek up to $80 million for legal fees and expenses, on top of the $500 million. They did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
