Cork County Council defends social housing record
Cork County Council has pushed back against figures recently released by the Department of Housing, Local Government and Heritage that placed the local authority 21st out of 31 local authorities when it comes to delivering new-build social housing.
The government target for Cork County Council between 2022 and 2024 was 1,818 new-build social houses while 1,304 were actually delivered, a shortfall of 28%.
Responding to a motion on the shortfall put by Cllr Danny Collins at this week's meeting of Cork County Council, Divisional Manager Michael Lynch defended the Council's record.
He said that a further 1,217 social houses are currently in the pipeline for the period 2025-2028 while 321 affordable houses have been offered across the county in 10 schemes and another 350 units are in the planning and design phase.
Mr Lynch added that social housing provision is not confined to newly built accommodation and the total number of allocations to acquire second-hand properties and vacated or refurbished dwellings in County Cork during 2022-24 was 2,329.
The Council official said that the Council has also worked with state agencies on projects in Carrigaline, Midleton and Carrigtwohill that will deliver more than 7,000 housing units.
'It should be noted Cork County is the highest performing local authority area outside of the Dublin Authorities and Kildare County Council in terms of housing delivery overall with over 2,000 new homes per annum being built currently,' he said.
Mr Lynch said that the challenges the Council faces in meeting social and affordable housing targets include the difficulty in creating a landbank in areas of high demand, insufficient capacity in Uisce Eireann infrastructure, and road infrastructure at key locations such as the R624 to Cobh, the N25, the Bandon Relief Road, the Mallow Relief Road and the development of the M20.
Speaking at the meeting, Cork County Council Chief Executive Moira Murrell said the housing figures released by the department "referred to a very narrow measurement of housing," namely social housing own-built by the Council on the Council's own land.
The figures don't take into account other models of housing delivery such as the Water Rock development between Midleton and Carrigtwohill "that's providing private public housing to a very large scale."
"I will say there's huge ambition across the county to deliver on housing and there's certainly huge capacity and great skill here within the local authority who have successfully been delivering and continue to deliver,' the Chief Executive said.
Funded by the Local Democracy Reporting Scheme.
Related topics
Peter McCarthy
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
3 hours ago
- The Journal
Dublin City Council refuses permission for operator to rent 10 apartments near Temple Bar
DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL has refused planning retention to a significant Airbnb operator close to Dublin Castle and Temple Bar to continue offering its apartments for short term letting to tourists. Dublin Castle Suites advertises its 10 apartments on the AirBnB platform and can earn up to €350 per night per apartment on busy weekends. The owner of the apartments, facing onto Parliament Street and Dame Street, would earn only a fraction of its current rental income if the apartments are to be rented for long-term letting only. A question mark has now been put over the lucrative enterprise following the City Council's decision to refuse planning retention to allow the apartments to be continued to be used for short term letting. Applicants Olympia Real Estate Limited now have the option of appealing the decision to An Coimisiún Pleanála, which may reverse the council's planning refusal. However, in its decision, the city council pointed out that there is a general presumption in the Dublin City Council Development Plan against the provision of dedicated short term tourist rental accommodation in the city due to the impact on the availability of housing stock. In refusing planning permission, the Council stated that Olympia Real Estate Ltd has not provided a sufficient justification for the provision of short lease apartments at this location. The Council found that the proposal to continue the apartments for short term letting 'would create an undesirable precedent for similar type development and would devalue property in the vicinity'. Advertisement The planners concluded that the proposed retention of short-term residential use is not compatible with the architectural character, historic fabric and special interests of the protected structure. The Council planning report which recommended a refusal concluded that the continued use of the apartments for tourist accommodation 'would result in existing residential stock being lost to the residential housing system, meaning less long-term and secure accommodation will be available to the growing number of families and people who need it'. Olympia Real Estate Limited lodged the planning application after the Council issued it with a Warning Letter over the use of the apartments for short-term letting. Planning consultants for the applicants, Cunnane Stratton Reynolds (CSR) state that 'enabling housing as short term let accommodation in this instance redirects such demand away from mainstream housing'. The consultants state that 'the proposed tourism accommodation will assist in the attractiveness of the area for tourists and will promote a continued busy and vibrant city centre'. CSR state that its client's ability to acoustically meet the standards of normal accommodation is not available given the protected status of the subject premises. They state 'in a period of substantial housing crisis these units cannot remain vacant'. Objecting to the planned retention, Fiachra Brennan of Oakcourt Park, Dublin 20 and who works on Parliament Street said that 'these are high-quality urban apartments which should be available on the long-term rental market'. He said: 'The applicant has pointed to issues with regards to soundproofing and insulation – this should not preclude the use of the property for its intended purpose. He added: 'I work on Parliament Street – it is a vibrant area with a range of commercial and hospitality businesses but is also an important urban, residential city neighbourhood. This status should be protected.'
RTÉ News
5 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Dublin City Council refuses planning retention to AirBnb operator
Dublin City Council has refused planning retention to a significant Airbnb operator close to Dublin Castle and Temple Bar to continue offering its apartments for short term letting to tourists. Dublin Castle Suites advertises its 10 apartments on the AirBnB platform and can earn up to €350 per night per apartment on busy weekends. The owner of the apartments facing onto Parliament Street and Dame Street would earn only a fraction of its current rental income if the apartments are to be rented for long-term letting only. A question mark has now been put over the lucrative enterprise following the City Council's decision to refuse planning retention to allow the apartments to be continued to be used for short term letting. Applicants, Olympia Real Estate Limited now have the option of appealing the decision to An Coimisiún Pleanála which may reverse the council's planning refusal. However, in its decision, the city council pointed out that there is a general presumption in the Dublin City Council Development Plan against the provision of dedicated short term tourist rental accommodation in the city due to the impact on the availability of housing stock. In refusing planning permission, the Council stated that Olympia Real Estate Ltd has not provided a sufficient justification for the provision of short lease apartments at this location. The Council found that the proposal to continue the apartments for short term letting "would create an undesirable precedent for similar type development and would devalue property in the vicinity". The planners concluded that the proposed retention of short-term residential use is not compatible with the architectural character, historic fabric and special interests of the protected structure. The Council planning report which recommended a refusal concluded that the continued use of the apartments for tourist accommodation "would result in existing residential stock being lost to the residential housing system, meaning less long-term and secure accommodation will be available to the growing number of families and people who need it". Olympia Real Estate Limited lodged the planning application after the Council issued it with a Warning Letter over the use of the apartments for short-term letting. Planning consultants for the applicants, Cunnane Stratton Reynolds (CSR) state that "enabling housing as short term let accommodation in this instance redirects such demand away from mainstream housing". The consultants state that "the proposed tourism accommodation will assist in the attractiveness of the area for tourists and will promote a continued busy and vibrant city centre". CSR state that its client's ability to acoustically meet the standards of normal accommodation is not available given the protected status of the subject premises. They state "in a period of substantial housing crisis these units cannot remain vacant". Objecting to the planned retention, Fiachra Brennan of Oakcourt Park, Dublin 20 and who works on Parliament Street said that "these are high-quality urban apartments which should be available on the long-term rental market". He said: "The applicant has pointed to issues with regards to soundproofing and insulation – this should not preclude the use of the property for its intended purpose. He added: "I work on Parliament Street – it is a vibrant area with a range of commercial and hospitality businesses but is also an important urban, residential city neighbourhood. This status should be protected."
RTÉ News
10 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Monthly export figures down 26% in June
New figures from the Central Statistics Office show that on a monthly basis, the value of exports fell sharply in June, down 26.3% from May as exports to the US slowed significantly. The CSO said that exports of goods to the US sank by 59.6% in June to €4.4 billion compared with €10.8 billion in May. The big drop had been expected as the past few months had seen significant front-loading and stockpiling ahead of new US tariffs, with trade flows now normalising. On an annual basis, exports to the US fell by 23.4% to €4.4 billion in June compared with the June 2024 figure of €5.7 billion. The CSO said the value of overall exports rose by 4.8% to €17.5 billion in June from €16.7 billion the same month last year. Ireland's top exporting partners in June were the US, the Netherlands and Belgium, with Ireland exporting 24.9%, 13.9% and 10.1% of total export goods respectively to these countries. Meanwhile, exports to Great Britain increased by 12.8% to €1.24 billion in June compared with €1.10 billion in June of last year. The CSO noted than exports to Great Britain accounted for 7.1% of total export trade in June Today's figures show that exports of Medical & Pharmaceutical Products increased by 8.9% to €7.3 billion in June from €6.7 billion in June of last year - marking 41.4% of total exports. But exports of Organic Chemicals decreased by 29.9% to €1.8 billion in June compared with €2.5 billion the same time last year. The CSO today reported a seasonally adjusted trade surplus of €5.4 billion for June, down from €12.3 billion in May - a drop of 55.7%. Commenting on today's figures, Carol Lynch, Head of Customs and International Trade Services at BDO, said the US remains Ireland's largest trading partner, accounting for almost a quarter of all exports in June, yet exports to the US fell by 23.4% year-on-year to €4.4 billion, and by almost 60% compared to May's figures. She noted that much of this decline was in organic chemicals, while medical and pharmaceutical exports to the US rose nearly 9% to €7.3 billion compared to €6.7 billion a year earlier. Ms Lynch said that attention now turns to the outcome of the US Section 232 investigation, which will determine whether EU pharmaceuticals will face the new standard US-EU tariff ceiling of 15%, a lower rate, or potentially a higher one - though the EU insists the 15% cap will apply. "The White House's 28 July statement confirmed a 15% ceiling on most EU goods, including pharmaceuticals, cars and semiconductors, while the European Commission stressed that this rate is inclusive and represents a maximum," Carol Lynch said. "However, President Trump has also floated the idea of pharmaceutical tariffs eventually rising to 150% and 250%, creating uncertainty over timing and application," she added.
