
Stefanik leads theoretical Republican primary for governor in latest statewide poll
May 20—Gov. Kathleen C. Hochul is holding steady with her middle-of-the-road poll numbers, while Rep. Elise M. Stefanik, R-Schuylerville, has rocketed to the top of the pack for potential Republican challengers for governor next year, according to the latest Siena College Research Institute poll.
The SCRI poll released Tuesday has Hochul's favorability rating holding at 44% positive, 46% negative, only a slight change from last month when she had a 44% positive, 43% negative rating. Her job approval ratings are similar, with 50% of voters holding a positive view and 46% with a negative one, compared to last months 48% positive, 45% negative rating.
Voters widely don't want to reelect Hochul according to the poll, with only 36% saying they want Hochul to keep the job compared to 55% who say they want "someone else." That's a steep drop from April, when 39% wanted Hochul re-elected and 48% didn't.
The election is just over 17 months out, and a lot can change as the campaigns heat up early next year.
In a theoretical primary, 46% of Democrats support Hochul compared to 12% who support Lt. Gov. Antonio Delgado and 10% who support Rep. Ritchie J. Torres, D-Bronx. Neither Delgado nor Torres have signaled a primary challenge to Hochul, although Delgado has hinted he may be considering it.
In the theoretical Republican primary, Stefanik carries support from 35% of voters compared to 22% for Hudson Valley Rep. Mike Lawler and 11% for Nassau County executive Bruce Blakeman. Lawler and Blakeman have hinted at potential runs for the governorship for months, while Stefanik only joined the pack last month after her bid to become the next United Nations ambassador was scuttled.
"When asking Republicans who they want to see as their gubernatorial nominee next year, Stefanik is their early frontrunner, with a small double-digit lead over her downstate colleague, Lawler, and Blakeman, with barely double-digit support, trailing badly. When Stefanik was not included last month, Blakeman had a narrow 6-point lead over Lawler," SCRI pollster Steven Greenberg said.
Greenberg noted that Stefanik has a negative favorability rating, with 35% of New Yorkers reporting a poor opinion of her compared to 25% with a positive opinion. A larger proportion, 40%, don't know who Stefanik is or have no opinion of her. Among Republicans, Stefanik carries a 45% positive, 22% negative favorability rating, with 33% of people reporting no knowledge or opinion of her.
The SCRI poll also touched on some recently settled issues in the state budget process, which was passed earlier this month. According to the poll, there's majority or plurality support for a majority of the policy issues included in the state spending plan. A majority of voters support the inclusion of a provision to make it easier for customers to cancel subscriptions, the expansion of free school lunch and breakfast to all public school students, and the statewide ban on cellphone use in schools.
A plurality — not a majority — support the "Inflation Refund Checks" that will be sent out later this year to most New Yorkers, the extension of emergency budget cut power to the governor if the federal government makes major cuts, and the decision to budget $10 million for Attorney General Letitia A. James to defend against federal charges of mortgage fraud.
Voters are evenly split on one issue — the decision to pay back the state's roughly $8 billion federal unemployment debt with state money, a debt that has been being slowly repaid by extra unemployment insurance costs for businesses. On that issue, voters are evenly split 38% to 38%, with a plurality of Republicans and independents supporting the move and a plurality of Democrats opposed.
Including moves like the expanded child tax credit and a delayed middle-class tax cut, a small majority of New Yorkers think this year's state spending plan will help to make New York at least somewhat more affordable. Some 15% of voters said the state will be a lot more affordable, 37% said it'll be somewhat more affordable, 26% said it won't make a significant difference and 17% said it'll make no difference at all. Opinions are split distinctly by party affiliation.
"Nearly two-thirds of Democrats think the recently passed budget will make New York at least somewhat more affordable, and by a nearly two-to-one margin, Democrats think the budget will make life better for everyday New Yorkers," Greenberg said. "On the other hand, a majority of Republicans and independents say the budget's impact on affordability is not very much, if at all. By three-to-one, Republicans say the 'bloated budget' doesn't address New Yorkers' real needs, and a plurality of independents agree with them."
At the federal level, President Donald J. Trump continues to be unpopular with much of the state's voting base. His overall approval rating is 40% positive, 57% negative, and is split heavily by party with 81% of Democrats disapproving of the job he is doing and 82% of Republicans approving.
On the issues of immigration, the Russia-Ukraine war, the economy, upholding the American reputation, inflation and trade, a majority of voters say Trump is doing a poor job, between 52% and 59% for each.
Sen. Charles E. Schumer, D-N.Y., now the most senior elected Democrat as the Senate minority leader, only slightly improved his worst-ever approval ratings from last month, with 42% of voters saying they have a good view of him to 48% who disapprove of him in this latest poll.
This SCRI poll was conducted between May 12 and 15, reaching 805 respondents by landline, cellphone and an online polling panel. The margin of error is 4.3% in either direction.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What the Trump-Musk Feud Means for SpaceX and NASA
The U.S. government relies on SpaceX to support NASA and other agencies, and the company has received more $20 billion in federal contracts for it. As Musk and Trump threaten to cut ties, here's what that would mean for the U.S.'s space ambitions.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
DHS wants National Guard to search for and transport unaccompanied migrant children
A Department of Homeland Security request for 21,000 National Guard troops to support "expansive interior immigration enforcement operations" includes a call for troops to search for unaccompanied children in some cases and transport them between states, three sources briefed on the plan tell NBC News. Having National Guard troops perform such tasks, which are not explained in detail in the DHS request, has prompted concern among Democrats in Congress and some military and law enforcement officials. The tasks are laid out in a May 9th Request for Assistance from the Department of Homeland Security to the Pentagon. The document states that, 'this represents the first formal request by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) for the deployment of National Guard personnel in support of interior immigration enforcement operations.' The request calls for National Guard troops to be used for 'Search and Rescue for UACs [Unaccompanied Alien Children] in remote or hostile terrain,' and 'Intra- and inter-state transport of detainees/ unaccompanied alien children (UACs)," without clearly explaining what that would entail. Most of the troops, about 10,000, would be used for transporting detained individuals, the DHS said. Roughly 2,500 troops would be used for detention support but the document does not specify where. Another 1,000 troops would be assigned to administrative support, such as processing detainees. The request also asks for up to 3,500 troops to 'Attempt to Locate — Fugitives' and to conduct 'surveillance and canvassing missions,' as well as 'night operations and rural interdictions.' It also asks for support for ICE in 'joint task force operations for absconder/fugitive tracking,' according to the three sources familiar with the plans. NPR first reported the details of the DHS request. Democrats in Congress and military and law enforcement officials have expressed concern about the use of National Guard troops to perform what they say are civilian law enforcement duties. One characterized the plan as the Trump administration 'finding a way to get the National Guard into the streets and into American homes,' saying, 'I fear it's going to look like a police state.' A second source said, 'Trump has said he wants to use the National Guard for law enforcement, and the Pentagon and other entities have always said, 'Oh, don't worry, it will never come to that.' But this is it.' Defense officials say the request has not been approved and is being evaluated by Pentagon policy officials, the General Counsel's office, and other Pentagon leadership. The officials say the most likely course of action would be for some parts of the request to be approved and others rejected. But one source briefed on the plans said that Secretary of Defense Peter Hegseth is close to approving some elements of the request and considering which state governors to approach first regarding National Guard units. 'We are so much closer to this being real,' said the source, who spoke on condition of anonymity. DHS is requesting the National Guard troops under Title 32 status, which means they would remain on state active duty under the command of their governor but would be federally funded. Title 32 status generally allows National Guard troops to conduct law enforcement activities without violating the Posse Comitatus Act, an 1878 law that bars the use of federal troops in law enforcement operations. A National Guard member who opposes troops performing such tasks told NBC News, 'I plan to leave the National Guard soon over this.' The Pentagon is also being asked by DHS to pay the full cost of deploying the 21,000 National Guard troops. That comes amid growing tension between the Pentagon and DHS over the cost of border and other immigrant-related operations. The DHS request for National Guard troops arrives when the Pentagon is already footing a $23-million-a-month bill to hold as many as 2,500 undocumented immigrants in a military facility in Texas. Defense officials say they are frustrated that the camp is holding far fewer individuals than they were told to expect and they would like a reprieve. The Defense Department is in a contract with the DHS to help support DHS and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, or ICE, officers who are under pressure from Deputy White House Chief of Staff Stephen Miller to arrest 3,000 undocumented immigrants a day. But it has been slow going for ICE agents, resulting in fewer arrests of undocumented immigrants across the country. That has resulted in many empty beds at facilities like the one in El Paso, owned and operated by the Defense Department. Military officials say the facility has been holding an average of 150 undocumented immigrants each day over the last several weeks — a fraction of its 2,500 beds. On one recent day, they said, the facility housed fewer than 80 people. Pentagon officials are asking to cut the number of beds in the facility from 2,500 to about 1,000, which they say would save $12 million per month. It is not clear if the DHS request for National Guard troops will increase the need for beds in the El Paso facility. The DHS request also comes as the Pentagon is struggling to fund critical projects to support U.S. troops. 'Congress is aware that the department is redirecting funds from existing military construction projects like barracks improvements for lower enlisted personnel and longstanding infrastructure projects elsewhere in the world in favor of southwest border missions,' a Senate aide who spoke on condition of anonymity told NBC News. 'They are pretty frustrated with the way that the department is ordering them to support DHS out of their own pockets for a grossly disproportionate cost compared to what ICE facilities would cost the government,' added the aide, referring to military officials. Last month, the Pentagon notified Congress that it planned to transfer more than $1.74 million in the current DOD budget to the southwest border mission, as step that will take money away from renovating barracks and base facilities. Service member advocacy groups have criticized the move. Rob Evans, the founder of Hots&Cots, where services members can post reviews of barracks, dining areas and other facilities, says he sees evidence daily of barracks with sewage leaks, mold, failing HVAC systems, and more. 'When funding is pulled from this line, troops pay the price in real ways: delayed repairs, worsening conditions, and a growing sense that their well-being comes second to optics and operations,' Evans said. 'Service members deserve clean, safe, and dignified living conditions. They've earned at least that much.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
US tariffs, export controls not directed at Singapore, says Rubio in meeting with Vivian
SINGAPORE – Foreign Minister Vivian Balakrishnan has raised the impact of America's tariffs and export controls with US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who said these were not directed at Singapore. 'Nevertheless, there is a lot of work in the next few months to ensure that there are no adverse secondary impacts on Singapore, so we will have to continue to engage the administration very, very closely in the months ahead,' said Dr Balakrishnan in a statement after they met on June 4. Dr Balakrishnan is in Washington on a working visit. He and Mr Rubio had a 'substantive and wide-ranging discussion' on bilateral ties and international developments, said the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). It added that Dr Balakrishnan registered the impact of the US' tariff policy on Singapore as a small and open economy that is highly dependent on trade, and the Republic's commitment to constructive engagement with the US to find mutually beneficial arrangements, including on pharmaceutical exports. In May, Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said preferential or even zero tariffs on Singapore's pharmaceutical exports to the US are possible concessions that emerged in ongoing talks between the countries. However, the secondary impact has already hit the Republic, with Singapore's factory activity contracting for a second month in May off the back of US President Donald Trump's tariffs continuing to threaten the global economy. The majority of Mr Trump's sweeping global tariffs have been paused for 90 days, with the pause expected to expire at the start of July. On June 4, Mr Trump signed an order to double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25 per cent to 50 per cent. During their meeting, Dr Balakrishnan and Mr Rubio also reaffirmed the longstanding and substantive bilateral relationship between the two countries in traditional areas of the economy, defence and security, as well as emerging areas such as critical technologies, energy and artificial intelligence. MFA said they also discussed other potential areas for collaboration, such as when the US holds the presidency for the Group of 20 major economies in 2026 and how Singapore can contribute to US priorities in meaningful and practical ways. In a separate statement, a spokesperson for Mr Rubio said he reaffirmed the strength of the US-Singapore strategic partnership and the shared commitment of both countries to a 'safe, secure and prosperous Indo-Pacific region'. Dr Balakrishnan is on a working visit to London and Washington from June 3 to 7, aimed at advancing bilateral cooperation in traditional and emerging areas of mutual interest. His visit to Washington – where he will meet senior administration officials, members of Congress and other senior personalities – is the first ministerial visit from Singapore to the US following both governments' new terms in office. He will also participate in a fireside chat hosted by US think-tank Hudson Institute, to discuss how the US can deepen engagement with Singapore and the region. Anjali Raguraman is a correspondent at The Straits Times. She covers politics, as well as consumer stories spanning tourism, retail and F&B. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction Discover how to enjoy other premium articles here