Russia ramps up offensives on 2 Ukraine fronts as both sides seek an advantage
In an effort to prevent Moscow from bolstering those positions in the east, Ukrainian forces are trying to pin down some of Russia's best and most battle-hardened troops hundreds of kilometres away, in the northeast Sumy region.'The best-case scenario for Ukraine," said Russian-British military historian Sergey Radchenko, "is that they're able to stall or stop the Russian advance" in the Ukrainian industrial heartland known as Donbas, which includes the Donetsk and Luhansk regions. Then Ukraine could "use that as the basis for a ceasefire agreement.'advertisement'There's a better chance for Russia to come to some kind of terms with Ukraine" in the fall when the Russians "see the extent of their offensive,' Radchenko added.While the battles rage, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy is waiting to learn whether the Trump administration will support tougher sanctions against Russia and back a European idea to establishing a 'reassurance force' to deter Moscow. One setback came with the U.S. decision to halt some weapons shipments out of concern over the U.S.'s own depleted stockpiles.UKRAINE FACES RELENTLESS ASSAULTS IN SUMYIn the Sumy region, Ukrainian forces face a constant barrage of aerial glide bombs, drones and relentless assaults by small groups of Russian infantrymen. They endure the attacks to prevent Russian forces from being moved to other battlegrounds in the eastern Donetsk region.Ukrainian forces intensified their own attacks in Sumy in April and even conducted a small offensive into Russia's neighbouring Kursk region to prevent up to 60,000 battle-hardened Russian forces from being moved to reinforce positions in the Donetsk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions, Ukraine's top army commander, Gen. Oleksandr Syrskyi, said last week.If those troops had been moved, they could have increased the tempo of Russian attacks across the front line and stretched Ukrainian forces thin.advertisementThe strategy did not come without criticism. Commanders who were ordered to execute it complained that it resulted in unnecessary loss of life.Russian forces have penetrated up to 7 kilometres into the northern Sumy region from different directions along the border.Ukrainian forces are determined to keep them there to avoid freeing up Russian forces to fight in the east. So far they have succeeded, locking up to 10,000 Russian troops in the Glushkovsky district of the Kursk region alone, where Ukraine maintains a small presence after being mostly forced out by Russian and North Korean troops earlier in the year.Russia seeks maximum gains in DonetskThe war's largest battle is being waged in Donetsk as Russia inches toward its stated goal of capturing all the Donetsk and Luhansk regions.Unable to tackle the strategically significant logistical hub of Pokrovsk directly, Russian forces are attempting to encircle the city, a manoeuvre that requires encroaching on the borders of the Dnipropetrovsk region. Bringing the war to a sixth Ukrainian region would be detrimental to Ukrainian morale and give Russia more leverage in negotiations if its forces manage to carve out a foothold there.advertisementSabotage groups crossed the border, only to be eliminated by Ukrainian forces.But in time, commanders fear that Russia will advance as Ukraine continues to grapple with severe shortages.A lack of soldiers and supplies across the 1,200-kilometre (745-mile) front line means that Ukrainian forces must concentrate on holding their positions and conserving resources rather than advancing, said Oleksii Makhrinskyi, deputy commander of the Da Vinci Wolves battalion.Commanders describe battles so intense under drone-saturated skies that rotating forces in and out of position has become a deadly operation. Ukrainian forces remain in combat positions for several weeks at a time or more, relying on supplies carried in by drones.The Russians' goal "is just to enter Dnipropetrovsk region, to have a good position politically if the presidents negotiate peace,' said Andrii Nazerenko, a commander of the 72nd Brigade, a drone unit in eastern Ukraine, referring to potential talks between Zelenskyy and Russian President Vladimir Putin.'They're really close to getting what they want,' he said.ALL EYES ON TRUMP'S NEXT MOVEZelenskyy hopes U.S. President Donald Trump will move away from his administration's past ambivalence toward Ukraine and signal his intention to continue American support, a move that could also alter Moscow's calculations. The two presidents met last week on the sidelines of a NATO summit and discussed a possible weapons package, including Patriot missile systems that Ukraine intends to purchase with European support.advertisementThe U.S. Defence Department did not specify which weapons were being held back when they disclosed the Pentagon review of U.S. weapons stockpiles on Tuesday.Zelenskyy also hopes Trump will punish Russia by imposing harsher sanctions on its energy and banking sectors, which bankroll the Kremlin's war effort.Europe and the U.S. have imposed successive sanctions on Russia since the full-scale invasion in 2022, but Zelenskyy says those measures have not been enough to pierce Moscow's war machine. He has proposed a $30 per barrel price cap on Russian oil.EU sanctions envoy David O'Sullivan said Europe needs to maintain the sanctions pressure while also 'holding out the prospect that if Russia behaves correctly, we could have some kind of ceasefire and some kind of sense of negotiation, but for the moment Russia doesn't seem to want that.'Kyiv's closest European allies are also awaiting a sign from Trump that he will support a plan to deploy foreign troops in Ukraine to guard against future Russian aggression after a ceasefire agreement. That is likely the best security guarantee Ukraine can hope for in lieu of NATO membership.advertisementMeanwhile, on the battlefield, Russian forces appear increasingly confident.Nazerenko noticed a shift in the morale of advancing Russian infantrymen in recent months. Instead of running away while being assailed by Ukrainian drones, they keep pushing forward.Nazerenko could not help but ask a Russian prisoner, 'You know you will die. Why go?'Because, the Russian soldier replied, 'we will win.'- EndsMust Watch
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Putin using chemical weapons in Ukraine? German and Dutch intel make shocking claim against Russia
In a stunning revelation, Dutch and German intelligence agencies have reported that Russia is using banned chemical weapons in Ukraine. The findings, based on independent investigations, include reports of choking agents dropped by drones to flush Ukrainian soldiers out of trenches, exposing them to deadly gunfire. Dutch Defence Minister Ruben Brekelmans and the German BND say this is part of a disturbing trend, the normalisation of chemical warfare on the battlefield. Ukraine has reported over 9,000 incidents involving toxic substances, including chloropicrin, a WWI-era chemical more toxic than riot control agents. However, Russia has denied the use of such weapons and blames Ukraine, though Kyiv and Western officials reject those claims. Show more Show less
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Gabbard rips into WaPo reporter for harassing intel officials, her family
US Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has slammed a Washington Post (WaPo) reporter for "actively harassing" her staff and also accused the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter of hounding and stalking her family a post on X, Gabbard took issue with journalist Ellen Nakashima's reporting approach."It has come to my attention that Washington Post reporter (Ellen Nakashima) appears to be actively harassing ODNI staff," she posted on social media on Thursday (US time), referring to the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI).advertisement She accused the Pulitzer Prize-winning reporter of not disclosing her identity and seeking sensitive information from intelligence officials."Instead of reaching out to my press office, she is calling high-level Intelligence Officers from a burner phone, refusing to identify herself, lying about the fact that she works for the Washington Post, and then demanding they share sensitive information.""Apparently, publishing leaked classified material wasn't enough for the Washington Post, so now they've decided to go after the Intelligence professionals charged to protect it (sic)," she SAME REPORTER WHO HARASSED AND STALKED MY FAMILY: GABBARDGabbard also alleged that Nakashima and her news outlet had been harassing her family in Hawaii."This is a clear political op by the same outlet and the same reporter who harassed and stalked my family in Hawaii," the US spy chief also accused the Washington Post of abandoning journalistic ethics in a bid to undermine Trump's agenda."This kind of deranged behaviour reflects a media establishment so desperate to sabotage POTUS's successful agenda that they've abandoned even a facade of journalistic integrity and ethics," she said."The Washington Post should be ashamed, and they should put an end to this immediately," she POST REJECTS CHARGESIn response, Washington Post Executive Editor Matt Murray said Nakashima is widely respected as one of the most diligent and fair-minded national security reporters."For three decades, Ellen Nakashima has been one of the most careful, fair-minded, and highly regarded reporters covering national security," Murray said in a statement."Reaching out to potential sources rather than relying solely on official government press statements regarding matters of public interest is neither nefarious nor is it harassment. It is basic journalism," Murray IS ELLEN NAKASHIMA?Ellen Nakashima has worked at the Washington Post since 1995 and has contributed to several Pulitzer Prize-winning teams for her reporting on the January 6 Capitol attack, Russian interference in the 2016 election, and the NSA's surveillance programs, according to her online biography on the Washington has been a White House correspondent, Southeast Asia bureau chief, and co-authored a biography of former Vice President of the United States, Al Gore.- Ends
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
How Enslaved Americans Responded To July 4 Declaration Of Independence
The summer air in Rochester, New York, hung thick with heat and celebration. It was July 5, 1852, a day after cannons had fired, flags waved and towns across America had burst into patriotic jubilation to mark the 76th anniversary of the nation's independence. Inside Corinthian Hall, a different kind of gathering was taking place. The man who rose to the podium was Frederick Douglass, once enslaved, now one of the most powerful voices for abolition in the country. He had been invited to speak on July 4 but chose instead to wait a day as per Time. In front of an audience of nearly 600, he began by acknowledging the Founding Fathers and the brilliance of the ideas they had set into motion in 1776. But then, his voice sharpened. "This Fourth of July is yours, not mine," he declared. The applause quietened by then. Douglass asked a now-famous question, "What, to the American slave, is your Fourth of July?" As Douglass spoke that day in 1852, slavery was still legal in half the country. The Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 had recently passed, forcing free states to return escaped enslaved people to bondage. As historian Dr Allison Wiltz later explained, many enslaved people saw July 4 as a day of mourning. Newspaper archives from the era are filled with ads for runaway slaves, many of whom chose the national holiday as the moment to make their escape, as per The Washington Post. "The blessings in which you, this day, rejoice, are not enjoyed in common," Douglass said in his speech. "The sunlight that brought light and healing to you has brought stripes and death to me. This Fourth July is yours, not mine. You may rejoice, I must mourn." "What, to the American slave, is your Fourth of July? I answer; a day that reveals to him... the gross injustice and cruelty to which he is the constant victim. To him, your celebration is a sham... your shouts of liberty and equality, hollow mockery... a thin veil to cover up crimes which would disgrace a nation of savages," his words reverberated across a room listening in pin-drop silence. During the Revolutionary War (1773-1783), many Black Americans saw that the Founders' promise of liberty excluded them. Thousands instead turned to the British, who offered real freedom in exchange for loyalty. In 1775, Lord Dunmore, the British governor of Virginia, promised emancipation to enslaved people who escaped Patriot masters to join British forces. Soon, units like the Royal Ethiopian Regiment and Black Pioneers included these freedom-seekers, some wearing sashes that read "Liberty to Slaves." Some of these escapees became prominent historical figures. Harry Washington, once enslaved by George Washington, fled in 1776, joined the Black Pioneers, and later resettled in Nova Scotia and Sierra Leone. Colonel Tye (born Titus Cornelius) escaped from New Jersey and rose to become one of the most feared Loyalist guerrilla leaders of the Revolutionary War. Frederick Douglass had produced what historian David Blight calls "the greatest speech he's ever delivered, of the hundreds of speeches he delivered in his life." On July 4, 1862, with the Civil War raging and emancipation not yet guaranteed, Frederick Douglass delivered another Independence Day speech. Where he had once referred to the Founders as "your fathers," he now called them "your fathers, and my fathers." Six months later, in January 1863, President Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, a landmark executive order aimed at ending slavery in the Confederate states. A decade after the Civil War, Frederick Douglass returned to the podium on July 5. With the rise of white supremacist violence and the hate group Ku Klux Klan, Douglass asked, "If war among the whites brought peace and liberty to the blacks, what will peace among the whites bring?" Though slavery had ended, America's commitment to racial equality was still uncertain.
