Dutch PM Schoof resigns, hours after far-right leader Wilders exits coalition
[AMSTERDAM] Dutch Prime Minister Dick Schoof announced his resignation on Tuesday (Jun 3), most likely ushering in a snap election, hours after anti-Muslim politician Geert Wilders quit the right-wing coalition for failing to back tougher migration policies.
Ministers from Wilders' PVV party will leave the Cabinet, while the others will continue for now as a caretaker government.
Any election is unlikely to be held before October, and the fractured political landscape means formation of a new government may well take months.
Anger over migration and the high cost of living are boosting the far right and widening divisions in Europe, just as it needs unity to deal effectively with a hostile Russia and an unpredictable and combative US president in the form of Donald Trump.
'I have told party leaders repeatedly in recent days that the collapse of the Cabinet would be unnecessary and irresponsible,' Schoof said after an emergency Cabinet meeting triggered by Wilders' decision.
'We are facing major challenges both nationally and internationally that require decisiveness from us.'
BT in your inbox
Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox.
Sign Up
Sign Up
Schoof said he would hand his resignation to King Willem-Alexander later on Tuesday.
Wilders had said he saw no other option than to quit the coalition, as it had not backed the stricter migration policies he had demanded.
He said he would lead the PVV into a new election and hoped to be the next prime minister.
The other parties in the coalition have the option to try to soldier on as a minority government, though they are not expected to.
'The most obvious outcome will be new elections after the summer: end of October, November,' said political scientist Joep van Lit at Radboud University in Nijmegen.
It remains to be seen whether right-wing voters will see the turn of events as Wilders' failure, or rather decide that he needs a bigger mandate to overcome other parties' resistance, van Lit said.
Simon Otjes, assistant professor in Dutch politics at Leiden University, said the PVV must have calculated that the next election would be seen as a referendum on immigration policy, 'because they know they would win that'. REUTERS
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
As birthrates fall, Turkey's government steps in
[ISTANBUL] Alarmed by the fact that Turkish women are having fewer children, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan has moved to tackle falling birthrates – 'a threat greater than war' – through policies designed to bring on the babies. After declaring 2025 Turkey's 'Year of the Family', Erdogan last month announced 2026 would mark the start of the 'Decade of the Family'. But his pleas for women to have at least three children and offers of financial incentives for newlyweds may not be enough as Turkey grapples with a deepening economic crisis. Official figures show Turkey's birthrate has fallen from 2.38 children per woman in 2001 to 1.48 in 2025 – lower than in France, Britain or the United States – in what Erdogan, a 71-year-old pious Muslim and father-of-four, has denounced as 'a disaster'. During his 22 years in office – first as premier, then president – fertility rates have dropped sharply in this country of 85 million people. Erdogan has blamed both women and LGBTQ 'perverts'. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up 'Women and LGBTQ+ individuals are considered the only culprits for the declining population growth rate, with no acknowledgement of political mistakes,' said retired academic and feminist activist Berrin Sonmez. 'People might be hesitant to have children in this chaotic and uncertain environment. Additionally, child support is almost non-existent and education has become the most expensive sector,' she said. High inflation has raged in Turkey for the past four years, forcing education costs up by more than 70 per cent over the past year, official data shows. In the first quarter, unemployment stood at 8.2 per cent, or 15 per cent among 15- to 24-year-olds. Researchers with the DISK union say the real rate is 28.5 per cent, and 37.5 per cent among young people. But the government seems bent on fixing other issues, such as Turkey's record number of elective Caesarean births – which stands at 61 per cent, rising to 78 per cent in some private hospitals. In April, Turkey banned C-section births at private healthcare facilities 'without a medical justification'. The procedure generally limits the number of pregnancies to two, or a maximum of three. Medical professionals say the high number of C-sections is linked to the rampant privatisation of the healthcare system since the late 1990s. C-sections are more time-efficient for medical staff – 30 minutes, versus 12 hours for a traditional delivery – and lower the risk of legal action over complications, said Hakan Coker, an Istanbul-based gynaecologist. 'Ultimately, C-sections are perceived as a guarantee of safety' for doctors and women alike, he said. Dr Harika Bodur, an obstetrician at a major Istanbul hospital, said some women ask for a C-section 'at the first appointment for fear of pain'. 'If you refuse, they'll go elsewhere,' she said. The fear is rooted in a lack of education and discomfort with sexuality, she said. The health ministry says it is now 'aiming for a target rate of 20 per cent (of C-sections) by encouraging normal childbirth through education of future parents'. But the word 'normal' has raised hackles – notably last month when a football team carried a huge banner promoting vaginal births onto the pitch before a top-flight clash, which read: 'Natural birth is normal.' 'If I don't want to, I won't have any children at all, it's my right,' said 23-year-old chemistry student Secil Murtazaoglu. 'Access to abortion is already difficult. Now they want to limit C-sections. It's all about the oppression of women,' she said. In 2012, the Turkish president described abortion as 'murder', but stopped short of banning it. By offering interest-free loans of 150,000 Turkish lira (S$4,900) for newlyweds and a monthly allowance of 5,000 lira from the third child onwards, Erdogan was trying 'to turn women into birthing machines', Murtazaoglu said. Feminist activist Sonmez said women were subjected to huge pressures, both within their families and within society, when the much more pressing issue was the need to tackle gender violence. 'We must start by combating violence against women: such policies have been eradicated and protections seriously undermined,' she said. AFP
Business Times
2 hours ago
- Business Times
Trump signs travel ban for 12 countries including Myanmar
[WASHINGTON] US President Donald Trump on Wednesday (Jun 4) signed a proclamation that bans individuals from 12 countries from entering the US, reinstating one of the most controversial and defining measures from his first term in the wake of an attack in Boulder, Colorado, that targeted a march in support of Israeli hostages. The second-term travel ban covers Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of the Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan and Yemen. The measure also partially limits the entry of people from Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela. Trump earlier in the week blamed the immigration policies of former president Joe Biden for the presence of the suspect in the Boulder attack, who was an Egyptian who overstayed his visa and would not have been impacted by the ban. Witnesses say they saw the suspect use a makeshift flamethrower and throw an incendiary device in the attack. 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas,' Trump said in a video posted on social media on Wednesday. 'We don't want them.' CBS News first reported Trump's efforts to block travellers from the 12 countries. The ban will not apply to those who already have visas, lawful permanent residents of the US, or teams travelling for the World Cup or Olympics. Those with special visas to escape persecution in Iran or for assisting the US military effort in Afghanistan are also exempted. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Impact on Harvard's foreign students Trump also signed a separate proclamation suspending the visas of foreign students seeking to participate in exchange programmes at Harvard University, which has already been a target for the administration that claims it has a liberal bias and is not doing enough to address antisemitism. In the Harvard proclamation, Trump accused the university of failing to discipline conduct violations on campus and complained the university had only turned over information about three foreign students accused of dangerous, illegal or threatening activity. 'Harvard's actions show that it either is not fully reporting its disciplinary records for foreign students or is not seriously policing its foreign students,' Trump said. In his first term, Trump barred travellers from Cuba, Iran, Libya, North Korea, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, Venezuela and Yemen. The addition of Afghanistan in this order comes after the Trump administration suspended the US refugee programme and froze federal funding for assistance programmes, including those that provided travel for Afghans who had already been approved to resettle in the US. The move is the latest step in what has been a sweeping immigration agenda aimed at cracking down on undocumented migration, ramping up deportations of people from the US and completing the construction of the US-Mexico border wall Trump began in his first term. Trump pledged to secure US borders, seizing on voter concerns about crime and a surge in migrants, in his 2024 presidential campaign. Trump put in motion efforts to reinstate a travel ban quickly upon taking office, ordering the secretaries of State and Homeland Security, the attorney general and the director of National Intelligence to identify countries for which 'vetting and screening information is so deficient as to warrant a partial or full suspension on the admission of nationals from those countries'. The travel ban is likely to face legal challenges, just as its first-term predecessor did and with many of Trump's other immigration actions during his current White House stint already being litigated in the courts. Trump has vowed to carry out an agenda that offers to test the powers of his office on immigration policy. The first-term travel ban marked a signature moment in Trump's tenure. Trump in 2017, within days of taking office, issued an order which barred people from seven countries with largely Muslim populations from entering the US for 90 days. The move sparked chaos and confusion at airports, protests across the globe and a flood of lawsuits seeking to halt the order, which critics assailed as a 'Muslim ban'. Trump defended the move as necessary for national security and, after judges struck down the initial version, moved to issue revised orders that altered the list of countries targeted and offered more specifics about the scope of the restrictions in a bid to survive further legal scrutiny. The subsequent changes to the policy eventually led to the US Supreme Court in 2018 upholding the travel ban, with the justices in a 5-4 ruling rejecting claims that it targeted Muslims and giving Trump a major legal victory that bolstered a president's broad controls over the nation's borders. Biden – in one of his first acts in office in 2021 – signed his own order ending Trump's travel ban. Trump during the 2024 campaign, though, had vowed to reinstate it and expand the measure to cover refugees from Gaza if elected and his move delivers on a key plank of his agenda. Since taking office, the president has declared a national emergency at the southern border and directed the Pentagon to deploy additional resources to address the situation. The administration has also ramped up deportations of undocumented migrants and attempted to end automatic birthright citizenship for children of people in the country illegally – the latter of which has been halted by the courts as they address legal challenges. The president has also used tariffs to pressure Mexico and Canada to do more to secure the border and directed agencies to identify federally funded programmes providing benefits to migrants in the country illegally. BLOOMBERG
Straits Times
4 hours ago
- Straits Times
World Bank to resume Uganda funding after halt over anti-LGBT law
KAMPALA - The World Bank said on Thursday it would resume funding to Uganda, nearly two years after the global lender suspended new financing to the country in response to an anti-LGBT law that imposes penalties including death and life imprisonment. The bank halted funding to the East African country in August 2023 after Uganda's parliament passed the Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA), saying the law contradicted its values. The bank had worked with Ugandan authorities to put in place strong measures to mitigate against potential harm from the law, a World Bank spokesperson told Reuters via email. "We have now determined the mitigation measures rolled out over the last several months in all ongoing projects in Uganda to be satisfactory," said the spokesperson, who asked not to be named. "Consequently, the Bank has prepared three new projects in sectors with significant development needs – social protection, education, and forced displacement/refugees – which have been approved by the Board." The World Bank is one of Uganda's biggest sources of external financing, especially in infrastructure construction in the transport sector. AHA mandates the death penalty for so-called "aggravated homosexuality" which includes among other categories having same-sex relations with a disabled person or where gay sex results in transmission of a terminal illness to a victim. It also decrees a 20-year sentence for "promoting" homosexuality. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
