logo
Sask. has been a sea of blue in recent federal elections. Here's why it's worth watching this time around

Sask. has been a sea of blue in recent federal elections. Here's why it's worth watching this time around

CBC24-03-2025

Social Sharing
Saskatchewan has been almost entirely blue in federal politics since the Conservative Party of Canada first ran a slate of candidates in the province in 2004.
While the Liberals and the NDP have picked up occasional seats, Saskatchewan's 14 federal ridings remain a stronghold for the Conservatives.
With a federal election looming, CBC News approached experts to get their views on the state of the race in the province.
WATCH| How Carney's win changes the election campaign:
At Issue: How Carney's win changes the election campaign
14 days ago
Duration 6:15
'The most conservative province'
There are 14 federal districts in Saskatchewan. The Conservatives have controlled all of them since 2019.
Daniel Westlake, an assistant professor of political studies at the University of Saskatchewan, said that is unlikely to change this election.
"My view is Saskatchewan is probably the most conservative province in the country, more so than Alberta," Westlake said.
Jim Farney, director of the Johnson Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, agreed.
"Fundamentally, we look like a blue province," Farney said.
Farney said that at the moment, Saskatchewan is likely more supportive of the Conservatives than it is of the province's governing Saskatchewan Party.
Westlake said Saskatchewan is a very rural province, and an increasing urban-rural divide will make it difficult for the Liberals or the NDP to secure enough votes.
While Alberta may view itself as a steadfast Conservative province, there are pockets of Calgary and Edmonton that are hospitable to the Liberals or the NDP, Westlake said.
"It is not clear that those same pockets exist in Saskatchewan," Westlake said.
Boundary changes put at least 1 riding in play
The electoral boundaries of all 14 Saskatchewan ridings changed as part of the 2022 electoral redistribution process.
The experts CBC spoke with said the changes will likely have little effect on the outcomes — except in one place.
All three agree the riding of Desnethé–Missinippi–Churchill River is now in play for the Liberals and NDP.
"With Meadow Lake being detached and added to the old Battlefords–Lloydminster riding, a significant chunk of the Conservative vote has gone with it," said Eric Grenier, a polls analyst and the creator of thewrit.ca. "Enough of it to make the riding very difficult for the Conservatives."
WATCH| Carney says transition to power will be seamless and quick:
Carney says transition to power will be seamless and quick
14 days ago
Duration 1:14
New Liberal Leader Mark Carney says his Monday discussion with Prime Minister Justin Trudeau covered U.S.-Canada relations and national security.
Westlake said he looked at the data from past elections, and if the current boundaries had been used in 2019 or 2021 the riding "would have voted NDP in 2019 and Liberal in 2021."
"That riding gets really interesting," Westlake said.
While the Saskatchewan NDP almost swept all of the seats in the province's cities in the 2024 provincial election, the experts say we're unlikely to see something similar at the federal level.
"Provincial and federal elections happen in their own distinct environments," Westlake said.
Ballot box questions have changed
Farney and Westlake told CBC News in separate interviews that if an election had been called in the fall, it likely would've resulted in an election framed around affordability or whether the economy was doing well.
Then along came Donald Trump.
"Now it's the much more existential question of who's better to deal with with Donald Trump and tariffs," Farney said.
Having a race focused on affordability would've been bad for the Liberals, Westlake said. As a long-term, incumbent government, the Liberals will be blamed for problems with the economy, health care and inflation, he said.
Refocusing the question on Trump and tariffs means the Liberals are "not nearly at the same kind of disadvantage against the Conservatives" as they would've been on cost of living, Westlake said.
Farney and Westlake said that may make the election more competitive overall, even it doesn't play out that way in Saskatchewan.
Both said the carbon tax will continue to play a role in resource-dependent Saskatchewan, even if this doesn't end up being the " Carbon Tax Election" Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre had been calling for.
Farney said the Conservatives are likely to focus on the message that the "economy will get better when government gets smaller and we cut your taxes."
"As a political messaging operation that's much easier to sell," Farney said.
Westlake said that even with the carbon tax falling out of favour among the Liberals, it will remain a metaphorical weapon for the Conservatives.
Even retreating from the policy or promising to end it is unlikely to stop the Liberals from being tagged on the subject.
"The Conservatives can still ask the question, why did you support this and why did your party support this over the last 10 years?" Westlake said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Letters: 'We're done being quiet' in Alberta
Letters: 'We're done being quiet' in Alberta

National Post

time3 hours ago

  • National Post

Letters: 'We're done being quiet' in Alberta

Article content This is in stark contrast to the pro-Palestinian groups that have chosen, in the spirit of Hamas, to spread hate in the world. We have watched these groups as they have become increasingly hateful, aggressive and violent. They have escalated from rallies outside of Jewish community centres and schools, to encampments on university grounds, to shootings at Jewish schools, to hunting Jews after a football match on the eve of Kristallnacht, to the murder of two innocent Israeli embassy staff. Standing next to them are the politicians who offer hollow words about antisemitism at the same time as they refuse to recognize or condemn the source of this evil. Article content Kudos to the Conservatives for pushing the Carney government (although unsuccessfully) to tender a spring budget. Obviously Prime Minister Carney thinks he has clear sailing to spend almost half a trillion dollars without telling Canadians where those billions will be going. Article content In any democracy the government is expected to inform taxpayers as to how it plans to spend their hard-earned tax dollars. Without a budget there is no real accountability or possibility for oversight. This move is a reminder for Carney, who keeps opining that voters gave him a massive mandate when in fact he has only a minority government. Article content Peter Shawn Taylor's article highlights a basic truth: when nature calls, fairness isn't optional — it's essential. But fairness means designing solutions that benefit the greatest number. Article content Gender inequality in washroom access is real. Long lines outside women's washrooms reflect a design failure rooted in outdated assumptions. But removing urinals or forcing everyone to sit doesn't fix the problem — it worsens it by increasing delays for all. Article content Instead of eliminating efficiency, we should expand it — especially as an aging population increases demand. Biological differences exist, and public infrastructure should reflect them. As in architecture, form should follow function. Article content The real issue is inadequate infrastructure for private functions in public spaces. Victorian prudishness once discouraged public washrooms; today, that legacy leaves us unprepared. Try to find easily accessible relief on the Toronto subway system. Moreover Canadians shouldn't adopt Europe's approach of charging for access. Intuition of natural law suggests that there is something wrong in demanding forced payment for nature's call. Instead, we should think and act based on utilitarianism: add urinals, increase public facilities, and open seasonal restrooms year-round. Article content Canada's $10-a-day child-care plan, legislated under Bill C-35, promised access, inclusion, and affordability — but it's clearly failing. Alberta, Ontario and Saskatchewan, holding over 73 per cent of Canada's child-care spaces outside Quebec, have refused the federal extension due to inadequate funding, soaring costs and discriminatory rules excluding private centres. Manitoba illustrates this clearly, giving raises only to educators in public or non-profit centres, leaving private educators behind simply due to business structure, not qualifications or quality. Alberta families face similar absurdities: newly licensed private centres can't access affordability grants, forcing parents into costly market-rate fees or endless waitlists.

Letters to the Editor, June 8, 2025
Letters to the Editor, June 8, 2025

Toronto Sun

time5 hours ago

  • Toronto Sun

Letters to the Editor, June 8, 2025

Sunday letters Photo by Illustration / Toronto Sun HUMAN CAPITAL This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Re 'Carney's hocus-pocus plan to increase debt and balance the budget' (Lorrie Goldstein, May 31): In today's knowledge economy, having a fit and well-trained workforce is economically essential, so trying to distinguish between capital and operating budgets and capping the latter (i.e. vital health and education expenditures) will be dangerously counter-productive. Today our elites want spending focused on infrastructure whose benefits immediately accrue to big businesses and financial institutions. Large projects may indeed have merit, but woe to us if we neglect crucial protection of our valuable human capital. For example, a dental program may be just as all-important as physical infrastructure: Low-income students are more likely to turn into highly-skilled workers if they can study without nagging toothaches and infected gums. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Larry Kazdan Vancouver (What is important at outcomes. The Liberals have spent billions on all sorts of programs but are we seeing the benefits to the economy?) HELP FROM BIG BROTHER USA Much has been said about how well Mark Carney is standing up to current pressure from Donald Trump. In the meantime, has Canada met its 2% obligation as a NATO member or are we still 'sorta hoping our big brother will protect us' notwithstanding? Tim Conway Toronto (Canada has not met this obligation) WEAK JUSTICE Re 'Undercover cops nab 36 men in Ontario child luring probe' (Jane Stevenson, June 5): Any serious justice system must prioritize the protection of the most vulnerable members of society, that being the elderly and the young. Huge kudos to those police officers who went after these criminals who prey on young children to satisfy their depraved sexual desires. This is a very difficult job for police having to deal with such seriously perverted individuals. Unfortunately, because of the current federal Liberal no-bail, often weak sentencing by social warrior justices, in what has become a revolving door justice system it is doubtful these perpetrators will be severely punished as a deterrent to others. The children pedophiles prey upon have their lives destroyed forever! Larry Comeau Ottawa (It is appalling what has happened. Where is Canadians' outrage over this?) Olympics Columnists Toronto & GTA World Columnists

Carney says Canada to focus on peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7 meeting
Carney says Canada to focus on peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7 meeting

Global News

time17 hours ago

  • Global News

Carney says Canada to focus on peace, energy security and new partnerships at G7 meeting

Canada has unveiled its priorities for the G7 leaders' summit just one week before it gets underway in Alberta as the government defends its decision to invite India to the summit. Prime Minister Mark Carney's office says Ottawa's top priority for the summit will be strengthening global peace and security, which includes countering foreign interference and transnational crime, as well as improving responses to wildfires. His office also says Canada will focus on spurring economic growth by improving energy security, fortifying supply chains for critical minerals and accelerating the use of artificial intelligence. Lastly, Canada will discuss creating jobs by securing partnerships to open new markets and generate large infrastructure investments. In addition, Canada plans to use its invitation for guests outside the group to discuss how to secure a lasting peace in Ukraine, and to 'build coalitions with reliable partners.' Story continues below advertisement Carney is hosting the summit in Kananaskis, Alta., from June 15 to 17, welcoming U.S. President Donald Trump on his first visit to Canada during this presidential term. Canada is expecting to welcome leaders of the other liberal democracies that make up the G7: the United Kingdom, France, Germany, Japan, Italy and the European Union. Get daily National news Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day. Sign up for daily National newsletter Sign Up By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy Analysts say the summit has come together under a time crunch, with Ottawa choosing the June date months ago before former prime minister Justin Trudeau resigned and a federal election campaign — which traditionally slows work in the public service. In addition to the G7 members, the host country can invite other leaders in order to give priority nations a voice at the summit. Carney revealed on Friday he had extended an invitation to Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, despite the RCMP accusing New Delhi of widespread acts of murder, extortion and coercion primarily against Sikh activists in Canada, including an assassination near Vancouver two years ago. Story continues below advertisement At least four other international leaders have accepted their invitations to Kananaskis: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, South African President Cyril Ramaphosa and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum has said she's considering Canada's invitation. The NDP and major Sikh groups in Canada have condemned Carney's decision to invite Modi, arguing the move puts economic concerns ahead of human rights. Supriya Dwivedi, a former senior advisor to previous prime minister Justin Trudeau, derided the invitation as Carney's government 'thinking some Canadian lives matter more than others,' she wrote on the platform Bluesky. 'It will also be incredibly difficult to take anything this (government) says on transnational repression and foreign interference seriously given this pivot,' she wrote. Others have said it's time for Canada to manage security issues through a structured process with India and not let the criminal allegations and India's concerns about Sikh separatism dominate the bilateral relationship. At a virtual news conference Saturday, Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand stressed her government 'will not undermine' the RCMP investigation into alleged criminality by Indian agents. 'The fact that leaders from a number of countries have been invited to this meeting does not, and should not, detract from the importance of the independent investigation that is ongoing and the rule of law considerations which are absolutely paramount,' she said. Story continues below advertisement Anand said Carney decides which countries get an invitation, and was circumspect about what criteria Ottawa is using to choose which leaders to invite. 'The meeting will allow global leaders to discuss issues of global concern, which is the general purpose of this meeting, and we are honoured to be able to invite leaders to our country,' she said. 'The prime minister will be hosting these leaders for a discussion (on) very serious issues that affect the global economy and the geostrategic environment.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store