Reeves to seek billions for growth from corporate pension surpluses
Rachel Reeves will this week announce plans to unlock tens of billions of pounds from corporate pension schemes as part of government plans to kickstart economic growth.
Sky News has learnt that the chancellor will use a crucial speech on Wednesday to disclose that she wants to use so-called surplus release to boost investment in the economy.
Government sources said it could unlock more than £60bn of pension surpluses held in defined benefit (DB) schemes, while other estimates suggested the figure could be in the region of £100bn.
The surplus release plan could be included in a pension schemes bill expected to be published in the coming months.
City sources said that a meeting had taken place earlier this month which was attended by Treasury officials, members of the Number 10 Policy Unit and representatives of the 100 Group of FTSE-100 company finance chiefs.
The meeting, which was hosted by Varun Chandra, Sir Keir Starmer's top business adviser, discussed the surplus release plan in detail, according to one finance director briefed on the talks.
Ms Reeves's move will form part of a wider set of pensions reforms initiated under the last government and now being accelerated by Labour.
These include forcing the merger of local government pension schemes, which collectively hold about £400bn of assets.
In her maiden Mansion House speech in November, the chancellor said she would preside over "the biggest set of reforms to the pensions market in decades to unlock tens of billions of pounds of investment in business and infrastructure, boost people's savings in retirement and drive economic growth so we can make every part of Britain better off".
An overhaul of defined contribution (DC) schemes, which in aggregate manage £500bn in assets, is also on the cards, with consolidation there also anticipated in the coming years.
The Treasury has cited Australia and Canada as examples of the model Britain's pensions system should seek to emulate, with both countries utilising pension scheme capital to invest more heavily in domestic infrastructure.
The surplus release plan has the potential to be a major catalyst for economic investment, although it was unclear this weekend how the deployment of this capital into UK growth initiatives would be guaranteed.
It was also unclear the extent to which pension trustees would play a role in any surplus release plans.
The pensions industry has been pushing for surplus release to be adopted in Britain for years, with the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association having endorsed such a move before last year's election.
Edi Truell, the prominent financier and pensions entrepreneur, said on Sunday: "It is time to split DB pension funds from their employers.
"The employers should be focussing on their core business; and the pension funds be backed by capital from specialist pension superfund managers."
"The Pensions Regulator needs to replace its misguided views of "risk" and recognise that investment in productive assets in the long term provides better pension outcomes."
Ms Reeves's speech on Wednesday will come at a critical time for her, with doubts having been raised about her grip on her job for the first time in recent weeks amid financial market volatility in the aftermath of her October Budget.
Speaking at the World Economic Forum in Davos last week, Ms Reeves indicated that she would row back from a number of Budget measures, including relating to the treatment of non-doms.
Having been repeatedly accused of talking down the economy in the wake of Labour's landslide general election victory, she said this weekend that she wanted Britain to be less "polite" about championing its economic virtues.
The chancellor has also formed a pivotal part of the government's move to shake up economic regulation, with the removal last week of the chairman of the Competition and Markets Authority.
Sky News revealed several weeks ago that Sir Keir had written to watchdogs to urge them to remove barriers to growth, with meetings between the chancellor and regulators set to continue in the coming weeks.
The chancellor's speech this week is expected to confirm government support for major infrastructure projects, including - controversially - a third runway at London Heathrow Airport.
The Treasury declined to comment on Sunday on the contents of the chancellor's growth speech.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Half of the bond market is US Treasurys. Why it's 'not healthy.'
Half of the bond market is US Treasurys. Why it's 'not healthy.' Show Caption Hide Caption Trump summons Fed's Powell to tell him he's wrong on rates U.S. President Donald Trump called Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell to the White House on May 29 for their first face-to-face meeting since he took office in January and told the central bank chief he was making a "mistake" by not lowering interest rates. Over the past 12 months, about half of all debt in the U.S. bond market has been Treasurys – bonds and notes issued by the federal government. That's according to a June 8 research note from Torsten Sløk, the chief economist for money manager Apollo. 'This is not healthy,' Sløk wrote. 'Half of credit issued in the economy should not be going to the government.' As USA TODAY has previously reported, the growing U.S. budget deficit has caught the attention of investors in the bond market. The deficit is the consequence of revenue – taxes, mostly – not keeping up with spending. As it increases, the government issues more debt to plug the hole, and as supply rises, the government needs to pay more to attract demand from investors. President Donald Trump's proposed tax bill would exacerbate that dynamic, swelling the deficit by an estimated $2.4 trillion over the next decade, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office. More: Treasury bond yields are surging as the Trump tax bill progresses. Here's why it matters. Since all kinds of credit products, such as mortgages, are linked to the important U.S. Treasury market, those higher borrowing costs ripple through the economy. Sløk has written previously about the concerns over the power dynamic between the government and bond investors. Some analysts are concerned that investors may become what's sometimes called 'bond vigilantes' – demanding certain fiscal conditions as a condition of buying a government's debt. Overseas investors own nearly one-third of outstanding Treasury debt. Sløk's June 8 analysis is a reminder that the Treasury's mounting debt has many ripple effects. 'The consequence is that investors need to allocate more and more dollars to finance the government rather than financing growth in the economy through loans to firms and consumers,' Sløk wrote. Read next: The White House's tax bill will consider SALT (again). What could that mean for you?
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Real risk Rachel Reeves's spending review will be about the departments that have lost out
"It's a big deal for this government," says Simon Case. "It's the clearest indication yet of what they plan to do between now and the general election, a translation of their manifesto. "This is where you should expect the chancellor to say, on behalf of the government: 'This is what we're about'." As the former cabinet secretary, Mr Case was the man in charge of the civil service during the last spending review, in 2021. On Wednesday, Rachel Reeves will unveil the Labour government's priorities for the next three years. But it's unclear whether it will provide all that much of an answer about what it's really about. Unlike the Autumn budget, when the chancellor announced her plans on where to tax and borrow to fund overall levels of spending, the spending review will set out exactly how that money is divided up between the different government departments. Since the start of the process in December those departments have been bidding for their share of the cash - setting out their proposed budgets in a negotiation which looks set to continue right up to the wire. This review is being conducted in an usual level of detail, with every single line of spending assessed, according to the chancellor, on whether it represents value for money and meets the government's priorities. Budget proposals have been scrutinised by so called "challenge panels" of independent experts. It's clear that health and defence will be winners in this process given pre-existing commitments to prioritise the NHS - with a boost of up to £30bn expected - and to increase defence spending. On Sunday morning, the government press release trumpeted an impressive-sounding "£86bn boost" to research and development (R&D), with the Science and Technology Secretary Peter Kyle sent out on the morning media round to celebrate as record levels of investment. We're told this increased spending on the life sciences, advanced manufacturing and defence will lead to jobs and growth across the country, with every £1 in investment set to lead to a £7 economic return. But the headline figure is misleading. . That £86bn has been calculated by adding together all R&D investment across government for the next three years, which will reach an annual figure of £22.5bn by 2029-30. The figure for this year was already set to be £20.4bn; so while it's a definite uplift, much of that money was already allocated. Read More: Peter Kyle also highlighted plans for "the most we've ever spent per pupil in our school system". I understand the schools budget is to be boosted by £4.5bn. Again, this is clearly an uplift - but over a three-year period, that equates to just £1.5bn a year (compared with an existing budget of £63.7bn). It also has to cover the cost of , and the promised uplift in teachers' pay. In any process of prioritisation there are losers as well as winners. We already know about planned cuts to the Department of Work and Pensions - but other unprotected departments like the Home Office and the Department of Communities and Local Government are braced for a real spending squeeze. We've heard dire warnings about austerity 2.0, and the impact that would have on the government's crime and policing priorities, its promises around housing and immigration, and on the budgets for cash-strapped local councils. The chancellor wants to make it clear to the markets she's sticking to her fiscal rules on balancing the books for day-to-day the decision to loosen the rules around borrowing to fund capital investment have given her greater room to manoeuvre in funding long-term infrastructure projects. That's why we've seen her travelling around the country this week to promote the £15.6bn she's spending on regional transport projects. The Treasury team clearly wants to focus on promoting the generosity of these kind of investments, and we'll hear more in the coming days. But there's a real risk the story of this spending review will be about the departments which have lost out - and the promises which could slip as a result.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
UK finance minister Reeves to meet China's vice premier on London trip
LONDON (Reuters) -British finance minister Rachel Reeves will hold a meeting with Chinese vice premier He Lifeng during his visit to Britain this week for trade talks with the United States, a British government source said on Sunday. China's foreign ministry said He would be in Britain between June 8 and June 13 when there will be talks in London with three of U.S. President Donald Trump's top aides to try to resolve a trade dispute between the world's two largest economies that has kept global markets on edge. The British government source said Reeves would host He for a bilateral meeting during the trip, although there were no details on when the talks would be held. The British finance minister met He during a visit to China in January, part of British attempts to improve ties with Beijing, one of the main policy goals of Prime Minister Keir Starmer's government. However, many British lawmakers remain sceptical of China amid regular accusations of espionage by spies working for Beijing, and plans for a new large Chinese embassy in London remains a divisive subject, with the opposition Conservative Party saying it must be blocked. The Chinese government wants to build the embassy at Royal Mint Court, a historic site near the Tower of London, which would be its largest in Europe but its requests for planning permission have been rejected by the local council, and the government will make a final decision. The Sunday Times reported that a senior U.S. official had said Washington was "deeply concerned" about the plans, due to its proximity to London's financial hubs and three significant data centres, and approval could impact UK-U.S. trade talks. "These (security) issues will be taken care of assiduously in the planning process," British technology minister Peter Kyle told Sky News on Sunday.
