‘Color is neither a poison nor a crime': Judge rips Kristi Noem's ‘racial animus' in latest ruling protecting migrants
A searing 37-page ruling argued that a decision by Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem to cancel those temporary humanitarian protections appeared partially rooted in 'racial and discriminatory animus.'
'Color is neither a poison nor a crime,' stated the ruling from District Judge Trina Thompson, who was appointed by former President Joe Biden.
Her decision is a reprieve for more than 60,000 immigrants who were allowed to legally live and work in the United States under the Temporary Protected Status program. Immigrants from Nepal who are enrolled in the program were set to lose their status August 5, and TPS was set to expire for Honduras and Nicaragua in September.
Thursday's decision postpones those deadlines until at least November 18 as the legal challenge continues.
In her decision, Thompson listed a series of statements from Noem and the president amplifying 'the discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population.'
'By stereotyping the TPS program and immigrants as invaders that are criminal, and by highlighting the need for migration management, Secretary Noem's statements perpetuate the discriminatory belief that certain immigrant populations will replace the white population,' Thompson wrote.
In several lawsuits, immigrants' advocacy groups and TPS holders have argued that the Trump administration explicitly relied on false and discriminatory stereotypes — including the president's claims that foreign prisons were emptying out jails to send criminals to the U.S., and that immigrants are 'poisoning the blood' of the country — to justify the end of the program.
'The freedom to live fearlessly, the opportunity of liberty, and the American dream. That is all Plaintiffs seek,' Thompson wrote in her ruling. 'Instead, they are told to atone for their race, leave because of their names, and purify their blood. The Court disagrees.'
The Independent has requested comment from Homeland Security.
Congress created the program in 1990 to provide temporary immigration protections for people fleeing war, natural disasters and 'extraordinary and temporary' conditions in their home countries. Beneficiaries are allowed to apply for renewable work permits and protections against deportation.
To carry out its plans for mass deportations, the administration has pushed to 'de-legalize' tens of thousands of immigrants who were granted humanitarian protections to legally live and work in the U.S.
In February, Noem announced the administration was ending TPS designations for Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
In May, the Supreme Court allowed the Trump administration to cancel TPS for roughly 350,000 Venezuelans while legal challenges continue. In a separate ruling, the nation's highest court paved the way for the administration to revoke TPS for another 532,000 immigrants from Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua and Venezuela.
Taken together, the rulings gave Trump permission to begin stripping legal status for nearly 900,000 people who are now vulnerable to deportation.
Noem's past statements reflect her 'animus against immigrants and the TPS program even though individuals with TPS hold lawful status — a protected status that was expressly conferred by Congress with the purpose of providing humanitarian relief,' Judge Thompson wrote.
'Their presence is not a crime,' the judge added. 'Rather, TPS holders already live in the United States and have contributed billions to the economy by legally working in jobs, paying taxes, and paying contributions into Medicare and Social Security.'
Thompson is at least the second judge to directly suggest that Noem's decision-making was rooted in racism.
In March, California District Judge Edward Chen said the Trump administration's 'generalization of criminality to the Venezuelan TPS population as a whole is baseless and smacks of racism predicated on generalized false stereotypes.'
Arguments from the Trump administration defending the move, including claims that TPS holders are members of the gang Tren de Aragua, are 'entirely lacking in evidentiary support,' Chen wrote.
Instead, the move to cancel those protections appears 'predicated on negative stereotypes casting class-wide aspersions on their character,' including 'insinuating they were released from Venezuelan prisons and mental health facilities and imposed huge financial burdens on local communities,' according to the judge.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's tariffs are now in place. Alcohol, a cup of joe, and Toyotas are about to cost a whole lot more
President Donald Trump's global tariffs, ranging from 10 to 50 percent, took effect on Thursday, igniting fear among consumers, companies, and investors about potential price hikes. Everyday items ranging from coffee to Toyotas, home furnishings to Gap jeans, are expected to become more expensive as companies adjust their prices to counteract the impact of tariffs. While the president has asked companies to absorb the cost of tariffs, many cannot forever. Even luxury items such as Range Rovers, French wines, or Rolex watches are likely to raise prices as they face 10 percent, 15 percent, and 39 percent tariffs, respectively, from the president. While Trump wants tariffs to promote domestic production and purchasing, Americans will most likely bear the cost. Economic experts agree that sweeping tariffs on goods from countries could lead to supply chain issues, price spikes, or even inflation. Here are some of the goods expected to cost more. Alcohol Consumers of French, Italian, or Spanish wines, Scotch whiskey, and aperitifs such as Aperol, can expect to see the price of their favorite alcoholic beverage rise due to the 15 percent tariff on the European Union. The E.U. is a major exporter of wines and spirits to the U.S. In 2024 alone, the E.U. accounted for $3.4 billion worth of imported spirits. Despite pleas from the beverage industry, the president's trade deal did not create exemptions for alcohol, which will likely drive up the price of imported wine or liquor – either in stores or restaurants. 'Without productive negotiations reducing reciprocal tariffs on wine and spirits, American wine retailers anticipate a significant decline in sales on top of the already difficult market, as well as significant job losses and subsequent business closures,' Tom Wark, the executive director of the Association of Wine Retailers, said. A letter to the president from the Toast Not Tariffs Coalition, a group of 57 associations representing the U.S. alcohol industry and related industries, said tariffs on the E.U. could result in 25,000 American job losses, and nearly $2 billion in lost sales. Diageo, the maker of Guinness, Bailey's, Johnnie Walker, and more, said the company expects to see a $200 million slump as a result of the tariffs. Cars and car parts Already, consumers have seen cars and car parts become more expensive over the last few months as a result of Trump's tariffs because the U.S. relies heavily on its trading partners for auto parts. Cox Automotive, an industry service and technology provider, expects the sticker price of vehicles to rise anywhere from four-to-eight percent by the end of the year. That means the average car price would be above $50,000. While the president struck several deals with countries, many of them still make imported vehicles more expensive. Imported cars from the U.K., such as Range Rovers, are subject to a 10 percent tariff. Japan, which sells more cars to the U.S. than any other country, is facing a 15 percent tariff rate, which is expected to cause major disruption. Toyota said on August 7 it expects a $9.5 billion profit loss for the year. "It's honestly very difficult for us to predict what will happen regarding the market environment," Takanori Azuma, Toyota's head of finance, said. But given that many car parts are imported from Japan, the tariffs are likely to hurt U.S. carmakers as well. General Motors projects a $4 billion loss, Stellantis, the maker of Jeeps, said it anticipates tariffs will add $1.7 billion in expenses, and Ford, which builds more cars in the U.S. than any of its rivals, said it expects tariffs to cause a $2 billion loss this year. Clothing Clothing is expected to see one of the most significant price increases since the U.S. is the largest single importer of apparel, and much of it comes from countries in Asia. 'The 2025 tariffs disproportionately affect clothing and textiles, with consumers facing 40% higher shoe prices and 38% higher apparel prices in the short-run,' the Budget Lab at Yale, a nonpartisan policy research center, said in a recent analysis. Shoes and apparel could remain 19 percent and 17 percent higher, respectively, in the long run, the report added. Vietnam, one of the largest exporters of appear to the U.S., has agreed to a 20 percent tariff. Brands such as Nike, Adidas, Zara, and Gap manufacture much of their clothing in Vietnam. While many can absorb some of those costs, even raising prices 10 percent would make a $65 pair of shoes $71.50, without tax. Bjorn Gulden, the CEO of Adidas, said the tariffs 'will directly increase the cost of our products for the U.S.' Other countries that are high producers of clothing face significant tariffs as well. Bangladesh has a 20 percent tariff, while Indonesia and Cambodia both face a 19 percent tariff. India, also a large producer of apparel, faces a steep tariff of 25 percent and Trump has threatened to increase that to 50 percent by the end of August if the country does not stop importing Russian oil. While the U.S. also imports a large portion of clothing from China, which is still negotiating a trade deal, Trump's decision to get rid of the de minimis exemption will make it more costly for consumers to purchase cheap clothing from stores like Shein or Temu. Coffee The U.S. relies heavily on Brazil to import coffee for the 165 million people who need their daily caffeine fix, but Trump's 50 percent tariff threatens the long-term availability and price of the drink. "When people go to their local coffee shop, whether it's Starbucks or something else, by and large they will likely be buying some form of Brazilian coffee," Monica de Bolle, senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, told NPR. "A 50 percent tariff will kill that market." Household products: appliances, cookware, furniture Everyday household items made with steel or aluminum, such as cookware, appliances, furniture, and more, are likely going to be impacted by Trump's steep 50 percent industry tariffs. The U.S. relies heavily on its trading partners, particularly Canada and Mexico, for steel and aluminium imports. Nearly half of the aluminum used in the U.S. is imported, while less than a quarter of steel is imported. But that doesn't mean consumers won't see price increases. One small business, Heritage Steel, a family-owned cookware manufacturer in Tennessee, told NBC News that they recently received a tariff bill of $75,000 on an order of handles – and they're anticipating higher bills in the future. Since the U.S. does not have many specialized steel manufacturers, Heritage Steel imports approximately 75 percent of its raw material. Unlike other cookware manufacturers, they only import raw material and create their products in the U.S. Danny Henn, the vice president of operations for Hertiage Steel, told NBC News that the company wants to keep its products moderately priced, but at the same time, cannot absorb the new price of steel. They've raised their prices approximately 15 percent to make up for it. 'We're happy and proud to be a provider of really high-quality cookware, but one that's more affordably priced than some of the others on the market,' Henn said. 'We want to continue to offer the best price we can, given our constraints.' Watches Although imported watches are not an everyday essential, luxury wristwatches made in Switzerland are likely to see significant price increases thanks to the 39 percent tariff imposed on the country on Thursday. That means Americans looking to purchase a watch from recognizable brands such as Rolex, Breitling, Patek Philippe, Omega, or TAG Heuer may have to pay significantly more. An analysis of the impact, conducted by Bob's Watches, a secondhand watch retailer, found that a $9,900 stainless steel Breitling could rise to $11,080. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
18 minutes ago
- Yahoo
White House prepares for Stephen Miran to be nominated to Fed board, Bloomberg reports
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The White House is preparing for U.S. President Donald Trump to nominate Council of Economic Advisers Chairman Stephen Miran to serve as a Federal Reserve governor, Bloomberg reported on Thursday, citing a person familiar.
Fast Company
19 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Why is Trump going after Intel's CEO?
Shares of Intel dropped more than 3% Thursday after President Donald Trump demanded the immediate resignation of the chipmaker's CEO. Claiming that there is 'no other solution to this problem,' Trump said Lip-Bu Tan is 'highly conflicted' in an early-morning post on Truth Social. Though the president didn't elaborate on his reasoning, Reuters has previously reported that Tan, either directly or through venture funds, has invested at least $200 million in Chinese manufacturing and chip companies. Intel shares dropped as much as 3.5% before recovering some of those losses. Tan caught the ire of Trump one day after Sen. Tom Cotton, a Republican from Arkansas, called Tan's ties to Chinese firms 'concerning' and questioned the potential impact on U.S. national security in a letter he sent to Frank Yeary, Intel's chairman. In his letter, Cotton requested that Yeary respond by next week to questions about Tan's ties to Chinese firms and his prior tenure as CEO of Cadence Design Systems, which last month agreed to plead guilty in a past criminal case. He also cited Intel's receipt of nearly $8 billion in funding under the CHIPS and Science Act during Joe Biden's presidency last year. 'Intel is required to be a responsible steward of American taxpayer dollars and to comply with applicable security regulations,' Sen. Cotton wrote. 'Mr. Tan's associations raise questions about Intel's ability to fulfill these obligations.' TAN AND TRUMP Tan's past investments came under scrutiny following his appointment as CEO, though as a former venture capitalist the size and scope is perhaps not so unusual. A Reuters investigation found that Tan's investments in China were made through Walden International, the venture capital firm he founded in 1987, along with two Hong Kong-based holding companies. Reuters said it found no evidence that Tan was invested directly in any company that's banned by the U.S. Treasury's Chinese Military-Industrial Complex Companies List. What's more, Walden International wasn't an anomaly: It was one of five American venture capital firms that were the subject of a congressional investigation last year into investments in China's semiconductor industry that totaled $1 billion since 2001. The other funds on the list were GGV Capital, GSR Ventures, Qualcomm Ventures, and Sequoia Capital. But Walden International and, by virtue Tan, may be out of favor by the Trump administration for other reasons. GGV Capital split its U.S. and China operations into two firms last year, while GSR Ventures did so this year. Qualcomm donated $1 million to a nonprofit that supported Trump's 2024 election bid, while Shaun Maguire, one of Sequoia's partners, is a vocal Trump supporter and the firm has ties to David Sacks, the White House AI and crypto czar. As recently as March, Tan said the Trump administration was prepared to help Intel so the U.S. can maintain semiconductor leadership — and he would seek the administration's help, as needed. On Wednesday, Trump threatened a 100% tariff on imported semiconductors and chips, which would actually favor Intel as it has domestic facilities. Even if information about Tan's investments are known, it's trickier to track the personal investments of CEOs in foreign companies as they're not required to disclose that information unless there's a potential conflict of interest. But sometimes their investments do catch the eye of watchdogs. Last year, for example, Campaign for Accountability, a Washington, D.C.-based nonprofit that runs the Tech Transparency Project, reported that former Google CEO Eric Schmidt had invested nearly $17 million through his private foundation into the Chinese AI industry, even as he was leading the National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence. INTEL'S WOES The Santa Clara, California-based company issued a statement in response on Wednesday, saying: 'Intel and Tan are deeply committed to the national security of the U.S. and the integrity of our role in the U.S. defense ecosystem.' The company hasn't responded to Trump's call for Tan's immediate resignation, according to reporting by other news outlets. Tan was appointed as CEO of Intel in March, replacing Pat Gelsinger, who was forced out in late-2024 after the board of directors lost confidence in his turnaround plans for the company. In his first few months, Tan has already embarked on an aggressive plan to streamline the organization with a plan for more layoffs, to the tune of about 15%. In a letter to employees in July when Intel reported second-quarter financial results, Tan said such efforts are 'steps in the right direction.' REACTIONS TO TRUMP'S POST On social media, several commenters questioned whether Intel will 'bend the knee' and submit to Trump's call for Tan's resignation. Analysts also weighed in about the implications of the president's post. 'Unfortunately, unlike other tech CEOs, Lip-Bu does not appear to have cultivated the kind of personal relationship with Trump that would help to assuage his ire,' Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said in a note to clients. And Trump's apparent meddling in corporate leadership could be setting 'a very unfortunate precedent,' Phil Blancato, CEO of Ladenburg Thalmann Asset Management, which does not own Intel shares, told Reuters. 'You don't want American presidents dictating who runs companies, but certainly his opinion has merit and weight.'
