US military to invade Latin American countries? Donald Trump's action against drug cartels sparks fear
The Trump administration designated Mexico's Sinaloa Cartel and other drug gangs as well as Venezuelan criminal group Tren de Aragua as global terrorist organizations in February.
U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio said on Thursday the administration could now use the military to go after cartels. 'It allows us to now target what they're operating and to use other elements of American power, intelligence agencies, the Department of Defense, whatever... to target these groups if we have an opportunity to do it. We have to start treating them as armed terrorist organizations, not simply drug dealing organizations,' Rubio said.
The New York Times carried the initial report on Trump's move against cartels.
What US military action against drug cartels could look like
A US official noted that Trump's move would allow the navy to carry out operations at sea, including drug interdiction operations.
The DEA estimates over nine million shipping containers arrive on large cargo ships each year and another 157,000 arrive on smaller vessels in many coastal towns across the U.S. Drugs smuggled in this method include cocaine, heroin, methamphetamine, amphetamine, and marijuana.
Operations could also include targeted military raids, the official continued, while another said that military actions didn't seem imminent, and it was not quite clear what types of operation the military would carry out.
Notably, the US military has already been using more and more airborne surveillance to collect information on Mexican drug cartels in an effort to chalk up a plan to best counter their activities.
'No invasion' says Mexico
Even as Trump issued the order, Mexican counterpart Claudia Sheinbaum has asserted there will be 'no invasion'.
'We are cooperating, we are collaborating, but there will be no invasion. That is absolutely ruled out,' she said.
Notably, the President has often blamed Mexico for not doing enough to stop the flow of fentanyl-laced cocaine into the US.
Trump's move has also raised questions among X users, with one asking 'Ok, let's imagine there is cartel in Bolivia (hypothetically) and Trump send army to deal with it in Bolivia, will that be considered as US aggression towards Bolivia or that is Special Military Operation only?)'
Another advocated for the toppling of the Mexican government, saying 'Mexico is a Narco state. Half the government is Cartel, including the president. To solve the problem, Trump is going to have to topple the Mexican Government and eradicate the cartels.'
Yet another individual noted '…it's important to call this an invasion: Trump is invading Mexico and opening another front in the ongoing world war'.
Needless to say, there are plenty of legal complexities involved in sending military troops to a foreign nation to carry out any sort of operation.
Interestingly, Trump's okaying of military action comes right on the heels of Attorney General Pam Bondi increasing the reward for the arrest of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro to $50 million. Maduro, as per the US government, has ties to cartels. The US had, in the past, carried out military operations in Panama – Operation Just Cause – which began in December 1989 to remove Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega, who also was indicted for drug trafficking.
(With agency inputs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
23 minutes ago
- Mint
What happens when politicians meddle with economic data: Argentina's example
Government statistician Graciela Bevacqua arrived at the office on a Monday to bad news from her boss: There was no easy way to say this, but the president wanted her head. It was January 2007, and Bevacqua oversaw the consumer-price index at Argentina's national statistics agency, Indec. Rising inflation threatened the electoral hopes of leftist President Néstor Kirchner's wife, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, who was running to succeed him. Bevacqua was unwilling to fudge the numbers, so Kirchner replaced her with a loyalist who did it. Echoes of the Argentine saga have reverberated in the U.S. since President Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, on Aug. 1 after big downward revisions to jobs data. He accused the bureau of rigging the data to make Republicans look bad but provided no evidence, and independent economists dismissed the allegation. 'This is the sort of thing only the worst populists do in the worst emerging economies," economist Phil Suttle said of McEntarfer's dismissal in a note to clients. Although Argentina is an emerging economy, its statistics agency was regarded as professional and independent, and governed by a solid legal framework. That makes its experience a useful lesson in what awaits the U.S. if new leadership politicizes economic data. Following Bevacqua's removal, Argentina's officially reported inflation rate fell to 8.5% in 2007 from 9.8% in 2006. Fernández de Kirchner easily won the election, and the government initially saved billions of dollars in interest on inflation-linked bonds which could be spent on social programs and subsidies. In reality, inflation had accelerated to around 25%, private economists estimated. The government faced lawsuits from unions and pensioners whose social-security checks were indexed to inflation. Some of the government's savings on inflation-linked bonds were offset by higher payments on debt tied to gross domestic product, which came in artificially high. 'It started to become a huge mess," said Alberto Cavallo, an Argentine economist teaching at Harvard University who created a website that tracked inflation based on publicly available prices to fill the void left by Indec. Users bombarded him with all sorts of questions over email, like how much to adjust settlement payments to an ex after a divorce. 'The examples add up, and you end up realizing how important some of these statistics are," he said. Cristina Fernández de Kirchner became Argentina's president in 2007, succeeding her husband, Néstor Kirchner. In the U.S., trustworthy economic data are central to determining how much people pay in taxes, receive in retirement benefits and earn on some investments. Along with an independent Federal Reserve, they also underpin the dollar's reserve-currency status, as well as roughly $120 trillion in stocks and bonds. It is unclear how far Trump intends to go in overhauling the BLS or its sister agencies. Kevin Hassett, Trump's National Economic Council director, has said that the president 'wants his own people there, so that when we see the jobs numbers, they are more transparent and reliable." On Tuesday, the BLS will report the CPI for July, its first major release since McEntarfer was fired. Trump had told reporters last Sunday that he planned to announce a new BLS commissioner 'sometime over the next three or four days" but hasn't yet done so. 'This is the most important selection in the history of the BLS," said William Beach, McEntarfer's Trump-appointed predecessor. Beach, who has called her firing 'totally groundless" and a 'dangerous precedent," said that to 'heal this, you would have to have an appointment of a person whose reputation for honesty and integrity is beyond question. You would have to have a unanimous vote in the Senate for that confirmation." If new appointees are perceived as partisan, that would likely erode the agencies' credibility. Market participants would take positive economic data with a grain of salt and presume negative data masked an even worse reality. The ability of the Fed and other policymakers to respond to changes in the economy would be compromised. 'You can't hide the fact that people are out of work and prices are changing, but without direct measurement of those things that are officially collected and that everyone has equal access to, it really would be sort of a Dark Ages situation," said Brent Moulton, a former associate director of the Commerce Department's Bureau of Economic Analysis, which calculates GDP, personal income and several other data series. Institutional checks exist to guard against outright manipulation. Mishandling economic statistics or improperly accessing the confidential information used to compile them is a felony. In addition, dozens of career staff work on major releases like the monthly jobs report, inflation data and GDP who would likely blow the whistle if data were mishandled, former officials said. But Argentina had similar legal protections around Indec, which survived a military dictatorship, hyperinflation and economic meltdowns and was considered a model statistics agency in Latin America. More than 100 staffers worked on the inflation index, Bevacqua said. 'The index had so many safeguards, it seemed impossible to me that someone could manage to change the numbers," Bevacqua said. 'Not only did that happen, but they stayed for many years, and part of the institution is still recovering." After Bevacqua was removed, political appointees changed the methodology for items that had jumped in price from December 2006 to January 2007. These included lettuce, health insurance and hotels, Argentine prosecutors said in an investigation report. Argentina's economic woes were the result of more than data manipulation. Price controls, capital controls and exchange-rate controls distorted economic incentives and led to even more interventions. The central bank lacked de facto independence and kept interest rates too low to bring inflation under control. Argentina stopped manipulating the data in 2015 after Fernández de Kirchner left office, and started a new inflation series that began in June 2016. It is now regarded as credible. The minister who spearheaded the politicization of Indec in 2007, Guillermo Moreno, was recently sentenced for manipulating the inflation data to three years of 'conditional" prison—akin to probation—and banned from public office for six years. Inflation continued to climb, dooming the Kirchners' political movement. Argentines elected libertarian Javier Milei president in 2023 on a platform of radical economic liberalization. Inflation, which peaked at 289% last year, was down to 39% as of June. Bevacqua said it is too soon to compare the situation at BLS to Indec. A key difference: Political appointees in the Kirchner administration had been making unusually detailed information requests about the inflation data for at least a year before they fired her, she said. 'I think the U.S. has strong institutions," she said. 'But it could be a sign. You never know."
Time of India
23 minutes ago
- Time of India
Ex Intel directors advocate massive shake up as Trump guns for CEO Tan
Academy Empower your mind, elevate your skills In a rare joint statement, four former Intel board members have called for a major restructuring at the chipmaker. Charlene Barshefsky, Reed Hundt, James Plummer, and David Yoffie urged shareholders to call for spinning off Intel Foundry—its manufacturing arm—into an independent company, with its own CEO and board, to restore competitiveness and address national security statement to Fortune comes close on the heels of US president Donald Trump calling for Intel CEO Lip-Bu Tan to resign immediately, over his Chinese ex-directors emphasised that the decision on Tan's future rests with Intel's board and shareholders, but argued that only a decisive break from the current structure could reverse years of underperformance. Intel has cycled through four CEOs in seven years with limited progress, they has two main businesses—the Foundry, which fabricates chips for Intel and third parties, and Intel Products, which produces processors for personal computers and servers, networking equipment, and software. While both verticals are vital for computing, the Foundry's advanced semiconductor manufacturing capabilities are critical to US national security and have been at the forefront of trade talks between Trump and his Chinese counterpart, Xi four ex-directors said separating the chip fabrication unit would make it more agile and competitive against rival TSMC. They also urged that remaining CHIPS Act funds be directed toward the new entity to boost its capabilities and attract orders from US chip design a move, they argued, would strengthen America's position in producing cutting-edge chips for commercial and defence needs, providing a viable alternative to TSMC and ensuring the nation retains control over critical semiconductor supply chains. The former directors called on shareholders to press for the split as the necessary step to secure Intel's future and the country's technological Thursday, Trump posted on Truth Social platform that Intel CEO Tan is 'highly conflicted', referring to his connections with Chinese companies, and and demanded his immediate Trump's salvo, Republican senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army. He enquired whether Tan had divested his interests in these companies to eliminate any conflicts of to demand for his resignation, Tan said he has "always operated within the highest legal and ethical standards". In a message to Intel employees, Tan clarified that there was misinformation circulating about his past roles at Walden International and Cadence Design Systems and that he's always followed proper standards.
News18
33 minutes ago
- News18
‘Will Take Half The World Down…': Asim Munir Threatens India With Nuke Attack From US Soil
Last Updated: Asim Munir threatened nuclear war with India, saying Islamabad would take "half the world" down if facing an existential threat, and warned of missile attacks on Indian dams. Pakistan Army Chief General Asim Munir once again threatened India, saying that Islamabad would plunge the region into nuclear war and would take 'almost half of the world" down if the country faces an existential threat in a future war with New Delhi. 'We are a nuclear nation; if we think we are going down, we'll take half the world down with us," Munir reportedly said at a black-tie event hosted for him in Florida's Tampa during his second visit to the US in two months, as reported by The Print. As per the report, this is the first time that nuclear threats have been issued from the soil of the US against a third country. Munir, who came out of the shadows amid soaring tensions between India and Pakistan, further raked up the Indus Waters Treaty issue, which has been kept in 'abeyance" by New Delhi after the ghastly Pahalgam terror attack, saying India's decision could put 250 million people at risk of starvation. He further threatened to destroy the Indian dams (to be built) with missiles on the river, saying that Islamabad has plenty of missiles. 'We will wait for India to build a dam, and when it does so, phir 10 missile sey faarigh kar dengey (we will destroy it with 10 missiles). The Indus river is not the Indians' family property. Humein missilon ki kami nahin hai, (we have no shortage of missiles)," Munir reportedly said. The Pakistan Army Chief is on his second visit to the US in less than two months to meet top American military officials. Munir held talks with US Joint Chiefs of Staff General John Dan Caine and invited him to visit Pakistan, according to a statement from Pakistan's military wing. They discussed matters of 'mutual professional interest," it said. Earlier, he was hosted to a private lunch at the White House by US President Donald Trump. On several occasions, Munir has blamed India without any evidence for the recent tensions in the region in the aftermath of the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. After the Pahalgam attack, the diplomatic ties between India and Pakistan downgraded with New Delhi announcing several punitive measures, including suspension of the Indus Waters Treaty, cutting Islamabad Mission strength and expulsion of its military attaches. India and Pakistan exchanged cross-border hostilities for four days after the former launched Operation Sindoor against terror camps in the neighbouring country. New Delhi struck several air bases and dealt a crushing blow to Islamabad Army's capabilities, while also effectively repelling missile and drone attacks. Despite this, Munir had claimed India undertaken acts of unprovoked aggression, marked by a 'troubling absence of strategic foresight", and vowed a decisive response to any future Indian aggression. view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
