'Necessary to protect our sovereignty': US sanctions four ICC judges for rulings on US and Israel; assets frozen
US secretary of state Marco Rubio (Image credits: AP)
The US would impose new sanctions targeting four judges from the International Criminal Court (ICC), secretary of state Marco Rubio announced in response to investigations into the military actions and arrest warrants issued against Israeli leaders.
"The United States will take whatever actions we deem necessary to protect our sovereignty, that of Israel and any other US ally from illegitimate actions by the ICC," Rubio said in his statement.
He said that the sanctions were a direct response to what he called illegitimate actions by the ICC against both the US and its ally Israel. The four judges named are Solomy Balungi Bossa of Uganda, Luz del Carmen Ibáñez Carranza of Peru, Reine Adelaide Sophie Alapini Gansou of Benin, and Beti Hohler of Slovenia.
According to the state department, Judges Bossa and Ibáñez Carranza authorised the ICC's investigation into US personnel in Afghanistan. Although the investigation was allowed to proceed at the time, it was later dropped. Khan, after taking office in 2021, announced he would not pursue allegations involving US military or CIA personnel.
Judges Alapini Gansou and Hohler, meanwhile, were part of the panel that authorised arrest warrants for Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former defense minister Yoav Gallant over actions taken during the war in Gaza.
Under the sanctions, all US-based assets belonging to the four judges must be frozen and reported to the treasury department. Americans are also prohibited from conducting business with them. Previous sanctions against ICC officials led to complications in banking and international travel, and some American staff at the court have since resigned.
This move follows earlier sanctions imposed in February, when the US penalised ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan for pursuing charges related to Israel's military campaign in Gaza.
The sanctions reportedly disrupted the work of Khan's team.
The US and Israel are not members of the ICC and have long opposed the court's efforts to investigate their officials or military personnel. During US President
Donald Trump
's first presidency, former secretary of state Mike Pompeo imposed similar sanctions when the court moved to investigate alleged war crimes by US troops in Afghanistan.
The ICC strongly condemned the new sanctions, calling them "a clear attempt to undermine" an institution that seeks to provide justice to victims of severe crimes.
In a statement, the court said such measures "only emboldens those who believe they can act with impunity."
Established in 1998, the ICC is the world's top criminal court, tasked with prosecuting war crimes, genocide, crimes against humanity, and aggression. The court depends on member states to enforce its rulings, as it has no power to carry them out on its own.
The Rome statute, the treaty that created the ICC, has been ratified by 125 countries. However, some of the world's most powerful nations, including the US, China, Russia, India, and Israel, are not parties to the treaty and do not recognize the court's authority.
"I call on the countries that still support the ICC, many of whose freedom was purchased at the price of great American sacrifices, to fight this disgraceful attack on our nation and Israel," he added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Mediation between two unequals not possible: Shashi Tharoor on Trump's claims
Congress MP Shashi Tharoor has said that to suggest one can mediate between two unequals is not possible because there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims, amid repeated claims by US President Donald Trump that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. Tharoor, currently in the US leading a multi-party delegation on Operation Sindoor , made the comments in response to a question during a conversation at the Council on Foreign Relations here Thursday. "...Mediation is not a term that we are particularly willing to entertain. I'll tell you why not. The fact is that this implies, even when you say things like broker or whatever, you're implying an equivalence which simply doesn't exist," Tharoor said. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Free P2,000 GCash eGift UnionBank Credit Card Apply Now Undo He said there is no equivalence between terrorists and their victims. "There is no equivalence between a country that provides safe haven to terrorism, and a country that's a flourishing multi-party democracy that's trying to get on with its business," he said. Live Events "There is no equivalence between a state that is a status quo power that just wants to be left alone by its neighbours, where the neighbours don't agree with us, and a revisionist power that wants to upset the geopolitical arrangements that have existed for the last three-quarters of a century. There is no equivalence possible in these cases, and in these circumstances, to suggest that you can mediate between two unequals is not possible," Tharoor added. Since May 10, when Trump announced on social media that India and Pakistan had agreed to a "full and immediate" ceasefire after a "long night" of talks mediated by Washington, he has repeated his claim over a dozen times that he "helped settle" the tensions between India and Pakistan. He has also claimed that he told the nuclear-armed South Asian neighbours that America would do a "lot of trade" with them if they stopped the conflict. On being asked how he would characterize the American role in the conflict, Tharoor said he is "guessing to some degree" that the American role would have been first of all to keep themselves informed, conversations on both sides, and "certainly my government received a number of calls at high levels from the US government, and we appreciated their concern and their interest." He said that at the same time, the US must have been making similar calls at the highest levels to the Pakistan side, and "our assumption is that's where, because that's the side that needed persuading to stop this process, that may well have been where their messages really had the greatest effect. But that's guesswork on my part. I don't know what they said to the Pakistanis." Trump repeated the claim as recently as Thursday when during a meeting with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, the US President said that he is "very proud" that he was able to stop the conflict between nuclear powers India and Pakistan. "I spoke to some very talented people on both sides, very good people on both sides" and said that Washington will not do any trade deals with either "if you are going to go shooting each other and whipping out nuclear weapons that may be even affect us. Because you know that nuclear dust blows across oceans very quickly, it affects us," Trump said. "You know what, I got that war am I going to get credit? I'm not going to get credit for anything. They don't give me credit for anything. But nobody else could have done it. I stopped it. I was very proud of that," Trump added. About two weeks after the horrific April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam in Jammu and Kashmir in which 26 civilians were killed, India launched Operation Sindoor targeting terror infrastructure in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir on May 7. India and Pakistan reached an understanding on May 10 to end the conflict after four days of intense cross-border drone and missile strikes. India has been maintaining that the understanding on cessation of hostilities with Pakistan was reached following direct talks between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of the two militaries.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Israel is supporting anti-Hamas fighters in Gaza, Netanyahu admits: ‘What is bad about that?'
Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has admitted that the country is supporting an armed group in Gaza that opposes Hamas. His remarks come amid heavy Israeli air raids on the enclave that have left dozens dead. Speaking in a video posted on social media on Thursday, Netanyahu confirmed reports that Israel had worked with local armed groups in Gaza. These groups, often described as criminal gangs by aid agencies, have been accused of stealing food and supplies meant for civilians. 'What did Liberman leak? That security sources activated a clan in Gaza that opposes Hamas? What is bad about that?' Netanyahu said, referring to Avigdor Liberman, a former defence minister who first spoke about the plan. 'It is only good, it is saving lives of Israeli soldiers.' This is the first time the Israeli government has publicly acknowledged it is supporting armed groups in Gaza. The group in question is reportedly led by Yasser Abu Shabab, a local figure based in Rafah, and is believed to belong to a Bedouin tribe spread between Gaza and Egypt's Sinai region. A senior Israeli official told the Associated Press that the group Netanyahu referred to is known as the Popular Forces. Israeli newspaper Haaretz had earlier reported on it under a different name – the 'Anti-Terror Service' – and said it was made up of about 100 fighters operating with Israeli approval. In recent weeks, the Abu Shabab group claimed it was helping protect aid trucks heading to new distribution centres run by the US and Israel-supported Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF). However, humanitarian workers and local officials say these fighters have been involved in attacks on civilians and aid convoys. Chris Gunness, a former UN spokesperson, said Gaza's aid system had become a 'human abattoir', blaming the way aid was being handled. He said people were 'herded like animals' into distribution zones and then 'slaughtered like cattle'. Violence around aid points has increased sharply. Over the past week, at least 100 people have been killed while trying to collect food, with Israeli soldiers opening fire on four different occasions, according to Al Jazeera. The GHF shut operations for a day after widespread criticism, reopening only two centres later, without confirming when full aid delivery would resume. Meanwhile, Abu Shabab's group denies working with Israel. In a post online, it said, 'We have never been, and will never be, a tool of the occupation. Our weapons are old, and our people support us.' Hamas, which has governed Gaza for nearly two decades, said the group had 'chosen betrayal and theft as their path' and called on residents to resist them. It claimed it had proof of coordination between these armed men and Israeli forces, accusing them of making Gaza's humanitarian crisis worse. Hamas's political chief, Khalil al-Hayya, said in a statement that the group had not rejected a new ceasefire proposal from the US but had asked for changes to ensure an end to the war. Talks with international mediators were continuing, he added. Meanwhile, Israeli attacks continued across Gaza on Thursday. Health officials reported that at least 52 people were killed, including several children. Four journalists were also reportedly killed in a strike on al-Ahli Hospital in Gaza City. (With inputs from agencies)
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
Trump travel ban: Will Iran travel for 2026 FIFA World Cup?
USA, Canada, and Mexico are all set to host the 2026 FIFA World Cup together. However, President Donald Trump's latest travel ban has posed questions about whether certain qualified countries will now be allowed to travel to the US and take part. Starting Monday (June 9), citizens of 12 countries will no longer be allowed to get a US visa, according to a recent decision by Trump. Citizens of Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, the Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen have been banned by Trump and tighter restrictions have been applied to seven other nations (Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela). Trump explained his move by stating in a video, 'The recent terror attack in Boulder, Colorado, has underscored the extreme dangers posed to our country, by the entry of foreign nationals who are not properly vetted, as well as those who come here as temporary visitors and overstay their visas. We don't want them.' As of now, Iran is the only country from the list to have already qualified to compete in the FIFA World Cup next year. Cuba, Sudan, and Haiti are currently in contention to contest. Venezuela is five points off the threshold for automatic qualification but a playoff might just cut the deal. Sierra Leone can still be involved through multiple playoff games while Burundi, Equatorial Guinea, and Libya have very slim chances. Under the current policy, sports teams of qualifying countries should still be able to contest since such a provision have been provided for 'any athlete or member of an athletic team, including coaches, persons performing a necessary support role, and immediate relatives, traveling for the World Cup, Olympics, or other major sporting event as determined by the secretary of state.' However, this exception will only continue as long as there is no change to the current ban policy adopted by the US. Iranian fans hoping to catch their national team in the spotlight won't be so lucky however since the policy provides no such exceptions for fans of sporting teams. Getting an American visa had already been tough for Iranians even before the ban was implemented due to tougher vetting procedures. However, considering how those indulging in international travel for sporting events are usually from a higher wealth bracket, such individuals could still try to circumvent the process by using different passport options. The move has stirred a debate about the intersection of politics with global sport. Back in 2017, FIFA President Gianni Infantino had said, "Any team, including the supporters and officials of that team, who qualify for a World Cup need to have access to the country, otherwise there is no World Cup." Infantino has since developed close ties with Trump and has re-emphasized that sporting teams of all countries will face no barriers in coming to the US for participation next year. The event is expected to raise a majority of the soccer body's revenue in the 2023-2026 period. Questions have also been raised about the US' legitimacy to hold the upcoming 2028 Olympic Games with such strict travel policies against certain participating countries.
