
'Corruption and negligence': New book uncovers past Beirut port explosions
Between the continuing economic crisis, regional conflicts and political inaction, the outrage over the Beirut blast and public demands for justice have grown quieter and quieter. The official investigation remains unfinished, and many remain sceptical that those responsible will ever be held to account.
Complicating matters further is the fact that Lebanon lacks a reliable public record. Archives are poorly maintained, if they are kept at all.
Illuminating and solidifying forgotten heritage has long been a great passion for artist, author and amateur historian Eddy Choueiry, who has brought together his academic background in philosophy and psychology with a quietly patriotic love for the legacy of Lebanon.
In the wake of the August 4 blast, however, his creative practice took on a new meaning, unpicking a disaster years in the making. Half a decade later, he plans to present the findings of his research, first in a public lecture hosted by Asabil Public Library in Beirut, and later in a new book, which will be released soon.
'After the explosion, my target was to make a book to represent what we call in French a travail de deuil, or work of mourning,' Choueiry tells The National. 'It's a mourning process and, as is usual with this process, I wanted to do it through art, culture and heritage, so I started the book one week after the blast.'
The history of the Port of Beirut stretches back to the Ottoman Empire, which, in 1887, put control of the port into the hands of the French company Compagnie du Port, des Quais et des Entrepots de Beyrouth. The Port of Beirut quickly grew to become a key shipping centre for the region, continuing to expand during the French Mandate thanks to greater funding and trade from France, even after Lebanon became an independent nation in 1943. In 1960, the company was renamed the Gestion et Exploitation du Port de Beyrouth.
Unfortunately, the Port of Beirut also earned a reputation for corruption and smuggling. Abandoned crew and cargo were also common occurrences, as was the case with the MV Rhosus, the Moldovan ship which, in 2013, delivered the 2,750 tonne of ammonium nitrate that caused the 2020 blast.
Many of the records of the port were destroyed by the explosion, but Choueiry managed to uncover a trove of physical documents kept in the Gestion et Exploitation du Port de Beyrouth offices. It took four years just to go through all the files, which include letters, photographs, maps, contracts and even newspaper articles.
'The old archives of the harbour had been saved – although still damaged – because they were in a closet,' says Choueiry. 'I discovered a lot of documents, so I limited my research to the Ottoman period, the French Mandate period, and then – after our independence – the construction of the silos.'
Unbeknownst to most in Lebanon, the 2020 explosion at the port of Beirut, although the most devastating, was not the first such blast. In fact, three other explosions had taken place, in 1919, 1928 and 1934. In the case of the first two events, only one fatality was reported from each incident. In the case of the third, 20 people were killed and 14 were injured.
The 1938 case stands out in particular in eerie similarity to the events of 2020. Back then, Warehouse S was used to store hazardous and explosive materials – including gunpowder and TNT – under restricted access but, due to limited space, this holding area had also started to be used for other goods, including flammable textiles and foodstuffs. Questions were also raised regarding the collapse of Warehouse S's roof and the failure of the sprinkler system to prevent fire from spreading through the building following the explosion. Ultimately, no responsible party was ever identified, and the damaged site was built over.
'The authorities launched an inquiry into the cause of that explosion,' Choueiry explains, 'but it led nowhere. Even at the time, it was predicted [in the local press] that it would lead nowhere, as with the two previous port explosions that happened in 1919 and 1928; that the third – 1934 – was going to be the same, without consequences.'
Despite the recurring historical pattern of worsening accidents caused by the improper storage and handling of hazardous materials at the port, no lessons were seemingly learnt. When the new grain silos were completed and put into operation in 1970, the port authorities designated Warehouse 12 – the eventual epicentre of the 2020 explosion – as the holding area for such materials; a building almost directly co-located with the silos.
'This is crazy,' says Choueiry. 'The silos stocked grain and wheat for the whole of Lebanon. Who could imagine putting this warehouse in front of the silos? There is no excuse in 2020 that nobody knew about the importance of nitrate, and how it's so dangerous. They are not doing their jobs as they should. It's negligence.'
Today, the remains of the damaged silos stand over the Port of Beirut as a scarred reminder of the latest tragedy to befall the harbour, but ensuring that it will be the last requires that Lebanon change its relationship with its complex and often painful past. Through this "mourning work", Choueiry and those like him are attempting to put Lebanon's ephemeral history into concrete forms that will persist and provide clarity for future generations, in the hope that this cycle of abuse, impunity and failure can finally be broken for good.
'We shouldn't forget this injustice that happened to Beirut and to Lebanon,' says Choueiry. 'We are crossing our fingers with the 2020 explosion that – if we are fortunate – we will have answers. God knows how long it's going to take, to tell the truth about what really happened.'
'If you put yourself face-to-face with catastrophe, it's going to be an eternal trauma,' he continues. 'But, if you try to make enough of it into something related to your identity, to your culture, now you are making something fruitful.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
11 minutes ago
- The National
Hamas says it will allow aid to hostages if Israel opens humanitarian corridors
Hamas has said it will co-ordinate with the Red Cross to deliver aid to the hostages it holds in Gaza if Israel ends air strikes and opens permanent humanitarian corridors. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on Sunday appealed to the International Committee of the Red Cross for help aiding hostages, amid outrage in Israel sparked by the latest videos showing two emaciated captives. This came as at least 70 Palestinians − including 37 seeking aid − were killed in Israeli attacks on Sunday, official news agency Wafa reported. Hamas said it would only allow the agency to access the hostages if food and aid were distributed across all areas of Gaza. The Al Qassam Brigades, the armed wing of Hamas, said the hostages were not 'intentionally' starved but that they would not receive special food privileges at a time of starvation in the enclave. Over recent days, Hamas and its ally Islamic Jihad have released three videos showing two hostages seized during the October 7, 2023 attack on Israel that triggered the ongoing war. The images of Rom Braslavski and Evyatar David, both of whom appeared weak and malnourished, have fuelled renewed calls in Israel for a truce and hostage release deal. Mr Netanyahu's office on Saturday said he had spoken with the families of the two hostages and "expressed profound shock over the materials distributed by the terror organisations". Of the 251 hostages taken during the Hamas attack, 49 are still being held in Gaza − including 27 the Israeli military says are dead. Six more people died of starvation or malnutrition in Gaza over the past 24 hours, the enclave's health ministry said on Sunday as Israel said it allowed a delivery of fuel to the enclave. Egypt's state-affiliated Al Qahera News TV said two lorries carrying 107 tonnes of diesel were set to enter Gaza, months after Israel severely restricted aid access to the enclave. There was no confirmation of whether the trucks had entered. Medical sources and witnesses said that Israeli troops opened fire at civilians waiting for aid at different locations in the enclave, killing at least 37 people − including seven near the southern city of Khan Younis.


Zawya
an hour ago
- Zawya
Trump eyes bringing Azerbaijan, Central Asian nations into Abraham Accords, sources say
WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump's administration is actively discussing with Azerbaijan the possibility of bringing that nation and some Central Asian allies into the Abraham Accords, hoping to deepen their existing ties with Israel, according to five sources with knowledge of the matter. As part of the Abraham Accords, inked in 2020 and 2021 during Trump's first term in office, four Muslim-majority countries agreed to normalize diplomatic relations with Israel after U.S. mediation. Azerbaijan and every country in Central Asia, by contrast, already have longstanding relations with Israel, meaning that an expansion of the accords to include them would largely be symbolic, focusing on strengthening ties in areas like trade and military cooperation, said the sources, who requested anonymity to discuss private conversations. Such an expansion would reflect Trump's openness to pacts that are less ambitious than his administration's goal to convince regional heavyweight Saudi Arabia to restore ties with Israel while war rages in Gaza. The kingdom has repeatedly said it would not recognize Israel without steps towards Israeli recognition of a Palestinian state. A soaring death toll in Gaza and starvation in the enclave due to blockage of aid and military operations by Israel have buoyed Arab fury, complicating efforts to add more Muslim-majority countries to the Abraham Accords. The war in Gaza, where over 60,000 people including tens of thousands of women and children have died according to local health authorities, has provoked global anger. Canada, France and the United Kingdom have announced plans in recent days to recognize an independent Palestine. Another key sticking point is Azerbaijan's conflict with its neighbor Armenia, since the Trump administration considers a peace deal between the two Caucasus nations as a precondition to join the Abraham Accords, three sources said. While Trump officials have publicly floated several potential entrants into the accords, the talks centered on Azerbaijan are among the most structured and serious, the sources said. Two of the sources argued a deal could be reached within months or even weeks. Trump's special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff, traveled to Azerbaijan's capital, Baku, in March to meet with Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev. Aryeh Lightstone, a key Witkoff aide, met Aliyev later in the spring in part to discuss the Abraham Accords, three of the sources said. As part of the discussions, Azerbaijani officials have contacted officials in Central Asian nations, including in nearby Kazakhstan, to gauge their interest in a broader Abraham Accords expansion, those sources said. It was not clear which other countries in Central Asia - which includes Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan - were contacted. The State Department, asked for comment, did not discuss specific countries, but said expanding the accords has been one of the key objectives of Trump. "We are working to get more countries to join," said a U.S. official. The Azerbaijani government declined to comment. The White House, the Israeli foreign ministry and the Kazakhstani embassy in Washington did not respond to requests for comment. Any new accords would not modify the previous Abraham Accords deals signed by Israel. OBSTACLES REMAIN The original Abraham Accords - inked between Israel and the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Morocco and Sudan - were centered on restoration of ties. The second round of expansion appears to be morphing into a broader mechanism designed to expand U.S. and Israeli soft power. Wedged between Russia to the north and Iran to the south, Azerbaijan occupies a critical link in trade flows between Central Asia and the West. The Caucasus and Central Asia are also rich in natural resources, including oil and gas, prompting various major powers to compete for influence in the region. Expanding the accords to nations that already have diplomatic relations with Israel may also be a means of delivering symbolic wins to a president who is known to talk up even relatively small victories. Two sources described the discussions involving Central Asia as embryonic - but the discussions with Azerbaijan as relatively advanced. But challenges remain and there is no guarantee a deal will be reached, particularly with slow progress in talks between Armenia and Azerbaijan. The two countries, which both won independence from the Soviet Union in 1991, have been at loggerheads since the late 1980s when Nagorno-Karabakh - an Azerbaijani region that had a mostly ethnic-Armenian population - broke away from Azerbaijan with support from Armenia. In 2023, Azerbaijan retook Karabakh, prompting about 100,000 ethnic Armenians to flee to Armenia. Both sides have since said they want to sign a treaty on a formal end to the conflict. Primarily Christian Armenia and the U.S. have close ties, and the Trump administration is wary of taking action that could upset authorities in Yerevan. Still, U.S. officials, including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Trump himself, have argued that a peace deal between those two nations is near. "Armenia and Azerbaijan, we worked magic there," Trump told reporters earlier in July. "And it's pretty close." (Reporting by Gram Slattery in Washington; Additional reporting by Steve Holland and Humeyra Pamuk in Washington, Emily Rose in Jerusalem and Nailia Bagirova in Baku Editing by Humeyra Pamuk and Deepa Babington)


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Why Lebanon needs closure on the Beirut port blast
On this day five years ago, Lebanon experienced a traumatic event that arguably became the defining moment for an entire generation. Although the country is no stranger to tragedy, the detonation of nearly 3,000 tonnes of improperly stored ammonium nitrate at Beirut port continues to cast a shadow over Lebanon and its people. The blast, which killed more than 220, injured thousands more and flattened large parts of the capital, continues to stir up painful feelings and visceral reactions among many Lebanese and those who love Lebanon. Although the country has gone through the anguish of foreign occupation, Israeli bombardment and civil war, the explosion of August 4, 2020, remains unique in its significance. This is because it sums up so much of the Lebanese experience in recent times: chronic mismanagement; a lack of transparency; poor governance; a cavalier attitude to citizens' well-being as well as attempts to achieve accountability being hampered by obfuscation and delay. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast. The failure to prosecute those responsible for such a catastrophe has repercussions that reach far beyond the frustration of the victims' families. A pervasive sense that the country is on the wrong path led many young Lebanese to reluctantly pack their bags and leave for opportunities abroad. One of them, architect Grace Dergham, recently told The National how, when she left in July 2001, she did so to support her parents because she was 'starting to lose hope in the country'. This is not to overlook the efforts currently under way to put the country on the right path. On Friday, The National reported that tighter regulations concerning the shipping, handling and storage of goods have been introduced in Lebanon to prevent such a tragedy from happening again. That the country now has a functioning presidency and parliament is also an important step forward. And despite many setbacks – including political interference, legal challenges and the removal of lead investigators – a judicial investigation into the blast is continuing. Five years on from one of the largest non-nuclear explosions in history, no high-ranking officials have been convicted in connection with the blast Nevertheless, much remains to be done. Beirut port, which suffered extensive damage, has not resumed full operations. Housing, transport and cultural assets, including many religious and archaeological sites and national monuments, remain badly affected. And other issues have emerged to compound these challenges, such as the overspill from the Gaza war and a persistent financial crisis. But there are also faint signs that things may be slowly improving; a World Bank report released on June 19 found that Lebanon's real gross domestic product was projected to grow by 4.7 per cent this year 'supported by anticipated reform progress, a recovery in tourism and consumption and limited capital inflows'. What shines through is the spirit of the Lebanese people, who have demonstrated resilience and determination despite the physical and emotional hurt stemming from the blast and its aftermath. But they should not have to be so resilient. What they want – a better future and a fair, functioning country – is right and just. Therefore, it is the job of the government, the judiciary as well as Lebanon's political and business classes to draw a line under the devastating 2020 explosion by achieving accountability and rebuilding trust in the country's institutions. A failure to do so will dog Lebanon's leaders for years to come and take away the opportunity to meet its people's aspirations.