Anna Delvey turns heads on New York Fashion Week runway with ankle monitor
Anna Delvey turns heads on New York Fashion Week runway with ankle monitor
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Anna Delvey struts down the runway in an ankle monitor during NYFW
Anna Delvey walked the runway during New York Fashion Week at the One Night in Bangkok fashion showcase, with her ankle monitor.
NEW YORK — Anna Delvey is back in the spotlight.
Delvey hit the runway not once, but four times, at the One Night in Bangkok fashion showcase during New York Fashion Week Tuesday night, ankle monitor and all.
The convicted scammer and one time DWTS contestant, whose real name is Anna Sorokin, received cheers from the crowd each time she stepped out, including louder hoots and hollers during the finale.
"Yes, baddie!" one guest shouted out during Delvey's final walk down the runway.
Thom Browne's NYFW show: Queen Latifah, Adrien Brody, Kerry Washington, more stars flock
The showcase highlighted Thai brands Matter Makers, Merge, Vickteerut and Vinn Patararin, with smaller collections from each making their way down the runway and Delvey, 34, modeling designs for all the brands. While she modeled third in the lineup for the first brand, Delvey was the last to step out onto the runway for each of the other three designers.
Delvey was accused of scheming to finance a lavish lifestyle and her personal business plans, stealing $275,000 from hotels, banks and lavish New Yorkers. She was convicted in 2019 of grand larceny, and served a little more than three years of her four- to 12-year prison sentence.
"Our focus has always been on streetwear and we loved working in New York, plus the models are so cool here," the design team for Matter Makers said in a statement.
Delvey was spotted earlier in the week at the Christian Cowan show, alongside singers Sam Smith and Kesha. And she modeled on the runway days prior at the Elena Velez show.
Previous coverage: Sam Smith, Kesha, Anna Delvey sit front row for Christian Cowan at NYFW
Delvey's fashion week entrée is not her first: Following her release from prison, she hosted a fashion show on the roof of her New York City apartment building in September 2023 while she was on house arrest for the fashion label Shao. She's been spotted out and about at fashion week events in the year since, and walked in Shao's show this past September.
Other celebrities to hit the fashion week runways included Elon Musk's mother Maye Musk at the Juzui show and Sarita Choudhury of "And Just Like That" at Kallmeyer.
Martha Stewart is effortlessly cool for Tory Burch's fashion week show at NY's MoMA
Delvey's runway return comes after her short-lived stint on "Dancing with the Stars" in September. Her casting on the ballroom competition reality show received backlash from the start, and her debut dance, a so-so cha-cha dance complete with her bedazzled monitoring anklet, was panned by viewers.
"I was very nervous going into my first dance, but I think I did well under the circumstances. The room went silent. It was clear I wasn't a fan favorite — yet. But I'm going to keep working at it. And I hope I can win people over with my work effort and perseverance. I'm not giving up," Delvey told USA TODAY in an emailed statement at the time.
She didn't get the chance to keep "working at it" for much longer: Delvey was eliminated from the dance competition a week into the season, after performing a quickstep with partner Ezra Sosa. Asked by host Julianne Hough what she took from her time on the show, Delvey was curt: "Nothing."
Contributing: Jay Stahl
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
5 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Miami Swim Week Is Here! Celebrate With These 13 Flattering Swimsuits, Starting at $18
We might earn a commission if you make a purchase through one of the links. The McClatchy Commerce Content team, which is independent from our newsroom, oversees this content. We've officially reached the end of May, which means Miami Swim Week is here (from May 28 through June 1)! Similar to New York Fashion Week, Miami Swim Week is all about showcasing trendy swimwear, resortwear and more. To celebrate, we rounded up a list of 13 stylish and flattering swimsuits that are all available on Amazon. From one-pieces to tankinis to rash guards, shop our top picks below. This Yonique two-piece swimsuit is so cute, you'll want to keep wearing it over and over again. It has a plunging V-neck top and ruched high-waisted bottoms that offer tummy control. And did we mention that it comes in 30 colors and patterns? This Charmo bikini has high-waisted bottoms that flatter your figure and a bold colorblock design that will make a style statement. Prefer a full coverage option? You can't go wrong with this Dokotoo tankini, which includes a tank top with removable padding and tummy control shorts. This Tempt Me one-piece has tie-knot shoulder straps and figure-flattering ruched detailing. One reviewer says it 'takes the cake' when it comes to modest and cute swimsuits. This Edelqual tankini offers just enough coverage while still being chic. The flowy, ruffled top flows right over your tummy and the ruched, high-waisted bottoms give a slimming effect. Who says you can't wear a dress while swimming? This Aqua Eve two-piece swim dress has a flowy silhouette that covers your tummy, plus an eye-catching twist top and shorts underneath. With over 7,400 five-star ratings, this B2prity Two-Piece Tankini has reviewers raving. The three-layered ruffled tank will turn heads and the slimming boyshorts are perfect for a modest look. Get two looks in one with this reversible Cupshe bikini that has unique braided back straps. One reviewer calls it the 'most flattering swimsuit [they've] ever worn!' Show some skin in this under-$20 BIKINX micro bikini, which has a triangle top and a high-cut bottom. Plus, you can grab it in 32 eye-catching colors and patterns. This Daci two-piece rash guard set is crafted with UPF 50+ protective fabric, which helps shield you from harmful UV rays. Reviewers call it the 'best ever,' raving about the cooling fabric and slimming effect. Athletes and avid swimmers will love swimming laps in this bright red Speedo one-piece, which has a compressive fit designed to increase performance. Best of all, it's on sale for 56% off! Don't forget a swimsuit coverup! This Anrabess option has a fun, boho-inspired look, and even though it's long-sleeved, the crochet pattern will still keep you cool.
Eater
16 hours ago
- Eater
On Instagram, Recipe-Sharing Automation Is Here to Stay
In December, the actress Sarah Snook, best known for playing the icy Shiv Roy on Succession , commented just one word on an Instagram post by NYT Cooking: 'Meatball.' And who could argue with that? Ali Slagle's Thai-inspired chicken meatball soup looked good, and getting the recipe required only that one leave the word 'meatball' in a comment. Do so, and a message from NYT Cooking pops into your inbox in seconds, offering a direct link to the recipe. This new format for engaging readers circumvents the clunky 'link in bio' maneuver, a workaround necessitated by the photo app's incompatibility with clickable links in captions and now considered the norm for publications and creators who use the platform to promote work that lives on other websites. Recently, a slew of new add-ons — including Manychat, which NYT Cooking uses — has allowed creators to automate messages and replies in this way. Food52 uses them too, as do recipe developers with unwieldy follower counts, like Yumna Jawad of Feel Good Foodie (4.7 million) and Deb Perelman of Smitten Kitchen (1.8 million). Influencers and creators have taken advantage of automation like this for a while, whether it's to send followers recipes or to share shoppable affiliate links. The effect is twofold, saving individuals from the tedious act of manually responding thousands of times and guaranteeing higher engagement since it prompts people to leave comments. These tools have become common enough to have instilled a habit: Some people now attempt to trigger chatbots even when a creator doesn't use them or instructs other steps for getting recipes. 'It doesn't actually matter as a content creator/pusher whether you use the bot thing — it's so standard now that people assume you do,' Perelman of Smitten Kitchen told me in a DM. For viewers, these tools are easier and less confusing than asking people to click the link in her bio. 'The actual conversation I had with myself was, 'Am I going to ignore hundreds of comments a day like this, or am I going to cough up $100/month(!) to give people what they want? With social media, the latter is my default — just make it easy; meet people where they are.' It's true: Recipe developers and creators use these tools because Instagram isn't the best place to share their recipes. Dropping instructions and measurements into a caption is easiest for viewers, but for creators, that means losing the potential revenue and the boosts to their engagement statistics that come from someone clicking through to their blog or signing up for their newsletter. However, since it isn't in Instagram's best interest to direct people to leave the app — or empower them to do so easily — the workarounds for highlighting off-platform content are annoying. Today, many people still don't understand their way around a 'link in bio,' even though the strategy has been in use since around 2018. Thus, recipe-sharing chatbots have emerged and taken hold. Do creators like them? Not necessarily. Do users? Begrudgingly. For the people who use them, these automation tools are a new necessary evil, just like being beholden to the whims of an algorithm. At best, these tools ensure that creator and commenter both get what they want. For one, that's a click; for the other, a recipe. At worst, they undermine the social nature of social media and depersonalize the experience of sharing food online. I went to Instagram — where I post pictures of food, pointedly without recipes — to ask food creators for their thoughts on these tools. The responses were overwhelmingly negative. 'Yes I hate it if that's strong enough of a sentiment,' said one. 'HATEEEEE,' said another. 'I HATE IT,' said yet another. Non-creators felt strongly enough that they had to write in too. Words that came up often were 'scammy' and 'desperate,' and some people resented them for being too obvious a play for engagement. Indeed, in one ad, which claims 'No Follow. No Freebies,' Manychat promotes that it allows creators to 'request a follow' before they 'give away content.' A common throughline was the idea of transactionality. 'On a deeper level, as a content creator who puts a lot of thought into how I create my recipes and corresponding content, I don't want people to simply think of me as a robotic recipe mill, constantly churning out recipes for consumption,' Lisa Lin, who runs the blog Healthy Nibbles, told me. 'An automated tool seems antithetical to that sentiment,' she added. This has long been the situation with food on social media. Get enough eyes on a picture of food online and you'll certainly become familiar with the 'recipe?' commenter. Not all pictures of food warrant a recipe, and not all people who post food are recipe developers; sometimes, the point is just to be proud of a nice lunch. Yet the 'recipe?' commenter sees no distinction between the professionalism of a published recipe meticulously shot and developed, and the individual's personhood, preserved and savored. At best, it's a well-meaning follower's detour into modest annoyance; at worst, it's the prelude to a total internet stranger becoming put out when a poster doesn't provide on-demand service, tailored to every need. In 2022, The New York Times 's Tejal Rao wrote of this phenomenon, coining it the 'endless torment of the 'recipe?' guy.' The core intentions of the ''recipe?' guy' are rarely bad: Isn't a desire to imitate a compliment? Yet their assumptions speak to a sense of entitlement around recipes and theto cooks for providing them. With one word, that request turns a shared appreciation of food into a transaction, regardless of whether its creator intended for it to be or if they even benefit at all financially. 'It's a way of treating the people who share their cooking online entirely as products. But I think it's also a way of becoming a bit less human,' Rao wrote. Indeed, this use of chatbots and automation tools only accelerates the normalization of treating people who share food online like robots themselves. Automation tools reward this behavior. They make it normal to drop a one-word comment to a stranger, like a caveman grunting a demand, without any effort toward etiquette or building a rapport. They reinforce the notion that creators must always provide, as well as the problematic sentiment that whatever we see on our screens should also be available for us to have. 'I've worked so hard to build a community,' said recipe developer and creator Erin Clarkson, known as @cloudykitchen. She chooses not to use automation tools, in part because she feels they detract from the conversational vibe she works to foster on her platforms. 'A chatbot destroys comment sections,' Clarkson said. That sentiment was echoed in the responses I got on Instagram, especially from non-creators. It used to be funny or helpful to read the comments, where people made jokes, shared their candid reactions and experiences, or asked clarifying questions. Now, as people seek to trigger auto-response tools, it's useless. We might see this as yet another example of enshittification: a once-social space optimized in favor of efficiency, but ultimately resulting in a worse experience for the people using the product. To Clarkson, these tools have also made readers 'even more lazy.' Clarkson says she regularly sees readers' assumptions that she uses them, even though she doesn't. She sees those presumptive comments another way: If these people can't bother to read the captions to figure that out, then they likely won't fare well with the level of detail on her blog . Everyone wants things instantly and easily, and recipes are no exception. Still, these tools remain a 'stopgap,' Lin said. Despite her ideological hesitation to tools that encourage robotic behavior from both creators and their audiences, the reality for her and most other recipe developers and food creators is that she 'primarily earns a living on a website outside of Instagram. At the end of the day, I need eyeballs on my website,' she said. Having now subscribed to one of these tools for several months, Lin has found that they're useful in getting people to visit her website. (Even when it comes to the established link-in-bio system, 'many, many people can't be bothered.') 'If Instagram would simply allow us to embed clickable links in our captions, we would not need this ridiculous workaround to deliver links to our audience,' Lin said. 'This automated recipe-sharing ecosystem wouldn't even need to exist. But I don't see Instagram developers changing their ways any time soon, so we're all stuck in this situation.' After hearing the malaise of social media users on all sides of the issue, I returned to the prompt that started it all. Committed to testing it out, I, like Snook, commented on that NYT Cooking post. Immediately, it felt silly — not just to comment 'meatball' publicly, but also to add to the mindless cacophony of requests and to masquerade as yet another someone who didn't bother to Google or search NYT Cooking. Afterward, I felt weirdly embarrassed: What friction was I really removing from my life by commenting? Sure, the recipe ended up in my inbox immediately, but then again, my mess of DMs is where useful information goes to die. The instant access didn't make me any more likely to make the recipe, and in fact, it would take me an awkwardly long time just to find the link in my inbox if I were in need of it while planning out dinner. I thought about all the recipes that have piled up in my saves on Instagram and in my screenshots folder. So many of them came to me so easily, offered up by way of too-knowing algorithms, and yet, I've never made most of them either. We now have access to so much information that we take its abundance — and the work that went into creating it — for granted. We see recipes as commodities that we are owed by virtue of us simply having seen them, even when we don't have any intention of following through. I thought about the technique that always works better for me anyway: just googling ingredients I have and then seeing how other people have already put them together. It makes me think a little more, of course, but especially in the age of AI, the most humanizing thing is to do a little of the work yourself — to have to think through a problem. I end up with something that's all mine; not something anyone willing to just comment 'meatball' can reproduce. The freshest news from the food world every day
New York Times
19 hours ago
- New York Times
Ex-Arsenal talent jailed for drug smuggling, who can beat Spain at World Cup?
The Athletic FC ⚽ is The Athletic's daily football (or soccer, if you prefer) newsletter. Sign up to receive it directly to your inbox. Hello. He once had Arsene Wenger purring. Now this former Arsenal forward is serving time for drug smuggling. On the way: The reason Jay Emmanuel-Thomas is now a former footballer is because of the story you're about to read. As recently as September of last year, he was playing out his days with Greenock Morton, a Scottish team on the outskirts of Glasgow. Then the police came knocking. That same month, Emmanuel-Thomas — best known as a product of Arsenal's academy — was arrested as part of a drugs bust and accused of smuggling cannabis with a street value of £600,000 ($814,000) into the UK. Yesterday, a court sentenced him to four years in prison. Aged 34, his name is tarred and his career is over, a sharp fall from grace complete. Advertisement It's many moons since mentions of Emmanuel-Thomas in dispatches were making ears prick at Arsenal and beyond. Ultimately, it didn't happen for him there and he soon became nomadic, passing through clubs in England, Scotland, Thailand and India. But he's still the guy Arsene Wenger once described as 'an unbelievable finisher' — so lethal and powerful that when he helped destroy Liverpool in the FA Youth Cup in 2009, Liverpool's players refused to believe he was young enough to be taking part in the competition. Why, then, did Emmanuel-Thomas embroil himself in the importation of narcotics, a crime his own barrister described as 'a catastrophic error of judgement', when, before this offence, he had been a law-abiding citizen his entire life? Danny Taylor was in court to find out. 'The most painful experience' By the time of his arrest, Emmanuel-Thomas was no longer earning big from football. His pay at Morton was £600 a week, before bonuses. The club terminated his six-month contract as soon as he was charged. Chelmsford Crown Court heard how he may have been tempted into criminality during his short time playing for Thai side PTT Rayong in 2019. The cannabis in question arrived on a plane from Bangkok. The court was also told that Emmanuel-Thomas enlisted two women — one of them his own partner at the time — to act as couriers, promising them £2,500 in cash and flying them business class via Dubai. The women were themselves charged by police, but the allegations against them were dropped after WhatsApp conversations showed they believed they were bringing gold back to the UK, rather than illegal drugs. Emmanuel-Thomas deleted his messages, threw away his mobile phone and, at first, denied all wrongdoing — before changing his tune and pleading guilty. The maximum sentence for cannabis importation in the UK is 14 years. He received four, although nine months of that sentence have already been served by him on remand. He called his conviction 'the most painful and eye-opening experience of my life'. Advertisement A father of two, he will re-emerge from prison before long, with no semblance of a career to cling to. As the judge told him, 'You will no longer be known for being a professional footballer. You will be known as a criminal, a professional footballer who threw it all away and put others at risk of imprisonment in pursuit of money.' The World Cup is rarely a foregone conclusion but, with the big kick-off in North America a little over 12 months away, is anybody looking beyond Spain? They're the European Championship holders, they've got Lamine Yamal running riot and they're different gravy. OK, their Nations League semi-final against France last night ended 5-4 in their favour, but I was packing up and heading to bed when they led 5-1 with 12 minutes to go. It was worth hanging on to see evidence (if any more was needed) of why Manchester City are so set on seducing France's Rayan Cherki. In the chaos of a frantic finish, he hammered in a beast of a volley (above) and plucked an assist right out of the Yamal playbook. These boys are the future, just like the Spanish, who face Cristiano Ronaldo's Portugal in Sunday's final. Our pals at The Pulse run a regular section entitled 'Hi, my name is…', where they introduce us to a prospect we haven't heard of (or not in great detail). Today, I'm pinching it for a footballer who is 32. Ravel Morrison won't need introducing to many of you, but he's been so far off the radar for so long that some readers might not be familiar. How gifted was he as a teenage midfielder at Manchester United? Sir Alex Ferguson explained it best when he said he'd never seen anybody better. Morrison displayed his talent with an iconic instep volley during an England Under-21 training session, below. Danny Taylor has interviewed Morrison for The Athletic and it's a great get because Morrison doesn't do much media. From Old Trafford to West Ham United, Lazio and now a second-division team in Dubai, he carried the reputation of being a bad boy and a big-time problem as his promise melted — a reputation he earned on occasions. Advertisement Aged 17, and just after his United debut, he was convicted of intimidating a witness in a robbery case. Negative headlines had a habit of coming for him. These days, however, he's on the straight and narrow, and aiming to represent Jamaica at next year's World Cup. Reading Danny's piece, the popular caricature of him becomes faintly ludicrous. Did he quit Lazio because of a lack of salad cream (a sandwich condiment in the UK)? Did he p**s in a former manager's fish pond? Did he complain about his digs at West Ham being haunted? No, no and no. The truth about Morrison was less likely to send a tweet viral, but where's the fun in that? (Selected games, kick-offs ET/UK time) Friday: UEFA World Cup qualifier Group I: Norway vs Italy, 2.45pm/7.45pm — Fox Sports, Fubo/Amazon Prime. Saturday: UEFA World Cup qualifier Group K: Andorra vs England, 2.45pm/7.45pm — Fox Sports, Fubo/ITV. International friendlies (all U.S. only): USMNT vs Turkey, 3.30pm — TNT, Peacock Premium, Fubo; Canada vs Ukraine, 3.30pm — OneSoccer; Mexico vs Switzerland, 4pm — Univision, VIX. MLS: DC United vs Chicago Fire, 7.30pm/12.30am — MLS Season Pass/Apple TV. Sunday: UEFA Nations League final: Portugal vs Spain, 3pm/8pm — Fox, Fubo/ITV. MLS: LAFC vs Sporting Kansas City; Vancouver Whitecaps vs Seattle Sounders — both 9pm/2am and MLS Season Pass/Apple TV. Everyone makes mistakes, even your loyal scribes at TAFC. So we're about to throw stones from a glass house. But here's a howler of epic proportions from Finland. This week, the manager of Finland's women's team, Outi Saarinen, named her squad for a Nations League match against Serbia. She meant to include defender Nanne Ruuskanen but absent-mindedly filled in the teamsheet with the name of Stina Ruuskanen — a 51-year-old whose last international appearance for Finland came almost 30 years ago. Advertisement The error was picked up too late to be changed, leaving Nanne to kick her heels, while Stina joked to a local paper: 'I'm definitely ready if the call comes.' If the squad had anything about them, they'll have worn Stina Ruuskanen face masks to the next training session. (Top photo by)
