Houseplant clinic: should I mist my plants or not?
Some sources recommend misting houseplants, while others strongly advise against it. Now I'm confused.
Diagnosis
Misting is a common practice intended to increase humidity, replicating the rainforest environments from where many of our houseplants originate. While this is beneficial, misting is not a one-spray-fits-all solution.
Prescription
If your houseplant thrives in high humidity (such as ferns, calatheas and peace lilies), gently misting its leaves with room-temperature water can promote healthy growth. However, for plants from dry habitats, such as cacti and succulents, misting can lead to problems such as fungal diseases and leaf rot. Instead, to safely increase humidity for only some plants, pebble trays filled with water beneath pots, grouping plants or a humidifier nearby are all excellent ways to increase ambient humidity in a localised way.
Prevention
Take time to research your plants' requirements. If you really want to take things seriously, invest in a hygrometer to accurately monitor humidity levels in your home.
Got a plant dilemma? Email saturday@theguardian.com with 'Houseplant clinic' in the subject line
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Using Generative AI for therapy might feel like a lifeline – but there's danger in seeking certainty in a chatbot
Tran* sat across from me, phone in hand, scrolling. 'I just wanted to make sure I didn't say the wrong thing,' he explained, referring to a recent disagreement with his partner. 'So I asked ChatGPT what I should say.' He read the chatbot-generated message aloud. It was articulate, logical and composed – almost too composed. It didn't sound like Tran. And it definitely didn't sound like someone in the middle of a complex, emotional conversation about the future of a long-term relationship. It also did not mention anywhere some of Tran's contributing behaviours to the relationship strain that Tran and I had been discussing. Like many others I've seen in therapy recently, Tran had turned to AI in a moment of crisis. Under immense pressure at work and facing uncertainty in his relationship, he'd downloaded ChatGPT on his phone 'just to try it out'. What began as a curiosity soon became a daily habit, asking questions, drafting texts, and even seeking reassurance about his own feelings. The more Tran used it, the more he began to second-guess himself in social situations, turning to the model for guidance before responding to colleagues or loved ones. He felt strangely comforted, like 'no one knew me better'. His partner, on the other hand, began to feel like she was talking to someone else entirely. ChatGPT and other generative AI models present a tempting accessory, or even alternative, to traditional therapy. They're often free, available 24/7 and can offer customised, detailed responses in real time. When you're overwhelmed, sleepless and desperate to make sense of a messy situation, typing a few sentences into a chatbot and getting back what feels like sage advice can be very appealing. But as a psychologist, I'm growing increasingly concerned about what I'm seeing in the clinic; a silent shift in how people are processing distress and a growing reliance on artificial intelligence in place of human connection and therapeutic support. AI might feel like a lifeline when services are overstretched – and make no mistake, services are overstretched. Globally, in 2019 one in eight people were living with a mental illness and we face a dire shortage of trained mental health professionals. In Australia, there has been a growing mental health workforce shortage that is impacting access to trained professionals. Clinician time is one of the scarcest resources in healthcare. It's understandable (even expected) that people are looking for alternatives. Turning to a chatbot for emotional support isn't without risk however, especially when the lines between advice, reassurance and emotional dependence become blurred. Many psychologists, myself included, now encourage clients to build boundaries around their use of ChatGPT and similar tools. Its seductive 'always-on' availability and friendly tone can unintentionally reinforce unhelpful behaviours, especially for people with anxiety, OCD or trauma-related issues. Reassurance-seeking, for example, is a key feature in OCD and ChatGPT, by design, provides reassurance in abundance. It never asks why you're asking again. It never challenges avoidance. It never says, 'let's sit with this feeling for a moment, and practice the skills we have been working on'. Tran often reworded prompts until the model gave him an answer that 'felt right'. But this constant tailoring meant he wasn't just seeking clarity; he was outsourcing emotional processing. Instead of learning to tolerate distress or explore nuance, he sought AI-generated certainty. Over time, that made it harder for him to trust his own instincts. Beyond psychological concerns, there are real ethical issues. Information shared with ChatGPT isn't protected by the same confidentiality standards as registered Ahpra professionals. Although OpenAI states that data from users is not used to train its models unless permission is given, the sheer volume of fine print in user agreements often goes unread. Users may not realise how their inputs can be stored, analysed and potentially reused. There's also the risk of harmful or false information. These large language models are autoregressive; they predict the next word based on previous patterns. This probabilistic process can lead to 'hallucinations', confident, polished answers that are completely untrue. AI also reflects the biases embedded in its training data. Research shows that generative models can perpetuate and even amplify gender, racial and disability-based stereotypes – not intentionally, but unavoidably. Human therapists also possess clinical skills; we notice when a client's voice trembles, or when their silence might say more than words. This isn't to say AI can't have a place. Like many technological advancements before it, generative AI is here to stay. It may offer useful summaries, psycho-educational content or even support in regions where access to mental health professionals is severely limited. But it must be used carefully, and never as a replacement for relational, regulated care. Tran wasn't wrong to seek help. His instincts to make sense of distress and to communicate more thoughtfully were logical. However, leaning so heavily on to AI meant that his skill development suffered. His partner began noticing a strange detachment in his messages. 'It just didn't sound like you', she later told him. It turned out: it wasn't. She also became frustrated about the lack of accountability in his correspondence to her and this caused more relational friction and communication issues between them. As Tran and I worked together in therapy, we explored what led him to seek certainty in a chatbot. We unpacked his fears of disappointing others, his discomfort with emotional conflict and his belief that perfect words might prevent pain. Over time, he began writing his own responses, sometimes messy, sometimes unsure, but authentically his. Good therapy is relational. It thrives on imperfection, nuance and slow discovery. It involves pattern recognition, accountability and the kind of discomfort that leads to lasting change. A therapist doesn't just answer; they ask and they challenge. They hold space, offer reflection and walk with you, while also offering up an uncomfortable mirror. For Tran, the shift wasn't just about limiting his use of ChatGPT; it was about reclaiming his own voice. In the end, he didn't need a perfect response. He needed to believe that he could navigate life's messiness with curiosity, courage and care – not perfect scripts. Name and identifying details changed to protect client confidentiality Carly Dober is a psychologist living and working in Naarm/Melbourne In Australia, support is available at Beyond Blue on 1300 22 4636, Lifeline on 13 11 14, and at MensLine on 1300 789 978. In the UK, the charity Mind is available on 0300 123 3393 and Childline on 0800 1111. In the US, call or text Mental Health America at 988 or chat
The National
3 hours ago
- The National
It's clear that the SNP must move further to the left
That was just so generous and a reflection of how The National treats its loyal readers. Also, a big 'thank you' to the very helpful Laura Webster who returned my voicemail message, and was keen to help, although by that point a nice woman at subscriptions had dealt with my query. Thanks Laura though for getting back to me. Dae ye think The Guardian wid dae that? Aye right! Now for my letter ... Last week, STV News did a piece about how younger adults in Scotland were now falling into poorer health earlier than previously. The esteemed Professor Devi Sridhar (below) of the University of Edinburgh Medical School stated: 'Cancers, for example, are much higher in younger people compared to previous generations, and that's diet, it's sedentary behaviour, relating to air pollution, also stress, mental health and anxiety. Much of it, I would say, is down to where you live, your community, what you have access to, what is affordable, and that is where we see inequality playing a part too.' If that is Devi's conclusions, that's mair than guid enough fur me! Then a map of Scotland was put up, showing levels of life expectancy in different parts of oor great country. What it showed by a country mile is that if you are determined not to keel over any time soon, do everything you can to move to and live in Orkney! Average life expectancy there for guys is 70.4 years and for women, 72.1. You might think that's not that brilliant, but hang on! The next best area for folk that stick aroond before they croak is Perth and Kinross at 65.4/66.6 (aye, youse women nearly always outlive us guys!). Then it's [[Edinburgh]], slightly lower – 64.6 / 65.8 – then a dramatic dip to Glasgow – 56.8 / 57.5. The programme didn't show every area of Scotland, like Fife, for example, where I live, or the Scottish Borders where I was born and raised. It did, however, show the two worst areas for life expectancy in Scotland: North Lanarkshire – 53.2 / 52.5 – and North Ayrshire, where the guys are almost neck and neck with the women at 52.6 / 52.5. Among these statistics, clearly Orkney is an outlier. However, as someone that lives in the central belt of Scotland, I don't want to make any assumptions about why this might be, due to the risk of attracting the ire of The National's brilliant very ain Rhoda Meek who lives on Tiree, and knows almost everything there is to know about island life. Mess wi Rhoda at yer peril, I reckon! So, Rhoda, can ye explain ... pretty please? Seriously, the gulf in the life expectancy between Perth and Kinross and Edinburgh compared to North Lanarkshire and North Ayrshire, as well as Glasgow, to a lesser extent, is grotesque! Fur me, that's clearly doon tae dosh or the lack of! The scary thing is that I reckon these discrepancies would be even worse if it wasn't for the Scottish Government's mitigation policies like the Scottish Child Payment, free prescriptions and many more including our tax rates which benefit those on lower incomes. In other words, aw the stuff the Yoon press totally ignores! These statistics surely mean the SNP need tae move mair tae the left as no doubt the formidable Mhairi Black, who has regrettably recently left the party, would approve of. Forget the rich and powerful – they will vote for the Tories or Reform UK. However, Labour have totally lost their way and no longer do 'Labour' stuff! Between now and May 2026, surely the SNP have to move heaven and earth to prise those folk that were back in the day Labour voters, but moved to the SNP in their droves (like me), only to fairly recently get disillusioned and move back to Labour (unlike me!). Hell, just tell them ye will make them live longer for god's sake! Ivor Telfer Dalgety Bay, Fife I WAS born in post-war West Germany, in the decade following the murder of six million Jews in Europe. At the time, my father was a captain in the US Army providing dental care at an American base in the period following Marshall Plan reconstruction. My late uncle, as a teenaged medic, was wounded fighting the Nazis, bearing the scars and the trauma of what he had experienced throughout a lifetime of raising a family and caring for his cancer patients in Boston. My maternal grandmother's family fled the Tsarist pogroms against Russian Jews, eventually finding refuge in Massachusetts. My grandson's maternal great grandmother was saved from Auschwitz through the intercession of Chiune Sugihara, the Japanese diplomat stationed in Lithuania, who provided transit visas to thousands of Polish Jews. I grew up in a family, faith and culture that respected the human rights of all people. For over one year, nine months, three weeks, Israel – with the support of presidents Biden and Trump, the Republican and Democratic parties, and many Christian and Jewish organisations – has laid siege to the civilian population of the Gaza territory, inflicting greater net destruction than was done to German cities like Hamburg in the Second World War. According to Unicef, more than 50,000 children have already been wounded or killed during the conflict. The United States is underwriting a government that is engaged in the deliberate starvation of children. Since the time of Abraham, millennia ago, the Jewish people have never committed crimes on this scale; indeed, there are no historical comparisons. The scale of destruction is biblical; in the totality of Jewish history, the only comparable 'reductions' of cities are to be found in the Torah. Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu, his ruling coalition and the people of Israel are responsible for this atrocity; but Americans and the Jewish diaspora will forever be remembered for our moral abdication. The butchers of Hamas may have precipitated the war with the slaughter, rape and abductions of October 7, but the Jewish state has moral agency in what followed – which is a 21st-century genocide. The genocide of one people does not justify the genocide of another; that course leads only to endless cycles of barbarity. Israel was, after all, founded as a safe haven for Jewish people in the aftermath of the Holocaust. Shortly after the war broke out, I told my cousin, an emergency physician whose father it was who had fought the Nazis, that it seemed to me that a vast number of our fellow Americans, Jews and the Israeli people had lost their moral compasses. I added, as the war continued, that the cruelly cynical Netanyahu and Hamas leadership would solve the hostage crisis with body bags. Hamas and Netanyahu have continued the war because it sustains their power. I was a kibbutz volunteer in Israel the summer before the Yom Kippur War of 1973. PM Golda Meir, who brilliantly led the defence of her country, desisted from destroying the retreating Egyptian Third Army, in interest of winning the peace that she negotiated with Anwar Sadat. I grew up with a respect for Israel's history of righteous self-defence. Judaism and the Jewish people have been betrayed by what has transpired in the past 21 months. The Gaza War has divided the Jewish community in the United States, as well as the Democratic base, and it was a significant factor in the re-election of President Trump. Here in high desert community of Santa Fe, the small Jewish community is a house divided. These acts of inhumanity are happening on our watch, with our money and with the weapons we have provided. What makes matters worse – and far more complicated – is that embedded within the legitimate peace movement in the United States are antisemites and people who don't believe in Israel's right to exist. I will not march alongside masked people calling for the destruction of the Jewish state. I believe, absolutely, in Israel and Palestine's rights to exist as sovereign states The American people, even in this polarised time, largely support three things: The complete disclosure of the Epstein investigation; the defence of Ukraine, and the end to the blockade of humanitarian relief to [[Gaza]] and the release of surviving hostages. Therein lies the potential for a bipartisan consensus for action. The MAGA movement claims to be the champion of children's welfare; the rights of the unborn; the salvation of children from paedophile conspiracies. Let them demonstrate their compassion. Donald Trump, on the other hand, is seemingly incapable of making an unambiguous moral decision on [[Gaza]]. What is happening now we will never live down. All military aid to Israel must be suspended immediately, the siege lifted and the massive flow of food and medical supplies initiated. [[Palestine]] should be universally recognised as a sovereign nation, and negotiations leading to a two-state solution and a durable peace, begun in earnest under the aegis of regional and Nato powers and the United Nations. The collapse of talks in Doha underscores the fact that Netanyahu and Hamas have little incentive to end the war and that US president Donald Trump is not an honest broker in these negotiations, having publicly discussed the removal of Palestinians from the territory and its redevelopment for beachfront property. Most recently, he advised Netanyahu to 'finish the job' in Gaza. The US, Israel and Palestine are led by unreliable narrators, whose interests lie not in the truth, but the perpetuation of their power – at any expense. Death by starvation is agonising torture; and even if and when adequate nutrition begins to reach Gazans, the long-term health consequences for the survivors include increased morbidity and mortality, and cognitive and immune disorders. While we will never wash our hands of these stains, we can act now to spare innocents further unimaginable suffering and death. In Gaza, dying children are telling their parents that they want to be in a heaven where there is food. Eric Radack Santa Fe, New Mexico AS regards the vaunted two-state solution for Palestine, what I would like to know is just exactly where the State of Palestine would be. If anyone imagines that Israel will give up and withdraw from the 60% of the West Bank it has already illegally occupied and settled or the Golan Heights or other annexed territories in the region they either deliberately ignore or are ignorant of the history of Israeli expansionism and its stated aims or are utterly deluded. David J Crawford Glasgow
The Independent
6 hours ago
- The Independent
Undeclared milk leads to US-wide butter recall
A voluntary recall has been issued for over 64,000 pounds of Bunge North America's NH European Style Butter Blend due to undeclared milk, a common allergen. The recall was initiated on 14 July and classified as a Class II recall by the FDA. The affected butter was distributed to 12 US centres and one in the Dominican Republic. This butter recall is part of a series of recent food and drink issues, including High Noon Vodka Seltzer being recalled as it was mislabeled as non-alcoholic energy drinks. Consumers are advised to check affected products and dispose of or return them.
