
Seven priests face tribunal over church sex abuse scandal
A bishop who served as an assistant to the King during the coronation is one of seven priests facing charges in front of a church tribunal over the scandal that led to the downfall of Justin Welby, the former Archbishop of Canterbury.
The Right Rev Paul Butler, who retired last year as Bishop of Durham, the church's fourth most senior role, will face a disciplinary tribunal alongside six other members of the clergy.
Lord Carey of Clifton, a former Archbishop of Canterbury, will not face legal action. Carey, who served as archbishop from 1991 to 2002, had been named in February among ten priests who could face disciplinary charges under the clergy discipline measure (CDM).
They all faced some degree of criticism within a damning report by the social worker Keith Makin into the Church of England's failure to stop John Smyth, a Christian barrister, from abusing boys over several decades.
The criticisms made of Welby in the report, including that he should have been more active in checking that the police were investigating the allegations, led to him announcing his resignation as Archbishop of Canterbury last November, and stepping down in January this year.
• Justin Welby: I forgive John Smyth but it is not me he abused
The Church of England has now confirmed that seven of the ten priests will face a disciplinary tribunal. These include the Rev Andrew Cornes, a General Synod member who had previously been a candidate to sit on the committee that will choose the next archbishop of Canterbury.
The complaints against them were technically 'out of time', but an independent panel has assessed each and said that seven can go ahead.
Carey, however, is among three priests who will face no further action. The Makin report alleged that Carey was sent a memo about Smyth's abuses while he was principal of Trinity Theological College in the early 1980s, but said that Carey 'denies seeing it'. He has maintained his denial of ever seeing such a memo.
Carey has already relinquished his permission to serve as a priest during his retirement. He cited his age, but has faced multiple criticisms over his handling of abuse allegations in the past.
He said on Thursday morning: 'After what has been a gruelling and punishing process, brought upon me by the CofE for myself and my family, after 63 years of ministry, I welcome the decision of the president of tribunals in standing up for principles of integrity rather than expediency. I am absolutely certain that I received no information in 1983-4 which could have alerted me to John Smyth's terrible crimes against young men and boys. The president's verdict is a welcome piece of news after the flawed Makin report.'
In 2015 Butler was president of the Scripture Union, and the Rev Tim Hastie-Smith, who is also facing a disciplinary charge, was director. The union had employed some staff at the camps where Smyth worked in the 1970s and 1980s.
Butler, who was also the church's lead bishop for safeguarding, and Hastie-Smith discussed Smyth in 2015 after allegations had come to light. However, Butler said that he was 'not provided with any detailed information about the abuse'. The report said they could have shared correspondence they received about Smyth more widely.
The other priests who will now face a tribunal include the Rev Roger Combes, the retired Archdeacon of Horsham, who was one of a small group who was given an explosive report about Smyth's abuse in 1982 but said that he did not know the seriousness of the allegations until much later.
The Rev Sue Colman is alleged to have been aware of allegations against Smyth before she was ordained, but has said she 'did not know the full details'.
The Rev Sue Colman
MAYOR OF BASINGSTOKE AND DEANE/FACEBOOK
The Rev Nick Stott was allegedly advised not to join Smyth in Zimbabwe but still went, allegedly witnessing 'surprising' behaviour at his camps. He was reportedly told of 'an issue' with Smyth but said he 'was not told any details'.
The Rev John Woolmer led the Christian Forum at Winchester College, where he was a teacher. He was allegedly told by a student in 1981 or 1982 that they were worried about something 'very serious which involved abuse'. The report found that he 'did not pursue this and has reported that he has regretted that since'.
Carey, the Rev Paul Perkin and the Rev Hugh Palmer will face no further action.
If the tribunals rule against them, those facing charges could face punishments ranging from a rebuke to a life prohibition from ministry. The church is reintroducing the power to 'defrock' a priest, but this change will not be in force in time to apply to them.
A church spokeswoman said: 'Victims and survivors and all those criticised in the Makin review have been informed and support offered. The national safeguarding team will make no further comment on these cases whilst the CDM proceedings are under way.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


BBC News
42 minutes ago
- BBC News
Man dies after being hit by van in Scarborough
A man has died after being hit by a van outside a church in North incident took place outside the Jehovah's Witness Church at the junction of Westbourne Park with Seamer Road, in Scarborough, at around 09:25 BST on man, aged in his 80s, was taken to hospital, but has since Yorkshire Police said the driver of the silver Volkswagen Transporter van will be interviewed, but anyone with any information or dashcam footage is asked to get in touch. Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.


Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
EXCLUSIVE How YOU could find yourself wrongly accused of 'pump and dash' and hit with a £60 fine - as alleged petrol thefts hit all-time high
Petrol thefts have soared to an all-time high, figures suggest. MailOnline can reveal that 110,000 charges for alleged 'pump and dash' thefts were issued by two major fuel security firms last year. This marks a 20-fold rise in just six years. Industry bigwigs insist there has been genuine increase in drivers fleeing forecourts without paying, or 'bilking', especially in the wake of the cost of living crisis. Yet drivers say they have been incorrectly stung with threatening letters demanding hefty 'admin fees' on top of their supposedly unpaid petrol or diesel. In an attempt to recoup the costs of stolen fuel for petrol stations, many of which are independently owned, Forecourt Eye and British Oil Security Syndicate (BOSS) scan forecourts with numberplate-recognition technology. The two companies work with hundreds of filling sites and are considered among the biggest in the sector. Between the duo, they fired off nearly 113,000 requests to the DVLA for driver details last year. This is up from around 5,500 in 2018, according to data MailOnline obtained from the DVLA through Freedom of Information. Firms only request such data, which costs £2.50 a time and includes the car owner's name and address, if they intend to recover costs for non-payment of fuel. As well as seeking to recuperate the alleged unpaid fuel, companies may slap on their own admin fees. Forecourt Eye bolts on a £60 add-on. Drivers may feel pressured into paying up, even if they already forked out at the time. Some claim to have been threatened with being banned from forecourts up and down the country. There are several ways motorists can wrongly be accused of a 'pump and dash'. For example, if your card was declined and neither you nor the cashier noticed before you drove off, you are likely to be sent a demand. If a criminal has cloned your plates and genuinely steals petrol, you could also be on the hook for any fuel they have stolen. Criminal gangs have also been known to use entirely fake plates to dodge paying for fuel. Drivers also risk being falsely accused of bilking if a cashier selected the wrong pump (or failed to select one at all) when totting up your bill. If this happened, it would mean your fuel was technically never paid for, even if you paid for someone else's. This is the equivalent of a supermarket cashier failing to scan an item at checkout. Chris Mullen, for example, was accused of not paying £7.80 for petrol – even though he was driving a diesel car and filled up £30 worth of fuel. Despite fighting the claim from Forecourt Eye, thought to be caused by staff error, the 63-year-old from Stalham, Norfolk, said the firm 'insisted this was the case'. He was slapped with a £60 admin charge on top of the petrol he allegedly owed. After appealing, Tesco did issue a refund and an apology to him as well as a £10 gift card, which the motorist branded 'something of an insult'. Tesco told the Great Yarmouth Mercury that its processes were 'regularly reviewed' with regular meetings and new staff training to 'prevent errors from occurring'. Social media and forums are littered with similar stories of motorists claiming to have been falsely accused of driving off without paying. MailOnline's analysis can't prove genuine thefts have risen, it only shows that reports have gone up. Police data, however, suggests more than 27,000 alleged thefts occurred last year, in line with levels in 2020. About 95 per cent of cases are canned with no suspect being identified. Cops themselves moan they have 'finite resources' to probe suspected thefts. The Petrol Retailers Association, whose members run two-thirds of forecourts, says bilking robs them of around £100million a year. Petrol stations themselves have resorted to shaming 'pump and dashers' online in a bid to claw back the stolen fuel. One forecourt in Hythe, Kent, last summer shared CCTV footage of a blue car filling up with £120 of petrol before the driver got straight back into his vehicle and casually zoomed off without attempting to pay. Owner Sutha Hari, 49, claimed she wasn't going to bother alerting the police because 'nothing ever comes of it'. While there is no specific offence code for robbing from fuel pumps, it falls under the 'making off without payment' umbrella. It also covers restaurant 'dine and dashers', as well as people who make off without paying taxi drivers at the end of journeys. Thieves can be jailed for up to two years. Experts say petrol theft pushes up prices for law-abiding motorists. Steve Gooding, director of the RAC Foundation, said: 'It would be tempting to suspect that the cost-of-living crisis is pushing normally law-abiding people into committing this type of offence, but that would be an insult to the vast majority of people who continue to obey the law whatever their circumstances. 'Repeat criminals might well be pushing their luck more than ever because they believe other pressures on the police are such that they'll get away with it. 'Drive-offs might be seen as relatively low-level crimes in the grand scheme of things but they are corrosive to society, damaging to businesses and ultimately push up pump prices for law-abiding motorists and riders. 'More is being done to prevent these crimes through adoption of better surveillance systems and pay-at-pump options, but the numbers suggest the problem has been getting worse, with tens of thousands of drive-away fuel thefts each year. 'Those tempted to refuel without paying need to feel there is a real threat of being caught and punished.'


The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review
It comes as the struggle between the Treasury and Angela Rayner 's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government over its budget continues, just days before Ms Reeves is set to outline the spending plans until the next election on Wednesday. With no agreement having been reached on housing, the chief executive of one of Britain's largest housing associations has raised the alarm that of a 'cliff edge' over building more homes – which means money is set to run out by 2026. The warning from Fiona Fletcher-Smith, chief executive of L&Q and until last week chair of the G15 group of London housing associations, comes as the Local Government Association (LGA) has warned that 51 per cent of councils are now running deficits on their housing budgets. Homeless charities are also warning of an impending crisis with new supply unable to keep up with increasing demand for social housing. Crisis has pointed out that over the past 10 years there has been a net loss of more than 180,000 social homes in England. Currently, 1.33 million households in England are currently stuck on council waiting lists for a social home. Ms Fletcher-Smith explained that the problem began with George Osborne's austerity budgets in 2010 when he slashed 63 per cent of the capital budget to build new homes. She said he then 'welched' on a deal to allow them to make up for the loss by charging CPI inflation plus 1 per cent in rent. which housing associations and councils now want restored for a decade. This will allow them to borrow money to build as it comes through as guaranteed income. The cumulative effect now means that housing associations no longer have the funds to build projects. Ms Fletcher-Smith said: 'Housing decisions are so long, it's not just planning permission, you've got to get all utilities, everything else lined up to build. It's a five to seven years to run in to build housing. We could see from our own predictions, we were just going to go off cliff edge, by 2025/2026.' The sector is also still struggling with the impact of the Grenfell fire tragedy in 2017, with thousands of homes now subject to problems with cladding which is costing them £2.6bn in London alone. In London alone, £4 million a month is being spent on 'keeping people in temporary accommodation' because homes with cladding are too dangerous to return to and clogged courts mean legal cases to fix the problem are taking years. Ms Fletcher-Smith also noted that the 'combination of Brexit, Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine' has hit the sector not least with inflation which saw building materials go up as much as 30 per cent well above the 11 per cent peak of the headline rate. There are now fears that Ms Reeves and the Treasury will force cuts to the housing budget to balance the books as the chancellor seeks to ringfence health spending, increase defence to 2.5 per cent of GDP and water down proposals on benefit cuts as well as U-turn on ending the winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The deputy prime minister is leading a charge to protect budgets and instead push for a series of wealth taxes on big corporations and millionaires. But this has been resisted by Ms Reeves. However, the fears over housing are shared by homeless charities who are calling for 90,000 new social housing homes to be built per year. Matt Downie, chief executive of Crisis, said: 'This spending review is an opportunity for significant investment to start to see homelessness levels come down. 'Small tweaks aren't enough to fix the problems we face.' Mairi MacRae, director of policy and campaigns at Shelter, said: 'With homelessness at a record high and councils spending huge chunks of their budgets just to keep families off the streets, now is the time to invest in building social rent homes, not cut back." The issue is also vexing Labour backbenchers looking at the party's slide in the polls. One Labour MP said cuts in this area would cause upset among backbenchers, especially those with seats in areas with councils that are already on the verge of collapse. Another pointed out that Labour's flagship housing pledge 'means nothing if the current stock of social housing suffers" as a result of cuts. The government provides financial support to local authorities for social housing provision, including funding for new builds, repairs, and improvements. Commenting on the finding that 51 per cent of councils running a deficit with housing, the LGA warned: 'These trends are not sustainable. There is a growing risk to the financial sustainability of some councils' HRAs, and revenue pressures in councils' HRAs are now being passed directly into their HRA capital programmes.' In the Autumn Statement, the government announced over £5 billion total housing investment in 2025/26 to boost supply, including a £500m extension to the current Affordable Homes Programme which runs out in 2026. At the Spring Statement, the government announced a down payment of £2bn for a successor programme. To make it cheaper for councils to finance new development, the government has extended the preferential borrowing rate available for council house building from the Public Works Loan Board until the end of 2025/26.