Long Covid scheme extended after court recommendation
At that point, anyone remaining on the scheme should transition to the Public Service Sick Leave Scheme, the court said.
Minister for Health Jennifer Carroll MacNeill said she fully supports the decision and will now move to ensure the scheme is extended as per the Labour Court recommendation.
Earlier in the Dáil, the Minister said the special scheme would finish at the end of June.
Minister Carroll MacNeill said that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was clear in June 2024 that that was the final extension, with the scheme originally due to end at the end of this month.
The Government said 159 Health Service Executive and Section 38 organisation staff are currently on the scheme and in receipt of full pay.
The scheme was put in place in 2022.
Speaking before the Labour Court made its recommendation, Labour Party spokesperson on health Marie Sherlock said the response from Government so far had been "disrespectful and downright degrading to those who gave so much and risked so much at a time of such uncertainty and risk for this country".
Deputy Sherlock said that these patients contracted long Covid in the workplace, and said "the refusal to extend this scheme" had reflected "a shocking lack of empathy and indeed respect for these workers".
She said people had described the scheme as "a lifeline".
Minister Carroll MacNeill said there was no intention not to be empathetic.
Ms Carroll MacNeill said that health workers had gone beyond the call of duty, particularly during the early days of the pandemic, when the protections were not as strong as they came to be and "when the risk was extraordinarily great".
She said a temporary scheme was put in place for 12 months in 2022, and believed there were 159 people in receipt of full pay for the past five years, and that this scheme had been updated four times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Journal
7 hours ago
- The Journal
Covid-19 handwashing messaging may have worsened symptoms for people with OCD
RESEARCHERS ARE LOOKING into how messaging around handwashing during Covid-19 impacted people with obsessive-compulsive disorder. A team at Trinity College Dublin have launched a study on handwashing, which it says is an 'under-researched' part of a 'hidden mental health issue' that impacts around three in every 100 people living in Ireland. Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a mental health condition characterised by unwanted thoughts or obsessions, and repetitive behaviours or compulsions, that individuals feel driven to perform, often to relieve fear and anxiety. Lead researcher Róisín Cunningham said: 'Handwashing became a global ritual during the Covid-19 pandemic. But for some people, it was already a distressing and hidden struggle that quietly affected their daily life.' She told The Journal that the most common behaviour people with OCD live with is compulsive checking, but contamination OCD, which is a fear of contamination and can involve repeated handwashing, impacts up to 16% of people with OCD. 'For these people, handwashing becomes repetitive, time consuming, and difficult to control. It can significantly affect daily functioning and mental wellbeing, yet it is rarely spoken about openly,' she said. Advertisement Signage on a church gate in Letterkenny, Co Donegal, reminding visitors of the need to social distance and sanitise hands if they wish to visit the church. Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo To receive an OCD diagnosis in Ireland, at least one hour of the day must be spent on compulsions, but Cunningham said some people with OCD spend significantly longer than this and live with obsessive thoughts throughout the day. She said the constant messaging around handwashing during the pandemic negatively impacted people with 'pre-existing fears' around contamination, but the specific experiences of compulsive handwashing and how the behaviour is managed are still not understood. 'It put handwashing into the spotlight, and blurred the line between hygiene and compulsion,' she said, adding that five years after the pandemic started, this impact is still affecting people's lives. She said OCD is little spoken about and often not understood. 'OCD can definitely be misunderstood or easily dismissed as 'you like things to be tidy'. It's much more than that, it's debilitating,' she said. She said that some people with the condition do not have a diagnosis due to long waiting list times, mental health stigma and a fear of no longer performing compulsions. 'People engage in compulsions to relieve anxiety, so it can be frightening to give up the thing that makes them feel safe', she added. Adults aged 25 and over are invited to take part in the study, which involves three confidential one-to-one interviews. A formal diagnosis of OCD is not required. For people struggling with OCD symptoms, Cunningham recommends discussing support options with a GP. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Tony Holohan will not run for president to protect family from campaign ‘abuse'
Former chief medical officer Tony Holohan has announced he will not now seek a nomination to run for the presidency because he wants to protect his family from the 'personal abuse' of a campaign. Prof Holohan said he could not expose his family to 'distress, criticism or abuse at a time when we are all still rebuilding our lives'. He had been strongly considering trying to enter this year's presidential race, after a poll commissioned by his supporters last week put him at 15 per cent. But in a statement to The Irish Times, Prof Holohan said that, 'after a lot of careful consideration and reflection, I have decided not to seek a nomination to contest the election'. READ MORE 'While a number of different factors have influenced my decision, my overriding consideration has been my wish to protect my family from the kind of personal abuse which is becoming increasingly normalised in Irish politics generally and in presidential elections in particular,' he said. 'I understand the very tough nature of modern politics and, while I am more than capable of defending my reputation and the decisions which I have taken over a long career during challenging times in public service, my family is not. I cannot now expose them to further distress, criticism or abuse at a time when we are all still rebuilding our lives.' [ Covid, CervicalCheck and the Trinity job: questions for Tony Holohan if he launches a presidential run Opens in new window ] Prof Holohan said he 'earnestly' hopes the upcoming campaign will be marked by 'civilised and respectful debate'. He wished the next president success, and said they will have his 'full support'. Meanwhile, Fine Gael will meet on Monday to consider the presidential election campaign as support grows inside and outside of the party for Heather Humphreys to run. The former minister has said she is giving the matter ' very serious consideration '. She had ruled out the possibility in May. Ms Humphreys, who did not contest last year's general election, has emerged as the favourite to replace former MEP Mairead McGuinness , who on Thursday announced she was stepping down as the Fine Gael candidate on health grounds . [ Can you have too much democracy? Opens in new window ] A number of Independent politicians have come out in support of Ms Humphreys running to succeed Michael D Higgins . Ministers of State Michael Healy-Rae , Noel Grealish and Seán Canney have said they would support her candidacy, noting her 'broad' appeal and ability to 'bring a lot of people together'. Ms Humphreys is also understood to be the preferred candidate for a number of senior Fine Gael ministers. Fine Gael MEP Seán Kelly , a former GAA president, on Saturday said he was weighing up his options about seeking the party's nomination after this week's news about Ms McGuinness. He said last month that he would not run, describing it as the 'most difficult decision' of his political life, but on Saturday told Newstalk 'the goalposts have changed'. Mr Kelly said the discussion within Fine Gael on who it would now run as its candidate 'hasn't started really' out of respect for Ms McGuinness. 'I think next week will be time enough to reflect properly on that and take action. There's no rush,' he added. Fine Gael MEP Regina Doherty, a member of the national executive, said there should be a contest if Mr Kelly and Ms Humphreys both put their names forward.
Irish Examiner
14 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
School meals fuss throws the baby out with the bathwater
As the summer draws to a close and back-to-school looms in the horizon, parents will no longer have to compete in the annual back-to-school photography Olympics of perfectly curated lunch boxes as all primary school kids can now avail of the free hot meals scheme. However, 350 new schools due to join the scheme will be put on hold due to proposed new rules from the Government's procurement department. The minister for social protection, Dara Calleary, confirmed that foods high in saturated fat, sugar, and salt will be removed from the programme from September. Up to now, such foods have been permitted once a week but only when selected by a child's parent(s). What has triggered the sudden hysteria around food ingredients and processed foods? Nobody argues with a pilot about how to fly a plane, but everyone thinks they're an expert on nutrition after watching a Netflix documentary, or by following social media influencers who pretend to be experts. There's a growing rhetoric in the past year suggesting that food labels are misleading and that the information can't be trusted. Nothing could be further from the truth. It seems some wellness influencers have positioned themselves as experts, but have clearly never read any of the EU food regulations. Nor do they understand how to interpret nutritional information and health claims on the label. Food labelling is highly regulated. People who confidently read lists of ingredients into the void in supermarkets have a lot to answer for as their videos amount to scaremongering of perfectly safe ingredients. Some might argue that influencers give correct information sometimes. That may well be the case, but a broken watch is also right twice a day Many people also believe that if is there is a long list of ingredients with words that are unfamiliar, sound scary, or may be difficult to pronounce, then the food is deemed to be "bad" according to them. Pyridoxine, ascorbic acid, and phylloquinone are just Vitamins B6, C, and K. Nothing to be afraid of, trust me. The nutritional value of an uneaten school lunch is zero. Compromise is key. There is no such thing as a good food or a bad food. It is the overall diet that counts, not the inclusion or exclusion of a few specific foods that might be high in fat, salt and/or sugar. Using such a simplistic approach would result in very nutritious processed foods being incorrectly categorised and banned — such as cheese. Unless a child's diet consists of just one or two foods, then it is the overall combination of foods in the diet that will determine if it is nutritionally adequate to support growth and development. Even the HSE's own food pyramid has processed high in fat, sugar, and salt foods on the top shelf; they are allowed once or twice per week as part of a healthy diet, so why are they being banned in school meals? Sensory issues Parents have the option to completely avoid whatever meals they personally perceive to be unhealthy by just not ordering them. Alternative meals are always available. What about neurodivergent children and those with sensory issues around food texture and colour? How are they going to be impacted by the exclusion of such foods? Nuance is needed here instead of the sledgehammer approach. Parents are supposed to be gatekeepers for their children's health. There is an onus on parents to seek advice from reliable sources. A recent study carried out in DCU, which analysed 67,000 videos on social media platform TikTok, found that only 2.1% of nutrition content was accurate; the remainder was misleading or potentially harmful. Another study in Ireland found that only 6.1% of nutrition-related posts were classified as being of good quality. Social media is the wild west when it comes to nutrition information and, unfortunately, it is not moderated It's so disheartening to see health professionals such as experienced paediatric dietitians / clinical nutritionists share their expertise, but are often torn to shreds — particularly on Instagram. The way so many people leap to defend influencers by trolling actual experts is cult-like behaviour. Of course, everyone is entitled to their own opinions — but not to their own facts. Two of the most important ultra-processed foods are infant formula, which is essential, and fortified breakfast cereals which are highly nutritious and affordable for so many people living in food poverty. We should not assess school lunches from a point of privilege. When this scheme was initially launched in 2019, it focused on providing school lunches in Deis schools only. Now that all children are being included, as a cost-of-living measure, the voice of the privileged is driving the narrative. It's turning into a circus. It would be wrong to assume that a meal which contains a few chicken goujons or fish fingers is unhealthy or problematic. No single food could skew nutrition intake to that extent unless the child consumed no other foods or beverages. For context, today I analysed a school lunch from one provider's gluten-free menu. It was a hot wrap containing baked chicken breast goujons and some ketchup. The analysis showed that the meal was low in saturated fat, low in sugar, high in fibre, and high in protein. The meal qualified for those nutrition claims as the nutritional composition met the strict criteria set out in EU food law. Available information Most providers' websites have the nutritional information readily available, and I certainly haven't seen any meals that set off alarm bells. Where's the hysteria coming from? Would it perhaps be that school principals haven't time to deal with this and are asking parents, who probably get their own nutrition information from social media, for assistance in choosing a supplier? A school lunch provides around one third of a child's daily nutrition needs, or around 24% of their overall food intake in a typical school week However, children only attend primary school for 183 days per year. We also need to exclude weekends and school holidays, so the likely contribution of school lunches to a child's overall nutritional intake is only around 12%. The focus should be on helping parents to optimise the other 88% of their children's nutritional intake. In 2017, the Government issued a detailed document on nutrition standards for school meals which clearly sets out the rules. Why was the nutritional composition of the menus not requested or audited until now? If the HSE or minister has some new scientific evidence that allowing one processed high in fat, sugar, and salt food option once a week in a school lunch is detrimental to a child's health, then I'd love to see it. Are we in danger of throwing the baby out with the bathwater with the proposed changes to the hot school meals scheme? It would be much better use of State resources to audit the allergen declarations on the school menus. Children are the largest cohort of the population with food allergies, which ranges from 2% of younger kids to 5% of older children. Consuming a processed high in fat, sugar, and salt food once a week carries no risk to a child, but inaccurate allergen labelling could lead to a potentially life-threatening situation. Nutrition is a science, not an opinion. Context matters.
