'I used to drink 12 pints a day, now I help others quit alcohol'
Three years ago Jimi Wilson was drinking well over ten times the weekly recommended alcohol limit every week - now he's not had a drink in over two years.
"Usually I would drink as soon as I finished work, which was usually two o'clock in the afternoon, right up until 10 or 11," says 40-year-old Mr Wilson.
He now volunteers with North Yorkshire Horizons, which supported him when he wanted to quit drinking.
The group provides support for people with drug and alcohol dependency from its five hubs in Northallerton, Selby, Scarborough, Skipton and Harrogate and holds smaller drop-in sessions in rural locations like his home town of Bentham.
"I finished work maybe two years ago due to my capability. I would leave work early on many occasions due to anxiety and it turns out it was my alcohol use which was driving my anxiety" says Mr Wilson, who has remained out of employment during his recovery.
NHS England recommends "men and women are not to drink more than 14 units a week on a regular basis", which Mr Wilson was exceeding on a daily basis.
"I was drinking around 150 units a week, around 20 units a day, about 12 pints of strong lager.
"My health had declined massively, I was off work, signed-off long term, I couldn't really get around so much due to the pressure I put on my body, so it was just a case of getting alcohol delivered from supermarkets.
"I was just drinking at home, signed off work long-term, drinking at home, all day, every day."
If you are affected by the issues raised in this story, you can visit the BBC Action Line for support.
Mr Wilson, who has been sober since March 2023, now runs rural support sessions with North Yorkshire Horizons.
The sessions, which Mr Wilson leads alongside a support worker from the group, involve sharing his story and "lived experience", which he says aids his own recovery as well as helping others.
"When I am working closely with the treatment worker, she will say 'Jimi was sat in your chair three years ago and look at him now' and I can see little glimmers of hope in people's expression and their eyes.
"Just giving people an ear and allowing them to speak is massively helpful to people, helps them realise they are not alone in these rural communities."
"It's giving people that bit of hope and just reassuring people there is help."
Although Mr Wilson has been out of work since leaving his factory job, he hopes to be able to use his volunteering experience to get full-time employment.
"I'm sticking with my volunteering, getting as much experience as I can, so that when my health allows it, I definitely will be getting a job in drug and alcohol recovery services."
Listen to highlights from North Yorkshire on BBC Sounds, catch up with the latest episode of Look North.
Deaths from alcohol at record high in England
'Alcohol is part and parcel of working culture'
'Alcohol left me homeless, now I help others recover'
North Yorkshire Horizons
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
NHS ‘to rely on migrants' as Government cuts British nurse training
The Government has cut funding for nursing courses in a move that risks undermining its pledge to end the NHS's reliance on foreign workers. Ministers have quietly frozen grants that are paid to universities to help them cover the higher costs of training medical workers. Critics reacted by warning that the move, which represents a real-terms cut, would 'worsen an already difficult situation' in the sector and 'leave us more reliant' on imported labour. It will also prompt fears of further cuts down the line, with education set to be one of the losers in Rachel Reeves's spending review this week. Universities are already struggling to keep nursing courses afloat, with research showing that many are cutting lecturer jobs to save cash. In last year's manifesto, Labour pledged to 'end the long-term reliance on overseas workers' with a 'workforce and training plan' for the NHS. However, Bridget Phillipson, the Education Secretary, has now frozen grants which are paid to universities to cover the extra costs of running medical courses. Those include courses for nursing, midwifery and 'allied health professionals' such as paramedics, radiographers and occupational therapists. In a letter to the Office for Students, she said the per-student funding levels should be kept the same as last year, representing a real-terms cut. That is part of an overall reduction of £108 million in the cash that has been made available for the Strategic Priorities Grant this year. Patricia Marquis, the executive director for the Royal College of Nursing in England, said nursing courses were already under threat from the 'financial crisis' at universities. 'A freeze in per student funding, effectively a real-terms cut, could make a bad situation worse, resulting in not only more job losses, but impacting the very financial viability of nursing courses,' she warned. 'University courses are the single biggest route into the profession, and this would be a disaster. Additional funding should be released to protect nursing courses in response to rising costs.' Vivienne Stern, the chief executive of Universities UK, also warned that the cuts to the grant risked 'worsening an already difficult situation'. She said that the move, combined with a recent decision to slash cash for apprenticeships, would have a 'detrimental impact on training our healthcare workforce'. 'Universities are committed to delivering what this country needs, including a strong and sustainable NHS workforce, and are crucial to training talent,' she said. 'We can't create a future-proof NHS workforce without long-term, sustained investment from the government.' Ms Phillipson said in her letter to the OfS that universities should prioritise funding for nursing courses as 'a strategically important subject'. She targeted grants for other courses and in particular media studies and journalism, which have been derided by some as 'Mickey Mouse' degrees. But despite that, it appears there was still only enough money in the pot for her to restrict the hit to medical courses to a real-terms cut. Laura Trott, the shadow education secretary, said the move was 'yet more evidence that Labour aren't serious about cutting immigration'. 'At a time when we should be training more British people to become nurses, they've cut teaching grants for universities and scrapped almost all higher-level apprenticeships, leaving an 11,000 shortfall in the NHS workforce plan,' she said. 'These decisions will leave us more reliant on foreign labour, when we should be training British people for British jobs.' The Department for Education is facing steep real-terms cuts to its budget when the Chancellor unveils her spending review on Wednesday. She will set out the annual funding totals that all Whitehall departments receive from next year until almost the end of the decade. Most are expecting to see their budgets squeezed to free up more cash for health and defence, which will be the two big winners. Within education, the schools budget is ring-fenced, meaning it cannot be cut. Early years provision, meanwhile, is a flagship Labour policy with the party pledging to fund the creation of 100,000 new nursery places. That means that higher education, including universities and apprenticeships, is expected to bear the brunt of the cuts imposed on the department. A Government spokesman said: 'We hugely value the work of talented nurses and midwives which is why we have prioritised Strategic Priorities Grant funding for important, high-cost courses, including nursing and midwifery, that are vital for economic growth and our Plan for Change. 'The dire situation we inherited has meant this Government must take tough decisions to put universities on a firmer financial footing and we're continuing to support them, including by increasing the amount they can charge in tuition fees. 'We are rebuilding the NHS for the benefit of patient and staff, and ensuring nursing remains an attractive career choice, including by unveiling a refreshed workforce plan to ensure we have the right staff in the right place so the NHS can be there for everyone.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
'My left breast was moved to my right after cancer recurred'
Five months into a pregnancy for a much wanted second child in 2024, Nicola Purdie found a lump in her right breast. It is a nightmare scenario for anyone. But for Nicola this was not a new experience. She had already had a double mastectomy, chemotherapy and breast reconstruction after being diagnosed with cancer in 2020. But a radical idea which she suggested to her surgeon has led to what is believed to be a pioneering world first procedure - transplanting a healthy reconstructed breast to replace a cancerous one. In September 2020, Nicola had just finished with breastfeeding her first child and was returning to work as a geography teacher in her home town of Swansea when she found a lump. By October it was diagnosed as cancer and she started five months of chemotherapy at Singleton Hospital, followed by the double mastectomy. Nicola, now 38, said: "Even though I only had cancer in the one breast, my maternal aunty and maternal grandmother also had had breast cancer previously. I thought 'I'm young, let's just get rid of everything and do as much as we can'." She had reconstructive surgery using skin and tissue from her abdomen in a procedure known as a DIEP (deep inferior epigastric perforator) flap. "It meant I had natural breasts which would grow and shrink with my bodyweight over time and I wouldn't need implants that would need changing in 10 or 15 years," she said. Because the cancer was oestrogen-fuelled, she was placed on hormone suppression therapy for at least two years. "We knew at the time I was diagnosed that we wanted to have another baby eventually, so we waited for two-and-a-half years actually. "All the oncologists we saw were of the same opinion that I was at no increased risk, because I'd had a complete pathological response [no sign of cancer post-treatment]." Then lump number two appeared. Nicola explained: "This time it was in the skin of the breast because that was the only tissue that was remaining really from the first surgery. There must have been some cancer cells there. "I knew straight away as soon as I found the lump, this is not a coincidence. This is cancer again." Apart from family and a close friend, Nicola did not tell anyone about the cancer this time. Partly it was to shield her daughter from knowing but she had another reason. "I wanted to protect the baby. I wanted him to come into the world and it to be all about him. I didn't want it to be focusing on 'oh gosh Nicky, you OK?'." She attributes this mindset to helping her "shut the door" on thinking about it until her son was born. Because of pregnancy, she could not begin chemotherapy, or have the usual scans to establish if the cancer had spread. She had some chest X-rays and an ultrasound of her stomach and liver, which gave a degree of certainty, although not "100%", that it remained contained in the breast. She also had a lumpectomy to remove the lump from the breast skin. The plan was to deliver the baby at 32 weeks, at the end of August, but even in the midst of the urgency for treatment, she had an eye to her son's future. "I think it was 26 August and I said 'can I put my teacher's hat on now and push it to the week after'. "My husband was like 'what?' But I said 'I've got to give him the best chance'. "So we waited until the first Monday in September and he was born at 32 weeks and six days." Fraser was in the neonatal unit for three weeks. "He went from strength to strength and that made things easier as well because of what I was dealing with. "I don't know how I would have been if he was poorly as well." Nicola started chemotherapy two weeks after giving birth and would go from the baby unit upstairs to have her treatment and then straight back down to her son. She had 16 rounds of chemo which took her all the way through to the beginning of February. Woman has pioneering breast reconstruction surgery 'Reconstructive breast surgery wait just adds to the ordeal' The cancer survivors waiting years for breast reconstruction Initially the oncology team had not been sure what operation to suggest as Nicola had multiple cancer sites in the right breast area and a tumour in one lymph node. The most likely option was removal and an LD (latissimus dorsi) flap, which involves swinging a muscle and skin from the back to cover the area left behind by the removed breast, but leaving the area flat in her case. Reconstruction using an implant on the right side instead would not have been possible as so much skin had to be removed, there would not be enough to cover it, or to withstand damage from subsequent radiation treatment. However, Nicola's aunt had had the LD flap operation and she knew it came with an arduous recovery process and possibly reduced range of movement - not an option for her as the mother of two small children. She also knew she wanted "symmetry" - either two breasts or none. It was while talking to her sisters she initially had the idea that, if she did end up having both breasts removed, why not use the skin from the healthy left breast to cover the larger affected area on the right. But it was only once she was in the consulting room with consultant plastic, reconstructive and breast surgeon Reza Arya, that the idea of moving the whole breast intact dawned. She realised it would allow her to create a right breast and have reconstructive surgery on the left side using an implant because there was enough skin left in situ from the first operation in 2020. When she put this to Reza - "could we rob Peter to pay Paul?" - she "could literally see the cogs whirring" in his head. He recalled being speechless at the idea. "I had never seen or heard of such a procedure being talked about or published. "I wasn't even sure at that stage whether I would be adding to Nicola's care or taking away from it." Reza said it was very unusual to have a patient come up with such a radical idea. "Kudos to Nicola because she's amazing. "I had extensive discussions with colleagues all over the UK who are all experts in flap reconstruction from the abdomen. The conclusion was maybe it is possible and just go ahead with it. "This is not run of the mill mastectomy we're talking about," he said. "We're removing the whole of the footprint of the breast [on the right]. It is a very, very large area of skin and to be able to close it you have to borrow from somewhere, some skin and tissue, that can withstand future radiotherapy. "Left is a side that's easy to reconstruct in future, because it's not subject to radiotherapy and all other treatments, and the cancer itself." When Nicola went into the surgery, she knew she could wake up to very different outcomes - a successful left to right transplant, or an LD flap reconstruction on her right side after all if he decided the transfer would not work, with the left breast removed anyway at her request. She gave Reza her blessing for any outcome. And her outrageous gamble paid off. "What makes it a world first is that the tissue has been ported to two different sites," she said. "We didn't know if that would be possible or probable, the microsurgery of actually sewing the vessels together - if it would work or if it would be so scarred that it would be completely impossible." She is starting a few weeks of radiotherapy, and around Christmas time will have reconstructive surgery on the left side using a saline implant. She will be on hormone therapy for the next 10 years to manage the risks of recurrence but has been given the all-clear in terms of this treatment cycle. For someone who has been through such gruelling experiences, she is remarkably upbeat. How does she stay positive? "If I am having those moments when I feel 'oh my god this is awful, why has this happened to us?' "I let myself think about it for a minute and then move on to the next thing. If you don't allow yourself to think about it, it won't get you down. "I have to sit back and think 'this is life. Worse things can happen'. I'm lucky that I've had incredible treatment from the word go, and an amazing team who I trust." She added: "Both the kids were just the best distraction ever. It's hope isn't it? When you see little children. You think there's hope for the future." Amy Dowden reflects on life after cancer treatment 'Breast cancer is more than surgery and chemo' Woman's breast reconstruction delayed three times
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A Mom-to-Be Says Her Mother Seems ‘Embarrassed' She's Giving Birth Via C-Section — and Now Her Husband Is Furious
A soon-to-be mom says she thinks her mother is 'embarrassed' that she's going to give birth via a C-section She says her mom claims a C-section 'isn't natural,' and told her, 'now you won't be able to tell people you've given birth to your baby' The woman says her husband is now "furious" with her mother and thinks she should "challenge" her, but she's not sure it's worth itA soon–to-be mom is upset after her 'difficult' mother told her that having a C-section isn't true childbirth — and she's wondering if she should say something. The woman detailed her story on the U.K.-based community site where women can seek advice from other women on interpersonal and parenting issues. In her post, the woman says that she is 39 weeks pregnant, and that she 'hoped and prepped for a vaginal birth' throughout her pregnancy. She goes on to say that 'despite doing all the planning,' including a hypnobirthing course, perineal massage, birthing ball exercises and more, her doctor recently confirmed that the baby is breech and she will require a C-section. 'I was upset at first, as I'd been almost looking forward to labor, and I'm quite scared of the surgery, but I've come to terms with it,' she adds. However, the original poster (OP) says that she recently told her mother of the birthing plan update, and her mom's reaction upset her 'all over again.' She says her mom was 'openly disappointed' by the news, and said, 'But now you won't be able to tell people you've given birth to your baby, as a C-section isn't natural.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. The OP says she was 'taken aback' by the comment and attempted to explain to her mother that 'the only important thing was [the] baby being born safely and me being well.' She says that her mother then 'doubled down,' saying, 'But the baby won't have been 'born,' will it?' 'I think she's embarrassed at the prospect of telling people her grandchild wasn't birthed vaginally,' the woman goes on to say, adding that her mom is in her 50s and that this will be her first grandchild. The OP says that her husband is currently 'furious' at her mother over the comments and thinks the OP should 'challenge' her on them. While the OP says she likely won't say anything because her mom 'can be a difficult woman and sometimes it's easier to just let things go to keep the peace,' she is hoping to get either 'validation' or a 'reality check' from her fellow members to find out whether 'I'm being sensitive,' or if her mom 'is out of order.' The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now! The vast majority of post commenters assured the OP that her feelings are completely valid and that her mother is being unreasonable. 'You are not overreacting. That was extremely insensitive of your mom,' said one person. 'Your [mother] sounds like she has ridiculous, fixed ideas,' one person said, adding, 'As long as your baby arrives safely it doesn't matter whether it was vaginal or [C-section] — and your [mother's] friends really won't be interested, disappointed, etc. in your method of giving birth either.' 'Why do people make such idiotic comments? You and your baby need to be safe first and foremost. No one I know would make any judgment about how a baby is born,' said someone else. And while a number of people said that the OP should probably just let the comment go, as challenging someone like her mother will likely just lead to more stress, some people said that the OP should say something now before the baby is born. One person said, 'I would message her saying something like, 'I just wanted to say I was upset by your comments on C-sections earlier. This is what my doctors have decided is best and the manner of birth isn't going to make any difference to the baby except possibly saving its life or my life. I'd appreciate it if you could avoid any more negative remarks on C-sections as it's deeply unhelpful for me at this time.' ' Read the original article on People
