A Mom-to-Be Says Her Mother Seems ‘Embarrassed' She's Giving Birth Via C-Section — and Now Her Husband Is Furious
A soon-to-be mom says she thinks her mother is 'embarrassed' that she's going to give birth via a C-section
She says her mom claims a C-section 'isn't natural,' and told her, 'now you won't be able to tell people you've given birth to your baby'
The woman says her husband is now "furious" with her mother and thinks she should "challenge" her, but she's not sure it's worth itA soon–to-be mom is upset after her 'difficult' mother told her that having a C-section isn't true childbirth — and she's wondering if she should say something.
The woman detailed her story on the U.K.-based community site Mumsnet.com, where women can seek advice from other women on interpersonal and parenting issues. In her post, the woman says that she is 39 weeks pregnant, and that she 'hoped and prepped for a vaginal birth' throughout her pregnancy.
She goes on to say that 'despite doing all the planning,' including a hypnobirthing course, perineal massage, birthing ball exercises and more, her doctor recently confirmed that the baby is breech and she will require a C-section.
'I was upset at first, as I'd been almost looking forward to labor, and I'm quite scared of the surgery, but I've come to terms with it,' she adds.
However, the original poster (OP) says that she recently told her mother of the birthing plan update, and her mom's reaction upset her 'all over again.'
She says her mom was 'openly disappointed' by the news, and said, 'But now you won't be able to tell people you've given birth to your baby, as a C-section isn't natural.'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories.
The OP says she was 'taken aback' by the comment and attempted to explain to her mother that 'the only important thing was [the] baby being born safely and me being well.'
She says that her mother then 'doubled down,' saying, 'But the baby won't have been 'born,' will it?'
'I think she's embarrassed at the prospect of telling people her grandchild wasn't birthed vaginally,' the woman goes on to say, adding that her mom is in her 50s and that this will be her first grandchild.
The OP says that her husband is currently 'furious' at her mother over the comments and thinks the OP should 'challenge' her on them.
While the OP says she likely won't say anything because her mom 'can be a difficult woman and sometimes it's easier to just let things go to keep the peace,' she is hoping to get either 'validation' or a 'reality check' from her fellow Mumsnet.com members to find out whether 'I'm being sensitive,' or if her mom 'is out of order.'
The PEOPLE Puzzler crossword is here! How quickly can you solve it? Play now!
The vast majority of post commenters assured the OP that her feelings are completely valid and that her mother is being unreasonable.
'You are not overreacting. That was extremely insensitive of your mom,' said one person.
'Your [mother] sounds like she has ridiculous, fixed ideas,' one person said, adding, 'As long as your baby arrives safely it doesn't matter whether it was vaginal or [C-section] — and your [mother's] friends really won't be interested, disappointed, etc. in your method of giving birth either.'
'Why do people make such idiotic comments? You and your baby need to be safe first and foremost. No one I know would make any judgment about how a baby is born,' said someone else.
And while a number of people said that the OP should probably just let the comment go, as challenging someone like her mother will likely just lead to more stress, some people said that the OP should say something now before the baby is born.
One person said, 'I would message her saying something like, 'I just wanted to say I was upset by your comments on C-sections earlier. This is what my doctors have decided is best and the manner of birth isn't going to make any difference to the baby except possibly saving its life or my life. I'd appreciate it if you could avoid any more negative remarks on C-sections as it's deeply unhelpful for me at this time.' '
Read the original article on People
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Doctors try 'poo pills' to flush out dangerous superbugs
UK doctors are attempting to clear dangerous superbug infections using "poo pills" containing freeze-dried faeces. The stool samples come from healthy donors and are packed with good bacteria. Early data suggests superbugs can be flushed out of the dark murky depths of the bowel and replaced with a mix of healthy gut bacteria. It is a new approach to tackling infections that resist antibiotics, which are thought to kill a million people each year. The focus is on the bowels which are "the biggest reservoir of antibiotic resistance in humans" says Dr Blair Merrick, who has been testing the pills at Guys and St Thomas' hospitals. Drug-resistant superbugs can escape their intestinal home and cause trouble elsewhere in the body – such as urinary tract or bloodstream infections. "So there's a lot of interest in 'can you get rid of them from the gut?'," says Dr Merrick. The idea of poo-pills isn't as far-fetched as it might seem. Faecal transplants – also known as a trans-poo-tion - are already approved for treating severe diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile bacteria. But scientists noticed hints that faecal transplants for C. difficile also seemed to get rid of superbugs. Microbiome podcast: Manipulating Our Hidden Half New research has focused on patients who had an infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria in the past six months. They were given pills made from faeces which people had donated to a stool bank. Each stool sample is tested to ensure it does not contain any harmful bugs, undigested food is removed and then it is freeze dried into a powder. This is stored inside a pill that can pass through the stomach unscathed and reach the intestines where it dissolves to release its poopy powdery payload. The trial has taken place on 41 patients at Guy's and St Thomas' hospitals in London to lay the groundwork for a large-scale study. It showed patients were up for taking a poo pill and the donated bacteria were still being detected in the bowels at least a month later. Dr Merrick says there are "really promising signals" that poo pills could help tackle the rising scourge of superbugs and that donor bacteria could be going to microbial war with the superbugs as they compete over food and space on the lining of the gut and either rid the body of them completely or "reduce them down to a level that doesn't cause problems". The study also suggests the array of gut bacteria becomes more varied after the therapy. This is a sign of good health and "may well be promoting colonisation resistance" so it is harder for new infectious bugs to get in. "It's very exciting. There's a real shift from 20 years ago where all bacteria and viruses were assumed to do you harm; to now where we realise they are completely necessary to our overall health," says Dr Merrick. Earlier this week scientists showed the good bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we are born – seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. First bacteria we ever meet can keep us out of hospital More than half your body is not human Our body's own human cells are outnumbered by the bacteria, fungi and others that live inside us - known as the microbiome. This has led to research implicating the microbiome in everything from Crohn's disease to cancer to mental health. If poo pills are proven to work against superbugs in larger studies then the researchers think they could be used for both treatment and prevention in people at risk. Medical procedures that suppress the immune system - including cancer therapies and organ transplants - can make the body more vulnerable. "A lot of these individuals come to a lot of harm from drug resistant organisms," Dr Merrick. The UK's drugs regulator – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency – said there were more than 450 microbiome medicines currently in development. "Some of them will success, so I do think we will seem them coming through quite soon," said Dr Chrysi Sergaki, the head of microbiome research at the MHRA. "We could potentially, in the future, replace antibiotics with microbiome [therapies] - that's the big picture, so there's a lot of potential."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
7 myths and truths about inducing labour, from dancing to spicy food
"Been pregnant for way too long." These lyrics, from the song Baby Mamma Dance, no doubt resonate with a lot of women in their third trimester – particularly if their baby is overdue or they're in the delivery room trying to induce labour. And although we can't be sure that that was the goal of those killer moves, Meghan Markle's video of her and Prince Harry twerking in the hospital to this song as they awaited the birth of their daughter Lilibet seems to speak to this. Of course, it's also quite possible that the pair were simply killing time and trying to lighten the mood before Meghan gave birth – or both. But dancing is, in fact, a good way to naturally encourage the baby along. Ruby Handley-Stone, midwife and professional advisor at the Royal College of Midwives, tells Yahoo UK: "Anything to help being upright and mobile is encouraged and will help with engagement of the baby's head and rotation. Equally, listening to music you love will help oxytocin and relaxation." Here, we take a look at seven myths and truths about inducing labour. A herbal tea high in vitamins, minerals and tannins, raspberry leaf tea is thought by some to help tone the muscles of the womb for when you go into labour. It can also help combat nausea. That said, health professionals don't suggest drinking the tea to induce labour, and it's unsure how safe it is in pregnancy. According to Tommy's pregnancy and baby charity, if you are going to consume it, it should be in the weeks leading up to your due date, starting with one cup a day and steadily increasing to three cups, spread throughout the day. They also advise speaking to your midwife or doctor before trying any herbal remedies, like raspberry leaf tea, as it may not be safe for everyone. The theory is that by eating spicy foods, you can stimulate your gut and in turn prompt contractions. But it can also bring on heartburn, so if you are prone to indigestion and acid reflux, it's probably best to avoid. Although the NCT says there's no evidence to suggest that spicy food can induce labour, there also isn't any harm in trying it. Whether you go for a stroll or rock on a birthing ball, gentle exercise has been linked to inducing labour. Being upright and moving about may help your baby settle into your pelvis. It is a common misconception that having sex while pregnant may hurt the baby. But, thanks to the amniotic sac, your child is protected from infection – plus a penis or sex toy cannot penetrate beyond the cervix. While having sex during pregnancy won't harm the baby and is perfectly safe for most people – unless a health professional advises against it – there isn't any evidence to suggest it can bring on labour. What may happen as a result of an orgasm in the later stages, though, is that you experience Braxton Hicks contractions (also referred to as "practice contractions"). This is perfectly normal, albeit uncomfortable, and you might want to lie down and relax until they pass. You can read the NCT's guide to sex during pregnancy for more information. Rich in fibre and antioxidants, dates are nutritious at the best of times, but there is also a theory they can help induce labour. A small study by the Jordan University of Science and Technology in 2008, for example, examined 69 women who ate six date fruits each day in the four weeks prior to their due date and compared them to 45 women who consumed none. The researchers found that spontaneous labour occurred in 96% of those who consumed dates, compared with 79% women in the non-date fruit consumers. Research suggests that breast stimulation increases the number of women in labour within 72 hours, as it encourages the body's production of oxytocin – the same hormone that prompts contractions in labour. Before trying any methods, though, it's always best to speak to your health team first. Previously, ingesting castor oil was recommended as a way to bring on labour, and there is some evidence to suggest it can work. That said, it is not advised you take castor oil while pregnant as it can lead to nausea, high blood pressure and digestive distress. Handley-Stone stresses: "There's very little safe evidence for midwives to recommend many of the 'old wives' tales', and techniques such as hot baths, castor oil and sexual intercourse aren't advised in official guidelines. "Similarly, there is little research that herbal teas influence the start of labour and some may actually be harmful – this is the same for essential oils. There is also some evidence to suggest that acupuncture may help the cervix to soften, but this is also limited." She continues: "Generally, although some methods may offer relaxation (which is the best thing to start labour!), it's always worth consulting your midwife before trying any complementary therapies to ensure they are safe and appropriate for you. Your baby will come when they're ready!" Read more about pregnancy and giving birth What Jamie Laing has said about parenthood as he announces pregnancy with Sophie Habboo (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read) How the most popular baby girl names in the UK compare with the US (Yahoo Life UK, 8-min read) Why it's not OK to speculate if someone's pregnant (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read)
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Doctors try 'poo pills' to flush out dangerous superbugs
UK doctors are attempting to clear dangerous superbug infections using "poo pills" containing freeze-dried faeces. The stool samples come from healthy donors and are packed with good bacteria. Early data suggests superbugs can be flushed out of the dark murky depths of the bowel and replaced with a mix of healthy gut bacteria. It is a new approach to tackling infections that resist antibiotics, which are thought to kill a million people each year. The focus is on the bowels which are "the biggest reservoir of antibiotic resistance in humans" says Dr Blair Merrick, who has been testing the pills at Guys and St Thomas' hospitals. Drug-resistant superbugs can escape their intestinal home and cause trouble elsewhere in the body – such as urinary tract or bloodstream infections. "So there's a lot of interest in 'can you get rid of them from the gut?'," says Dr Merrick. The idea of poo-pills isn't as far-fetched as it might seem. Faecal transplants – also known as a trans-poo-tion - are already approved for treating severe diarrhoea caused by Clostridium difficile bacteria. But scientists noticed hints that faecal transplants for C. difficile also seemed to get rid of superbugs. Microbiome podcast: Manipulating Our Hidden Half New research has focused on patients who had an infection caused by drug-resistant bacteria in the past six months. They were given pills made from faeces which people had donated to a stool bank. Each stool sample is tested to ensure it does not contain any harmful bugs, undigested food is removed and then it is freeze dried into a powder. This is stored inside a pill that can pass through the stomach unscathed and reach the intestines where it dissolves to release its poopy powdery payload. The trial has taken place on 41 patients at Guy's and St Thomas' hospitals in London to lay the groundwork for a large-scale study. It showed patients were up for taking a poo pill and the donated bacteria were still being detected in the bowels at least a month later. Dr Merrick says there are "really promising signals" that poo pills could help tackle the rising scourge of superbugs and that donor bacteria could be going to microbial war with the superbugs as they compete over food and space on the lining of the gut and either rid the body of them completely or "reduce them down to a level that doesn't cause problems". The study also suggests the array of gut bacteria becomes more varied after the therapy. This is a sign of good health and "may well be promoting colonisation resistance" so it is harder for new infectious bugs to get in. "It's very exciting. There's a real shift from 20 years ago where all bacteria and viruses were assumed to do you harm; to now where we realise they are completely necessary to our overall health," says Dr Merrick. Earlier this week scientists showed the good bacteria our bodies meet – in the hours after we are born – seem to halve the risk of young children being admitted to hospital with lung infections. First bacteria we ever meet can keep us out of hospital More than half your body is not human Our body's own human cells are outnumbered by the bacteria, fungi and others that live inside us - known as the microbiome. This has led to research implicating the microbiome in everything from Crohn's disease to cancer to mental health. If poo pills are proven to work against superbugs in larger studies then the researchers think they could be used for both treatment and prevention in people at risk. Medical procedures that suppress the immune system - including cancer therapies and organ transplants - can make the body more vulnerable. "A lot of these individuals come to a lot of harm from drug resistant organisms," Dr Merrick. The UK's drugs regulator – the Medicines and Healthcare Products Agency – said there were more than 450 microbiome medicines currently in development. "Some of them will success, so I do think we will seem them coming through quite soon," said Dr Chrysi Sergaki, the head of microbiome research at the MHRA. "We could potentially, in the future, replace antibiotics with microbiome [therapies] - that's the big picture, so there's a lot of potential."
