
Manipur: 48-hour bandh affects normal life in Imphal Valley
All business establishments, educational institutions, and government and private offices were closed and public transport remained off the roads.
At Wangkhei, Khurai, Kongba in Imphal East district and Kwakeithel, Naoremthong in Imphal West district, bandh supporters came out on the streets to enforce the shutdown and asked any individual outside their homes to return back. The bandh started on Wednesday midnight.
Bandh supporters also burned tyres on the roads at Naoremthong, Kwakeithel, Khurai and Wangkhei in state capital Imphal.
Security has been tightened across Imphal to prevent any untoward incident.
Central forces personnel have been deployed at strategic places across all points leading to the Raj Bhavan.
The Manipur government on Wednesday ordered a probe into the allegations that security personnel forced to cover the state's name on a bus taking journalists to the Shirui Lily festival.
It was alleged that security forces had stopped the state-run bus, on which journalists were being taken by the government to cover the tourism festival in Ukhrul district on Tuesday, and forced the Directorate of Information and Public Relations (DIPR) staffers to cover the state's name written on the windshield with a white paper.
The government formed a two-member inquiry committee, and said that it will 'examine facts and circumstances involving security personnel and Manipur State Road Transport Bus carrying media persons to cover the Manipur Shirui festival on May 20 near 'Gwaltabi Checkpost', according to an order issued by the Home Department.
'The committee shall look into lapses, if any and suggest measures to prevent recurrence of such a situation in future,' it said.
The committee, comprising Commissioner (Home) N Ashok Kumar and Secretary Th Kirankumar Singh, has been asked to submit its report within 15 days, it added.
Amid outrage over the incident, COCOMI called a 48-hour general strike from Wednesday midnight, and demanded an apology from Governor Ajay Kumar Bhalla, and the resignation of Security Advisor Kuldiep Singh, DGP Rajiv Singh and Chief Secretary Prashant Kumar Singh.
'The decision to have Manipur removed from a state bus itself is anti-Manipur, absolutely challenges the idea of Manipur and its historical and cultural identity,' COCOMI convenor Khuraijam Athouba said.
'The people of Manipur demand to know under whose authority the decision was taken. It should be clarified to the public within 48 hours,' he added.
The Shirui Lily festival is being held after a gap of two years as the state, ravaged by ethnic clashes between Meiteis and Kuki-Zo community, limps back to normalcy amid the President's Rule, which was imposed in February following the resignation of N Biren Singh as the chief minister.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
30 minutes ago
- India Today
ICC bans former Sri Lanka first-class cricketer for corruption attempt in T10 League
Former Sri Lankan domestic cricketer Saliya Saman has been handed a five-year ban from all forms of cricket after an ICC Anti-Corruption Tribunal found him guilty of violating the Emirates Cricket Board (ECB) Anti-Corruption 39-year-old was among eight individuals charged in September 2023 over offences related to the 2021 Abu Dhabi T10 Cricket League. The tribunal determined that Saman had attempted to manipulate matches in the tournament, but timely intervention by the ICC and the Designated Anti-Corruption Official (DACO) prevented the breaches from being carried suspension is backdated to 13 September 2023, the date he was provisionally suspended, meaning he has already served two years of the sanction. A seasoned campaigner, Saman played 101 first-class and 77 List A matches during his domestic career. Also Read: Asia Cup T20s: Is Hardik Pandya's leadership dream slipping away?He was charged under Articles 2.1.1, 2.1.3, and 2.1.4 of the ECB Code, which cover match-fixing, attempts to fix matches, and soliciting or inducing others to engage in corrupt 2.1.1: Being party to an attempt to improperly fix, contrive, or influence matches or aspects of matches in the Abu Dhabi T10 2.1.3: Offering a reward to another participant in exchange for engaging in corrupt 2.1.4: Soliciting, inducing, or encouraging another participant to breach Article Saman's career in briefSaliya Saman enjoyed a prolific domestic career across formats. In first-class cricket, he scored 3,662 runs in 101 matches at an average of 27.95, including two centuries and 22 fifties, with a highest score of 129. He also contributed in List A cricket with 898 runs in 77 games and a best of 65, while in T20s he tallied 673 runs at a healthy strike rate of 129.92, highlighted by two half-centuries and a top score of 78 not equally effective bowler, Saman claimed 231 first-class wickets at 25.92, with best figures of 8/53. He took 84 wickets in List A cricket and 58 in T20s, including a five-wicket haul in each format. His sharp fielding added 27 catches in first-class games, 11 in List A and 14 in T20s.- Ends


NDTV
43 minutes ago
- NDTV
Saliya Saman Banned From All Forms Of cricket For 5 Years. Reason Is...
Former Sri Lankan domestic cricketer Saliya Saman has been banned from all forms of cricket for five years after an ICC Anti-Corruption Tribunal found him guilty of breaching the Emirates Cricket Board (ECB) Anti-Corruption Code. Saman was among eight people charged in September 2023 for breaching the Code during the 2021 Abu Dhabi T10 League, where attempts to corrupt matches in the tournament were disrupted by the ICC, the Designated Anti-Corruption Official (DACO) for the purposes of the ECB's Code for the tournament. The ban, as per the ICC statement on Friday, is backdated to 13 September 2023, when Saman was provisionally suspended. 'Following a full hearing and presentation of written and oral argument, the Tribunal found Saman guilty of: Article 2.1.1 which states, 'Being party to an attempt to fix, contrive or influence improperly matches or aspects of matches in the Abu Dhabi T10 2021'.' 'Saman is also charged under Article 2.1.3, which reads as 'Offering a Reward to another Participant in exchange for that player engaging in Corrupt Conduct under the Code,' and Article 2.1.4, which talks about, 'Directly or indirectly soliciting, inducing, enticing, instructing, persuading, encouraging or intentionally facilitating any Participant to breach Code Article 2.1,' said the ICC. The development comes after Saman, along Pune Devils franchise co-owners Krishan Kumar Chaudhary and Parag Sanghvi, Bangladesh allrounder Nasir Hossain domestic player Rizwan Javed, batting coach Ashar Zaidi, assistant coach Sunny Dhillon, and team manager Shadab Ahamed were charged by the ICC's Anti-Corruption Unit over alleged corrupt activities in the tournament. In April this year, Hossain resumed playing competitive cricket in Bangladesh after serving a two-year ban from all forms of cricket due to being found guilty of breaching the anti-corruption code. ICC had said that time that from Hossain's two-year ban, six months were suspended.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Federal judge overturns Trump administration's anti-DEI directives, blocking threats to strip funding from schools and universities
The battle over diversity, equity, and inclusion in American classrooms reached a decisive moment on Thursday when a federal judge struck down two Trump administration directives aimed at eradicating such programmes from schools and universities. The ruling dismantles a policy framework that threatened institutions with financial ruin for maintaining equity-based initiatives, and it restores, at least temporarily, the space for educators to address longstanding disparities without fear of federal reprisal. Emerging from a political climate where DEI has become both a rallying cry and a lightning rod, the decision underscores how deeply divided the nation remains on questions of race, representation, and academic freedom. Opponents of the initiatives cast them as reverse discrimination; defenders see them as vital correctives to structural inequities. This judgment does not settle that moral argument, but it imposes a procedural halt on a campaign that had sought to recast civil rights law in ways critics warned would silence lawful and necessary educational practices. A ruling that reverberates across campuses US District Judge Stephanie Gallagher of Maryland ruled that the Education Department acted unlawfully when it threatened to strip federal funding from institutions that maintained DEI efforts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like American Investor Warren Buffett Recommends: 5 Books For Turning Your Life Around Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo The contested guidance, delivered through two internal memos, ordered the elimination of all 'race-based decision-making' in admissions, hiring, financial aid, and student life, or risk severe financial penalties. The memos had been on hold since April, after multiple courts blocked portions of the department's anti-DEI campaign. Thursday's decision, prompted by a lawsuit from the American Federation of Teachers and the American Sociological Association, sweeps away the guidance entirely. Educators push back against 'censorship' Plaintiffs argued that the directives forced educators into an impossible choice: Censor lawful speech and dismantle inclusive programmes or face the loss of federal funding and possible prosecution. A drastic expansion of Supreme Court ruling The February 14 memo sought to extend the Supreme Court's 2023 ban on affirmative action well beyond its original scope. It declared that any consideration of race in academic policy was a violation of civil rights law. A follow-up in April intensified the pressure, requiring states to certify they were not using 'illegal DEI practices' or face the False Claims Act. Gallagher rejected the government's argument that the memos merely restated existing law, noting instead that they 'initiated a sea change' in oversight and left 'millions of educators' fearing punishment for lawful and even beneficial actions. The procedural faultline Crucially, Gallagher did not weigh in on whether DEI is inherently good or bad. Her ruling focused on the Education Department's failure to meet procedural requirements, ordering the immediate withdrawal of the guidance. The department has not commented on the decision, which for now halts an initiative critics described as government overreach dressed in the language of equality. A deeply polarised battlefield Supporters of the memos claimed DEI discriminates against white and Asian American students, while opponents view it as an essential tool to address entrenched inequities. Thursday's decision keeps the debate alive, and, for now, leaves space for educators to continue equity-driven practices without the shadow of federal retaliation. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!