
What's behind the Kamala Harris-based fear about wireless earphones?
We know where Kamala Harris stands when it comes to earbuds - and her take seems to have spooked the internet.
Appearing on Stephen Colbert's late night talk show The Late Show with Stephen Colbert for her first interview since losing to Donald Trump – and to promote her upcoming memoir '107 Days' - the former US vice president revealed the reason why she does not use wireless earphones.
Harris was shown some photos, including some of her taking calls after Joe Biden announced he was quitting the presidential race on 21 July 2024.
She admitted to taking more than 100 calls that day, and could be seen using wired earphones - as opposed to Bluetooth.
"I know I've been teased about this," she said. "But I like these kinds of earpods that have [a cable] because I served on the Senate Intelligence Committee."
She continued to explain: "I have been in classified briefings and I'm telling you, don't be on the train using your earpods thinking someone can't listen to your conversation. I'm telling you, the [wired earphones] are a bit more secure.'
The clip has gone viral, with social media users questioning some of their lifestyle choices and getting worried about who's listening in when it comes to wireless earpods...
"A politician warning you about how "they" are listening to you is all you need to know!" said one user, while another joked: 'Imagine the government being able to listen in through AirPods for them to find out I'm just listening to the same song on repeat for over a week."
Some were slightly more concerned.
"I hate the idea of people's privacy being violated", one wrote, while another commented: "If you're just listening to music or taking casual calls, wireless is fine. But for important/sensitive calls or data, wired is the smartest choice ... & @KamalaHarris isn't wrong for sticking to it."
So, can conversations be intercepted via wireless earpods?
According to techradar, German IT security analysts recently found flaws in the Airoha system on a chip (SoC), apparently 'widely used' in True Wireless Stereo (TWS) earbuds. These vulnerabilities were found in headphones from big names including Sony, Bose, JBL and Marshall – meaning that the security flaw could hypothetically let hackers eavesdrop on calls.
Furthermore, the UK's Ministry of Justice notes on their security guidance page that Bluetooth devices may not be safe enough for "Official-Sensitive or higher material", and can be used to track someone's location.
For people like Harris, who are high-risk individuals when it comes to spying, then wired earbuds are definitely the way to go. However, for the average user, the security risk is low.
That said, if the NSA or the FBI fancy hearing us chat about our favourite movies of the year so far, they're welcome. Some must-sees in there.
Elsewhere, regarding Stephen Colbert and the controversial cancellation of his long-running late-night talk show, Donald Trump has insisted that he is not the reason behind CBS and the network's parent company Paramount pulling the plug.
Taking to his social media platform Truth Social, Trump addressed the rumours he had something to do with the axing of the 33-year-old show: "Everybody is saying that I was solely responsible for the firing of Stephen Colbert from CBS, Late Night. That is not true!"
The president then started contemplating which one "will go first".
"Next up will be an even less talented Jimmy Kimmel, and then, a weak, and very insecure, Jimmy Fallon. The only real question is, who will go first?" wrote Trump. "Show Biz and Television is a very simple business. If you get Ratings, you can say or do anything. If you don't, you always become a victim. Colbert became a victim to himself, the other two will follow."
The final series of The Late Show with Stephen Colbert will sadly end in May 2026.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Local France
3 hours ago
- Local France
European leaders urge more 'pressure' on Russia ahead of Trump-Putin summit
Presidents Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump will meet in the US state of Alaska this Friday to try to resolve the three-year conflict, despite warnings from Ukraine and Europe that Kyiv must be part of negotiations. Announcing the summit last week, Trump said that "there'll be some swapping of territories to the betterment of both" sides, without elaborating. But President Volodymyr Zelensky warned Saturday that Ukraine won't surrender land to Russia to buy peace. "Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier," he said on social media. "Any decisions against us, any decisions without Ukraine, are also decisions against peace," he added. Zelensky urged Ukraine's allies to take "clear steps" towards achieving a sustainable peace during a call with Britain's Prime Minister Keir Starmer. European leaders issued a joint statement overnight Saturday to Sunday saying that "only an approach that combines active diplomacy, support to Ukraine and pressure on the Russian Federation to end their illegal war can succeed". They welcomed Trump's efforts, saying they were ready to help diplomatically -- by maintaining support to Ukraine, as well as by upholding and imposing restrictive measures against Russia. "The current line of contact should be the starting point of negotiations", said the statement, signed by leaders from France, Germany, Italy, Poland, Britain, Finland and EU Commission chief Ursula Von Der Leyen, without giving more details. Advertisement They also said a resolution "must protect Ukraine's and Europe's vital security interests", including "the need for robust and credible security guarantees that enable Ukraine to effectively defend its sovereignty and territorial integrity". "The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine," they said. National security advisors from Kyiv's allies -- including the United States, EU nations and the UK -- gathered in Britain Saturday to align their views ahead of the Putin-Trump summit. French President Emmanuel Macron, following phone calls with Zelensky, Starmer and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said "the future of Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukrainians" and that Europe also had to be involved in the negotiations. In his evening address Saturday, Zelensky stressed: "There must be an honest end to this war, and it is up to Russia to end the war it started." A 'dignified peace' Three rounds of talks between Russia and Ukraine this year have failed to bear fruit. Tens of thousands of people have been killed since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, with millions forced to flee their homes. Putin, a former KGB officer in power in Russia for over 25 years, has ruled out holding talks with Zelensky at this stage. Ukraine's leader has been pushing for a three-way summit and argues that meeting Putin is the only way to make progress towards peace. The summit in Alaska, the far-north territory which Russia sold to the United States in 1867, would be the first between sitting US and Russian presidents since Joe Biden met Putin in Geneva in June 2021. Nine months later, Moscow sent troops into Ukraine. Zelensky said of the location that it was "very far away from this war, which is raging on our land, against our people". The Kremlin said the choice was "logical" because the state close to the Arctic is on the border between the two countries, and this is where their "economic interests intersect". Advertisement Moscow has also invited Trump to pay a reciprocal visit to Russia later. Trump and Putin last sat together in 2019 at a G20 summit meeting in Japan during Trump's first term. They have spoken by telephone several times since January, but Trump has failed to broker peace in Ukraine as he promised he could. Fighting goes on Russia and Ukraine continued pouring dozens of drones onto each other's positions in an exchange of attacks in the early hours of Saturday. A bus carrying civilians was hit in Ukraine's frontline city of Kherson, killing two people and wounding 16. The Russian army claimed to have taken Yablonovka, another village in the Donetsk region, the site of the most intense fighting in the east and one of the five regions Putin says is part of Russia. In 2022, the Kremlin announced the annexation of four Ukrainian regions -- Donetsk, Lugansk, Zaporizhzhia and Kherson -- despite not having full control over them. As a prerequisite to any peace settlement, Moscow demanded Kyiv pull its forces out of the regions and commit to being a neutral state, shun Western military support and be excluded from joining NATO. Kyiv said it would never recognise Russian control over its sovereign territory, though it acknowledged that getting land captured by Russia back would have to come through diplomacy, not on the battlefield.


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Nawrocki's first trip as Polish President will be to meet Trump in US
Karol Nawrocki's first visit as President of Poland will to be the United States, where he will meet with Donald Trump. The head of the President's Cabinet, Pawel Szefernaker, announced Nawrocki's meeting with Trump on X on Saturday. "In an official congratulatory letter delivered on the day of his swearing-in, US President Donald Trump invited Polish President Karol Nawrocki to the White House for an official working meeting on 3 September 2025," wrote Szefernaker. The meeting is expected to focus on bilateral relations, security cooperation and NATO, as Warsaw aims to strengthen its strategic partnership with Washington. Relations with the United States, including the Polish diaspora, the Trump administration, NATO and Trump himself, were one of the key themes in the Polish presidential campaign, which concluded with the second round of elections in June. With the ongoing war in Ukraine and security issues along the border with Belarus, both candidates in the race ran their campaign on the premise that they would be the ones to ensure the best possible transatlantic cooperation. During a parade marking the 3rd of May, the anniversary of the Polish Constitution, Nawrocki met with the Polish community in Chicago to celebrate the holiday and express his support for the close ties between the two countries. The previous day, Nawrocki was received in the Oval Office by US President Donald Trump, after attending an event to mark the National Day of Prayer. During a presidential debate in April, Nawrocki conveyed that his priority was to go to Washington "to sort out our international relations and do what Donald Tusk's government is not doing". A US delegation led by Kelly Loeffler, head of the Small Business Administration, was present at Nawrocki's presidential inauguration. Loeffler highlighted the US commitment to its alliance with Poland, emphasising the development of economic cooperation and common security goals. Marcin Przydacz from the president's office said that Nawrocki received a sculpture of an eagle from the US delegation - a symbolic expression of the close relations between the two countries. Can the US be a guarantor of lasting peace for Poland? Many conservative politicians in Poland welcomed Trump's policy, even despite the US president's clashes with Ukraine and President Volodymyr Zelenski. "Without the Americans, it is difficult to imagine a lasting peace, and yet we all strive for it," Morawiecki said in an interview with Euronews in March. He added that "without American support we in Europe would not have been able to maintain peace for decades". Current Polish President Andrzej Duda expressed similar sentiments. "Today my conclusion is absolutely unequivocal, there is no one but the United States who can stop Putin," Duda said in an interview with Euronews . "That is why I believe that President Donald Trump, through his determination, can end this war," he added. Duda was the first international leader to visit Donald Trump at the White House after his inauguration in January. Poles have ambiguous opinions on the US Most Poles recognise the military might of the US, leading many to appreciate the strategic relationship between the two countries. A survey conducted in March for the Polish weekly magazine Polityka found that 85% of respondents recognized the US as a powerful military presence globally. At the same time, the percentage of Poles who say the US has a positive impact on the world is falling. In a survey conducted by state research institution CBOS in April 2025, only 20% of respondents said the US had a positive influence on international politics, the lowest recorded result since the agency began measuring this opinion in 2006. Data from the same survey also shows that only 31% of Poles would rate Polish-US relations as "good" - this is the lowest score since the fall of communism. "Model NATO ally" Key figures from the Trump administration have praised Poland's policies, including the country's commitment to security spending and migration policy. In February, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth described Poland as a "model NATO ally" after a meeting with his Polish counterpart Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz. In turn, Secretary of State Marco Rubio expressed similar sentiments in a statement. "Poland and the United States stand together as partners in building a safer and more prosperous future for our peoples," he wrote. "We look forward to further strengthening our cooperation on energy security." "Our shared future has never looked brighter," Rubio added.


France 24
11 hours ago
- France 24
Armenians caught between hope and distrust after accord with Azerbaijan
The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan, two Caucasian countries embroiled in a territorial conflict since the fall of the USSR, met Friday and signed a peace treaty under the watch of US President Donald Trump. In Yerevan, however, few of the people asked by AFP were enthusiastic. 'Acceptable' "It's a good thing that this document was signed because Armenia has no other choice," said Asatur Srapyan, an 81-year-old retiree. He believes Armenia hasn't achieved much with this draft agreement, but it's a step in the right direction. "We are very few in number, we don't have a powerful army, we don't have a powerful ally behind us, unlike Azerbaijan," he said. "This accord is a good opportunity for peace." Maro Huneyan, a 31-year-old aspiring diplomat, also considers the pact "acceptable", provided it does not contradict her country's constitution. "If Azerbaijan respects all the agreements, it's very important for us. But I'm not sure it will keep its promises and respect the points of the agreement," she added. 'endless concessions' But Anahit Eylasyan, 69, opposes the agreement and, more specifically, the plan to create a transit zone crossing Armenia to connect the Nakhchivan region to the rest of Azerbaijan. "We are effectively losing control of our territory. It's as if, in my own apartment, I had to ask a stranger if I could go from one room to another," she explains. She also hopes not to see Russia, an ally of Armenia despite recent tensions, expelled from the region." Anahit also criticizes Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan for "making decisions for everyone" and for his "endless concessions to Azerbaijan". "We got nothing in exchange, not our prisoners, nor our occupied lands, nothing. It's just a piece of paper to us," she fumes. Shavarsh Hovhannisyan, a 68-year-old construction engineer, agrees, saying the agreement "is just an administrative formality that brings nothing to Armenia." "We can't trust Azerbaijan," Hovhannisyan asserted, while accusing Pashinyan of having "turned his back" on Russia and Iran. "It's more of a surrender document than a peace treaty, while Trump only thinks about his image, the Nobel Prize." 'More stability... in the short term' According to President Trump, Armenia and Azerbaijan have committed "to stop all fighting forever; open up commerce, travel and diplomatic relations; and respect each other's sovereignty and territorial integrity." For Olesya Vartanyan, an independent researcher specializing in the Caucasus, the Washington agreement "certainly brings greater stability and more guarantees for the months, if not years, to come." But given the long-lasting tensions between Armenia and Azerbaijan, "I fear that we will have to plan only for the very short term," she said.