logo
Hawaii to receive $700M in drug settlement over blood thinner

Hawaii to receive $700M in drug settlement over blood thinner

Yahoo10-05-2025

Hawaii will receive $700 million in a landmark settlement from pharmaceutical giants Bristol Myers Squibb and Sanofi following more than a decade of litigation over the blood thinner Plavix and its lack of efficacy in Asian American, Pacific Islander and Native Hawaiian populations, Gov. Josh Green announced Friday.
The state had accused the companies of failing to warn that Plavix—one of the most widely prescribed blood thinners—was either less effective or completely ineffective in people of certain ethnic backgrounds.
The medication, which requires activation by liver enzymes, was prescribed more than 837, 000 times in Hawaii between 1998 and 2010.
'Proud to report to you that after nearly a decade of litigation and through the perseverance of the office of the attorney general … the state has reached a landmark settlement with two multinational pharmaceutical companies, ' Green said at a state Capitol news conference. 'It's a historic result that we're grateful for.'
Although the state was originally awarded $834 million in a 2023 nonjury trial, an amount later increased to $916 million in a 2024 retrial, the new settlement guarantees an immediate payout, avoiding years of appeals and uncertainty. Green said the state is expected to receive the full $700 million by June 9, adding, 'We've reached a good-faith settlement here with the parties.'
The state and Bristol-­Myers Squibb, headquartered in Lawrenceville, N.J., finalized a $350 million settlement Friday, resolving all claims related to the marketing and sale of Plavix, with a matching agreement executed separately with Paris-based Sanofi.
Under the settlement terms, Bristol-Myers Squibb will wire the full amount by June 9 to the state's counsel in the case, Baron &Budd PC, after which Hawaii will withdraw its lawsuit and release the drugmaker from any further liability related to Plavix.
The settlement does not preclude private citizens or state employees in their personal capacities from filing claims against the drugmaker.
Bristol-Myers Squibb did not admit to any wrongdoing and agreed to settle to avoid continued litigation. Both parties will cover their own legal fees, and the agreement is governed by Hawaii law, with any disputes to be resolved in the state's 1st Circuit Court.
Green said the windfall comes at a pivotal moment for the state. Hawaii is still managing the financial fallout from the COVID-19 pandemic ; the Aug. 8, 2023, Maui wildfires disaster ; and mounting concerns over possible federal funding cuts.
Green said his administration has been working closely with legislative leaders to prepare for a potential special session later this year in the event of Medicaid shortfalls, funding gaps in EBT (Electronic Benefits Transfer ) benefits through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, commonly known as food stamps, or unmet school lunch needs.
'These moneys, I've already spoken to the legislative leadership, ' he said. 'They knew that these dollars were coming so they could begin the process, as we already had planned, to potentially have a special session later in the year, ' Green said.
'This settlement of $700 million is going to go a very long way to help our people.'
The decision by the two drugmakers to settle the state's claims avoids further proceedings and finalizes a case that has drawn national attention for its focus on racial and ethnic disparities in pharmaceutical safety.
State Attorney General Anne Lopez, who joined the governor at Friday's news conference, emphasized the years of effort her office put into the case, calling the outcome a message to corporations doing business in Hawaii.
'It is important to me that everyone who does business in the state of Hawaii, whether you're a small shop or a multinational, multibillion-dollar oil company, knows that the Attorney General's Office will be relentless in our pursuit of compliance with our consumer protection laws.'
A nonjury trial in the case in 2023 resulted in an $834 million award to the state. That ruling was vacated by the Hawaii Supreme Court, which found a legal error by the trial judge. A second trial was held in the fall of 2023, and 1st Circuit Judge James Ashford in May 2024 increased the award to more than $916 million, before the parties agreed to settle.
Green said the final $700 million settlement, once legal fees are taken into account, will be directed to the state's general fund to support underfunded health and social programs, particularly those that serve vulnerable communities. The governor noted the Legislature will ultimately decide how the funds are allocated, but his administration is advocating for investments that align with pressing health and equity needs.
'We will be completely collaborative with the Legislature. We will ask for their advice on where they would like to appropriate these moneys. … They may decide to spend more money on housing, they may decide to spend more money directly on health care benefits.'
The case also spotlighted broader concerns about how pharmaceutical companies consider—or fail to consider—ethnic and genetic diversity in drug development and warnings. Experts say it could set a precedent for other jurisdictions where diverse populations may be similarly affected.
Special Attorney General Rick Fried, with the Honolulu law firm Cronin, Fried, Sekiya, Kekina &Fairbanks, said he started working on the case in 2012 with then-­Attorney General David Louie.
'It's been 13 years we've been working on this—two trials up to the Supreme Court and back. We were going back again, and we finally were able to work out this resolution, ' Fried said Friday. 'There were … lots of discoveries in between.'
The state Department of the Attorney General confirmed that the Honolulu law firm had contracted Dallas-based Baron &Budd PC, which specializes in representing plaintiffs' claims.
Neither the state nor Cronin, Fried, Sekiya, Kekina &Fairbanks disclosed how much of the settlement would go to the law firms.
'There are a few loose ends, and so we can give more details when those are finalized, and we will give more details at that time, ' Fried said. 'But for now this is all we can say with respect to the details of this case.'
As the state prepares for a potentially volatile federal budget year, Green said the timing of the payout will give Hawaii some breathing room 'to honor the priorities of the Legislature and everyone's needs.'
While the settlement represents a historic legal victory for Hawaii, officials emphasized it also marks renewed efforts toward health equity and corporate accountability.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘We're on the cusp of more widespread adoption': Laura Shin on Trump, stablecoins, and the global rise of cryptocurrency
‘We're on the cusp of more widespread adoption': Laura Shin on Trump, stablecoins, and the global rise of cryptocurrency

Fast Company

time32 minutes ago

  • Fast Company

‘We're on the cusp of more widespread adoption': Laura Shin on Trump, stablecoins, and the global rise of cryptocurrency

With the first family actively engaged in memecoin ventures, speculation about the future of cryptocurrency has never been hotter. Laura Shin, crypto expert and host of the podcast Unchained, reveals the sector's emerging economic, political, and geopolitical implications. Shin also provides context for why stablecoins are growing so fast and how the current administration is shaping the conversation. This is an abridged transcript of an interview from Rapid Response, hosted by Robert Safian, former editor-in-chief of Fast Company. From the team behind the Masters of Scale podcast, Rapid Response features candid conversations with today's top business leaders navigating real-time challenges. Subscribe to Rapid Response wherever you get your podcasts to ensure you never miss an episode. You call yourself a no-hype crypto journalist, so can you give us a short, no-hype overview of where we are right now in crypto's evolution? Yeah, I would say we're probably on the cusp of more widespread adoption. The number-one biggest reason is simply that the Trump administration is really embracing crypto. That has not been true of previous administrations. In fact, the Biden administration was probably, I want to say, actively hostile. I don't know if people will love that term, but that's probably a pretty accurate description. For a long time, there were a lot of entrepreneurs who were cautious about doing things in the U.S. This administration is more, not only open-minded, but even in some regards almost a little bit too embracing of crypto, you could say. I think there's going to be probably a decent number of crypto IPOs this year, but then on top of it, stablecoins are probably the first major application that has really found what the industry likes to call product-market fit. We're seeing that stablecoins have a huge amount of uptake, especially in so many other jurisdictions where they don't trust their local currency. It could be Argentina or Venezuela or Turkey or Nigeria. There are just a lot of places where people don't actually have a great way to save their money, and they maybe don't also have really great ways to send money across borders. So, stablecoins are fulfilling that role and Congress is probably on the cusp of finally passing legislation here in the U.S. around stablecoins. For a layperson, someone not engaged in the crypto world, can you just explain what a stablecoin is relative to a memecoin, relative to whatever the portfolio might look like? Yeah, so a stablecoin is any blockchain-based asset that is pegged to the value of some other asset—99% of all stablecoins are pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar. The way that stablecoins really took off initially was that on a number of crypto exchanges, people wanted to be able to buy and trade using dollars. I wrote this book called The Cryptopians, and it covers 2013 until 2018. Even at that time, people would recite back to me the price of Bitcoin or the price of Ether in dollars. No matter whether they were European or Asian or just wherever they were in the world, they always knew the price in dollars. . . . Here's a really simple example: There's a serial entrepreneur in Afghanistan. Her name is Roya Mahboob, and she had this microblogging platform, and I think a lot of the people writing for it were women. They had a hard time paying them, because a lot of women in Afghanistan, they don't have bank accounts, or if they do, then their male relatives might actually take the money that they earned from them. So [the platform] set them up with Bitcoin wallets and then taught them how to use them. One of the women was in an abusive marriage and saved up the Bitcoin and then used that to eventually divorce her husband, so that gives you some kind of agency. I have some close Turkish friends, and I think it was in 2018, the value of the lira was just going down and down. So it's like people in those places I think grasp these kinds of things a lot more quickly, like the value of crypto. Having a form of money that isn't influenced by a central bank, that's stablecoins. Because the stablecoins are generally linked to the U.S. dollar, it's a way to sort of have dollars without having dollars, right? Exactly. I mean, you're getting the stability of that U.S. market, which there's some irony in that, because of course one of the philosophical ideas around crypto is that it's not linked to a government, that it's separate. Now we're going to get really deep into this. So you're correct that this is people wanting U.S. dollars, which is a form of currency linked to a specific government, but of course the people who want those dollars are people who don't otherwise have the privilege of easily accessing them. Bitcoin, of course, existed before stablecoins ever existed. There have been times when the Bitcoin price would go up, and then it would crash for a little while, and then it would go up again and then it would crash, and so that's kind of when you started to see stablecoins also take off. A lot of people view Bitcoin as a good long-term investment, but on any short-term timescale, you don't really know where the price is going to be, so if you need the money on a shorter-term timescale, then you would probably rather have something more stable, and so that's where the interest in stablecoins came about. There's a reason why 99% of the stablecoins are denominated or pegged to the value of the U.S. dollar, and it's of course because we're the global reserve currency, so there's a lot of safety there. Trump seems like he's done a full 180 on crypto. I mean, he said it was a scam during his first term and then supported it very strongly in his campaign. He's launched his own Trump coin three days before the inauguration. Do we know how much of Trump's crypto position is about political opportunity or financial opportunity, or some larger philosophy about markets? I don't think there's a larger philosophy. I think most people probably know what Trump's MO is. But let's just say he's president and he took a luxury jetliner from the Qataris, so whatever it is that you think that says about him, it applies to his activities in the crypto world. What I will say though, aside from his personal dealings, which by and large in my opinion, they're business dealings, things that would help his family or him. He launches this memecoin, which by the way, to make one of these things costs almost no money, so I just want to make that clear, and you're basically printing money out of thin air, right? But then on top of that, the people who got in very early, they just had some agreement where they had to hold their coins until whatever it was, 90 days or I forget what the number of days was. Now, fortuitously, when that deadline came, [Trump] announced that he was going to have a dinner, and in order to participate in the dinner, you had to be one of the top holders of this coin, so of course the price shot up right at that time when this unlock was happening for those insiders. Just note the timing there and put those two facts together and you can make your own conclusions, but, well, let me put it this way: Trump saw that the Biden administration alienated the crypto community. He realized these people have money and they hate the Democrats. . . . He said, 'I'm the crypto candidate,' and he even went to the Bitcoin conference last year. He made all these promises to the crypto community and Bitcoin communities. On top of that, people in his personal orbit, his family, realized this industry is going to get bigger, this industry's all about money, and so they have been taking advantage. So you will see, and this is very interesting, there were a number of people who were very passionately pro-Trump during the campaign, and then once the memecoin thing happened, because not only Trump, but also Melania launched a memecoin, and they were not happy about what he was doing. It was reported that their company, World Liberty Financial, was doing deals with different token teams where basically they were just exchanging money. 'I'll give you this amount of money if you buy the World Liberty Financial token, and we'll buy this amount of your token. I'll scratch your back and you scratch mine.' But people in the industry also kind of look down on that, because it's not organic.

U.S. Futures Drop As Trump Says He'll Set Unilateral Tariffs In 2 Weeks
U.S. Futures Drop As Trump Says He'll Set Unilateral Tariffs In 2 Weeks

Forbes

time41 minutes ago

  • Forbes

U.S. Futures Drop As Trump Says He'll Set Unilateral Tariffs In 2 Weeks

U.S. stock futures slumped early on Thursday—with the Dow index dropping by more than 200 points—after President Donald Trump said his administration will soon send letters to other countries unilaterally outlining the tariff rates that will be imposed on them. U.S. President Donald Trump speaks to the media during a guided tour of the John F. Kennedy Center ... More for the Performing Arts. While attending a show at the Kennedy Center on Wednesday evening, Trump was asked about extending the ongoing 90-day tariff pause—which will expire on July 9—and said: 'I would, but I don't think we're going to have that necessity.' The president said the U.S. was negotiating with 15 countries, including Japan and South Korea. Trump then noted that the U.S. has around '150 plus' trading partners and 'at a certain point, we're just going to send letters out…saying this is the deal, you can take it or leave it.' 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries, telling them what the deal is,' he added. The president touted the proposed agreement with China as a 'great deal,' adding, 'We're very happy with it, we have everything we need.' U.S. stock futures slumped in premarket trading early Thursday, with the benchmark S&P 500 slipping by 0.4% to 6,004 points. The Dow Futures index was the worst hit, dropping by 0.5% to 42,684 points, while the tech-focused Nasdaq Futures fell 0.4% to 21,799 points.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store