Cars priced below R400,000 are driving the growth in SA's new vehicle market
Image: Supplied
The good times are rolling in South Africa's new vehicle market, with nine consecutive months of sales growth putting the industry 13.6% ahead of where it was this time last year, Naamsa figures show.
June was a particularly strong month for the motor trade, with year-on-year sales growing by 18.7% to 47,294 units, as both passenger cars and light commercial vehicles made solid gains of 21.7% and 14.9% respectively.
But household budgets remain tight and much of the growth is currently concentrated at the lower end of the vehicle market.
'The majority of the growth we're seeing is centred in the sub-R400,000 segment,' said Brandon Cohen, chairperson of the National Automobile Dealers' Association (NADA). 'This price point remains critical for volume, affordability and trade-ins, with a direct knock-on effect on pre-owned sales performance,'
He added that the used vehicle market was also benefiting from improved affordability metrics, driven by softened interest rates, favourable vehicle pricing, and the rollout of the two-pot retirement savings reform.
Most telling is that 24 of the 30 best-selling new passenger vehicles in South Africa last month (see IOL's top 50 list here) have a starting price of below R400,000.
In fact, four of the five top-sellers, namely the Volkswagen Polo Vivo, Chery Tiggo 4 Pro, Suzuki Swift, and Hyundai Grand i10, all have starting prices of less than R300,000.
Many buyers continue to face budget constraints, said Lebo Gaoaketse, marketing head of WesBank, and at a finance level this is being seen through longer contract terms and lower credit amounts.
"These are two major indicators of affordability pressure to reduce monthly installments within the need for new replacement vehicles,' Gaoaketse added. 'In short: South Africans want new cars – but they're spending less on them.'
According to late-2024 data from TransUnion, the average loan amount on a new car in South Africa is currently R401,000.
Yet, regardless of how much South Africans are spending, it seems evident that lower interest rates have had a positive effect on new vehicle sales.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
'South Africa's new vehicle market growth has an uncanny alignment to the start of interest rate cuts,' Gaoaketse added.
'Interest rate reprieve since September 2024 has lifted some burden on indebted consumers and stimulated demand for credit and consequently new vehicles. The South African Reserve Bank has lowered rates 0,75% over the past nine months but may become more cautious with further cuts given global economic turmoil.'
Absa's new vehicle application figures show a 13% year-on-year increase in June compared to the same period last year.
'The decreasing interest rate and the stable inflation rate have provided a welcome boost to consumers. As a result, consumers pay less on home loan and other debt instalments, increasing their ability to purchase new cars,' said Henry Botha, strategy executive at Absa Vehicle Finance.
IOL Motoring
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
2 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Integrating AI in your business can be a double-edged sword
AI promises to transform businesses with smarter systems and personalised customer experiences. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. Without proper scrutiny, these tools can do more harm than good. The AI sales pitch is irresistible: automated customer service, hyper-personalised engagement, razor-sharp inventory forecasting. But AI, like any tool, requires skill to wield. 'AI isn't magic; it's math and data,' said Matthew Elliot, chief delivery officer at tech consultancy CloudSmiths. 'The more visibility you have into how it works and what it's doing, the safer your outcomes will be.' 'Safe' is the key word here. While AI can give any business an edge, it can just as easily entrench inequality, expose private data, or simply, much like humans, make bad calls. Riskier than you think According to Wendy Tembedza, partner at Webber Wentzel, the issue isn't whether or not to use AI – because most businesses already do. The problems creep in when the risks of its usage are not rigorously assessed. 'Businesses must carefully consider the intended use case of any AI tool and conduct a risk assessment prior to implementation,' she advised. 'This helps manage the risks that may arise from incorrect or inappropriate use.' Those risks include exposure to legal liability if systems fail to meet ethical or compliance standards. If an AI tool inadvertently discriminates, say by offering preferential pricing or marketing to customers living in urban areas that shop online, it poses the risk of enforcing bias. 'In a society where South Africans have unequal access to the internet, AI tools that learn only from online behaviour run the risk of generating biased results,' Tembedza warned. 'The resulting insights may fail to reflect the actual behaviours and preferences of the wider customer base.' Bad inputs, bad outcomes Much of the risk begins with the data. AI tools need clean, well-structured, and representative data to train on. 'Bad inputs make bad decisions,' Elliot said. 'If you don't know where your data came from or how your model behaves, you're flying blind.' TymeBank chief technology officer, Bruce Paveley agrees on that point. 'Bank data is carefully selected and scrubbed to ensure we don't put dirty data into our AI tools,' he said. 'We also allow our AI tools to use learning from other reliable sources to avoid bias toward our own ideas.' What is 'dirty' data? This refers to information that is inaccurate, incomplete, or outdated, hindering the performance and reliability of AI models Elliot reckons that bias is a human problem as much as it is a technical issue, and if your model isn't trained on diverse, representative data, it will leave people behind. To mitigate this, CloudSmiths has developed workflows that stress-tests models against real-world scenarios, using tools such as 'Objective Lens' to detect underrepresentation and misclassification. 'If your AI doesn't work for everyone, it doesn't really work,' Elliot said. Inventory gains, infrastructure pains Inventory management is one of AI's most lucrative use cases. Predictive tools can anticipate buying trends and automate restocking, which reduces waste. But again, the model is only as smart as the data it learns from. 'In practice, many retailers do not have centralised or well-organised data sets,' Tembedza said. 'If data used to train AI models are outdated, inconsistent or inaccurate, no level of technical sophistication can compensate.' Even when the data is right, legacy IT systems often aren't. 'Many retailers continue to operate on legacy information technology systems that may not support the integration of the AI tools they intend to implement,' Tembedza added. In Africa, up to 60% of businesses cited IT infrastructure as a major barrier to AI implementation, a survey by cybersecurity company Fortinet found. Modern, cloud-first businesses like TymeBank are less encumbered, but even their barriers are not always technical. 'The challenge was more adoption by our team members rather than a technical limitation,' said Paveley. 'Education and exposure were key enablers to get our team to embrace AI as a productivity tool rather than one that threatens their jobs.' Leak risks of generative AI When it comes to businesses that adopt and use AI, the most insidious risk does not necessarily come from a chatbot gone rogue but rather from employees pasting confidential information into ChatGPT. 'Never assume off-the-shelf AI is private by default,' Elliot said. He sees companies frequently underestimating the risk of intellectual property exposure and data leaks from generative AI tools. His advice: Use air-gapped or private models for anything involving intellectual property. Train staff on what's safe to input. Review AI governance legislation, like the EU's AI Act. Establish monitoring and evaluation frameworks from day one. 'There needs to be a policy to govern, rather than restrict, usage of AI in our business,' Paveley said. 'Our staff need to complete AI training to ensure they understand the power of productivity improvements but also for awareness of the associated risks.' Boost engagement, don't alienate Done right, the shiny promise of personalisation through AI can boost engagement. If not, it reinforces stereotypes and alienates customers and clients. 'The most ethical AI is also the most useful,' Elliot said. 'If users trust the experience, they are more likely to engage with it – and that's good for everyone.' 'Personalisation shouldn't enforce stereotypes; it should surprise you, teach you something new, or reflect who you're becoming, not just who you've been.' Helpful or harmful? For all its potential, AI certainly doesn't solve problems on its own and certainly not by default. 'The questions are similar from what we hear every day from our South African and UK clients,' Elliot said. 'Typically it's concerns around safety, fairness, cost or return on investment. It seems most businesses are desperately trying to minimise AI risk while staying competitive.'
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
How ANC's collusion with big businesses undermines transformation
Nco Dube a political economist, businessman, and social commentator. Image: Supplied South Africa's post-apartheid journey has been marked by a bold constitutional promise: to dismantle the economic structures of racial privilege and build a society where the black majority can share in the country's wealth and opportunities. Central to this promise are the empowerment laws, Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) and Affirmative Action (AA), crafted to drive economic inclusion and redress decades of exclusion. Yet, nearly three decades on, the slow pace of transformation and the growing backlash against these laws reveal a darker reality: a coordinated agenda, both local and global, to halt transformation, preserve white privilege, and enrich a narrow elite. At the heart of this crisis lies a deeply troubling collusion between big business and ANC elites. A symbiotic relationship that has subverted the original intent of empowerment laws, turning them into tools for elite enrichment rather than broad-based economic justice. The Promise and the Betrayal of Empowerment When the ANC was unbanned in 1990 and South Africa embarked on its democratic journey, the vision was clear: to dismantle apartheid's economic legacy and create a more equitable society. BEE and AA laws were designed to open doors for black South Africans through ownership, management, employment equity, and skills development. There have been pockets of progress. Black ownership and representation in certain sectors have increased, and a black middle class has emerged. Some black entrepreneurs have thrived, and certain companies have made genuine strides in employment equity. But for the ordinary black South African, the man on the street, these gains have often been invisible or out of reach. Poverty, unemployment, and inequality remain entrenched, and the benefits of transformation have been captured by a small, politically connected elite. This failure is no accident. It is the product of systemic corruption, incompetence, and a political will that has been fatally compromised by the very leaders entrusted with delivering transformation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading The Symbiotic Relationship Between Big Business and ANC Elites Since the unbanning of the ANC, a problematic alliance has formed between big business and ANC political elites. White monopoly capital, anxious to protect its interests in the new dispensation, extended lucrative BEE deals to ANC insiders. This was not broad-based empowerment, it was a transactional pact: business secured access to government contracts, regulatory favour, and influence, while ANC elites gained wealth and power. This arrangement has had devastating consequences for genuine transformation: Elite Enrichment Through Selective BEE Deals: Instead of empowering the masses, many BEE deals were structured to benefit a narrow group of ANC-connected individuals. Shares, directorships, and business opportunities were handed to political insiders, creating a black elite that often mirrored the exclusivity of the apartheid-era white elite. The majority of black South Africans saw little direct benefit from these deals. Empirical evidence shows that many beneficiaries of these deals were ANC apparatchiks, with the majority of black South Africans seeing little direct benefit. Board Appointments and Political Influence: At least 56 ANC politicians have held directorships in major JSE-listed companies, blurring the lines between political power and corporate governance. This overlap ensured that business interests were protected and that policies favoured entrenched elites rather than broad economic inclusion. Research shows a significant overlap between ANC politicians and the boards of major JSE-listed companies. Many of them holding multiple directorships across a wide array of companies. This integration allowed big business to secure their interests by aligning with politically influential individuals, ensuring favourable treatment and policy influence, rather than driving genuine transformation. Fronting and Window-Dressing: Many companies engaged in fronting, appointing black individuals to nominal positions to meet BEE requirements without transferring real control or economic benefit. This practice allowed companies to access government contracts and benefits fraudulently, undermining the integrity of empowerment laws. While real control and benefits remain with the original (often white) owners. Examples include listing low-level black employees as company directors without their knowledge or creating side agreements that strip black shareholders of real power. State Capture and Policy Manipulation: The alliance between business and ANC elites facilitated state capture, where government resources and policy were manipulated to serve private interests. The mutually beneficial relationship between business and ANC elites has led to 'state capture,' where business interests influence legislation and procurement processes for their own benefit, often at the expense of the broader public. This has included shaping policies to favour certain companies, securing lucrative government contracts, and manipulating regulatory frameworks to protect established interests. The Bosasa scandal, for example, involved manufacturing BEE credentials and funnelling money to the ANC through corrupt tender processes, with cash bribes and fraudulent invoicing used to secure government business and support election campaigns. This collusion has transformed empowerment laws from instruments of justice into mechanisms for elite enrichment and preservation of privilege. The focus on enriching a politically connected elite, rather than fostering broad-based participation and economic inclusion, has led to widespread public disillusionment and persistent inequality. The original vision of BEE as a tool for mass empowerment has been subverted by collusion between big business and ANC elites, resulting in a narrow base of beneficiaries and limited progress for the majority. The Global Rightward Shift and the Anti-Transformation Agenda Adding fuel to the fire is the global political climate. The rise of right-wing populism in the United States and elsewhere has emboldened anti-transformation forces in South Africa. Figures like Donald Trump and Elon Musk have amplified narratives of white victimhood, including the false and dangerous 'white genocide' myth targeting South Africa. White interest groups such as the Democratic Alliance (DA), Solidarity, and Afriforum have seized this moment to push back against transformation. They cloak their agendas in rhetoric about 'meritocracy' and 'non-racialism,' but their true aim is to preserve apartheid-era privileges and slow the pace of change. Meanwhile, as the ANC faces potential electoral decline, white monopoly capital is already seeking new political partners to maintain its influence, regardless of who governs. The anti-transformation agenda is thus both a local and international phenomenon, threatening to roll back the hard-won gains of the past three decades. Successes, Failures, and the Road Ahead It is important to acknowledge the successes. There are black entrepreneurs, professionals, and leaders who have leveraged empowerment laws to build businesses and create jobs. Some sectors have made genuine progress in diversifying ownership and management. But these successes are exceptions, not the rule. The systemic failures of corruption, elite capture, fronting, and state capture have undermined the transformative potential of empowerment laws. The struggle over South Africa's empowerment laws is a struggle for the soul of the nation. Will the country continue down a path where transformation is hollowed out by corruption and elite collusion, or will it reclaim the constitutional imperative to build an inclusive economy for all its people? The stakes could not be higher.
IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Win big with Cell C: R10 million in prizes awaits you
Cell C is giving South Africans 10 million reasons to stay connected with the return of its thrilling Win Big campaign – Amplified. Why settle for small wins when you can have amplified ones? Cell C is cranking up the volume on rewards - from instant prizes to R100,000 in cash, this campaign is designed to change lives. Whether you're recharging, upgrading, or signing up, every move you make brings you closer to winning life-changing rewards from instant vouchers to R100,000 in cash. This year's Win Big campaign is bigger and better across every touchpoint, with over R10 million in prizes up for grabs across national, regional, in-store, and radio platforms. Here's how to Win Big – amplified style: Recharge, upgrade, or sign up – each action is an entry. Score instant vouchers and weekly in-store wins of R1,000. Win big with cash prizes of up to R100,000 – and possibly your contract for life! And there's more!
