Hyett relishing chance to show what England can do
It is the second edition of the U20 tournament, which debuted in Italy last year, when England won two of their three matches.
Twenty-year-old centre Hyett, who tasted Premiership Women's Rugby glory with Gloucester Hartpury earlier this year, is keen for England to focus on their own game and let everything else take care of itself.
'I'm excited for [the Scotland game] and I think it'll be a really good battle,' said Worcester native Hyett.
'We know they're going to be physical and turn up on the day, but it's just about playing our game and doing what we're good at.
'It's a really good chance for this U20 group to showcase what they can do. We've been working really hard this past six or seven months and it's exciting to show what we're about on the pitch.'
Following on from the 2024 Women's Summer Series, 14 players across the six countries went on to achieve senior honours during the 2025 Guinness Women's Six Nations, including England's Lilli Ives Campion.
And Hyett, who took up rugby aged four after growing up with three brothers who all played the sport, highlighted the importance of the Women's Summer Series for giving players the opportunity to stand out and to use it as a springboard to break into the senior team.
'In the top bracket of the older year of U20s, it's a good step and good time to prepare yourself for senior rugby, whether that's for PWR or the Red Roses. It's everyone's dream to play for the Red Roses,' she added.
'Senior coaches are watching this, and we've already seen players like Millie David, Sarah Parry and Lilli too kick on, so it's great that progression is there.'
With women's rugby on an upward trajectory, the 2025 Six Nations Women's Summer Series is a big chance for stars of the future to gain vital international experience, graduate along the development pathway, while also inspiring a new generation of rugby fans.
Spread across three dates during July, England will also face Italy on 11 July before rounding off their campaign against France six days later.
Julie Paterson, Chief of Rugby at Six Nations Rugby, added: 'The Women's Summer Series is an essential part of the strategy and commitment of Six Nations Rugby, and the six unions and federations, to proactively support the creation and growth of opportunities in the women's game.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
MPs to vote on making Premier League games free-to-air
MPs are to vote on a proposal to force the Premier League to make at least 10 games a season free-to-air by law. An amendment to the Football Governance Bill has been tabled by the Liberal Democrats, giving Parliament its first say on whether the world's richest league should remain entirely behind a paywall. A pledge to make at least 10 Premier League matches a season free-to-air was part of the Lib Dems' General Election manifesto but it failed to gain support from Labour and the Conservatives and there has been no sign of that having changed since. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer would therefore be able to use his large parliamentary majority to crush the proposal by Sir Ed Davey's party upon it being put to a vote of MPs on Tuesday. The amendment being tabled would also require the new Independent Football Regulator to ensure that the League Cup final and the English Football League's play-off finals were shown free-to-air. But the Lib Dems' primary target is the Premier League, for which virtually every match has been exclusively behind a paywall since its inception 33 years ago. Davey's party cited analysis that showed armchair fans would have to cough up £660 to watch every game next season under the competition's latest TV deals with Sky Sports and TNT Sports, as well as figures showing viewership on the channels fell 10 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively, last term. It also pointed out that La Liga's partnership with streaming service DAZN included one free-to-air game a week. Max Wilkinson MP, Lib Dem spokesperson for Culture, Media and Sport said: 'I'm urging MPs of all stripes to back our amendment to tear down the paywall and make Premier League games available on free-to-air channels. 'For too long, the jewel in the crown of British football has been locked behind an expensive barrier that keeps fans out while lining the pockets of broadcasters. 'Fans are being rinsed of every last penny to watch the beautiful game, while the next generation of Bellinghams and Bronzes are priced out of the chance to see football played at the very top level. 'That must end today – with a free-to-air revolution that gives the Premier League back to the country.' The Premier League declined to comment but Telegraph Sport has been told that making games free-to-air would inevitably reduce the value of its UK broadcast contract and put at risk some of the millions it redistributes within football and to other causes. This is a political football – free-to-air Premier League action is years away There have long been calls for the Premier League to make some of its matches free-to-air but MPs have never voted on a proposal to force it to do so by law. And before anyone gets carried away – including at the likes of the BBC or ITV – they should take note of the fact that Tuesday's vote has been orchestrated by the Liberal Democrats. Indeed, there has been no sign of the Lib Dems' amendment to the Football Governance Bill being backed by Labour or the Conservatives, both of whom have had plenty of opportunities in the last 33 years to do something akin to what Sir Ed Davey's party is proposing. Of course, the latter knows this and is doubtless using the issue as a political football weeks after England fans turned on Sir Keir Starmer during the country's World Cup qualifier against Andorra. Given the crises engulfing the Prime Minister over issues such as his botched flagship welfare reforms and cuts to winter fuel payments, painting him as the celebrity Arsenal fan who refuses to support making some Premier League games free feels like an open goal in the current climate. According to analysis cited by the Lib Dems, both Sky Sports and TNT Sports experienced a decline in Premier League viewership last season. At least part of that decline would have been down to illegal streaming, with Telegraph Sport chronicling earlier this year how many fans appeared to have shunned expensive subscriptions in favour of cheap modified Fire Sticks. With more Premier League matches than ever being shown live in the UK next season – 270 versus 200 – via one fewer broadcaster, executives at Sky and TNT will be hoping that represents increased value for money.
Telegraph
16 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Andy Murray blasts Wimbledon for closing roof during Sinner-Dimitrov match
Sir Andy Murray has hit out at the All England Club's roof policy, questioning why the later stages of Jannik Sinner's match against Grigor Dimitrov could not have been played in the open air. As it happened, the match never reached completion, because a pectoral injury forced Dimitrov to retire. But Murray's point was that Dimitrov – who led by two sets to zero when the decision was taken – was on track to close out a famous victory well before the light was due to fail. 'So ridiculous to close the roof at this stage of the match,' Murray posted on X. 'At least an hour of light left… well over a set of tennis can still be played... it's an outdoor tournament!' Murray's criticism, which was posted when the roof closed at around 8.30pm, continues a trend of controversy around decision-making at this tournament, even if this was a very different type of call to the line-judging debates we have heard in recent days. A two-time Wimbledon champion, Murray has been promised a statue on the grounds by the summer of 2027 – the 150th anniversary of the Championships. His argument on the roof was supported by BBC pundit John McEnroe, who said: 'They should have played a third set [before closing the roof] because there was 45 minutes to an hour left.' But Tim Henman, another BBC pundit who is also a senior figure at the AELTC, was more equivocal. 'I don't think [they could have played a whole set before nightfall] on Centre Court,' said Henman. 'Outside it will be brighter but inside there is less light so they probably could have played six games, get to sort of quarter to nine, then it gets dark. But they try to shut the roof at a convenient time.' The AELTC's roof policy has changed noticeably over the years, with the initial instruction to referees being to keep it open unless there was absolutely no alternative. These days, we see a more proactive approach in which the primary goal is to avoid an awkward hiatus at a tense moment of play. The roof mechanism takes around 10 minutes to complete the closure, but there is usually a further two or three-minute delay while the players warm up again after the break. Meanwhile, giant fans flood the arena with dry air to prevent the humidity from climbing too high. With 15,000 Centre Court spectators all breathing water vapour into a closed space, the grass would otherwise become dangerously slippery. Wimbledon's policy is that, if artificial lighting is required, it can only be used under a closed roof on Centre or No 1 Courts. Continuing after nightfall also risks the players' safety because of dew. If there is a danger of the roof needing to be closed during a match, or even a set, the referee – who is now Denise Parnell – tends to take the initiative and make the decision early. Murray's former coach Brad Gilbert was another observer who remarked upon the closure. His post on X stated that 'this is day 8 @Wimbledon and the 7th time this tournament will finish under roof, not for rain because of long matches, never seen this happen before.' As Gilbert implied, matches are becoming longer, which begs the question of why the AELTC does not start play on Centre Court earlier than 1.30pm. When responding to this enquiry in previous years, the club has cited the danger of the grass wearing out under the stress of longer hours of play, as well as the need to give spectators from further afield enough time to arrive for the start. There is also a theory that the BBC enjoys having plenty of live play to televise in the evening, when its audience figures are highest.
The Guardian
24 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Player faith in technology shaken by storm around AI line-calling at Wimbledon
When the Wimbledon organisers announced last year that electronic line-calling would replace line judges for the first time at the Championships this year, plenty of criticism could have been anticipated. Some people would take issue with the more sterile landscape on court and the lack of human touch, while the cull of around 300 linesmen and women would also surely be a sore point. It is difficult, however, to imagine they were prepared for the firestorm that has followed its long-awaited implementation at this tournament. Electronic line-calling, or ELC, which uses automated ball-tracking technology has, after all, long been used in professional tennis tournaments, starting with the Next Gen ATP Finals in 2018. It has been four years since the Australian Open became the first grand slam to utilise the technology and this year, for the first time, the men's tour, the ATP, is using ELC at all of its events. Although all other men's clay-court events use ELC, the French Open is now the only grand slam that still employs human line judges. Instead of this year offering Wimbledon to step into the future, however, the All England Lawn Tennis Club (AELTC) has spent the first eight days of the tournament defending its implementation of the technology. For the first five days of the tournament the most significant blows were the parting shots from Jack Draper and Emma Raducanu, the men's and women's British No 1 players, who each criticised the ELC system following their defeats. Both players believed they had been subjected to incorrect calls. 'It's kind of disappointing, the tournament here, that the calls can be so wrong, but for the most part they've been OK. It's just, like, I've had a few in my other matches, too, that have been very wrong,' Raducanu said. The AELTC maintained that the system was working optimally and that ELC remains considerably more accurate than the line judges it replaced. Wimbledon employs Hawk-Eye, one of numerous ELC providerswhich uses a system that incorporates 10 cameras placed around the court, and which track the bounce of the ball. Hawk-Eye states that its margin of error is 2.2mm. Wimbledon had previously used ELC only as a safety net, allowing players to challenge calls conducted by line judges. 'It's funny, because when we did have linesmen, we were constantly asked why we didn't have electronic line-calling because it's more accurate,' Debbie Jevans, the chair of the AELTC, told the BBC. Then came a disastrous series of events on Centre Court. As Anastasia Pavlyuchenkova held game point on her serve at 4-4 in the first set against Sonay Kartal on Sunday, a backhand from Kartal clearly flew long but it was not called out. After a lengthy delay, it emerged that some of the ELC cameras had not been functional on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court for some time during the game. The umpire Nico Helwerth opted to replay the point. Around 10 minutes later, after losing that service game, Pavyluchenkova faced a set point on Kartal's serve. In the end, the AELTC was fortunate with the outcome. Pavlyuchenkova, who told Helwerth the tournament had 'stolen' the game from her, recovered to win both the set and the match, limiting the significance of the error. The AELTC announced in a statement on Sunday night that the ELC had been accidentally deactivated on Pavlyuchenkova's side of the court by one of the operators running the system. Sign up to The Recap The best of our sports journalism from the past seven days and a heads-up on the weekend's action after newsletter promotion Bright on Monday morning, the Wimbledon chief executive, Sally Bolton, fielded a contentious scheduled meeting with the media, which was almost entirely centred around ELC. Bolton asserted repeatedly that the mistake was purely down to human error, that the protocols had been changed to prevent a similar issue and that ELC has otherwise been working accurately during the tournament. At the very least, the situation with Pavlyuchenkova also underlined the importance of having contingency plans for when technology fails, including the possibility of umpires using video replay. Since the implementation of ELC, player reaction has largely been positive as it was rolled out on hard courts, with players recognising the greater accuracy provided by the system compared to human errors. However, after numerous dramatic moments during the clay-court season, as some players were frustrated with the differences between the ball marks and the ELC's judgments, the first week of ELC at Wimbledon has been a difficult one. It is clear that faith in its implementation on the surface has diminished and both privately and publicly, players and coaches have expressed scepticism about its accuracy. As the tournament moves into the latter stages, it remains to be seen if that faith will be restored.
