logo
Aid groups call on Israel to end ‘weaponisation' of aid in Gaza

Aid groups call on Israel to end ‘weaponisation' of aid in Gaza

Rhyl Journal2 days ago
A letter signed by organisations including Oxfam, Doctors Without Borders and Care accused Israel of 'weaponising aid' as people starve in war-torn Gaza and using it as a tool to entrench control.
The groups were responding to registration rules announced by Israel in March that require organisations to hand over full lists of their donors and Palestinian staff for vetting.
The groups contend that doing so could endanger their staff and give Israel broad grounds to block aid if groups are deemed to be 'delegitimising' the country or supporting boycotts or divestment.
The registration measures were 'designed to control independent organisations, silence advocacy, and censor humanitarian reporting,' they said.
The letter added that the rules violate European data privacy regulations, noting that in some cases, aid groups have been given only seven days to comply.
COGAT, the Israeli military body in charge of humanitarian aid to Gaza, denied the letter's claims. It alleged the groups were being used as cover by Hamas to 'exploit the aid to strengthen its military capabilities and consolidate its control' in Gaza.
'The refusal of some international organisations to provide the information and co-operate with the registration process raises serious concerns about their true intention,' it said in a statement on Thursday. 'The alleged delay in aid entry … occurs only when organisations choose not to meet the basic security requirements intended to prevent Hamas's involvement.'
Israel has long claimed that aid groups and United Nations agencies issue biased assessments.
The aid groups stressed that most of them have not been able to deliver 'a single truck' of life-saving assistance since Israel implemented a blockade in March.
A vast majority of aid isn't reaching civilians in Gaza, where tens of thousands have been killed, most of the population has been displaced and famine looms.
UN agencies and a small number of aid groups have resumed delivering assistance, but say the number of trucks allowed in remains far from sufficient.
Meanwhile, tensions have flared over Israel and the United States backing the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation to serve as the main distributor of aid in the besieged territory. The American contractor, meant to replace the traditional UN-led aid distribution system in Gaza, has faced international condemnation after hundreds of Palestinians were killed while trying to get food near its distribution sites.
Israel has pressed UN agencies to accept military escorts to deliver goods into Gaza, a demand the agencies have largely rejected, citing their commitment to neutrality. The stand-off has been the source of competing claims: Israel maintains it allows aid into Gaza that adheres to its rules, while aid groups that have long operated in Gaza decry the amount of life-saving supplies stuck at border crossings.
Bushra Khalidi, an aid official with Oxfam in Gaza, said: 'Oxfam has over 2.5 million dollars worth of goods that have been rejected from entering Gaza by Israel, especially WASH (water, sanitation and hygiene) items as well as food.'
Aid groups' 'ability to operate may come at the cost of their independence and ability to speak out,' she added.
As European countries amplify their criticisms of Israel and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza, some are expanding evacuations.
Italy on Wednesday night received 114 Palestinian evacuees from Gaza, including 31 children in need of medical assistance, its foreign affairs ministry said.
The young patients are suffering from either severe injuries and amputations or serious congenital diseases.
Since the beginning of the war Italy has evacuated more than 900 Palestinians from Gaza, including those who have arrived as part of a family reunification programme.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

The Alaska summit doesn't look good for Ukraine
The Alaska summit doesn't look good for Ukraine

Spectator

time21 minutes ago

  • Spectator

The Alaska summit doesn't look good for Ukraine

And just like that, the highly-anticipated summit between Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin in Alaska has been and gone, seemingly without very much at all to show for it. The two presidents met in Anchorage yesterday for what Trump had touted as a 'feel-out' meeting to lay the groundwork for negotiations to discuss an end to the war in Ukraine. But despite Trump rating the tête-à-tête a ten out of ten – 'in the sense that we got along great' – on substance, the American president has come away with little to prove that Putin is any closer to stopping his invasion. Yesterday's meeting was a historic event: this was the first time Trump and Putin had met in person since 2019, and the first time the Russian president had stepped foot on American soil in a decade. The American delegation did their best to treat Putin as the global statesman – rather than pariah – that he has always craved. A red carpet was rolled out for him at the airport, with Trump himself there to meet him and shake his hand on landing. Yesterday had the potential to be pivotal for the war in Ukraine. In refusing to pull the trigger on the secondary sanctions he had threatened against countries that buy Russian oil, and instead calling this summit, Trump had created a unique opportunity to appeal directly to Putin. The American president had kept his cards close to his chest in the run up to the summit, but had variously floated ideas about 'land swaps', including retrieving for Ukraine its 'ocean real estate', and bringing in 'severe consequences' in the form of sanctions if Putin didn't comply. Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky and his European allies had spent the week fearing the worst and appealing to Trump not to sign away the country's territory to Putin without consulting Zelensky first. Trump had appeared to agree, saying discussions about exchanging territory would come at a second, follow-up meeting between the three leaders. And yet, despite the global attention yesterday's meeting received, surprisingly little is known about how it went or what – if anything – was agreed. The leaders met one-on-one for three hours, followed by a wider three-hour meeting that also included their political entourages. Ahead of the summit, Trump had said a joint press conference with Putin afterwards, or simply one on his own, would depend on how things between them went. In the event, the two leaders did a short, 12-minute press conference together, taking no questions. The working lunch due to take place between both delegations was cancelled and the two leaders boarded their planes for home shortly afterwards. Trump, who typically likes to think out loud on his Truth Social media platform, remained uncharacteristically quite on there on the trip back to Washington. Speaking to Fox News afterwards though, Trump said the two had a 'very good meeting'. And yet, with little seemingly achieved by the American President to help Ukraine fend off its invader, it's hard to see how this is the case. Things for Putin, however, look rosier. Trump has clearly failed to wield any threats or incentives capable of forcing the Russian president to consider a ceasefire in Ukraine. Indeed, the Kremlin is already boasting this morning that Trump refused to follow through on his threat to increase sanctions on Russia, and that Moscow could negotiate without having to pause its 'special military operation' in Ukraine. In the hours since the summit ended, Trump has been on the phone to debrief Zelensky and Ukraine's European allies. No doubt their reactions to the meeting with Putin will start to filter through in the coming hours. And yet the signs for Ukraine don't look promising. Trump has already started to publicly pile the pressure on Zelensky to 'make a deal' with Putin, who 'wants to solve the problem'. The Ukrainian president will meet with Trump on Monday to discuss the situation further. Many were hoping that yesterday would provide clarity, both on Ukraine's future and the role of Trump and the US in the conflict. Those hopes have been dashed – for a little while longer, Ukraine's fate continues to hang in the balance.

Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other
Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other

Scottish Sun

time21 minutes ago

  • Scottish Sun

Alpha males, ‘genuine' smiles & power gestures…Trump & Putin's body language dissected as they try out macho each other

Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A TOP body language expert has revealed how Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump tried to out macho each other during their meeting in Alaska. The US President greeted his Russian counterpart on the tarmac at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson Air Base on Friday. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 7 The US President greeted Putin with a warm handshake 7 The pair looked relaxed and pleased to see each other 7 A press call turned to chaos when Putin suggested he couldn't hear the journalist's question Credit: Reuters The pair went on to address the world in a brief press conference and negotiate with their teams in private. Putin looked relaxed as he walked down a red carpet towards Trump - giving the US leader a thumbs-up before greeting him with a warm handshake. Both of them then shared a moment alone in Trump's presidential limo - known as The Beast - before posing for journalists during a chaotic photocall. Their public interactions were watched and poured over with fine tooth comb - not just to find out the diplomatic outcome of their historic meeting, but also to dissect the two men's relationship. A top body language expert told The Sun that Trump and Putin tried to display their egos in a "frenzy" moment to perceive themselves as the two most powerful men on earth. Darren Stanton, known as the human lie detector, said Putin and Trump were matching each other's "power gestures" in a show of force to convey confidence and authority. There were also subtle signs showing Trump was trying to look stronger than Vlad. Mr Stanton said: "Both men displayed what we call the reverse steeple gesture, which is used to convey power and authority. "Both Putin and Trump are Alpha males and fully aware of what these gestures mean. Both men are trying to convey confidence, being self-assured. "They used the signs to express, 'I will not be pushed around. I am the most dominant person here'. "Both Putin and Trump match and mirror each other's gestures and behaviours. Putin is the only politician that Trump does not employ his full arsenal of trying to undermine, intimidate and make them look weak. He always meets Putin on mutual ground. "But there were signs that Trump was trying to look stronger and also trying to be subtle." He added that Trump's hero welcome of Putin will likely rattle America's European allies and Zelensky. Mr Stanton added: "Zelensky will not be happy about the way Trump welcomed Putin. The fact that Trump pulled all the stops and gave him a grand welcome." The expert said Trump showed a mutual respect for Putin, and both leaders had a genuine smile on their faces despite all the side issues. This was seen when the US leader lightly applauded his Russian counterpart as he approached him on the tarmac. And later when he "gently patted" his hand - a symbolic gesture of familiarity and friendliness. Trump also broke from his usual approach as the pair shook hands, opting to have his hand under Putin's showing a more "subordinate position". 7 The pair appeared to try and out macho each other Credit: Getty 7 Putin appeared shocked during the press call Body language expert Patty Ann Wood told Newsweek: "Trump typically likes to have his hand on top, but here it appears he presented his palm up—a weaker, more subordinate position—indicating he sees Putin as more powerful." While Trump showed initial deference to the Russian leader, he followed up the handshake with a pat on Putin's back. Ms Wood said this is a subtle "sign of dominance" and it symbolically says "I could strike you if I wanted to." When the pair sat down for questions from journalists, pleasantries turned to chaos as the press pool began throwing tough questions at Putin. One of the journalists asked: 'How can the US trust your word? Will you stop killing?' Smirking Putin then appeared to shout over the journalists before the camera was forced to cut away. He appeared baffled as journalists quizzed him over the slaughter in Ukraine. At one stage, he pointed to his ear to indicate he couldn't hear. But body language expert Dr. Beth Dawson said this was actually a sign of the leader not wanting to answer the difficult question. She told the NY Post: "He's looking down, his mouth is turned down … It doesn't look like a genuine, 'Okay, what are you saying? I can't hear you. Could you repeat it, please?' 7 Putin and Trump were all smiles as they met in Alaska

Starmer speaks with Trump after president's Ukraine ceasefire talks with Putin
Starmer speaks with Trump after president's Ukraine ceasefire talks with Putin

Belfast Telegraph

time39 minutes ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Starmer speaks with Trump after president's Ukraine ceasefire talks with Putin

The Prime Minister joined a call with Mr Trump and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as other European leaders, after the US-Russia ceasefire talks, Downing Street said. Mr Trump did not secure a deal to end the conflict in Ukraine after nearly three hours of talks with his Russian counterpart at a military base in Anchorage, Alaska. After the negotiations, which took place alongside senior officials, the two presidents refused to answer questions from reporters. However, both made statements, with Mr Trump saying 'some great progress' was made with 'many points' agreed and 'very few' remaining. After the summit, Mr Trump suggested there were only a few major stumbling blocks holding up the prospect of a peace deal. Speaking to Fox News, he said it was now up to Mr Zelensky to 'make a deal' to end the war. In a call after the summit, Sir Keir and Mr Zelensky spoke with the US president alongside leaders from Italy, France, Finland, Germany and Poland, as well as Nato's Mark Rutte, and Ursula von der Leyen of the European Commission. Sir Keir is due to speak again with European leaders this morning. Mr Zelensky said the call began as a one-on-one between him and the US president, before European Nato leaders joined them. The Ukrainian leader also suggested he would travel to Washington DC at the start of next week to continue talks. Writing on social media, the Ukrainian president said: 'We support President Trump's proposal for a trilateral meeting between Ukraine, the USA, and Russia. Ukraine emphasises that key issues can be discussed at the level of leaders, and a trilateral format is suitable for this. 'On Monday, I will meet with President Trump in Washington DC, to discuss all of the details regarding ending the killing and the war. I am grateful for the invitation.' European allies must be 'involved at every stage to ensure reliable security guarantees together with America', he added. British personnel are ready to arrive in Ukraine 'days' after Moscow and Kyiv agree to put fighting on hold, the Ministry of Defence earlier said as Mr Trump met Mr Putin. Planning has continued on an 'enduring basis' to deploy the so-called Multinational Force Ukraine to keep peace once the war is concluded, the MoD said. The force, which resulted from months of talks between 30-plus countries known as the 'coalition of the willing', is aimed at warding off future Russian aggression.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store