Toyota is NZ's most reputable company again
The Kantar Corporate Reputation Index, now in its 11th year, measures consumer perceptions of New Zealand's top 50 companies, addressing trust, leadership, fairness, and responsibility.
Among the top 10 companies, Toyota led in the Trust and Leadership pillars and ranked among the top performers in Fairness and Responsibility.
Tatsuya Ishikawa (front) with other members of the TNZ management team.
Toyota New Zealand Chief Executive, Tatsuya Ishikawa, says the recognition reflects both the strength of the Toyota team and the trust customers place in the brand.
'Toyota is a brand for all New Zealanders. Every day, we work hard to earn their trust, in every interaction we have with them.
'Our ambition has always been to be more than just a car company. We want to be a trusted partner in our customers' lives and a responsible contributor to New Zealand's future.
'Toyota Stores don't just invest in their businesses; they also invest in the communities they're part of. We recognise their efforts through our annual Citizenship Awards. We complement this local impact with national initiatives that support safer roads and stronger communities across New Zealand.'
Tatsuya Ishikawa continues: 'At our core, we're a mobility company but it's the strength of our relationship with customers that drives our success. That relationship doesn't begin and end with a purchase. We work hard to anticipate needs, resolve issues quickly, and deliver a seamless experience at every stage. How we look after our customers after a purchase is so important to us. While things won't always go to plan, being truly customer-focused means taking responsibility and putting things right quickly, and with care.
'We're focused on helping communities thrive, not just through economic investment but by shaping a more sustainable future. That means continuing to electrify our fleet, reducing emissions, and staying on track to meet our goal of net-zero carbon by 2050,' says Tatsuya Ishikawa.
'At Toyota, we embrace the philosophy of kaizen, a commitment to continuous improvement. It's a simple idea, but a powerful one. We believe reputation is earned one decision, one relationship, one interaction at a time.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
6 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
'Focused 100%' on economy, not passport: Luxon
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon denies the government has lost its focus, as calls intensify for the government to take action to help pull Auckland out of its economic slump. Earlier this month Auckland Business Chamber boss Simon Bridges called on the government to do more to stimulate the economy in the supercity. The latest Stats NZ data showed Auckland's 6.1% unemployment rate for the June 2025 quarter was the worst of all regions, ahead of the national rate of 5.2%. An article in the the Sunday Star-Times at the weekend said "many business leaders and political insiders, including those from traditional centre-right bases of support for National, are beginning to doubt whether" Luxon's coalition has an economic plan. Heart of the City boss Viv Beck said "Rome is burning for some of our small businesses", and Newmarket Business Association head Mark Knoff-Thomas said it was "ludicrous" the government was spending its time reordering words on passport covers instead of focusing on the economy. Mayor Wayne Brown wants a bed night levy, which the government is not keen on. "They'll cave in. They want to be elected…. They'll cave in on this, mate. This is a third of New Zealand. This is the city that decides who's the government." Luxon said the government was "not focused on passport changes" but would not be implementing a bed tax. "We're actually focused 100% on actually growing this economy … We inherited the big recession. We've had a massive post-Covid hangover," he said. We've had a lot of international challenges with respect to tariffs, and what that's done for sentiment and confidence, but I just say to you, we're also seeing a recovery in New Zealand." Luxon said South Island primary industries were "growing strongly" but "we know we've got work to do in our cities". He pointed to the government's fast-track scheme for big projects, capital investment write-offs for small businesses and making it easier to get things built. "It's really tough in Auckland and also in Wellington, you know? If you're in Christchurch, it's different, as I said before, but, you know, there's no doubt about it," Luxon said "We're open to continuing to look at what more we can do. We're pretty dynamic and agile. We keep adjusting and doing things to adjust to the circumstances that we're in." One recent poll saw Labour surge ahead of National, and Luxon neck-and-neck with Labour's Chris Hipkins as preferred prime minister. Another had National and Labour in a statistical, ditto for Luxon and Hipkins, with just 1 percentage point separating the parties and leaders. When Bridges led the National Party, it regularly polled in the 40s. He was rolled as leader in 2020 after a collapse in the party's support as Covid-19 spread the world. Luxon said he would "absolutely" be leading National into the 2026 election. "For me it's actually staying focused on what New Zealanders care about and that is actually us fixing this economy. "I appreciate it's been difficult, you know, we've had a very difficult, you know, a poor inheritance, but, you know, our job is to fix it for New Zealanders and that's what we're going to do every day."
NZ Herald
10 hours ago
- NZ Herald
NZ debt nears $1 trillion as growth moderates, savings fall
At the current rate of growth, we'll hit that landmark inside the next three years. The rate of growth has moderated in the past two years as the Government has sought to curb borrowing, and the housing market, which accounts for the largest chunk of our debt, has been flat. Businesses have also been hunkering down, afraid to invest and expand, and farmers are getting good returns but using them to address high debt levels. But while the rate at which we're borrowing has eased, so too has the rate at which we are saving and growing wealth. The easiest path out of debt is wealth creation, shrinking our net debt and our debt-to-GDP ratio. So going backwards on that front is a cause for concern. The big, ugly numbers In the year to May 31, we hit a total of $872.6 billion in gross debt. That figure is up from $827.3b last year, a rise of 5.4%. It represents an average of $163,717 in raw debt for every Kiwi in the country. The rate of growth is relatively subdued by the standards of previous years. In the first New Zealand Herald Nation of Debt feature, in 2016, the total gross debt figure was $492.5b. We have seen total debt rise 77% since then. That represents an average annual increase of 6.65%. Given we are still coming down from a period of high interest rates, it was not surprising that borrowing growth was subdued, said Reserve Bank adviser for financial stability assessment and strategy, Charles Lilly. 'We're still in a relatively contractionary phase,' he said. 'We want to see stability. We don't want credit debt off the scale and people taking too much risk.' On the downside, a lack of borrowing growth was more of an issue with the financial system if the banks were not willing to lend, he said. 'I think banks are still willing to lend; it's mainly from the demand side, they just don't have customers coming through the door.' Crown debt also continues to rise, despite the Government's efforts to curb spending. Core Crown borrowing (the baseline we've used since 2016) was $238.8b in the year to May 31, 2025. That's up from $215b in the year to May 30, 2024 – an increase of 11%. It follows an increase of 11% for the previous year. While the coalition Government hasn't been able to stop Crown debt rising in double digits, it has at least reduced the annual rate of increase. It was 27% and 17% respectively in the years to May 2022 and May 2023. Crown debt is always a hot political topic. Wellington business editor Jenée Tibshraeny will take a deep dive into the state of the Government books tomorrow in part two of this series. The other side of the ledger Of course, the nominal figures still look scary. So does your mortgage if you don't weigh it against the value of your house. It is important to compare the gross debt figure to our saving rates and assets to add more context. Unfortunately, the latest Stats NZ figures (for the year to March) showed New Zealanders' household net wealth has fallen. Household net worth, the value of all assets owned by households less the value of their liabilities, fell $25.4b to $2.42 trillion in the March 2025 quarter. That is still almost three times the total gross debt figure. But in the year ended March 2025, household net worth fell $23.1b (0.9%), after a rise of $61.2b (2.5%) in the year ended March 2024. We're currently headed in the wrong direction. Most of that fall will be related to house prices, although some of it can be attributed to lower savings rates. Stats NZ's household saving data shows how much households are saving out of their current income (ie current income less current consumption). The data shows savings fell $392 million to minus $1.6b in the March 2025 quarter. Sector by sector Housing It should come as no surprise that the nation's mortgage debt accounts for the bulk of what we owe. Housing debt shot up during the big housing booms in the middle of the last decade and again during the first blush of Covid as stimulus money and low interest rates bolstered property prices. In the year to May 2016, the annual rate of increase for total housing debt was 9.2%, in 2021 it was 11.5%. If we look back further, it topped 16% in 2004. So this year's increase of 4.7% looks modest in comparison. It represents a slight increase on the even more modest 3.3% rise in the year to May 2024. That lift in mortgage debt may reflect the slight uptick in prices late last year and early this year (albeit something of a false start for those waiting on a full-blown housing market recovery). But the level of borrowing has also been lifted by record numbers of first-home buyers coming into the market, and fewer investors, said the RBNZ's Lilly. The former typically need to borrow more from the bank than the latter. If the housing market picks up later this year, as many pundits expect, then we'll likely see the rate of increase in mortgage borrowing follow, he says. Mortgage debt, most of which we owe to Australian banks, is a feature of the New Zealand economy that tends to worry international credit agencies more than our Crown debt. It has been a concern for the Reserve Bank in the past. 'In the current environment, subdued is definitely the theme,' Lilly said. Business Business borrowing barely lifted in the past year – and that is not good news for the economy. At $136.5b in the year to May 31, it was up just 0.6%. Businesses typically borrow to invest in new equipment that will improve productivity or to expand, taking on staff, to grab more market share. None of that stuff has been a feature of the past year. In fact, the opposite has been the case. Many businesses are struggling to survive. Those that desperately need cash to stay in business aren't going to get it from a bank. The struggle for many retail businesses is also highlighted in the relatively anaemic growth in personal consumer lending. At $14.5b, it is up 1.1% in the year to May 31. NZ Herald retail reporter Tom Raynel will take a closer look at the consumer borrowing trends later this week as part of the Nation of Debt series. For larger businesses, issues such as global uncertainty and tariffs would be limiting the appetite to borrow and take risks, Lilly said. It was also the case that the commercial property sector remained very weak, he said. Agriculture Unlike the struggling urban business sector, farmers have been benefiting from strong international export prices in the past year. Numerous commentators have suggested increased spending in the agricultural sector should buoy the regional economies and eventually flow through to the cities. The borrowing data for the past year offers some clues as to why that may take longer than many expect. Total agricultural debt is down 1% for the year to May 31, to $62.8b. Farmers appeared to be using their increased earnings to pay down debt in the first instance, Lilly said. This wasn't a bad thing; it is only a few years ago that the Reserve Bank was highlighting dairy debt as a significant risk to New Zealand's financial stability, he said. By the numbers That big, ugly number in our graphic is New Zealand's total gross debt. It combines the latest Reserve Bank figures for private debt with Treasury numbers for Crown debt and Local Government Funding Agency data on council debt, and IRD's data on student loans. The Reserve Bank figures include housing debt, consumer debt, business debt and agricultural debt to June 30. These are updated monthly by the central bank as part of its brief to monitor and maintain financial stability. The Crown debt figure is taken from the Treasury's Interim Financial Statements (11 months to May 31) and is the figure for core Crown borrowings. This is different from the net core Crown debt figure often used by politicians when discussing debt-to-GDP ratios. We use this (on Treasury's advice) as it is a gross debt figure but excludes debt held by state-owned enterprises, which would have been covered in the Reserve Bank statistics. The debt figure supplied by the Local Government Funding Agency is gross debt for the year to June 30, 2024. It captures all core council activities (Watercare, Auckland Transport, etc) but excludes some commercial activities (eg Christchurch City Council's Orion lines company, Port of Lyttelton, Christchurch Airport) as these would also be included in RBNZ data. Student loan debt is from the IRD statistics to March 2025. COMING UP IN THIS SERIES Tomorrow: Gov't debt: Are higher taxes inevitable? Wednesday: Consumer debt: What are Kiwis borrowing for? Thursday: Student debt: How big? How bad? Liam Dann is Business Editor at Large for the New Zealand Herald. He is a senior writer and columnist, as well as presenting and producing videos and podcasts. He joined the Herald in 2003.
Otago Daily Times
11 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Mad as hell and not taking it any more
The government's Retirement Villages Act review must put people before profits, Brian Peat writes. The review of the Retirement Villages Act 2003 has turned into a slow-motion farce. Every extra month without reform is another month residents remain trapped in unfair contracts — waiting far too long for their own money, paying fees after they have left, and battling disputes in systems stacked in favour of operators. Let us call it for what it is: the government is dragging its heels. Hiding behind phrases like "careful consideration" and "getting it right" is nothing more than political cover for doing nothing while older New Zealanders suffer. This is not a theoretical policy exercise. This is about real people, many in their 80s and 90s, who do not have the luxury of waiting years for fairness and protection. The government has all the evidence it needs to act. The Ministry of Housing and Urban Development has years of reports detailing systemic unfairness. Residents have spoken out repeatedly. International models, for example New South Wales, show that fairer rules including repayment timeframes can be introduced without bankrupting the sector. The worst injustice is "the elephant in the room" — exit payments. Residents' capital is routinely held for months, even years, after they leave. The answer is simple. Require operators to lodge sufficient funds in a government agent trust account, just as landlords must under the Residential Tenancies Act. That would force repayment within a set timeframe and end the industry's excuse that "there's no money until a new resident moves in." That excuse sounds eerily like a Ponzi scheme, especially when one of the "big six" operators openly boasts in its annual report of holding $2.8 billion of interest-free funds from residents. The Retirement Villages Association (RVA) calls this a "resident-funded model". If that is true, why don't residents share in the profits? We all know the answer. The RVA continues to refuse to make any concessions, or even enter into meaningful discussions with the Retirement Village Residents Association (RVResidents) on the urgent issue of a mandated timeframe for repayment of capital. This stance disregards the overwhelming feedback from thousands of residents and their families and, effectively, prolongs financial hardship for many older New Zealanders who cannot afford to wait months, or even years, for what is rightfully theirs. The operators love to boast that "95% of residents are happy". No-one disputes that but happiness does not make an unfair law fair. The Act is broken, and it must be fixed. The government must commit to: — A hard, enforceable deadline for exit payments — no more than 3 to 4 months — Operators, not residents, paying for the repairs and maintenance of operator-owned chattels — An end to ongoing fees after departure — Contracts written in plain English, so residents know exactly what they are signing — A genuinely independent dispute resolution system with real teeth and real consequences I have visited and presented in more than 400 villages across New Zealand. I have heard the stories first-hand. Residents are tired of being told they are "just grumpy old radicals" for daring to demand fairness. RVResidents is no longer a lone voice. We have the backing of Consumer NZ, Grey Power, Citizens Advice, Age Concern, the Law Society, Community Law, Positive Ageing and major superannuation groups. These organisations represent hundreds of thousands of New Zealanders. The message is clear: reforming the Retirement Villages Act is not just a residents' issue — it is a national issue of fairness, dignity and consumer protection. Ignoring this call is ignoring a powerful cross-section of New Zealand society. We are done with hollow promises. We are done with endless process. And we are especially done with ministers claiming to "care about older New Zealanders" while siding with corporate operators. This review will not be judged by the weight of its final report. It will be judged by how quickly it delivers concrete protections. Every day without change is a deliberate political choice. Right now, the choice this government is making is to protect operators over people. The clock has run out and so has our patience. The government's choice is clear: side with the people who built this country, or side with those exploiting them. — Brian Peat is a Dunedin village resident and president of the Retirement Village Residents Association.
