Trump's 'revenge tax' on other countries could hit U.S.
A controversial tax being proposed by President Donald Trump's administration that could cost Canadians and Canadian businesses billions is also likely to cost the U.S. government, according to an assessment by a non-partisan U.S. congressional office.
It is also likely to cost American companies by prompting investors from countries hit with the tax to move investments out of the U.S, according to the assessment.
Dubbed the "revenge tax," Section 899 of Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act calls for a new withholding tax to be imposed on investment income paid out by American companies to investors who live in countries the U.S. government considers to have unfair or discriminatory taxes.
Canada's digital services tax, which hits companies like Amazon, Google, Meta, Uber and Airbnb with a tax on revenue from Canadian users, is among the taxes the U.S. considers discriminatory.
Top Canadian officials acknowledge privately that they are concerned by the prospect of Trump's new withholding tax and are closely watching what is happening in Washington — as are Canadian investors, companies, investment advisors and tax lawyers.
Federal Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne says he's standing by the tax — which has its first big payment due June 30.
"The DST is in force and it's going to be applied," he told reporters on Parliament Hill last week.
Two different versions of Section 899 are currently before Congress, but both versions risk hitting Canadians and Canadian companies with a new withholding tax.
The version adopted by the House of Representatives would take effect quickly and impose a five per cent withholding tax on things like dividends to Canadians from U.S. companies, adding another five per cent each year to a maximum of 20 per cent.
An amendment to that section, currently before the Senate, would delay the tax until 2027 and would top it out at 15 per cent. The Senate has not yet voted on the bill, although it is being pressured by Trump to approve the legislation by July 4, the U.S. national holiday.
A study of Section 899 by the U.S. Congress's non-partisan Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), which performs a function similar to Canada's Office of the Parliamentary Budget Officer, predicts that the new tax would initially bring billions into the U.S. Treasury. However, it also predicts those revenues would then start to decline — and that by 2033 or 2034 it would actually lead to a drop in revenue.
The version of Section 899 adopted by the House of Representatives is expected to rake in an estimated $116.3 billion US between 2025 and 2034 for the U.S. Treasury, with $12.5 billion US in 2026 rising to $28.7 billion US in 2027 and $31.8 billion US in 2028.
However, the analysis projects that revenues would then start to decline. By 2033, the withholding tax is projected to cost the U.S. Treasury $4.8 billion US in lost revenue and, by 2034, $8.1 billion US.
The amended version of Section 899 is projected to bring in only $52.2 billion US between 2025 and 2034. But by 2034 it too would cost the U.S. government $2.5 billion US in lost revenue.
A source familiar with the JCT's work said its analysis assumes that the U.S. gross national product will remain fixed and foreign laws, like the DST, will not change. What it assumes will change, however, is the behaviour of individuals and companies to avoid the withholding tax.
The JCT projects that the reduction in demand for direct and portfolio investment on the part of foreign investors will reduce the value of U.S. assets. In turn, that drop in value will lead to a loss in tax revenue for the U.S. Treasury.
David Macdonald, senior economist with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, said the JCT's analysis makes a very big assumption — that countries like Canada won't hit back at the U.S. with their own retaliatory taxes.
He said the ongoing trade war has shown that Canada is willing to hit back.
Should Canada retaliate, Macdonald said the U.S. is more exposed than Canada on the tax front because a lot of American companies operate here.
"They make a lot more profits in Canada than Canadian companies make in profits operating in the U.S.," Macdonald said.
Macdonald agreed with the JCT's assessment that the withholding tax could prompt an exodus of investment in U.S. securities, predicting that many companies are probably already figuring out ways to hedge their investments.
He said this is bad for business and risks damaging the economies of both countries.
"Nobody wins a trade war and nobody wins a tax war," said Macdonald.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Miami Herald
17 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
What is the FCRA, and How Can It Help Remove Collection Accounts From Your Credit Report?
NEW YORK CITY, NY / ACCESS Newswire / June 26, 2025 / When inaccurate or outdated collection accounts show up on a credit report, the consequences can be immediate, from denied loans, increased interest rates, or even job application rejections. That's why understanding the Fair Credit Reporting Act ("FCRA") is crucial for anyone facing credit reporting issues. Petroff Amshen LLP, a New York-based consumer protection law firm, is raising awareness about the FCRA and how it can be used to remove damaging or incorrect information, or unfair collections. What Is the FCRA? (FCRA Meaning) The FCRA, or Fair Credit Reporting Act, is a federal law enacted by Congress in 1970 to promote accuracy, fairness, and privacy in the information maintained by consumer reporting agencies. In simple terms, the FCRA meaning is rooted in the idea that consumers have the right to know what's on their credit reports, and the right to challenge what doesn't belong there. This law regulates how credit bureaus collect and report data and gives consumers the ability to: Request copies of their credit reportsDispute incorrect or incomplete informationBe notified if their credit report has been used against themLimit how long negative items can remain on fileSeek damages for violations Using the FCRA to Remove Collections One of the most powerful tools within this law is the ability to use the FCRA to remove collections that are inaccurate, outdated, or unverified. This includes: Debts that don't belong to you (often due to identity theft or clerical errors)Duplicate entriesUnverified accounts reported without adequate documentationCollections older than 7 years When a consumer files a dispute, the credit reporting agency must investigate and respond within 30 days. If the furnisher of the information cannot verify the debt with supporting evidence, it must be removed. "The FCRA exists to protect consumers from being defined by credit data that is flat-out wrong," said Steven Amshen, Founding Partner of Petroff Amshen LLP. "If a creditor or collector can't prove the debt, they shouldn't be allowed to report it." Legal Support Can Make the Difference While consumers are legally required to file FCRA disputes themselves, many quickly run into roadblocks, including creditors that don't respond, agencies that close investigations without real inquiry, or accounts that reappear after deletion. That's where proper legal support becomes essential. Petroff Amshen LLP assists clients who have already taken that first step but haven't received meaningful results. The firm's team reviews the credit file, evaluates the prior dispute, and takes action when violations of the FCRA are evident - especially when creditors ignore documentation or credit bureaus fail to follow proper procedures. "When a valid dispute is ignored or mishandled, it's not just negligence; it's a violation of federal law," said Steven Amshen. "That's when we intervene to make sure consumer rights are enforced." Petroff Amshen LLP's FCRA Approach The firm's legal strategy is focused on results, not delays. By leveraging the FCRA, Petroff Amshen LLP helps clients: Identify all inaccurate or unverifiable items in their credit reportsSupport targeted disputes with proper documentationFile claims against credit bureaus or creditors when rights are violatedDemand monetary compensation and full deletion of harmful records when justified Petroff Amshen LLP doesn't offer generic credit repair. As a consumer protection law firm, its team approaches every case through the lens of litigation, not negotiation. Know Your Rights, Protect Your Credit If you've found collections that don't belong to you, errors that won't go away, or accounts reported without proof, it may be time to explore legal solutions under the FCRA. The law exists to protect, not just monitor, your credit history. Petroff Amshen LLP encourages consumers in New York and New Jersey to take action when collection accounts are misreported or mishandled. Every inaccurate record has the potential to affect housing, employment, and financial freedom. Stay Informed. Stay Protected. Stay Connected. Petroff Amshen LLP uses its social platforms to share legal updates, case victories, credit protection tips, and consumer rights resources in real time. Whether you're looking to understand your rights under the FCRA or want to connect directly with the firm, these channels are built to support and inform you. Follow Petroff Amshen LLP for practical legal insights and ongoing protection strategies: Instagram: @petroffamshenFacebook: Petroff Amshen LLPLinkedIn: Petroff Amshen LLP | New York SOURCE: Petroff Amshen LLP press release


UPI
17 minutes ago
- UPI
NYC incumbent Mayor Adams launches re-election bid
1 of 9 | New York City Mayor Eric Adams speaks at his re-election campaign launch event on the steps of City Hall in New York City on Thursday. Photo by John Angelillo/UPI | License Photo June 26 (UPI) -- New York City Mayor Eric Adams kick-started his re-election bid as an independent candidate on Thursday. Adams was joined by about 100 supporters on the steps of the New York City Hall as he announced his candidacy and laid out a case for another four years as the city's mayor. "It's a choice between a candidate with a blue collar and one with a silver spoon," Adams said of his background versus that of Democratic Party candidate and self-avowed socialist Zohran Mamdani. Mamdani, 33, surprised many in the political establishment by winning Tuesday's Democratic Party primary over former New York Gov. Andrew Cuomo, who conceded the loss and announced he would continue running as an independent. Adams, likewise, was elected to the mayoral office as a Democrat in 2021 but since has left the party to become an independent. "This is a city not of socialism," Adams told supporters on Thursday. "There's no dignity in someone giving you everything for free," he said. "There's dignity in giving you a job, so you can provide for your family and the opportunities that you deserve." Adams said New York is "not a city of handouts" but instead helps people improve themselves and their lives. Adams has challenged the prior Biden administration's immigration policies and supports the Trump administration's efforts to oppose illegal immigration. The Biden administration filed federal charges accusing Adams of bribery, wire fraud and conspiracy, which the Trump administration dropped earlier this year. Adams said the charges against him were politically motivated due to his opposition to the Biden administration's immigration and border policies. "Despite our pleas, when the federal government did nothing as its broken immigration policies overloaded our shelter system with no relief, I put the people of New York before party and politics," Adams told media after he was indicted on Sept. 27. "I always knew that if I stood my ground for all of you, that I would be a target," he said. "And a target I became." Mamdani has proposed government control of grocery stores, free public transportation, free childcare, freezing rents and eliminating tuition at city universities, among other proposals. Mamdani is a New York state representative who was born and raised in Uganda in 1991 and became a naturalized U.S. citizen in 2018. He has a bachelor's in Africana Studies from Bowdoin College and, if elected, said he would use his power as mayor to "reject Donald Trump's fascism, to stop [Immigration and Customs Enforcement] agents from deporting our neighbors and to govern our city as a model for the Democratic Party." His mother, Mira Nair, is an Indian-American filmmaker who is known best for "Mississippi Masala." Mamdani's father, Mahmood Mamdani, is a Ugandan and former professor of colonialism in India, African history and political violence at Columbia University and other institutions. He is the director of the Makerere Institute of Social Research in Uganda.


Axios
20 minutes ago
- Axios
Tampa Bay's new People's Pride rejects corporate, police ties
Concerned that St. Pete Pride has grown too corporate, a group of activist organizations say they want to return the celebration to its roots. Why it matters: The People's Pride Coalition will hold its inaugural Pride Night on Friday at a time of increasing skepticism of corporate-backed Pride events and marketing campaigns. The big picture: That's especially true this year, as major companies retreat from Pride sponsorships and participation amid President Trump's attacks on diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. "They're outing themselves as not truly supporting queer people," coalition member V Garcia told Axios. The wishy-washy approach also shows that relying on corporate support isn't sustainable, added coalition member Gabby Aguilera. Zoom in: The coalition — made up of local grassroots organizations including Tampa Democratic Socialists of America and the Justice Advocacy Network — formed in the wake of the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas terrorist attacks and the ensuing war that has so far killed more than 50,000 Palestinians. Organizers were troubled by the big-business sponsors underpinning St. Pete Pride, such as defense contractor GE Aerospace and phosphate mining firm Mosaic, which has a troubling environmental history in Tampa Bay. They've also taken issue with the festival's police presence, a wariness that's only grown as more law enforcement agencies, including St. Pete police, sign partnerships with federal immigration authorities. What they're saying:"It just goes directly against the roots and history of Pride," which began as an uprising, Aguilera said. The other side: St. Pete Pride leaders have heard the coalition's concerns "and recognize that the origins of Pride are rooted in protest and the ongoing fight for liberation and equity for all," president Byron Green-Calisch said in a statement to Axios. Police officers are there to "ensure the safety of the more than half a million attendees expected at our Pride events." "This is a necessity, not an endorsement," he said, adding that leaders "understand that it raises valid concerns for some." Between the lines: Coalition organizers recognize the need for security and that police are typically involved with closing off city streets for parades and similar events. Cutting ties is "not going to be a quick fix," Aguilera said. The nonprofit St. Pete Pride is also working on broadening its individual donor base, new executive director Bior Guigni told Axios in a previous interview. When it comes to corporate partnerships, her goal is to ensure that "it's not just a monetary exchange, but it's also a mission alignment," she said. The latest: While GE Aerospace and Mosaic are not listed among this year's sponsors, coalition members plan to continue putting pressure on the organization to meet their demands. And while they'll march in Saturday's Pride parade, coalition members organized Pride Night for folks who identify with their mission. If you go: The event is 6-10pm Friday at Allendale United Methodist Church in St. Pete. The lineup includes live music, drag performances, crafts, free food and a free store. A $5-15 donation is suggested but not required.