Book Blacklist in Kashmir Aims to Muzzle Criticism of India
These and 22 other books have been banned by authorities in the Indian-administered part of Kashmir, the disputed borderland that India and Pakistan have fought over for more than three-quarters of a century.
In announcing the list on Tuesday, the federally appointed government of the Indian-administered region called the works 'secessionist literature' that were 'disguised as historical or political commentary' but promoted a 'culture of grievance, victimhood and terrorist heroism.'
The order makes it illegal to circulate, possess or access the texts in the valley, under threat of years in prison. How well it can be enforced is unclear, however, given that many of the works can be accessed online or bought outside Kashmir.
Still, authors of the outlawed books and analysts described the ban as the latest move in India's long-running attempts to muzzle free expression in a region that has endured decades of conflict and insurgency, and a symbol of the tightening repression in Kashmir since it was stripped of its autonomy in 2019.
Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Netanyahu vows to 'complete the job' against Hamas
(Reuters) -Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said on Sunday that Israel has no choice but to "complete the job" and defeat Hamas, given the Palestinian group's refusal to lay down its arms. Netnayahu also told a news conference that his new Gaza offensive plans aim to tackle two remaining Hamas strongholds.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump once openly discussed nuclear disarmament. What happened?
On Feb. 13, President Donald Trump did something truly rare — he made sense. In an Oval Office press meeting, for the first time in decades, a sitting president openly discussed nuclear disarmament: 'There's no reason for us to be building brand new nuclear weapons. We already have so many... You could destroy the world 50 times over, 100 times over. And here we are building new nuclear weapons, and they're building nuclear weapons,' he said. He's right. China and India have unconditional no-first-use pledges in place. So did Russia until we continued to expand our already insane nuclear arsenal and exit such arms control agreements as the ABM Treaty and INF Treaty. The United States refused to come to the table. That's why Trump's expressed desire to return to negotiations was so promising. Returning to negotiations refers to multilateral nuclear reduction agreements on the premise of minimum effective deterrence. The commemoration of the 80th anniversary of Hiroshima and its deadly toll this past week gives us an opportunity to understand just what is at stake. That devastating first use of the atomic bomb killed at least 70,000 people instantly, a legacy of tragedy the world will not forget. Alas, Trump's initial promise of nuclear disarmament was short-lived. And what has actually happened since this unexpected moment of clarity from a leader who thrives on chaos? More chaos. Trump violated the war powers clause in launching a military strike against Iran's nuclear bases, and now, he refuses to rule out more strikes. Even if he deterred Iran's nuclear program, it put the U.S. directly at odds with other nuclear powers. Former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev has even come out to say that other countries would simply provide Iran with nuclear his actions, Trump pushed us closer to the brink of nuclear war once more. The U.S. war machine and its many benefactors will stoke this, spurring on a new arms race to line their pockets. The fact is, more bombs will not solve nuclear proliferation — not by building them, not by hoarding them, and certainly not by using them on other countries. The president must make a choice: Protect our nation and the world, or instigate nuclear Armageddon. The U.S. could take the lead on denuclearization, cut back our bloated military budget, finally sign a no-first-use pledge, and actually make the world safer. Or we could keep feeding the weapons manufacturers, spending nearly a trillion dollars a year on the Pentagon while ignoring the fact that our biggest threats — climate change, poverty, and access to health care — can't be solved with bombs. But right now, we're on the wrong path — the path of excessive militarization and the risk of total annihilation. The path that mortgages our environment, livelihoods, and our souls to feed the insatiable war profiteers. Eighty years ago, one nuclear bomb incinerated over 100,000 people in Hiroshima. Right now, the U.S. has the equivalent of 50,000 Hiroshima-sized bombs. And the Pentagon is spending $2 trillion on a whole new generation of nuclear weapons. The time of mutually assured destruction between two nuclear superpowers is over. The last thing we need is a new nuclear arms race. But that's what our corrupt Congress and war profiteers are betting on. Should Trump decide to take the denuclearization path, it could change the very fabric of America. Imagine the impact of just 15% of the Pentagon's budget going toward lead-free pipes and safe drinking water, affordable housing, and universal health care. It could single-handedly revitalize the American dream. Would we really be less secure if we spent only $850 billion a year preparing for war instead of our current $1 trillion? This article was originally published on Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How the ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said
As the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is reportedly tied to proposed sweeping reforms of federal taxation and entitlement programs, many Americans are wondering: What does it mean for Social Security, especially the taxes that fund it? I asked ChatGPT to break down what the Big Beautiful Bill meant for Social Security Taxes — here's what it said. Read Next: For You: What Is the 'Big Beautiful Bill'? Essentially, this bill is aimed at overhauling the tax system, cutting government spending and possibly reforming entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. Trending Now: Could It Affect Social Security Taxes? According to ChatGPT, any major tax overhaul could impact how Social Security is funded in several ways below. Raising or Eliminating the Payroll Tax Cap Currently, only wages up to $168,600 (as of 2024) are subject to the 6.2% Social Security tax. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' proposes eliminating this cap, requiring high earners to contribute more, a change that could extend the life of the Social Security trust fund. Changing the Tax Rate The bill could mean an increase in the Social Security tax rate for workers and employers alike. Even a small rate bump would generate billions in revenue but could face stiff opposition. Means-Testing or Changing Benefit Formulas Instead of raising taxes, the bill may reduce future benefits for high-income retirees or change how cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are calculated, indirectly affecting how much taxpayers benefit from the system they fund. What Should Workers Expect? The 'Big Beautiful Bill' raises real questions about the future of Social Security funding. If you're a working American, especially under 50, it's smart to stay informed and prepare for potential changes in how much you contribute and what you can expect in return. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact RetireesHow Much Money Is Needed To Be Considered Middle Class in Your State? This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said
