Maryland Democrat Ivey furious not given access to Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador
Rep. Glenn Ivey said he was "stonewalled" in his efforts to check on the welfare of Abrego Garcia, whose deportation in March has become a deeply polarizing issue for Republicans and Democrats. The Trump administration accuses Abrego Garcia of also being a human trafficker and a wife beater, while Democrats say he is a "Maryland man" who was not given his due process in court before being deported.
"I was very, not just disappointed, but angry, actually," Ivey told reporters after returning from his trip Tuesday morning.
Dem Immigration Talking Points Fizzle As Dark Picture Of Abrego Garcia Emerges
Ivey, who said he did not use taxpayer money to fund his trip, said he had arranged with embassies in the U.S. and in El Salvador to meet Abrego Garcia in prison but was met with bureaucratic hurdles when he got there. Ivey said he was told he had to obtain a permit at a location 90 minutes away, which blocked his plans.
"And I won't tell you what I said, but I mean, it's ridiculous that an international delegation would get that kind of treatment, especially when we're making this kind of request," Ivey said.
Read On The Fox News App
WATCH: Democrat Rep. Glenn Ivey fumes he was not allowed access to Kilmar Abrego Garcia
He didn't say if he attempted to get a permit but added that locals also told them no one—not even families—were getting permits to visit loved ones in detention.
"It was a clear run around and not a way that a foreign government should be treating the Congress of the United States," he said.
Ivey said he wanted to see Abrego Garcia to confirm the detainee's condition, location and ensure he receives due process in U.S. courts. Several other Democrats, including Maryland Sen. Chris Van Hollen, have rushed to meet with Abrego Garcia and decried what they said was a lack of due process extended to him.
White House Photo Bluntly Shows Where Parties Stand On Immigration Amid Abrego Garcia Deportation
When asked about Abrego Garcia's condition, Ivey told reporters, "Nothing's been confirmed along those lines. We believe he is and we believe he's at Santa Ana. But they didn't confirm that yesterday. So it was kind of a runaround."
In a video posted to X on Monday, Ivey wrote that he traveled to the Central American country to visit his "constituent" and called on the government there to "cut the crap."
Abrego Garcia was sent in March to El Salvador's notoriously high-security prison equipped to handle violent gang members, known as CECOT, which sparked Van Hollen to lead the surge of Democrats traveling there. The Trump administration has repeatedly cited court and police documents showing that the El Salvadoran man was not only in the U.S. illegally, but also connected to the MS-13 gang and that his wife had sounded the alarm to police about his violence.
Court records show Abrego Garcia's wife, Jennifer Vasquez Sura, filed a protective order against her husband in August 2020. The order said their shared son and stepchildren needed protection from Abrego Garcia, accusing him of verbal and physical abuse against her and mental abuse against her children.
Some Democrats and left-wing media have characterized Abrego Garcia as a "family man" who was wrongly deported back in March and the following weeks.
Ivey, meanwhile, also railed over what he said were more than 250 Venezuelans jailed in El Salvador after deportation from the U.S., claiming that around 50 of them have no criminal records and were sent to a country where they have no pending offenses.
"That's un-American. That's not what we should be doing," Ivey said.
Fox News' Emma Colton contributed to this report. Original article source: Maryland Democrat Ivey furious not given access to Kilmar Abrego Garcia in El Salvador
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the aisle
I'm worried about my friends on the other side of the political aisle. Two weeks ago in this newsletter, I wrote about how Texas House Democrats were making fools of themselves, fleeing to states like Illinois, to protest Republicans' efforts to redraw voting district maps to gain five more seats in Congress. To be clear, Republicans looked silly too. But Democrats continue to escalate the matter, and the whole thing has become a farce for Republicans, Democrats and the state. Texas Rep. Nicole Collier spent two nights on the Texas House floor after refusing to consent to a law enforcement escort. House Speaker Dustin Burrows announced Aug. 18 that Democrats who fled the state to protest redistricting would be required to have a police escort to leave the floor. Collier refused to submit, saying she was the victim of 'illegal confinement.' 'This is the fight that all of us have in resisting, you know, the end of our democracy, basically,' Collier said. The whole thing is nonsense, but Texas Democrats in particular look more unhinged than ever. They're not the only ones. California Gov. Gavin Newsom's press office has started trolling President Donald Trump on X by posting in all caps to mimic Trump's unique communication style. In a post Aug. 19, Newsom slammed Fox News' Dana Perino – whose show I was on last week – ending with 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER,' Trump's signature sign off. The account has also mocked Vice President JD Vance's physical appearance. Real classy. Perhaps Newsom's office is trying to be witty, but their messaging falls flat. Trump posts comments on social media like a middle school kid, but he also is brokering peace between warring nations, improving trade policy and bolstering the economy. Newsom's California, meanwhile, is in rapid decline. Americans have noticed that Democratic leaders are increasingly unhinged. The Real Clear Politics polling average shows Democrats with an unfavorable rating of about 60%. Only a third of Americans have a favorable view of the Democratic Party. The party's future looks grim, and dashing out of state to avoid a legislative vote or posting obnoxious messages on social media won't help. Read more from me and my colleagues:
USA Today
2 minutes ago
- USA Today
Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. More than half of respondents -- 57% -- said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump's Republican Party. The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington -- where Republicans control both chambers of Congress -- and state capitals. The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans- such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering - were "bad for democracy." At Trump's urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump's first term led to two impeachment probes. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state's district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans' expected Texas gains. The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points. As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force. In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state's potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as 'cheating' but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind. The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats. 'Shady Business' Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort. "I don't like it when either side tries to do that. I think that's shady business," Kelley said. "The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth." Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it. "It's unfair, and it sets a bad precedent," said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering "is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing. "They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.' Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party. Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that "people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted," while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed. The poll also showed politics weighing more on people's everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year's presidential election has negatively affected their friendships. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump's first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats - 18% - reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017. Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics. 'I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don't think that they're trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,' Larson said. Close to half of Democrats - or 46% - said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party. Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party's leaders. 'I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,' Ogden said. Analysts said that ordinary Democrats' greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party's chances at regaining political standing. 'Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,' said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster. Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating. "The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don't want to talk to the opposition party," Ceraso said. "We have to be better." (Reporting by Jason Lange, Nolan D. McCaskill and James Oliphant; Editing by Scott Malone and Cynthia Osterman)
The Hill
2 minutes ago
- The Hill
California AG on Trump National Guard deployment threat: ‘Absolute' violation of the law
California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D) denounced President Trump's threat to deploy National Guard troops to help combat crime in California as an 'absolute' violation of the law. 'Absolute, complete, transparent, blatant, brazen violation of the law. The Posse Comitatus Act said you cannot use military to engage in civilian law enforcement on American soil. Period, full stop,' he told NewsNation's Blake Burman in an episode of 'The Hill.' 'Tackling crime is the very definition of civilian law enforcement,' he continued. 'He — the military would be involved in detentions, arrests, searches and seizures, in clear violation. So, he's already, he's saying he will break the law.' Bonta added, 'But that's consistent for him, he's broken it 39 times. That's how many times we sued him in 30 weeks.' Trump signaled last week he could attempt to widen his efforts to exert federal control to other Democratic-led cities after launching a crackdown in Washington, D.C., citing what he said was out-of-control crime and squalor. 'We have other cities also that are bad. Very bad. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is,' Trump told reporters during a press conference, after boosting federal law enforcement in the nation's capital. 'New York has a problem. And then you have, of course Baltimore and Oakland, we don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone. We're not going to lose our cities over this,' the president continued at the time. 'And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with D.C., and we're going to clean it up very quickly, as they say.' Despite the move, the district's records show that crime is at a 30-year low. The Justice Department launched a probe into the D.C. data earlier this week. Democrats, district residents and local officials have pushed back on the Trump administration's efforts, including the deployment of National Guard troops — some of them armed — across the district. Trump has also suggested he could work with Congress to extend the federal takeover past the 30 days allotted under the city's Home Rule Act. His latest threat on California comes after the president deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles earlier this year to quell protests of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement's (ICE) deportation raids.
