
Plastic pollution treaty talks end without an agreement
They were meeting for the 11th day at the United Nations office in Geneva to try to complete a landmark treaty to end the plastic pollution crisis but remained deadlocked over whether the treaty should reduce the exponential growth of plastic production and put global, legally binding controls on toxic chemicals used to make plastics.
This round of negotiations was meant to be the last, producing the first legally binding treaty on plastic pollution. But now delegates are leaving without a treaty after talks collapsed, just like they did at the meeting in South Korea last year.
Nations deeply disappointed to leave Geneva without a treaty
Representatives of Norway, Australia, Tuvalu and other nations said they were deeply disappointed to be leaving Geneva without a treaty.
"We came to Geneva to secure a global plastics treaty because we know the stakes could not be higher," European Commissioner for Environment, Water Resilience and Competitive Circular Economy, Jessika Roswall said in a post on social media.
"While the latest text on the table does not yet meet all our ambitions, it is a step forward—and the perfect must not be the enemy of the good."
Roswall added that the EU will continue to push for a stronger, binding agreement.
Saudi Arabia said both drafts lacked balance, and Saudi and Kuwaiti negotiators said the latest proposal takes other states' views more into account and addresses plastic production, which they consider outside the scope of the treaty.
No further action on the latest draft text
Luis Vayas Valdivieso, the chair of the negotiating committee, wrote and presented two drafts of treaty text in Geneva based on the views expressed by nations at the talks.
That draft, released early Friday, did not include a limit on plastic production but recognised that current levels of production and consumption are 'unsustainable' and global action is needed. New language had been added to say these levels exceed current waste management capacities and are projected to increase further, 'thereby necessitating a coordinated global response to halt and reverse such trends.'
The representatives from 184 countries did not agree to use either one as the basis for their negotiations. Valdivieso said Friday morning, as the delegates reconvened in the assembly hall, that no further action is being proposed at this stage on the latest draft.
Talks in Geneva have been an "abject failure", David Azoulay, health programme director and head of the delegation for the Center for International Environmental Law, said in a statement.
"In the final days of the negotiations, we have clearly seen what many of us have known for some time - some countries did not come here to finalise a text, they came here to do the opposite: block any attempt at advancing a viable treaty.
"It's impossible to find a common ground between those who are interested in protecting the status quo and the majority who are looking for a functional treaty that can be strengthened over time."
What happens now?
Delegates are still meeting and have not decided on the next steps yet.
Azoulay said that, while negotiations will continue, they will fail again if solutions aren't identified and the process doesn't change.
"We need a restart, not a repeat performance. Countries that want a treaty must now leave this process and form a treaty of the willing. And that process must include options for voting that deny the tyranny of consensus we have watched play out here."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


AFP
14 hours ago
- AFP
Photo shows ammunition seizure, not bullets sold in South Sudan market
'A normal day in SouthSudan. Bullets sold in the market along side cereals (sic),' reads an X post published on August 11, 2025, and reposted more than 1,900 times. Image Screenshot of the misleading post, taken on August 12, 2025 The image shows a woman sitting on the ground next to sacks of grains and piles of bullets. The claim was also shared on Instagram and on Facebook here and here. South Sudan conflict South Sudan has endured decades of conflict, driven by civil war and inter-communal conflict (archived here). While the signing of the 2018 Revitalized Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in the Republic of South Sudan (R-ARCSS) brought hopes of peace, implementation has been slow, and the country continues to face violence (archived here and here). The human toll remains consequential. According to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), about 1.9 million people are displaced within the country, while over 2.3 million others are refugees in neighbouring countries (archived here). Additionally, South Sudan is a transit hub for smuggling illegal goods and ammunition from countries including Sudan, Uganda and the Democratic Republic of Congo due to its porous borders (archived here). To curb the influx of weapons that could fuel further fighting, the UN Security Council introduced an arms embargo in 2018. While this has curtailed official arms dealing, small arms and ammunition continue to flow in the country (archived here and here). However, online posts claiming to show bullets being sold in a South Sudanese market are misleading. Smuggled ammunition AFP Fact Check conducted reverse image searches and established that while the photo was indeed taken in South Sudan, it has been shared in the wrong context on social media. The image was featured in an August 8, 2025, article by South Sudanese media outlet Radio Tamazuj with the headline: 'Woman arrested in Tonj South County for smuggling bullets' (archived here). According to the report, the woman, only identified as Aguek, was caught by security personnel at a checkpoint trying to smuggle 1,121 bullets hidden in sorghum sacks from Northern Bahr el Ghazal State to Warrap's Tonj East County. Image Screenshot of the Radio Tamazuj article, taken on August 12, 2025 The incident was reported by other local media outlets (archived here and here). The image, alongside others, was also published on Facebook by Tonj South County Commissioner's press unit on August 7, 2025 (archived here). 'County authority apprehended the woman who sneaked ammunition in Alol of Tonj South county,' reads the post. 'An operation carried out by Tonj South County security forces resulted in the arrest of people who were identified as conflict instigators, arms sneakers and the confiscation of a major cache of ammunition mixed with sorghum.' AFP's South Sudan correspondent also confirmed that 'ammunition is not sold in open markets across the country.'

LeMonde
14 hours ago
- LeMonde
Trump-Putin meeting in Alaska: A high-stakes summit for a ceasefire in Ukraine
United States President Donald Trump and Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are set to meet in Alaska on Friday, August 15, in a high-stakes, high-risk summit that could prove decisive for the future of Ukraine. Putin will step onto Western soil for the first time since he ordered the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, a war that has killed tens of thousands of people and on which Russia has not relented, making rapid gains just before the summit. Trump extended the invitation at the Russian leader's suggestion, but the US president has since been defensive and warned that the meeting could be over within minutes if Putin does not compromise. Trump has called the summit a "feel-out meeting" to test Putin, whom he last saw in 2019. "If it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future," Trump said Thursday. He gave the summit a one-in-four chance of failure. Trump's latest shift Trump has boasted of his relationship with Putin, blamed predecessor Joe Biden for the war and vowed before his return to the White House in January to bring peace within 24 hours. Yet despite repeated calls to Putin, and a stunning February 28 White House meeting in which Trump publicly berated Zelensky, the Russian leader has shown no signs of compromise. Trump has acknowledged his frustration with Putin and warned of "very severe consequences" if he does not accept a ceasefire – but also agreed to see him in Alaska. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has also called for security guarantees for Ukraine – an idea downplayed by Trump at the start of his latest term. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) on Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, the largest US military installation in Alaska and a Cold War base for surveillance of the former Soviet Union. Adding to the historical significance, the United States bought Alaska in 1867 from Russia – a deal Moscow has cited to show the legitimacy of land swaps. The Kremlin said it expected Putin and Trump to meet alone with interpreters before a working lunch with aides. Neither leader is expected to step off the base into Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, where protesters have put up signs of solidarity with Ukraine. Closely watched abroad Every word and gesture will be closely watched by European leaders and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who was not included and has publicly refused pressure from Trump to surrender territory seized by Russia. Zelensky said on Tuesday that the Alaska summit was a "personal victory" for Putin. With the trip, Putin "is coming out of isolation" and he has "somehow postponed sanctions," which Trump had vowed to impose on Russia without progress. Trump has promised to consult with European leaders and Zelensky, saying that any final agreement would come in a three-way meeting with Putin and the Ukrainian president to "divvy up" territory. Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, meanwhile, responded to a question from Russian state TV by saying that Moscow would not make guesses on the outcome of the meeting. "We never make any predictions ahead of time," Lavrov said after he reached Alaska, wearing what appeared to be a shirt with "USSR" written across it in Cyrillic script. "Our position is clear and unambiguous. We will present it," he said. Sanctions eased The summit marks a sharp shift from the approach of Western European leaders and Biden, who vowed no discussion with Russia on Ukraine's future unless Ukraine was also at the table. Putin faces an arrest warrant from the International Criminal Court, leading him to curtail travel sharply since the war began. However, the United States is not a party to the Hague tribunal, and Trump's Treasury Department temporarily eased sanctions on top Russian officials to allow them to travel and use bank cards in Alaska. Exiled Russian opposition figure Yulia Navalnaya – whose husband Alexei Navalny died in prison last year – urged the two leaders to strike a deal to "release Russian political activists and journalists, Ukrainian civilians, [and] those who were imprisoned for anti-war statements and posts on social media."


Euronews
16 hours ago
- Euronews
Fact check: Are most refugees in Europe of Muslim background?
ADVERTISEMENT A politician from the far-right Portuguese Chega party, which is known for its anti-immigration policies, alleged in a post shared on X that "85% of refugees are Muslim" on 1 August. Chega has previously faced accusations of Islamophobia, with the party's leader André Ventura having called for the "drastic reduction of the Islamic presence in the European Union.' Chega party's lawmaker Pedro Frazão also claimed that "instead of seeking asylum" in other Muslim countries, these individuals "choose to flee to the West." Both claims are difficult to back with data, as there is a lack of precise and up-to-date data cataloguing refugees' religious affiliation. However, it is evident that wars, economic crises and natural disasters impact the makeup of the global refugee population. While the United Nations produces a vast amount of data on refugees and forcibly displaced people worldwide, it is heavily reliant on government data. While some countries provide information on refugees' religious affiliations, others do not. Where did refugees come from in 2024? According to the UN refugee agency UNHCR, the global refugee population, including people in need of international protection, reached nearly 42.7 million in 2024. In addition, there were 73.5 million people displaced within the borders of their own countries (IDPs) and 8.4 million asylum-seekers. Within Europe, Germany was the European country which hosted the most refugees in 2024 — which has been the case since 2015. Research conducted by the German government published in 2021 revealed that between 2013 and 2019, 69.7% of the refugees it hosted were Muslim faithful. However, these figures predate Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in early 2022, when millions of Ukrainians were forced to leave the country at war. The latest data from the UNHCR showed that in 2024, nearly seven out of 10 of all refugees and people in need of international protection originated from Syria, Afghanistan, South Sudan, Venezuela and Ukraine. The main religion in Syria, Afghanistan and South Sudan is Islam, but in Ukraine and Venezuela, different branches of Christianity are the predominant belief. Given that Ukrainians and Venezuelans made up nearly one-third of all refugees and other people in need of international protection in 2024, it is "unlikely" that 85% of refugees are Muslim, a UN spokesperson told EuroVerify. Although a country may have a Muslim-majority population, this does not mean that all refugees who originate from there are Muslim, and vice versa. In addition, those who nominally belong to an ethnic group associated with Islam might not be actual believers. Muslim-majority nations top the list of host countries Contrary to the claim that refugees of Muslim background predominantly seek refuge in the West, Germany is the only European country which features among the seven countries which have hosted the most asylum seekers since 2015. Iran and Turkey are the two top countries where the most refugees sought asylum between 2015 and 2024. Meanwhile, four out of the seven nations which hosted the most asylum seekers in this period — Iran, Turkey, Chad and Pakistan — were Muslim-majority countries, which debunks the claim that refugees who identify as Muslim only seek refuge in the West.