Politician takes aim at Renfrewshire Labour leadership after councillor's Reform UK defection
Councillor Andy Doig has had a pop at the group's stewardship after Councillor Jamie McGuire's controversial switch.
The leadership of Renfrewshire's Labour group could be "in tatters" after it lost a councillor to Nigel Farage's Reform UK, a veteran politician has claimed.
Councillor Andy Doig, an independent, has taken aim at Councillor Iain McMillan and suggested the party is "going backwards" in the chambers under his stewardship.
It comes after it was announced on Monday that Councillor Jamie McGuire, who also used to work in Alison Taylor MP's office, had decided to switch allegiance.
Councillor Doig, who represents Johnstone North and the surrounding villages, said: "I have known Iain McMillan for decades and I like him and respect him as an individual, however, the defection of one of the Labour group's youngest councillors Jamie McGuire to the odious Reform UK really marks Iain out as a lame duck leader.
"Since 2022, Renfrewshire Labour have lost three councillors and now have one less councillor than they had in 2017.
"Under his stewardship Labour in the council chambers are going backwards and that is a concern because it is healthy for local democracy to provide a level of scrutiny and Labour are the main opposition."
Councillor Eddie Devine left Labour in October 2022 and was followed by Councillor John Hood within a month. The pair have continued as independent elected members since.
But Councillor McGuire, who dismissed suggestions from Councillor McMillan he isn't a "team player" on Tuesday, has taken a different path and joined former Conservative councillors Alec Leishman and John Gray at Reform UK.
Councillor Doig added: "Jamie McGuire seemed to me to be somewhat of a protégé of Iain McMillan's. Iain would feed him questions at the economy and regeneration policy board and they shared a joint passion for all things, red, white, and blue.
"However, that relationship is now in tatters and so too may be Councillor McMillan's leadership of the Labour group."
Councillor McMillan, who represents Johnstone South and Elderslie, was unfazed by the comments and said his party will continue to hold the SNP administration to account.
He added: "Andy has a record of falling out with parties himself and it's quite clear I have the support of the Labour group, having just been unanimously elected as the group leader for the fourth time last week."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mirror
42 minutes ago
- Daily Mirror
MPs could vote to force government to build 150,000 social homes a year
A proposed change to the Planning and Infrastructure bill would demand a 150,000 target for building social homes this Parliament LIb Dem MPs will push for a vote to force the government to set a target on social homes. A proposed change to the Planning and Infrastructure bill would demand a 150,000 target for building social homes this Parliament. It comes amid reports Deputy PM Angela Rayner is locked in a struggle with the Treasury over the Housing budget ahead of this weeks spending review. Agreement has yet to be reached on funding for the Housing department, which is responsible for delivering Labour 's target of 1.5 million new homes - including a promised social housing 'revolution' - by the end of the Parliament. The Lib Dems amendment would also make it mandatory for new car parks to have solar panels on them. And it would create a pubic register of donations made to the Housing Secretary from developers whose projects they have commissioned, dating back ten years. Liberal Democrat Housing and Planning Spokesperson Gideon Amos MP said: "For too long, planning and infrastructure regulations have been in the slow lane, preventing economic growth that would help put money back into British families' pockets. 'If the Government is serious about kickstarting the economy, they need to be far more ambitious. This starts with finally setting a social housing target, and pushing ahead with the healthcare, GPs, transport and energy infrastructure that communities want to see come first where new housing is proposed.' The Party is also pushing for stricter protections for local wildlife and habitats, with requirements on ministers and Natural England to take steps to prevent and reduce adverse effects on the environment. One of their amendments would also ensure development corporations provide green spaces in all new developments.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Ex-Reform chairman Zia Yusuf ‘snapped' after a tirade of abuse from ‘extreme right', claims Farage
Nigel Farage has claimed ex- Reform UK chairman Zia Yusuf quit the party having snapped after receiving a "tirade of personal racist abuse" on social media. The Reform leader suggested Mr Yusuf was 'burnt out', saying the 'very hard extreme right" was to blame for the abuse he received on social media. Mr Yusuf, a Muslim businessman, left the party on Thursday saying he no longer believes 'working to get a Reform government elected is a good use of my time'. It came after the then chairman – who was brought in to professionalise the party - described new Runcorn MP Sarah Pochin as 'dumb' after she challenged Keir Starmer over the legality of women wearing the burqa in the UK during Prime Minister's Questions on Wednesday. Mr Yusuf - who has been the target of anger by many activists over several months - was hit with a tirade of abuse on social media in the wake of his remarks. Speaking about his decision to quit the party, Mr Farage told Times Radio: 'He and I have been pretty much inseparable over the course of the last 11 months. He is, frankly, a bit burnt out.' He added: 'When Zia says anything you cannot believe the absolute tirade of personal racist abuse that he gets on a platform called X, formerly known as Twitter. And I just think he snapped'. Asked where the abuse comes from, Mr Farage responded: 'Well, the interesting thing about it and and and and where he's really made a mistake is if you look at the nastiness, most of it comes from anon. 'I think it comes from the very hard extreme right. I have little doubt about that. They're Indian bots. Someone's paying for it to happen. I've no idea who it is.' He denied that Mr Yusuf quit the party as a result of the row over whether or not the burqa should be banned in Britain, saying: 'No, absolutely not. And Zia just thought we should be focusing on different priorities.' But he later said he thinks that 'on balance' the burqa should be banned, adding: 'But do I think this is a major political priority for my party? Absolutely not.' After the row over Ms Pochin's remarks broke out, a Reform spokesperson clarified that banning burqas was not party policy, sparking calls from the far right for Mr Farage to adopt the proposals. The latest party fracture comes just months after MP Rupert Lowe was ousted following a row which began with Mr Yusuf in December. Mr Lowe is still seeking damages for defamation against Mr Yusuf after he was accused of threatening the chair. Since Mr Lowe, the MP for Great Yarmouth, was forced out of the party in March, a number of former members, including ex-deputy leader Ben Habib and former London mayor candidate, Howard Cox, have demanded Mr Farage sack Mr Yusuf. However, Reform still made massive gains in the May local elections and Mr Farage said that it was only able to happen thanks to Mr Yusuf's professionalisation of the party. Reacting to his resignation, Mr Farage wrote on X, formerly Twitter: 'I am genuinely sorry that Zia Yusuf has decided to stand down as Reform UK Chairman. As I said, just last week, he was a huge factor in our success on May 1st and is an enormously talented person. Politics can be a highly pressured and difficult game and Zia has clearly had enough. He is a loss to us and public life.'
Powys County Times
2 hours ago
- Powys County Times
Home Office plans to spend £2.2bn of foreign aid on asylum support this year
The Home Office plans to spend about £2.2 billion of foreign aid to support asylum seekers this financial year, according to new figures. The amount of overseas development assistance (ODA) budgeted by the Home Office – which is largely used to cover accommodation costs such as hotels for asylum seekers – is slightly less than the £2.3 billion it spent in 2024/25. International rules allow countries to count first-year costs of supporting refugees as overseas development assistance (ODA). The figures, first reported by the BBC, were published in recent days on the Home Office website. The Home Office said it is 'urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs' which will cut the amount spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. It also said it was expected to have saved £500 million in asylum support costs in the last financial year, and that this had saved £200 million in ODA which had been passed back to the Treasury. A total of 32,345 asylum seekers were being housed temporarily in UK hotels at the end of March this year. This figure is down 15% from the end of December, when the total was 38,079, and 6% lower than the 34,530 at the same point a year earlier. Asylum seekers and their families are housed in temporary accommodation if they are waiting for the outcome of a claim or an appeal and have been assessed as not being able to support themselves independently. They are housed in hotels if there is not enough space in accommodation provided by local authorities or other organisations. Labour has previously said it is 'committed to end the use of asylum hotels over time', adding that under the previous Conservative government at one stage 'more than 400 hotels were in use and almost £9 million per day was being spent'. Jo White, chairwoman of the Red Wall group of Labour MPs, told BBC Radio 4's Today programme on Saturday: 'We need to be looking at things like ECHR article eight. I don't think anything's off the table … including looking at new options such as processing abroad. 'So, we have to be open to see how we can move move that backlog as quickly as possible. I'm getting impatient. 'I know my colleagues in parliament are getting impatient and we're pressing the Government as hard as we can on this.' A Home Office spokesperson said: 'We inherited an asylum system under exceptional pressure and are urgently taking action to restore order and reduce costs. 'This will ultimately reduce the amount of official development assistance spent to support asylum seekers and refugees in the UK. 'We are immediately speeding up decisions and increasing returns so that we can end the use of hotels and save the taxpayer £4 billion by 2026. 'The Rwanda scheme also wasted £700 million to remove just four volunteers – instead, we have surged removals to nearly 30,000 since the election, are giving law enforcement new counter-terror style powers, and increasing intelligence sharing through our Border Security Command to tackle the heart of the issue, vile people-smuggling gangs.'
