logo
Australia isn't exporting arms to Israel, weapons components a 'separate issue', Marles says

Australia isn't exporting arms to Israel, weapons components a 'separate issue', Marles says

SBS Australia2 days ago
Germany is suspending all exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza.
Australia's Defence Minister says the country's part in the Lockheed Martin supply chain is a separate issue.
Richard Marles argues Australia's exports are not on the same scale as Germany and have a limited impact. Acting Prime Minister Richard Marles says any action regarding Australia's exports of component parts to Israel are unlikely to have an impact on the war in Gaza, after reiterating that Australia did not supply weapons to Israel. Marles was asked on Sunday whether Australia would follow Germany's lead to suspend all exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza.
German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, a conservative whose support for Israel was a foundation of his election campaign, last week announced he would not authorise any exports of military equipment that could be used in Gaza "until further notice".
Speaking on ABC's Insiders program on Sunday, Marles was questioned on whether Australia would cease exports of armoured steel and components for F-35 jets to Israel. Marles said Australia did not supply weapons to Israel and there was "a lot of misinformation" around this issue.
When pressed further on the issue of components, he said that Australia was part of the F-35 supply chain and had been for decades.
"That is a multi-lateral arrangement with supply chains that are organised by Lockheed Martin in the United States and have multiple supplies in respect of all of those supply chains," he said. But he said that was "a very different question" to the issue of being an arms exporter.
Marles said components were "a separate issue, and this is about having an impact on Israel".
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said the army will "prepare" to take over Gaza City with Israel's proposal outlining principles for "concluding the war". Source: Getty / Amir Levy "There is no step that we can take here which has any impact in relation to the activities of Israel. And it is a very different question to what is being talked about in relation to Germany which obviously has a significant supply in to Israel," he said. "We want to do everything we can to see an end to the hostilities that are occurring in Gaza. The most important thing that we can do is use our international voice here and that's what we have been doing."
After the US, Germany is the next biggest supplier of arms to Israel.
Source: SBS News The Greens and pro-Palestinian groups have been pressuring the government over its military trade arrangements with Israel in recent months. Responding to Marles' comment, Greens senator David Shoebridge said: "If the Albanese government stopped the export of F-35 fighter jet parts to Israel, then their F-35 fleet would be grounded." "International law is crystal clear, parts of weapons are weapons," he added.
"Australia is a key part of the F35 fighter jet program. We are the only place in the world that makes parts like the bomb bay doors and we operate as one of the few regional distribution hubs."
Anthony Albanese responds to calls for sanctions on Israel Meanwhile, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has brushed off calls to impose sanctions on Israel.
"No, we make decisions and we never foreshadow any of those measures, but sometimes it's just a slogan. I mean, sanctions, I've done this before at a press conference, which sanctions are you talking about," he replied.
Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese may be on a visit to New Zealand, but broader world matters have continued to be a pressing issue, with questions about Australia's position in regard to Israel being directed his way. Source: AAP / Peter Meecham "People aren't clear. What we need to do here is to have very clear statements and actions by the Australian government that make a difference, rather than respond to a slogan on a protest. "What we do is make a difference. The sanctions that we put on Israeli government ministers are a serious action given the actions of those ministers. So, it's entirely appropriate."
Albanese also repeated his government's call for Israel to abandon its plan to seize control of Gaza City which was approved by Israel's security cabinet on Friday.
"We called for an immediate ceasefire," he told reporters on Sunday morning following a meeting with Kiwi counterpart Chris Luxon. "We called for the release of hostages and we called for the unimpeded entry of aid into Gaza.
"We have a humanitarian catastrophe unfolding there. And the idea that it can just be continued is completely unacceptable."
Concerns around Palestinian state recognition under Hamas Opposition home affairs spokesman Andrew Hastie said he was hesitant to recognise the state of Palestine with Hamas, which is listed as a terrorist organisation by Australia, still in "prime position" to control Gaza. "If they did move to elections, let's just say that the Gaza conflict wound up and they moved to elections, what guarantee would there be that Hamas would not win another majority?" he told Sky News. However, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said it would not be unprecedented for Australia to recognise a country while part of it was occupied by a terrorist organisation. "There have frequently been countries where half of that nation has been occupied by a terrorist group and we haven't ceased to recognise the country," he said. "Both Syria and Iraq had a long period where parts of those countries were being occupied and realistically controlled by ISIS."
- with additional reporting by AAP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia and Vanuatu close to signing Nakamal Agreement worth $500m
Australia and Vanuatu close to signing Nakamal Agreement worth $500m

ABC News

time6 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Australia and Vanuatu close to signing Nakamal Agreement worth $500m

Australia and Vanuatu are close to signing an "ambitious" new strategic pact that will see the federal government plough about half a billion dollars into the Pacific island country over the next decade. Vanuatu's Council of Ministers is widely expected to endorse the Nakamal Agreement later today after months of negotiations between the two countries. Foreign Minister Penny Wong, Defence Minister Richard Marles and Pacific Minister Pat Conroy will then join Vanuatu's Prime Minister Jotham Napat and other senior leaders on the island of Tanna tomorrow to give their initial agreement to the pact, ahead of a formal signing next month. Mr Napat's office said in a statement the development and security agreement would "cover a wide range of bilateral issues, including infrastructure planning, economic development, and climate resilience initiatives in light of the devastating December 17 earthquake of 2024". "The partnership between Vanuatu and Australia remains strong, especially as Vanuatu continues its recovery efforts," it said. One Australian government source said Vanuatu had driven "quite a hard bargain", but insisted the pact would boost Vanuatu's development while buttressing Australia's strategic position in the country — which is also being energetically courted by China. Under the pact, Australia is expected to make substantial commitments worth up to $500 million over a decade — or $50 million a year. For example, Australia would provide approximately $120 million to help Vanuatu deliver its plan to build two "large data centres" in both Port Vila and Santo. Australia is also expected to deliver around $100 million in security assistance and budget support worth $55 million, and more than $110 million to help Vanuatu deal with the impacts of climate change. The federal government is also expected to make smaller financial contributions to boosting labour mobility, fostering cultural connections and improving digital connectivity. But several details in the agreement remain under wraps. For example, it is not yet clear whether Australia will offer any concessions to Vanuatu on travel and migration, which is an issue likely to be closely watched by other Pacific nations. Last month Mr Napat declared he would not sign the Nakamal Agreement unless Australia agreed to offer "visa-free" travel to his country, saying the pact had to be "win-win" for both countries. Successive Australian governments have been unwilling to relax visa and travel rules for Pacific nationals, partly due to fears a large proportion would remain in Australia illegally. Relaxing travel restrictions for the Pacific could also be politically contentious. Australian officials have previously raised deep concerns about Vanuatu's contentious "Citizenship By Investment" scheme — sometimes called the Golden Passport program — which critics say has drawn oligarchs and criminals seeking to evade foreign law enforcement. It is not yet clear what commitments Vanuatu has made to Australia on the security front. The Pacific island nations of Tuvalu and Nauru have effectively handed Australia the right to veto security agreements with third nations under sweeping treaties they signed with Canberra in 2023 and 2024 respectively. But Vanuatu has long maintained a fierce commitment to non-alignment — or "friends to all, enemies to none" — and is very unlikely to make a similar commitment to Australia. In 2022, Vanuatu's then-Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau signed a contentious security agreement with Ms Wong that labelled Australia as Vanuatu's "principal security partner" and said both countries would "consult" with each other on any "common security interests." But Mr Kalsakau's cabinet rebelled in the wake of that agreement, accusing the prime minister of going above the heads of his ministers and parliament — and the security agreement was never ratified by either Australia or Vanuatu. The statement from Mr Napat's office suggested the Nakamal Agreement will supersede the 2022 security pact. "It is important to note that a security agreement signed in late 2022 between Australia and the former Government of then Prime Minister Ishmael Kalsakau was never approved by COM, let alone parliament!" it said. A spokesperson for the Foreign Minister Penny Wong said discussions on the Nakamal Agreement were "progressing" but "there is still work to do on both sides." "We look forward to continuing our constructive conversations on the ground as we work towards reaching an agreement that delivers shared objectives," they said. "Our visit to Vanuatu highlights the respect, shared values, and cultural and religious connections that are the platform for deepening the partnership between our countries." "As we have shown through our Pacific partnerships, Australia is open to ambitious agreements where they advance the prosperity and security of our region."

Israel's deadly strike on Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza condemned
Israel's deadly strike on Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza condemned

News.com.au

time6 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Israel's deadly strike on Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza condemned

The deaths of five journalists by an Israeli airstrike near a hospital in Gaza has ignited global fury, as hundreds of Palestinians carried their bodies through the streets of the city. Prominent Al Jazeera correspondent Anas al-Sharif and four of his colleagues – correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh and camera operators Ibrahim Zaher, Mohammed Noufal and Moamen Aliwa – were killed in the strike on a tent for journalists outside al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City on Sunday. Hospital director Mohammed Abu Salmiya said a sixth journalist, freelance reporter Mohammed al-Khaldi, was also killed in the assault. The Israeli Defence Force (IDF) admitted it had targeted Sharif, claiming he was a 'terrorist' affiliated with Hamas who 'posed as a journalist' – an allegation previously refuted by Sharif, the Qatari broadcaster and UN Special Rapporteur Irene Khan as baseless. The military released documents alleging to show the date of Sharif's enlistment with Hamas in 2013, an injury report from 2017 and the name of his unit and rank. Describing Sharif as 'one of Gaza's bravest journalists', Al Jazeera led condemnations of the attack, 'a desperate attempt to silence voices in anticipation of the occupation of Gaza'. 'Anas al-Sharif and his colleagues were among the last remaining voices in Gaza conveying the tragic reality to the world,' it said. According to local journalists who knew him, Sharif had worked at the start of his career with a Hamas communication office, where his role was to publicise events organised by the group that has ruled the Gaza Strip since 2006. The 28-year-old was one of Al Jazeera's most recognisable faces working on the ground in Gaza, providing daily reports on the now 22-month-old war. A posthumous message, written by Sharif in April in case of his death, was published on his X account on Monday. 'If these words reach you, know that Israel has succeeded in killing me and silencing my voice,' Sharif wrote, urging people 'not to forget Gaza'. 'I have lived through pain in all its details, tasted suffering and loss many times, yet I never once hesitated to convey the truth as it is, without distortion or falsification.' 'It is a war crime' Dozens of Gazans stood amid bombed-out buildings in the courtyard of the hospital on Monday to pay their respects to the reporters. Mourners – including men wearing blue journalists' flak jackets – carried their bodies, wrapped in white shrouds with their faces exposed, through Gaza City's narrow alleys to their graves. Media freedom groups – including Australia's journalists' union, the Media Entertainment and Arts Alliance (MEAA) – spoke out against the attack, which the United Nations human rights agency called a 'grave breach of international humanitarian law'. 'Israel's pattern of labelling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect for freedom,' the Committee to Protect Journalists' (CPJ) director for the Middle East and North Africa, Sara Qudah, said. The CPJ had called for Sharif's protection in July following online posts by an Israeli military spokesperson. 'International law is clear that active combatants are the only justified targets in a war setting,' CPJ's chief executive, Jodie Ginsberg, told AFP on Monday. Unless Israel 'can demonstrate that Anas al-Sharif was still an active combatant, then there is no justification for his killing'. In its own statement, the MEAA said the deaths were the culmination of 'a long smear campaign of unsubstantiated allegations against al-Sharif and other journalists'. 'As Al Jazeera has said, this was a 'dangerous attempt to justify the targeting of journalists in the field',' the MEAA said. 'Tragically, these warnings have now come to fruition. The targets of journalists is a blatant attack on press freedom, and it is also a war crime. It must stop.' Reporters Without Borders said nearly 200 journalists have been killed in the war, which was sparked by Hamas' attack on Israel on October 7, 2023. Israel prevents international reporters from entering Gaza, except on occasional tightly-controlled trips with the military. A spokesperson for British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said his government is 'gravely concerned by the repeated targeting of journalists in Gaza'. 'Reporters covering conflicts are afforded protection under international humanitarian law and journalists must be able to report independently without fear, and Israel must ensure journalists can carry out their work safely,' they said. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres has called for 'an independent and impartial investigation into these latest killings'. 'Journalists and media workers must be respected, they must be protected and they must be allowed to carry out their work freely, free from fear and free from harassment,' his spokesperson said.

Australia should lead global food security, expert says
Australia should lead global food security, expert says

ABC News

time21 minutes ago

  • ABC News

Australia should lead global food security, expert says

The Indo-Pacific is facing significant climate and population pressures, and that presents Australia with an opportunity it must take to become a leader in food security across the region. That's the key message at this year's Crawford conference, the country's largest food security event which continues in Parliament House today. It comes as experts increase calls for urgent, coordinated action, arguing it is one of national security and a foreign policy priority.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store