As NYC mayoral election nears, Eric Adams' associates face new wave of corruption accusations
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg and the city's Department of Investigation announced charges Thursday, accusing Ingrid Lewis-Martin of accepting more than $75,000 in bribes and other benefits in a series of corruption schemes spread across several city agencies.
The wide-ranging indictments also involve Lewis-Martin's son, two siblings who own a prominent soundstage studio company in the city and a former New York State Senator who works as a deputy commissioner at the Department of Citywide Administrative Services and is a close ally of the mayor.
'We allege that Ingrid Lewis-Martin engaged in classic bribery conspiracies that had a deep and wide-ranging impact on City government,' Bragg said in a statement. 'As alleged, Lewis-Martin consistently overrode the expertise of public servants so she could line her own pockets.'
While Mayor Adams is not mentioned in the indictment and has not been accused of any wrongdoing, the latest legal troubles involving members of his inner circle are likely to reinforce the perception of a persistent cloud of corruption and government malfeasance that has hung over City Hall during Adams' entire administration.
The indictments come at a politically perilous time for the mayor, who is seeking a second term running as an independent after opting out of the Democratic primary following his own corruption scandal last year.
'Mayor Adams was not involved in this matter and has not been accused of or implicated in any wrongdoing,' Kayla Mamelak Altus, a spokesperson for Adams, said in a statement.
'He remains focused on what has always been his priority — serving the 8.5 million New Yorkers who call this city home and making their city safer and more affordable every single day. Ingrid Lewis-Martin no longer works for this administration.'
A federal judge formally dismissed corruption and bribery charges against Adams in April, sparking controversy and leading to the resignation of several high-profile prosecutors.
As part of its directive to dismiss the charges, the Department of Justice said charges against the mayor were preventing him from doing his job, including cooperating with President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.
Adams' opponents frequently point to the directive and the mayor's unwillingness to criticize Trump to suggest he is compromised and unfit to defend the city from the president's attacks. Adams has consistently said he wants to have a working relationship with the Trump administration, specifically on issues of immigration.
Polling released earlier this year shows Adams facing historically low approval ratings among New York City voters. Democratic mayoral nominee Zohran Mamdani and former Governor Andrew Cuomo, who is also running as an independent, consistently try to tie him to Trump.
CNN has reached out to the Mamdani and Cuomo campaigns.
The charges unsealed against Lewis-Martin, who the mayor has often referred to as his 'sister,' allege criminal activity in close proximity to the mayor, including an alleged conspiracy where Lewis-Martin obtained approval for a residential renovation project in exchange for thousands of dollars of catering for events at Gracie Mansion and City Hall, according to court documents.
According to the indictments, Lewis-Martin allegedly used her influential position at City Hall to help steer government contracts, fast track permits and intervene in policy decisions in exchange for cash, speaking roles and a television appearance.
Prosecutors allege Lewis-Martin influenced the city's Department of Transportation to withdraw its approval for renovations on a road frequently used by 'Broadway Stages,' a production company run by Gina and Tony Argento – two high-powered donors who run one of New York City's biggest soundstage companies. In exchange, Lewis-Martin allegedly received $2,500, roughly $10,000 in catering services for an event at Gracie Mansion and a speaking role on the TV show 'Godfather of Harlem,' which was filmed at the Argentos' studios.
Lewis-Martin and eight other co-defendants, including two corporations along with former State Senator Jesse Hamilton, are expected to be arraigned in Manhattan criminal court Thursday.
CNN has reached out to attorneys for Hamilton, Lewis-Martin's son, and the Argentos for comment.
Arthur Aidala, an attorney for Lewis-Martin, dismissed the accusations Thursday, saying she would plead not guilty.
'Ingrid Lewis Martin is facing charges classified at the lowest level of felony in our justice system. Her only so-called 'offense' was fulfilling her duty—helping fellow citizens navigate the City's outdated and often overwhelming bureaucracy. At no point did she receive a single dollar or any personal benefit for her assistance,' Aidala said in a statement.
'Yet, the District Attorney seeks to portray a dedicated and honest public servant as a criminal. This is not justice—it is a distortion of the truth and a troubling example of politically motivated 'lawfare.' We will vigorously fight these charges and ensure that the facts prevail. The public deserves to know the truth, and we will not allow this injustice to stand.'
Lewis-Martin, who was previously indicted on separate corruption charges last year – which she pleaded not guilty to – resulting in her resignation, is a close personal friend of the mayor. The two have worked side by side for decades after he first recruited her to run his campaign for the State Senate in 2004.
Lewis-Martin was seen as having a great deal of power and authority at City Hall. In her official capacity, she was tasked with overseeing human resources and mayoral appointments, but through the years Adams gave her additional authority to work on a range of issues, including the city budget, housing and rezoning proposals.
Hamilton and Adams also have a long history.
The former Brooklyn State Senator was Adams' hand-picked successor in the legislature when Adams vacated the seat to run for Brooklyn Borough president. Years after losing his senate seat in 2018, Adams hired him as an attorney for the city's Department of Citywide Administrative Services where he was quickly promoted to deputy commissioner of real estate services.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Gov. Cox defends Utah Senate president
Utah Gov. Spencer Cox stood by state Senate President Stuart Adams on Thursday, defending the top lawmaker's decision not to disclose his personal connection to a law inspired by the criminal case of his granddaughter. During a tense exchange with reporters, Cox said there is no need for an investigation into Adams' behavior because he and Senate Majority Leader Kirk Cullimore, R-Draper, have openly stated the extent of their involvement in the law's passage. 'There's nothing to investigate,' Cox said. 'The facts of this are very, very clear.' What is the new law? The provision, which passed in 2024 as part of SB213, allows 18-year-old high school students to be charged as 17-year-olds if they engage in noncoercive sexual activity with teenagers who are 13. In a stated effort to keep the process fair, Adams did not tell legislators, except for Cullimore — the bill's primary sponsor — that his granddaughter was currently the defendant in a Davis County criminal case falling into that category. Cullimore has said that after Adams told him about his granddaughter's situation in 2023 he contacted her defense attorney, Cara Tangaro, to identify statutory changes to prevent high school students from being charged with child rape when no force was involved. The change was discussed in committee hearings and floor debates before passing as part of the 49-page criminal justice omnibus bill. The law did not apply retroactively to Adams' granddaughter, but it was referenced at her sentencing. Court observers disagree on the extent to which the law may have shaped the eventual plea bargain that let the granddaughter avoid a prison sentence and sex offender designation. 'I don't think there are any facts in dispute,' Cox said. 'He talked to the Senate majority leader. The Senate majority leader took that information and he proposed a piece of legislation.' Calls for Adam to resign State Sen. Nate Blouin, D-Salt Lake City, Utah Democratic Party Chair Brian King, and activist groups across the political spectrum have called on Adams to resign, alleging that he abused his power. But Cox said these criticisms are unfounded. This is the process taken by many pieces of legislation, the governor said, and by not disclosing his personal situation, including to Cox, Adams allowed lawmakers to focus on the policy's merits. 'Every single legislator has experiences in their life where they see something that they feel may be unjust, and that influences the way they bring legislation to the table,' Cox said. Cox pushed back against some legislators who have said the provision was snuck into the bill late in the process. It was part of the initial draft and was debated by stakeholders, Cox said, adding that those who say they didn't know about the provision are 'lying to you, or they're a terrible legislator.' Review will happen Cox repeatedly said he was 'grateful' that Adams had not told him 'this was impacting someone in his family' because it may have changed how he 'reacted to the bill.' But Cox said he and others now have a chance to revisit the legislation if needed. On Friday, Utah House Speaker Mike Schultz announced the creation of a working group of policy experts to 'review' SB213 and analyze state laws related to unlawful sexual activity among high school students. In an interview with Deseret News and last week, Adams said he had no participation in the drafting of the provision, or its placement in SB213, and said the way the bill became law 'was done ethically and morally perfect.' Cox said on Thursday that Adams made the right call by staying out of the legislative process as much as he could as it related to the provision — even if it was initiated by his concerns tied to a family connection. 'I think it was appropriate for the top person in the Senate not to weigh in on this bill, which is exactly what happened,' Cox told reporters. 'He did not weigh in on this bill — I can only imagine what you would have written if he had.' Play Farm Merge Valley
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration not eyeing equity in companies that are increasing US investment, WSJ reports
(Reuters) -The Trump administration is considering taking equity stakes in companies receiving funds from the 2022 CHIPS Act but has no plans to seek shares in bigger semiconductor firms that are increasing their U.S. investments, the Wall Street Journal reported on Thursday, citing a government official. The development follows comments made by U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick, who on Tuesday said the government is continuing to work on the possibility of taking a 10% stake in troubled chipmaker Intel. However, the administration does not intend to take equity stakes in companies like TSMC, which are ramping up investment, the official told the Journal. Businesses not increasing their commitments may need to offer equity to the government in exchange for subsidies. "The Commerce Department is not looking to take equity from TSMC and Micron," the official told WSJ. TSMC executives have already had discussions about giving back their subsidies if the administration asks to become a shareholder, according to the report. The White House and TSMC did not immediately respond to Reuters' requests for comment. TSMC, which counts Nvidia and Apple as key clients, announced plans for a $100 billion investment in the United States during an event with President Donald Trump at the White House in March. This investment is in addition to $65 billion committed for three manufacturing facilities in the state of Arizona. The U.S. Commerce Department, which oversees the $52.7 billion CHIPS Act, formally known as the CHIPS and Science Act, late last year finalized subsidies of $6.6 billion for TSMC to produce semiconductors in the United States. Besides Intel, Micron, TSMC and Samsung were among the biggest recipients of CHIPS Act funding. In the past, the U.S. government has taken stakes in companies during periods of economic uncertainty to provide financial support and restore confidence. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'It's alarming': Education Department revokes guidance on English learning services
The U.S. Education Department has rescinded critical guidance to schools regarding how they provide English language learning services for roughly 5 million students in U.S. schools. The Education Department on Tuesday rescinded a 2015 Dear Colleague letter on its website, which served as a guide for school districts that are serving English learners to ensure they're providing adequate resources to their students under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. In a statement to ABC News, the Education Department said the document was "overly prescriptive" and that it micro-managed states. MORE: Immigrant families fear Trump's deportations as children return to school "States have vastly different needs for this important population of students and are best equipped to determine how best to educate these students while following all applicable federal laws," the department said in the statement. The document is still available online for "historical purposes only," according to a notice. The Washington Post was the first to report the guidance had been rescinded. Advocates worry the decision removes federal oversight and accountability, which could lead to school districts opting to discriminate against English learners. Despite those concerns, removing the guidance does not strip resources from schools nor does it alter state curriculums, which are handled by state and local agencies. Roxanne Garza, director of higher education policy at the Education Trust, suggested the move could further the fears of immigrant students wary of returning to school amid the Trump administration's measures to curb illegal migration. "I think it could add to the overall feeling of fear -- like making these people, these families, feel like they don't belong in their communities." MORE: Education leaders split on how Department of Education cuts will affect families Montserrat Garibay, former assistant deputy secretary and director of the Office of English Language Acquisition (OELA) during the Biden administration, equated the now-rescinded English-learners document to the Bible for English language instructors. During her tenure, she said the letter was instrumental to her office in providing resources to the students who needed it most. Garibay, who said nearly three quarters of students in English Language Acquisition programming are U.S. citizens, argued the move could have a lasting impact if it results in scaled-back resources. "These are children who eventually are going to be paying our Medicare and Medicaid, right? Our Social Security, because they are U.S. citizens. And it's outrageous that we are not providing them with the resources that they need to be successful in the 21st century." Garibay also said lifting the long-standing guidance appears to fly in the face of an executive order Trump signed earlier this year designating English as the official language of the United States. Education advocates decried the agency's decision. MORE: Trump admin live updates: US, European Union announce 'Framework Agreement' on trade ImmSchools Co-Founder Viridiana Carrizales told ABC News "It's alarming because, you know, it feels like this administration is stripping away every right, every protection, funding, access to resources etc. that are so critical for those 5 million students in the country who are learning English." Carrizales, whose organization partners with school districts to create more welcoming and safe schools for K-12 immigrant students, said the recent move is a significant shift for classroom educators because immigrant protections, overall, are "diminishing." "We're hearing a lot more concerns from educators themselves, who're trying to figure out how they can meet and support this population when their resources and protections are being taken away," she said. Anne Kelsey, senior policy analyst for disability rights at the Young Center for Immigrant Children's Rights, argued the decision will harm immigrant children and families. "Language access is a fundamental right that builds safer, smarter, and more connected communities, and ensures children can receive a full and fair education while keeping their parents actively involved," Kelsey wrote in a statement to ABC News, adding "These programs welcome parents and families fully into the school community and we know it leads to stronger educational outcomes for students." The effort to return education responsibilities and decisions to the states is arguably President Donald Trump's top K-12 education priority. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon kicked off her 50-state "Returning Education to the States" tour last week.
