New Texas law requires 10 Commandments to be posted in every public school classroom
AUSTIN, Texas — Texas will require all public school classrooms to display the Ten Commandments under a new law that will make the state the nation's largest to attempt to impose such a mandate.
Gov. Greg Abbott announced Saturday that he signed the bill, which is expected to draw a legal challenge from critics who consider it an unconstitutional violation of the separation of church and state.
A similar law in Louisiana was blocked when a federal appeals court ruled Friday that it was unconstitutional. Arkansas also has a similar law that has been challenged in federal court.
The Texas measure easily passed in the Republican-controlled state House and Senate in the legislative session that ended June 2.
'The focus of this bill is to look at what is historically important to our nation educationally and judicially,' Republican state representative Candy Noble, a co-sponsor of the bill, said when it passed the House.
Abbott also signed a bill that allows school districts to provide students and staff a daily voluntary period of prayer or time to read a religious text during school hours.
The Ten Commandments laws are among efforts, mainly in conservative-led states, to insert religion into public schools.
Texas' law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship.
Supporters say the Ten Commandments are part of the foundation of the United States' judicial and educational systems and should be displayed.
Opponents, including some Christian and other faith leaders, say the Ten Commandments and prayer measures infringe on others' religious freedom.
A letter signed this year by dozens of Christian and Jewish faith leaders opposing the bill noted that Texas has thousands of students of other faiths who might have no connection to the Ten Commandments. Texas has nearly 6 million students in about 9,100 public schools.
In 2005, Abbott, who was state attorney general at the time, successfully argued before the Supreme Court that Texas could keep a Ten Commandments monument on the grounds of its Capitol.
Louisiana's law has twice been ruled unconstitutional by federal courts, first by U.S. District Judge John deGravelles and then again by a three-judge panel of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also considers cases from Texas.
State Attorney General Liz Murrell said she would appeal and pledged to take it to the U.S. Supreme Court if necessary.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
12 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Accidentally Doxxes Himself While Sharing Results of a Drug Test
Elon Musk accidentally doxxed himself while trying to prove he isn't a drug addict. After a New York Times exposé about his drug use revealed that Musk has taken so much ketamine, it's given him bladder issues, the former chief of the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency posted a second drug test on X in the space of a week. The Times also reported Musk had taken ecstasy, magic mushrooms, and Adderall regularly. On Tuesday, Musk posted the results of a urine test that showed he was drug-free, with no traces of 16 substances, including amphetamines, cocaine, fentanyl, marijuana, or opioids. He followed up with a hair follicle test the following day—and goaded Times reporters to post the results of their own drug tests. 'The WSJ & New York Times fake 'journalists' lied through their teeth about me,' he wrote in the caption. 'Now let's see their drug test results. They will fail.' But Musk inadvertently leaked the last four numbers of his Social Security number, putting the billionaire at risk of identity theft from hackers and scammers. The Daily Beast has asked Musk for comment about the leak of his personal information. The Times put out a statement following the publication of Musk's drug tests that said it stood by its reporting. 'Elon Musk is continuing to lash out because he doesn't like our reporting,' the outlet wrote. 'Nothing that he's said or presented since our article about his drug use during the presidential campaign was published contradicts what we uncovered.' Musk is sensitive about his personal security. In March, he banned several journalists from Twitter for reporting on the itinerary of his private jet, claiming that users sharing the publicly available information were broadcasting 'basically assassination coordinates.' During his time in the White House, he surrounded himself with up to 20 bodyguards who were deputized as federal marshals, which allowed them to carry weapons on federal grounds. As of Friday, Musk has not commented on the leak of his personal information or removed the post. Musk shared the details of his drug tests after falling out with President Donald Trump following his departure from DOGE. At the height of their feud, Trump referred to Musk as a 'big-time addict' and said, 'He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' The Wall Street Journal further reported in June 2023 and January 2024 that the billionaire regularly used party drugs like ketamine, LSD, cocaine, ecstasy, and psychedelic mushrooms. In a 2024 interview with former CNN host Don Lemon, Musk admitted that he took a 'small amount' of medically prescribed ketamine every two weeks for depression. 'If you've used too much ketamine, you can't really get work done, and I have a lot of work,' he said at the time. Musk's drug tests were carried out at the Fastest Labs of South Austin in Texas, though without the involvement of a third party, it is impossible to determine their veracity.
Yahoo
17 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New Details Emerge in Iran Attack: U.S. Used Submarines, 6 'Bunker Buster' Bombs
The United States bombed three Iranian nuclear facilities on June 21, and now new details are emerging about how the attack was launched. The attack involved submarines and stealth B-2 bombers. Fox News gave additional details on the attacks against the Fordow, Natanz, and Esfahan (Isfahan) facilities. The U.S. used six "huge bunker buster bombs" to obliterate the Fordow facility, which is located deep in the mountains, Fox News reported. They were "dropped from American stealth B-2 bombers." Natanz and Esfahan were targeted differently, Fox News reported. They were attacked with '30 tomahawk missiles launched by American submarines from 400 miles away," Fox News reported, saying that the U.S. "completely obliterated" Fordow. What are bunker buster bombs? "The Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) is a weapon system designed to accomplish a difficult, complicated mission of reaching and destroying our adversaries' weapons of mass destruction located in well-protected facilities. It is more powerful than its predecessor, the BLU-109," the Air Force says. The bunker buster bombs are also known as GBU-57s, and "can only be carried by B-2 bombers, with each aircraft capable of carrying two of these 30,000-pound weapons at a time," Newsweek reported. Originally, it was believed that only two bunker buster bombs would be needed to obliterate Fordow. What is Natanz? "The nuclear complex, about 250 kilometers (150 miles) south of the capital Tehran, is considered Iran's largest uranium enrichment facility," CNN reported. The network reported that much is not known about Fordow because of its location deep in the mountains. Its "main halls are an estimated 80 to 90 meters (around 262 to 295 feet) beneath the ground," the network added. What is Isfahan? "Isfahan, in central Iran, is home to the country's largest nuclear research complex," the network noted. The network reported that lawmakers' response to the bombing was Details Emerge in Iran Attack: U.S. Used Submarines, 6 'Bunker Buster' Bombs first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 22, 2025
News24
18 minutes ago
- News24
Tactical vs ‘strategic success': Trump gambles on force over diplomacy after striking Iran
The US openly escalated its longstanding conflict with Iran by striking its nuclear sites, fuelled by concerns over Iran's potential development of nuclear weapons and following Israel's encouragement. Trump's decision marks a shift from prior diplomacy, abandoning efforts for a new deal with Iran and intensifying tensions in a region already destabilised since the October 2023 attacks and Israel's recent actions. Analysts are divided on the consequences of this action, with some seeing it as necessary due to failed diplomacy, and others warning it may entrench Iran's regime or accelerate nuclear ambitions. For nearly a half-century the United States has squabbled with Iran's Islamic Republic, but the conflict has largely been left in the shadows, with US policymakers believing, often reluctantly, that diplomacy was preferable. With President Donald Trump's order of strikes on Iran's nuclear sites, the United States – like Israel, which encouraged him – has brought the conflict into the open, and the consequences may not be clear for some time to come. 'We will only know if it succeeded if we can get through the next three to five years without the Iranian regime acquiring nuclear weapons, which they now have compelling reasons to want,' said Kenneth Pollack, a former CIA analyst and supporter of the 2003 Iraq war, who is now vice president for policy at the Middle East Institute. US intelligence had not concluded that Iran was building a nuclear bomb, with Tehran's sensitive atomic work largely seen as a means of leverage, and Iran can be presumed to have taken precautions in anticipation of strikes. Trita Parsi, an outspoken critic of military action, said Trump 'has now made it more likely that Iran will be a nuclear weapons state in the next five to 10 years'. 'We should be careful not to confuse tactical success with strategic success,' said Parsi, executive vice president of the Quincy Institute for Responsible Statecraft. 'The Iraq war was also successful in the first few weeks, but President Bush's declaration of 'Mission Accomplished' did not age well,' he said. Weak point for Iran Yet Trump's attack – a week after Israel began a major military campaign – came as the cleric-run state is at one of its weakest points since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah. Since the 7 October 2023 attack on Israel by Hamas, which enjoys Iran's support, Israel, besides obliterating much of Gaza, has decimated Lebanon's Hezbollah, a militant group that would once reliably strike Israel as Tehran's proxy. VIDEO: 🇺🇸 🇮🇷 Trump says Iran nuclear sites 'obliterated,' threatens more strikes President Trump said US air strikes on Sunday "totally obliterated" Iran's main nuclear sites, as Washington joined Israel's war with Tehran. In a televised address, Trump warned the United States… — AFP News Agency (@AFP) June 22, 2025 Iran's main ally among Arab leaders, Syria's Bashar al-Assad, was also toppled in December. Supporters of Trump's strike argued that diplomacy was not working, with Iran standing firm on its right to enrich uranium. 'Contrary to what some will say in the days to come, the US administration did not rush to war. In fact, it gave diplomacy a real chance,' said Ted Deutch, a former Democratic congressman who now heads the American Jewish Committee. 'The murderous Iranian regime refused to make a deal,' he said. Top Senate Republican John Thune pointed to Tehran's threats to Israel and language against the United States and said that the state had 'rejected all diplomatic pathways to peace'. Abrupt halt to diplomacy Trump's attack comes almost exactly a decade after former president Barack Obama sealed a deal in which Iran drastically scaled back its nuclear work, which Trump pulled out of in 2018 after coming into office for his first term. Most of Trump's Republican Party and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has long seen Iran as an existential threat, attacked Obama's deal because it allowed Tehran to enrich uranium at levels well beneath weapons grade and the key clauses had an end date. But Trump, billing himself a peacemaker, just a month ago said on a visit to Gulf Arab monarchies that he was hopeful for a new deal with Iran, and his administration was preparing new talks when Netanyahu attacked Iran. This prompted an abrupt U-turn from Trump. — AFP News Agency (@AFP) June 22, 2025 'Trump's decision to cut short his own efforts for diplomacy will also make it much harder to get a deal in the medium and long runs,' said Jennifer Kavanagh, director of military analysis at Defense Priorities, which advocates restraint. 'Iran now has no incentive to trust Trump's word or to believe that striking a compromise will advance Iran's interests.' Iran's religious rulers also face opposition internally. Major protests erupted in 2022 after the death in custody of Mahsa Amini, who was detained for defying the regime's rules on covering hair. Karim Sadjadpour, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, wrote on social media that Trump's strikes could either entrench the Islamic Republic or hasten its downfall. 'The US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities is an unprecedented event that may prove to be transformational for Iran, the Middle East, US foreign policy, global non-proliferation and potentially even the global order,' he said. 'Its impact will be measured for decades to come.'
