logo
'Great relief': After uncertainty, Canadian Harvard students anticipating return this fall

'Great relief': After uncertainty, Canadian Harvard students anticipating return this fall

National Observer19 hours ago
Thomas Mete says he is feeling "great relief" now that he knows he'll be returning to Harvard University to finish the last year of his degree, after a tumultuous summer of limbo.
"I can't wait to be back in Cambridge," the fourth-year economics student said in an interview from Montreal this week.
Mete is among hundreds of Canadians who expect to be back at the Massachusetts-based Ivy League school in the fall after United States President Donald Trump's administration wreaked uncertainty earlier this year.
Harvard enrolled nearly 6,800 international students from more than 100 countries in the fall of 2024.
According to the university's fact book, 751 of those new students were Canadian. The only country from which more students joined Harvard was China.
Mete told The Canadian Press that he was picking up his brother from school in Ridgeway, Ont., when he learned in May that Trump's government was moving to block international students from studying at Harvard.
At the time, it was "a complete shock," he said.
"There was just a sense of fear of not being able to go back, and I think that was overwhelming for me and a lot of my other Canadian friends and international students," he recalled.
"There was this idea we weren't going to be able to go back and my senior year wasn't going to start. ... I had a whole life in Cambridge that was sort of put on pause."
Mete said the questions over his own future were a "heavy burden" to carry as the political battle over international students seized the American news cycle.
"It was just a shame that politics had to get involved with higher education and Harvard specifically. It was never something I thought of when I applied to college," he said.
"I hope (this is) going to be a great year and that there aren't any more bumps in the road."
Since the spring, Harvard has been locked in a battle with the Trump administration after rejecting a list of federal demands calling for sweeping changes to campus governance, hiring and admissions with a view to limiting activism on campus.
The feud has included an investigation into alleged campus antisemitism, the slashing of more than $2.6 billion in research funding and the end of several federal contracts.
In late May, the situation escalated further as the U.S. Department of Homeland Security issued a letter saying it would not allow international students to study at Harvard.
The letter accused the university of creating an unsafe campus environment by allowing "anti-American, pro-terrorist agitators" to assault Jewish students.
The next day, Harvard filed a lawsuit in a federal court in Boston that challenged the Trump administration's decision, calling it an unconstitutional retaliation for defying the White House's political demands and saying the move violated the First Amendment that protects fundamental rights.
In June, a federal judge granted a preliminary injunction stopping the policy from taking effect, and Harvard announced it would continue enrolling international students as the case moved forward.
The administration signalled last week in court documents associated with the lawsuit that it does not intend to enforce its May letter. The documents dated Aug. 6 say the department agrees the letter will not be used to revoke Harvard's status as an entity that can enrol international or exchange students.
Meanwhile, The Associated Press and New York Times reported Wednesday that Harvard and the Trump administration were getting close to an agreement that would require the Ivy League university to pay $500 million to regain access to federal funding and to end investigations.
Jared Gaffe, who is also gearing up to return to Harvard in a few weeks for his final year of law school, said there was a great deal of confusion amid initial reports that international students could be blocked from attending Harvard.
He said he planned to "follow the guidance of the university" as much as possible.
For now, he added, the school is telling students like him that they "should be fine" to return to the U.S.
"I sort of feel resigned to the fact that there's pretty much nothing I can do to change the situation," Gaffe said.
Harvard University pointed The Canadian Press to its prior statements about the situation facing international students.
In several communications to its community this year, the school has stated that it intends to comply with U.S. laws while upholding university policies.
"We will continue to do all that we can to ensure that our international community can continue to research, study, work and thrive at Harvard," it said in an update to students last month.
During this summer's uncertainty, Harvard announced several contingency plans should international students be unable to get back into the country.
One was an agreement between Havard and the University of Toronto, which agreed in June to host graduate students enrolled at Harvard's Kennedy School of Government at its Munk School of Global Affairs & Public Policy.
U of T declined to answer questions about whether any of Harvard's foreign students enrolled at the Munk School.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Singer's upcoming performance controversial
Singer's upcoming performance controversial

Winnipeg Free Press

time2 hours ago

  • Winnipeg Free Press

Singer's upcoming performance controversial

As of this writing, Sean Feucht — the controversial right-wing and pro-Trump evangelical Christian worship leader — is still slated to perform in Winnipeg on Aug. 20. Originally, he was scheduled to play and preach in Central Park. But the city refused to issue him a permit after determining it was not feasible due to the large number of people (2,000) Feucht claimed would be there. In denying him a permit, Winnipeg joined other cities across Canada that either refused him a permit or cancelled previously-issued permissions to play in public parks and other settings due to his anti-COCID lockdown, anti-Black Lives Matter and anti-LGBTTQ+ rhetoric. Jose Luis Magana / The Associated Press files Christian musician Sean Feucht sings during a rally at the National Mall in Washington, Oct. 25, 2020. In those other locations, Feucht found private places to play and preach — which is his right, just as people in this country have a right to invite him to perform. He might do the same in Winnipeg, too. While his visit has prompted a lot of media attention, this is not the first time the controversial singer has been to Canada. He sang and preached in Edmonton in 2022 and Calgary, Vancouver and Ottawa in 2023. But his presence back then didn't generate much in the way of media attention. There are a number of worrisome aspects to Feucht's visit, including how some might be tempted to lump Canadian evangelicals together with his brand of evangelical Christianity. In fact, he is quite unlike the majority of evangelical Christians in this country. Although it's true that most Canadian evangelicals lean towards the Conservative Party, many others vote Liberal and NDP. They are not at all like their co-religionists in the U.S., where about 80 per cent of evangelicals voted for Donald Trump. In fact, I suspect most Canadian evangelicals would be very uncomfortable with Feucht's in-your-face style. That's not how the vast majority would conduct themselves in public. It's also worth noting that, as far I can tell, Feucht was not invited to Canada by any Canadian group. He says he was 'sent' to Canada to bring his message, although he doesn't say who sent him. He seems to have decided to come here all on his own. Before deciding to come, it might have helped if Feucht had done some homework about Canada. If he had, he would have discovered that Canada's culture and context is not at all like the U.S. While his Fox News style views may be acceptable to many in the U.S., they are not welcome by most people here — just like Trump's talk of Canada being the 51st state is off-putting to the vast majority of Canadians. What Feucht also gets wrong is assuming what's true for him as a Christian in the U.S. must be true all over the world. It's the worst kind of American hubris, the kind that drives the rest of us crazy. If he had done a bit of research, Feucht would realize his not being persecuted for his faith or beliefs. It's because of how he shares them. That's not how Canadians like to talk to each other over difficult and challenging subjects. For proof, consider that many religious groups are also opposed to abortion and have views on LGBTTQ+ that are different from the majority of Canadians. But nobody calls for their services to be cancelled or prevents them from holding public rallies, even though they might attract protestors. And why is that? It's because unlike Feucht, most religious groups in Canada that hold positions contrary to public opinion are respectful in sharing their views (even if a few on the fringe might be shrill in trying to force those minority views on others). So where does this leave us? First, the uproar over Feucht should remind Canadian religious groups about the importance of respectful dialogue and active listening when it comes to difficult and controversial issues. Everyone has a right to our opinions, as long as they don't venture into the area of hate, but we also have an obligation to hear each other and find ways to live together peacefully in this land. Sundays Kevin Rollason's Sunday newsletter honouring and remembering lives well-lived in Manitoba. Second, Feucht may believe he is coming to bring 'revival' to Canada, but the opposite will likely happen. Sure, there may be a few Christians who like what he says. But research consistently shows that one of the main reasons people leave Christianity is due to the harsh, judgemental, anti-LGBTTQ+ and pro-Trump positions taken by many evangelical Christians in the U.S. — the same ones that Feucht touts and represents. His coming, in other words, may cause more people to decide against Christianity than to be interested in it. But maybe Feucht's coming to Canada will end up being a gift to Christians in this country, in a backwards sort of way by causing them to reflect on the best ways to show faith to others. Is it to be loud and brash, or is it best to quietly be of service in their communities? I think most will choose the latter. And his visit could prompt Christians in Canada to ask if Feucht doesn't represent what faith looks like to them, then what does a Canadian version of Christianity looks like? If that happens, then maybe his visit, and all the negative media attention it produced, will be worth it. faith@ The Free Press is committed to covering faith in Manitoba. If you appreciate that coverage, help us do more! Your contribution of $10, $25 or more will allow us to deepen our reporting about faith in the province. Thanks! BECOME A FAITH JOURNALISM SUPPORTER John LonghurstFaith reporter John Longhurst has been writing for Winnipeg's faith pages since 2003. He also writes for Religion News Service in the U.S., and blogs about the media, marketing and communications at Making the News. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.

Qatar sends Baha'i leader to jail for 5 years over social media posts
Qatar sends Baha'i leader to jail for 5 years over social media posts

Canada News.Net

time4 hours ago

  • Canada News.Net

Qatar sends Baha'i leader to jail for 5 years over social media posts

DOHA, Qatar: The head of Qatar's small Baha'i community has been sentenced to five years in prison for social media posts authorities claim "cast doubt on the foundations of the Islamic religion," according to court documents obtained by the Baha'i International Community (BIC). A three-judge panel of Qatar's Supreme Judiciary Council delivered the verdict on August 13 against Remy Rowhani, 71, who has been in detention since April. The documents show that the court rejected a defense plea for leniency, citing Rowhani's heart condition. Saba Haddad, the BIC's representative to the United Nations in Geneva, condemned the ruling as "a serious breach and grave violation of the right to freedom of religion or belief" and "an attack on Remy Rowhani and the Baha'i community in Qatar." In a statement on X, the organization urged the international community to press Qatar to release Rowhani immediately and comply with international law. The Baha'i faith, founded in the 1860s by Persian nobleman Baha'u'llah, teaches that all religions are progressive revelations of God's will, culminating in the unity of all people and faiths. While accepted in many countries, Baha'is in parts of the Middle East face persistent repression. Human rights advocates say persecution is most severe in Iran, where the faith is banned. They accuse Tehran of promoting anti-Baha'i policies beyond its borders, including in Yemen, where Iran supports the Houthis, and in Qatar, which shares the world's largest natural gas field with Iran. "The sheer arsenal the Iranian government has expended to crush the Baha'is in every avenue of life has been astronomical," said Nazila Ghanea, a University of Oxford law professor and U.N. Special Rapporteur on religious freedom. "It has also extended its reach, time and again, beyond the border of Iran." Advocates say anti-Baha'i discrimination in the region includes deportations, family separations, denial of marriage licenses, exclusion from public schools, and restrictions on burial rights.

Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities
Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities

Toronto Star

time5 hours ago

  • Toronto Star

Trump's aggressive push to take over DC policing may be a template for an approach in other cities

WASHINGTON (AP) — The left sees President Donald Trump's attempted takeover of Washington law enforcement as part of a multifront march to autocracy — 'vindictive authoritarian rule,' as one activist put it — and as an extraordinary thing to do in rather ordinary times on the streets of the capital. To the right, it's a bold move to fracture the crust of Democratic urban bureaucracy and make D.C. a better place to live. Where that debate settles — if it ever does — may determine whether Washington, a symbol for America in all its granite glory, history, achievement, inequality and dysfunction, becomes a model under the imprint of Trump for how cities are policed, cleaned up and run, or ruined.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store