logo
Consent decrees force schools to desegregate. The Trump administration is striking them down

Consent decrees force schools to desegregate. The Trump administration is striking them down

The Guardian24-07-2025
In late April, the Department of Justice announced that it was ending a decades-long consent decree in Plaquemines parish, Louisiana, in a school district that has been under a desegregation order since the Johnson administration in the 1960s.
The Plaquemines parish desegregation order, one of more than 130 such orders nationwide, was in place to ensure that the school district, which initially refused to integrate, followed the law. Many consent decrees of the era are still in existence because school districts are not in compliance with the law.
Some experts, including former justice department employees, say the change in direction for the department could be worrying.
These orders 'provide students with really important protections against discrimination', said Shaheena Simons, who was the chief of the educational opportunities section of the civil rights division at the justice department for nearly a decade. 'They require school districts to continue to actively work to eliminate all the remaining vestiges of the state-mandated segregation system. That means that students have protections in terms of what schools they're assigned to, in terms of the facilities and equipment in the schools that they attend. They have protection from discrimination in terms of barriers to accessing advanced programs, gifted programs. And it means that a court is there to protect them and to enforce their rights when they're violated and to ensure that school districts are continuing to actively desegregate.'
The justice department ended the Plaquemines parish desegregation order in an unusual process, one that some fear will be replicated elsewhere. The case was dismissed through a 'joint stipulated dismissal'. Previously, courts have followed a specific process for ending similar cases, one in which school districts prove that they are complying with the court orders. That did not happen this time. Instead, the Louisiana state attorney general's office worked with the justice department in reaching the dismissal.
'I'm not aware of anyone, any case, that has [ended] that way before,' said Deuel Ross, the deputy director of litigation of the Legal Defense Fund (LDF); the LDF was not specifically involved with the Plaquemines parish case. 'The government as a plaintiff who represents the American people, the people of that parish, has an obligation to make sure that the district has done everything that it's supposed to have done to comply with the federal court order in the case before it gets released, and the court itself has its own independent obligation to confirm that there's no vestiges of discrimination left in the school district that are traceable to either present or past discrimination.'
Despite the district not proving that it is compliant with the order, the justice department has celebrated the end of the consent decree.
'No longer will the Plaquemines Parish School Board have to devote precious local resources over an integration issue that ended two generations ago,' Harmeet K Dhillon, assistant attorney general of the justice department's civil rights division, said in a statement announcing the decision. 'This is a prime example of neglect by past administrations, and we're now getting America refocused on our bright future.'
But focusing on the age of the case implies that it was obsolete, according to Simons, who is now the senior adviser of programs and strategist at the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law. 'The administration is trying to paint these cases as ancient history and no longer relevant.'
In 1966, the Johnson administration sued school districts across the country, particularly in the south, that refused to comply with desegregation demands. At the time, Plaquemines parish was led by Leander Perez, a staunch segregationist and white supremacist.
Perez had played a large role in trying to keep nearby New Orleans from desegregating, and once that effort failed, he invited 1,000 white students from the Ninth Ward to enroll in Plaquemines parish schools. By 1960, nearly 600 had accepted the offer. Perez was excommunicated by Archbishop Joseph Francis Rummel for ignoring his warning to stop trying to prevent schools run by the archdiocese of New Orleans from integrating.
Perez attempted to close the public schools in Plaquemines parish, and instead open all-white private academies, or, segregation academies, which became a feature of the post-integration south. An estimated 300 segregation academies, which, as private schools, are not governed by the same rules and regulations as public schools, are still in operation and majority white.
Students and teachers working in school districts today might be decades removed from the people who led the push for desegregation in their districts, but they still benefit from the protections that were long ago put in place. Without court oversight, school districts that were already begrudgingly complying might have no incentive to continue to do so.
According to the Century Foundation, as of 2020, 185 districts and charters consider race and/or socioeconomic status in their student assignment or admissions policies, while 722 districts and charters are subject to a legal desegregation order or voluntary agreement. The justice department currently has about 135 desegregation cases on its docket, the majority of which are in Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama and Georgia.
Sign up to The Long Wave
Nesrine Malik and Jason Okundaye deliver your weekly dose of Black life and culture from around the world
after newsletter promotion
'Separate but equal doesn't work,' said Johnathan Smith, former deputy assistant attorney general in the civil rights division at the justice department. 'The reality is that students of color do better when they are in integrated classrooms … We know that the amount of resources that are devoted to schools are greater when there are a higher number of white students. So to have students attend majority-minority school districts means that they're going to be shut out, whether that's from AP classes, whether that's from extracurricular activities. All the activities that make it possible for students to fully achieve occur when you have more integrated classrooms.'
'Public education isn't just about education for the sake of education,' he added. 'It's about preparing people to be citizens of our democracy and to be fully engaged in our democratic institutions. When you have students that are being shut out from quality public education, the impact is not just on those communities. It's on our democracy writ large.'
Smith, the current chief of staff and general counsel for the National Center for Youth Law, said that the decision 'signals utter contempt for communities of color by the administration, and a lack of awareness of the history of segregation that has plagued our nation's schools'.
'Even though we are 71 years after the Brown v Board [of Education] decision, schools of this country remain more segregated today than they were back in 1954,' he said. 'The fact that the administration is kind of wholeheartedly ending these types of consent decrees is troubling, particularly when they're not doing the research and investigation to determine whether or not these decrees really should be ended at this point.'
Smith said that the decision in the Plaquemines parish case may be a 'slippery slope' in which other school districts begin reaching out to the Trump administration.
'The impact they can have across the country and particularly across the south is pretty huge,' he said. 'I worry that we're going to see more and more of these decrees falling and more and more of these districts remaining segregated without any real opportunity to address that.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Inside where Trump and Putin will hold crunch summit
Inside where Trump and Putin will hold crunch summit

Metro

time14 minutes ago

  • Metro

Inside where Trump and Putin will hold crunch summit

All eyes are turning to Alaska, where Presidents Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin will have a one-on-one summit centered on Ukraine. With the high-profile meeting just a day away, the main details have been revealed, including the exact location. The US and Russian leaders will come face-to-face at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in the state's largest city, Anchorage. It is Alaska's biggest military base and spans 64,000 acres at the northern end of the city. Surrounded by mountains, glaciers and frigid lakes, the remote installation is home to American fighter jets that historically intercepted Russian aircraft. The base dates back to the Cold War era and was constructed in the 1940s as an air defence and central command center to fend off Soviet opponents. In the 1950s, the base held more than 200 fighter jets and was dubbed 'Top Cover for North America' as its mission was to track and monitor threats from enemies overseas. It was formed in 2010 with the merger of the US Air Force's Elmendorf Air Force Base and the US Army's Fort Richardson. More than 32,000 people reside at the base today, making up about 10% of Anchorage's population. White House officials have said that the installation meets safety requirements for welcoming Trump and Putin. Summit planners found Anchorage to be the most suited, after also considering the state capital of Juneau and the city of Fairbanks, according to CNN. They reportedly decided that Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson was the only site in Anchorage that fulfills security requirements. Officials with the base and White House have declined to disclose specifics around securing the site for the historic meeting. A commander retired from the base last year said the discussion is unlikely to unfold close to area used for sensitive military operations. 'We always had visitors on base from different countries, and obviously not necessarily a Russian citizen on base, but we're always very mindful of that,' David Nahom, who led the Alaskan NORAD region, Alaskan Command and 11th Air Force, told Defense One on Wednesday. 'My guess is these conversations are not going to happen in areas that are required for the mission or would have any security concerns.' More Trending Trump went to Elmendorf-Richardson numerous times during his first term, and in his initial trip in 2019 said that troops stationed there 'serve in our country's last frontier as America's first line of defence'. Trump has expressed optimism on what can be accomplished at the summit toward ending the war in Ukraine. 'I believe now (Putin)'s convinced that he's going to make a deal,' Trump told Fox News Radio on Thursday. 'He's going to make a deal. We're going to find out – I'm going to know very quickly.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Melania Trump threatens to sue Hunter Biden over Epstein link – but he won't apologise MORE: What will happen after Trump's meeting with Putin in Alaska? MORE: Trump and Putin to discuss 'huge untapped potential' for Russia-US economic gains

Alleged DC sandwich-thrower worked at justice department, attorney general says
Alleged DC sandwich-thrower worked at justice department, attorney general says

The Guardian

time15 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Alleged DC sandwich-thrower worked at justice department, attorney general says

The US attorney general, Pam Bondi, announced on Thursday that the man facing a felony assault charge for allegedly throwing a sandwich at a federal law enforcement officer in Washington DC worked at the Department of Justice. In a statement posted on social media, Bondi said that the man, identified in court documents as 37-year-old Sean Charles Dunn, has since been fired. 'If you touch any law enforcement officer, we will come after you. I just learned that this defendant worked at the Department of Justice – NO LONGER. Not only is he FIRED, he has been charged with a felony,' Bondi wrote. 'This is an example of the Deep State we have been up against for seven months as we work to refocus DOJ. You will NOT work in this administration while disrespecting our government and law enforcement.' Dunn served as an international affairs specialist in the criminal division of the office of international affairs at the Department of Justice, according to CNN. On Wednesday night, the FBI director, Kash Patel, said that Dunn had been charged with felony assault on a federal officer. In court documents, authorities say that the incident occurred on Sunday night on 14th Street in north-west DC. They say that Dunn approached and confronted a group of US Customs and Border protection officers who were patrolling the area. Authorities claim that Dunn pointed his finger in an officer's face and yelled, 'Fuck you! You fucking fascists! Why are you here? I don't want you in my city,' before 'winding his arm back and forcefully throwing sub-style sandwich' at an officer. Authorities said that Dunn then attempted to flee on foot but was apprehended. During processing, authorities say that Dunn confessed to the incident and told the officers, 'I did it. I threw a sandwich,' according to court documents. The incident was captured on video, which has since gone viral. In the footage, a man can be seen yelling 'You see these fascists? Fuck you!' and 'Shame!' at a group of officers patrolling the area before throwing a wrapped sub-style sandwich at one of them. He is then chased by the officers. The US attorney for the District of Columbia, Jeanine Pirro, who was recently confirmed to the position, announced the charges against Dunn on Wednesday. 'This guy thought it was funny – well, he doesn't think it's funny today, because we charged him with a felony,' the former Fox News host said. The incident came several days after Donald Trump ordered federal officers to start sweeping the streets of Washington DC, in what the White House said was part of an effort to crack down on violent crime, despite statistics showing that the city's violent crime rate hit a 30-year low in 2024. On Monday, one day after the sandwich incident, Trump announced that he was deploying the national guard in Washington DC and seizing control of the city's police force. National guard troops began deploying across the city on Tuesday night.

US taking 'special measures' to protect people possibly exposed in court records hack
US taking 'special measures' to protect people possibly exposed in court records hack

Reuters

time15 minutes ago

  • Reuters

US taking 'special measures' to protect people possibly exposed in court records hack

WASHINGTON, Aug 14 (Reuters) - The U.S. government is taking unspecified "special measures" to protect people potentially exposed in a recent hack of court records, a top U.S. Department of Justice official said on Thursday. The hack of the federal judiciary's filing systems has raised concerns across the judiciary since it was disclosed last month, in part because of reports that data about confidential informants and other sealed case files may have been accessed. Although details of the intrusion - or intrusions - have yet to be made public, a person familiar with the matter said unspecified foreign actors had been identified as the culprits. The New York Times reported on Tuesday that investigators believed Russia was at least partly responsible. "We're aware of the issue," Acting Assistant Attorney General Matt Galeotti told reporters at a briefing. "There's different filing measures that are being put in place. We're also taking other different technical steps." He added that in cases involving individuals who were possibly "subject to some sort of release of information," the department is "taking special measures in those cases." Galeotti did not elaborate on the nature of those measures, and the DOJ and the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts did not immediately answer questions about his comments. The person familiar with the matter said chief judges throughout the country were notified in mid-July that at least eight federal court districts had been targeted by the hackers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store