Trump's Washington DC takeover is straight out of a fascist playbook
Buying into state violence this way produces something historian Robert Paxton has called a 'mobilizing passion'. In his book The Anatomy of Fascism, Paxton described how 'the beauty of violence and the efficacy of will' is produced and then mobilized by fascists by creating 'a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of traditional solutions'. In other words, there's always a grave, existential threat lurking around every corner, and only fascist violence can restore order to a lawless world. To the fascist, as Umberto Eco once put it, 'life is a permanent war'.
Enter Donald Trump. Whether it's an existential threat of 'wokeness' run amok in American universities, or the extraordinary danger of unauthorized immigrants picking our vegetables, Trump is prepared to battle everyone and everything, including his own windmills, to restore the country to some illusory past glory that we are all supposed to believe in, and be willing to sacrifice ourselves for.
But the sad truth is that many, if not most, of Trump's justifications for his policies, are unsurprisingly based on bald-faced lies or gross exaggerations simply to further his pursuit of absolute power. Yet it doesn't seem to matter. With each new announcement, Trump continues to prove how excellent he is at crafting the illusion of problems where there basically are none and leading his followers down an often-violent path of retribution. (Remember January 6, DC's most violent day in recent history?) By doing so, he seeks to constantly expand his authority while also deflecting from all the substantial problems that are staring him in the face. And these problems are not insignificant. Think of the Jeffery Epstein scandal or the continuation of global conflicts that he promised months ago he would uniquely be able to end.
The federal takeover of the Washington DC police department, announced with loud fanfare by Trump on Monday, is the latest example of this phenomenon. Some 800 national guard troops will be deployed in the nation's capital because, according to the president, 'our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs, and homeless people.'
This does sound rather frightening. Fortunately, it's not true. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to matter.
First, the facts. Crime in DC is at historic lows. 'Total violent crime for 2024 in the District of Columbia is down 35% from 2023 and is the lowest it has been in over 30 years,' the justice department announced earlier this year. And crime numbers for 2025 are even better, substantially lower than 2024. Violent crime in 2025 is down 26% compared to 2024.
The DC Council understands this. The council responded to Trump's announcement with an angry joint statement: 'This is a manufactured intrusion on local authority. Violent crime in the District is at the lowest rates we've seen in 30 years. Federalizing the DC police is unwarranted because there is no Federal emergency. Further, the National Guard has no public safety training or knowledge of local laws. The Guard's role does not include investigating or solving crimes in the District. Calling out the National Guard is an unnecessary deployment with no real mission.'
Such facts ought to matter. So why don't they to Trump?
Facts don't matter for Trump because facts have always operated as nothing more than an inconvenience for him. Just ask Erika McEntarfer, former commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. She was recently fired by Trump after accurately reporting employment statistics, and those specific numbers contradicted Trump and his policies. But with every new policy enacted by this administration, Trump's fact-free worldview becomes a lot more worrisome.
That's true for this policy, too. Owing to its historically limited autonomy, the District of Columbia is governed differently than other parts of the county. And under the Home Rule Act of 1973, it's easier for the federal government to take over its policing functions for a period of 30 days. Congress would probably then have to extend that time limit if needed. But to think that Trump is focused on federal policing authority solely to deploy it to Washington DC is to also believe that Donald Trump has never seen a spray tan machine.
Here is Trump: 'We have other cities also that are bad, very bad,' he said at his press conference. 'You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities that are very bad. New York is a problem. And then you have of course Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore, they're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with DC.'
Now, here are the facts. In Chicago, homicides are down 33% in 2025. Los Angeles had the 'lowest homicide total in nearly 60 years' in 2025. New York's police department is reporting that 'from January 2025 through May 2025, New York City experienced the lowest number of shootings and murders in recorded history.' The Baltimore police department has stated that 2025 'continues to see double-digit reductions in gun violence, including a 22% decrease in homicides'. And the Oakland police department reported last week 'that overall crime in Oakland has dropped by 28% in the first six months of 2025' including a 24% decrease in homicides.
Donald Trump wants to take over all forms of law enforcement in the United States, from local policing to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agency that is now pumped up on budgetary steroids. (Under Trump's so-called Big, Beautiful Bill, Ice will now expand to become the largest federal law enforcement agency in US history, with a bigger budget than most nations' militaries.) Trump's desire to control all forms of state power, and to expand them beyond belief, is a move straight out of the fascist playbook. And it's completely dependent on the production of both extraordinary fear and blatant lies.
The first way of fighting such an obvious power grab is not to give in to the fear and not to believe the lies. But what is less understood about Trump is that he doesn't even care if we believe his lies. Like all such leaders, what Trump really wants is just that we no longer believe in the truth. The difference between not believing the lies and believing in the truth may sound slight, but it's exactly in that distinction where some people are allowed to live and others must die. It's where democracy is found or democracy is lost. And it's why holding on to the very concept of truth ultimately matters so much more than just arguing over the lies.
Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel To Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
4 hours ago
- Daily Mail
The minimum wage in Australia needs to be raised to $76/hr RIGHT NOW… and there's a very good reason for it
A business and finance guru claims the minimum wage should be raised to a staggering $76/hr so Australians can more easily afford a house. AJ Clores argued the substantial increase should be carried out so it would 'match what it could buy in the 1950s'. 'Back then, a single income could cover the mortgage, bills, groceries, a family car, and even a holiday every now and then,' he wrote. 'Owning a home wasn't a dream, it was just what happened when you worked.' During the 1950s, the median price for a house was $7,150, which was a little more than double the average income. Today, the median house price across the country is significantly higher at $912,563; however, it is even higher in some cities, with the figure at $1,525,956 in Sydney. The substantial increase means that house prices, for a lot of Aussies, are 13 times the average income. Mr Clores argued couples who were working full-time jobs were still not making enough money to buy their own house, and they were forced to rent. @onepercentanswers Minimum wage would need to be $76 an hour today to match what it could buy in the 1950s. Back then, a single income could cover the mortgage, bills, groceries, a family car, and even a holiday every now and then. Owning a home wasn't a dream, it was just what happened when you worked. Now, even with two people working full-time, many are still stuck renting into their 30s and 40s. The idea of buying a home feels like chasing smoke. It's not about 'kids these days don't work hard enough.' People are working just as hard, the ladder has just been pulled up higher. Wages haven't kept pace with the cost of living, and the gap between what we earn and what we need keeps getting wider. For a lot of Aussies, it's not about being lazy or irresponsible, it's about playing a game that's been completely rewritten. And the rules? They're not in our favour. #sydney #australia #australian #aussie ♬ Golden Hour: Piano Version - Andy Morris 'The idea of buying a home feels like chasing smoke,' he wrote. 'It's not about 'kids these days don't work hard enough.' 'People are working just as hard, the ladder has just been pulled up higher. 'Wages haven't kept pace with the cost of living, and the gap between what we earn and what we need keeps getting wider. 'For a lot of Aussies, it's not about being lazy or irresponsible, it's about playing a game that's been completely rewritten.' Social media users were divided, with some arguing the substantial increase would be unrealistic. 'Do you know wages aren't set by housing prices, and raising wages would only drive up demand for houses and thus prices?' one wrote. 'Instead, we need to address the causes of the overly inflated housing prices to drive affordability.' Another added: 'If $76 was minimum, how much would a 2L milk cost?' 'Minimum wage is not the issue,' a third said. 'The issue is that the housing and job markets are dominated by greedy old rich folks who only want their own friends and family to have good jobs and own houses.' Others sided with Mr Clores, saying $76/hr should be the new standard. 'Should be, but it'll never be,' one wrote. 'We have no chance unless we revolt and start over,' a second added. A third joked: 'Boomers be like "nah, you just have to work harder and not buy a coffee every day".' The Australian Property Institute's (API) Valuation Report, released in May, painted a grim outlook for those seeking to step onto the property ladder in Sydney. Fifty years ago, a median priced home in Australia's most populated city cost just 4.2 times the average worker's salary. In 1995, it had only risen to 5.8 times their income. But by 2015, that same median-priced home was worth 11.1 times an average income for Sydneysiders. The average Australian salary last year was just short of $103,000, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, while a median home price is nearly $1.34million. The new data equates to a median home costing more than 13 times the average income.
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Donbas: Why Russia is desperate to capture eastern Ukraine's industrial heartland
The future of Ukraine's industrial heartland in the east is likely to play a key role in talks between Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump as they prepare to meet in Alaska on Friday. The Russian leader has demanded that Ukrainian forces withdraw from Donetsk as part of any any ceasefire deal, according to Volodymyr Zelensky. The Ukrainian president has said that Putin wants the remaining 30 per cent of the eastern region, which has seen some of the fiercest battles in the three-and-a-half year long war. But losing Donetsk would give Russia control of almost all of the Donbas, the collective name for Ukraine's eastern industrial heartland which has been long coveted by Putin. Earlier this week, Zelensky vowed Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned that Putin could use it as a spring board for a future invasion. As Kyiv fights to keep Donbas from Trump's so-called 'land swap' deal, here's all you need to know about the region. Where is the Donbas? Far along Ukraine's eastern border, Donbas is a portmanteau name from 'Donets Basin', a further abbreviation of 'Donets Coal Basin', in reference to the coal basin along the Donets Ridge and river. Donbas stretches across the Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts, two large regions of Ukraine that have formed a significant part of the frontline in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. How long has it been occupied? The Donbas has been partially occupied by Russia since 2014. At around the same time, Putin decided to annexe Crimea, a peninsula which lies just off the south of Ukraine towards the Black Sea. Russian-backed separatists broke away from the Ukrainian government to proclaim themselves independent 'people's republics' and, as a result, Moscow captured over a third of Ukraine's eastern territory. Russia classes the Republic of Crimea, Sevastopol, the Luhansk People's Republic, the Donetsk People's Republic, and the regions of Zaporizhzhia and Kherson as subjects of the Russian Federation. Ukraine says these territories are part of Ukraine and they are not recognised by the United Nations. Now, it is believed around 88 per cent of the Donbas region is under Russian control. This includes almost all of the Luhansk region and 75 per cent of the Donetsk region, according to Reuters. Approximately 6,600 square km is still controlled by Ukraine, but Russia has been focusing most of its energy along the front in Donetsk, pushing towards the last remaining major cities such as Pokrovsk. A key strategic region in the war The hyper-industrialised Donbas economy is dominated by coal mining and metallurgy. The region has one of the largest coal reserves in Ukraine, even when extraction of coal decreased elsewhere. When conflict broke out in the area in 2014, Ukraine's coal mining enterprises saw a 22.4 per cent decline in the production of raw coal from 2013, as reported by Kyiv Post, showing the country's reliance on Donbas as an energy power house. But as well as its economic significance, Donbas has been described as a 'fortress belt' by The Institute for the Study of War in terms of its strategic value in the war. Donetsk forms the main fortified defensive line across the frontline, stretching through Sloviansk, Kramatorsk, Druzhkivka, and Kostiantynivka. Elina Beketova, a fellow for CEPA, said: 'Ukraine is holding a key defensive line across Donetsk,' describing a 'fortified zone build up over years because the war began 11 years ago.' She added that Russia hasn't been able to break through since 2014 and they have lost many people there. The entire region is heavily mined and Ukrainian troops have been preparing it for years. 'It's not just trenches, it's a deep, layered defence with bunkers, anti-tank ditches, minefields, and industrial areas built into the terrain. The area includes dominant heights, rivers, and urban zones that make it extremely hard to capture.' Ms Beketova said losing this fortified line would have 'catastrophic consequences' as it holds back Russia's advancement into central and western parts of Ukraine. 'The front would shift approximately 80km west, and Russia would gain open ground - flat steppe with no natural barriers - giving them direct paths toward Kharkiv, Poltava, and Dnipro.' What Zelensky has said about the Donbas Zelensky has repeatedly rejected calls from Russia to give up the Donbas. In response to Putin's request that Ukraine withdraws from eastern Donetsk, he vowed Ukraine would 'never leave' the Donbas and warned Putin's troops could use it as a spring board for a future invasion. "We will not leave Donbas. We cannot do this. Everyone forgets the first part - our territories are illegally occupied. Donbas for the Russians is a springboard for a future new offensive,' he said.
The Guardian
3 days ago
- The Guardian
Trump's Washington DC takeover is straight out of a fascist playbook
A key chapter in the fascist playbook has always been to convince the public that it is living in such a state of mortal danger and unbridled chaos that the only chance of survival is to cede individual rights to the determined will of the Dear Leader. That's why fascist leaders have constantly demanded that their populations venerate all violence performed in the service of the state and revere the apparatuses of state violence, such as police forces and the military. In this scenario, state violence is not only necessary for the nation's survival. State violence is understood as even beautiful, something the public can and must believe in. Buying into state violence this way produces something historian Robert Paxton has called a 'mobilizing passion'. In his book The Anatomy of Fascism, Paxton described how 'the beauty of violence and the efficacy of will' is produced and then mobilized by fascists by creating 'a sense of overwhelming crisis beyond the reach of traditional solutions'. In other words, there's always a grave, existential threat lurking around every corner, and only fascist violence can restore order to a lawless world. To the fascist, as Umberto Eco once put it, 'life is a permanent war'. Enter Donald Trump. Whether it's an existential threat of 'wokeness' run amok in American universities, or the extraordinary danger of unauthorized immigrants picking our vegetables, Trump is prepared to battle everyone and everything, including his own windmills, to restore the country to some illusory past glory that we are all supposed to believe in, and be willing to sacrifice ourselves for. But the sad truth is that many, if not most, of Trump's justifications for his policies, are unsurprisingly based on bald-faced lies or gross exaggerations simply to further his pursuit of absolute power. Yet it doesn't seem to matter. With each new announcement, Trump continues to prove how excellent he is at crafting the illusion of problems where there basically are none and leading his followers down an often-violent path of retribution. (Remember January 6, DC's most violent day in recent history?) By doing so, he seeks to constantly expand his authority while also deflecting from all the substantial problems that are staring him in the face. And these problems are not insignificant. Think of the Jeffrey Epstein scandal or the continuation of global conflicts that he promised months ago he would uniquely be able to end. The federal takeover of the Washington DC police department, announced with loud fanfare by Trump on Monday, is the latest example of this phenomenon. About 800 national guard troops will be deployed in the nation's capital because, according to the president, 'our capital city has been overtaken by violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs, and homeless people.' This does sound rather frightening. Fortunately, it's not true. Unfortunately, it doesn't seem to matter. First, the facts. Crime in DC is at historic lows. 'Total violent crime for 2024 in the District of Columbia is down 35% from 2023 and is the lowest it has been in over 30 years,' the justice department announced earlier this year. And crime numbers for 2025 are even better, substantially lower than 2024. Violent crime in 2025 is down 26% compared with 2024. The DC council understands this. The council responded to Trump's announcement with an angry joint statement: 'This is a manufactured intrusion on local authority. Violent crime in the District is at the lowest rates we've seen in 30 years. Federalizing the DC police is unwarranted because there is no Federal emergency. Further, the National Guard has no public safety training or knowledge of local laws. The Guard's role does not include investigating or solving crimes in the District. Calling out the National Guard is an unnecessary deployment with no real mission.' Such facts ought to matter. So why don't they to Trump? Facts don't matter for Trump because facts have always operated as nothing more than an inconvenience for him. Just ask Erika McEntarfer, former commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics. She was recently fired by Trump after accurately reporting employment statistics, and those specific numbers contradicted Trump and his policies. But with every new policy enacted by this administration, Trump's fact-free worldview becomes a lot more worrisome. That's true for this policy, too. Owing to its historically limited autonomy, the District of Columbia is governed differently than other parts of the county. And under the Home Rule Act of 1973,the federal government can take over its policing functions for a period of 30 days. Congress would probably then have to extend that time limit if needed. But to think that Trump is focused on federal policing authority solely to deploy it to Washington DC is to also believe that Donald Trump has never seen a spray tan machine. Here is Trump: 'We have other cities also that are bad, very bad,' he said at his press conference. 'You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities that are very bad. New York is a problem. And then you have of course Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that any more, they're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen. We're not going to lose our cities over this. And this will go further. We're starting very strongly with DC.' Now, here are the facts. In Chicago, homicides are down 33% in 2025. Los Angeles had the 'lowest homicide total in nearly 60 years' in 2025. New York's police department is reporting that 'from January 2025 through May 2025, New York City experienced the lowest number of shootings and murders in recorded history.' The Baltimore police department has stated that 2025 'continues to see double-digit reductions in gun violence, including a 22% decrease in homicides'. And the Oakland police department reported last week 'that overall crime in Oakland has dropped by 28% in the first six months of 2025' including a 24% decrease in homicides. Donald Trump wants to take over all forms of law enforcement in the United States, from local policing to the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) agency that is now pumped up on budgetary steroids. (Under Trump's so-called big, beautiful bill, Ice will now expand to become the largest federal law enforcement agency in US history, with a bigger budget than most nations' militaries.) Trump's desire to control all forms of state power, and to expand them beyond belief, is a move straight out of the fascist playbook. And it's completely dependent on the production of both extraordinary fear and blatant lies. The first way of fighting such an obvious power grab is not to give in to the fear and not to believe the lies. But what is less understood about Trump is that he doesn't even care if we believe his lies. Like all such leaders, what Trump really wants is just that we no longer believe in the truth. The difference between not believing the lies and believing in the truth may sound slight, but it's exactly in that distinction where some people are allowed to live and others must die. It's where democracy is found or democracy is lost. And it's why holding on to the very concept of truth ultimately matters so much more than just arguing over the lies. Moustafa Bayoumi is the author of the award-winning books How Does It Feel to Be a Problem?: Being Young and Arab in America and This Muslim American Life: Dispatches from the War on Terror. He is professor of English at Brooklyn College, City University of New York
