RFK Jr scraps vaccine committee members in effort to restore 'public trust'
The Department of Health and Human Services dismissed all the members of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on Monday.
The committee's job was to decide and "make recommendations" related to the necessity and use of vaccines, according to an HHS news release.
All the current members of the committee were brought in under the Biden administration, and 13 of them were put on the committee last year. HHS said it would take until 2028 for most of the members to be replaced if they served their full term.
Rfk Jr's Hhs To End Routine Covid Vaccine Guidance For Children, Pregnant Women: Report
Public debate about vaccines, especially whether government or workplaces should mandate them, escalated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Much of the criticism and skepticism fell on the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which ACIP advises.
"Today we are prioritizing the restoration of public trust above any specific pro- or anti-vaccine agenda," Secretary Robert F. Kennedy said in a statement on Monday. "The public must know that unbiased science—evaluated through a transparent process and insulated from conflicts of interest—guides the recommendations of our health agencies."
Read On The Fox News App
The HHS release noted that the next meeting for the committee will be June 25-27 in Atlanta, and the committee will have new people that are "currently under consideration."
Cdc Eyes Narrower Covid-19 Vaccine Guidance Ahead Of 2025-2026 Season
"A clean sweep is necessary to reestablish public confidence in vaccine science," Kennedy continued. "ACIP's new members will prioritize public health and evidence-based medicine. The Committee will no longer function as a rubber stamp for industry profit-taking agendas. The entire world once looked to American health regulators for guidance, inspiration, scientific impartiality, and unimpeachable integrity. Public trust has eroded. Only through radical transparency and gold standard science, will we earn it back."
HHS cited an executive order from President Donald Trump saying that changes were needed in how the federal government plays a role in science and health.
"Unfortunately, the Federal Government has contributed to this loss of trust. In several notable cases, executive departments and agencies (agencies) have used or promoted scientific information in a highly misleading manner," the order stated.
Millions Spent By Biden On Covid 'Vaccine Hesitancy' Campaign Slashed By Trump Nih: Report
"For example, under the prior Administration, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention issued COVID-19 guidance on reopening schools that incorporated edits by the American Federation of Teachers and was understood to discourage in-person learning," the order, signed on May 23, continued.
"This guidance's restrictive and burdensome reopening conditions led many schools to remain at least partially closed, resulting in substantial negative effects on educational outcomes — even though the best available scientific evidence showed that children were unlikely to transmit or suffer serious illness or death from the virus, and that opening schools with reasonable mitigation measures would have only minor effects on transmission," it added.
Kennedy was confirmed by the Senate to lead the department in February after Trump nominated him.Original article source: RFK Jr scraps vaccine committee members in effort to restore 'public trust'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Wall Street Journal
23 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
RFK Jr. Conducts His Vaccine Purge
We'd like to conclude we were wrong to oppose Robert F. Kennedy Jr. to run the Health and Human Services Department, but alas, no. The latest evidence is his purge of a vaccine advisory panel. Mr. Kennedy announced his not-so-clean sweep of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) in these pages on Tuesday. The panel of outside experts advises the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on vaccine schedules. Its recommendations determine which vaccines insurers must cover without patient cost-sharing.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: Chronic Absenteeism Is a Vital Sign for Kids' Health. New Framework Seeks a Cure
When we worked in clinics caring for families and children, we routinely measured vital signs like blood pressure and heart rate and growth metrics like height and weight. But one of the most important health indicators remained out of reach: whether the kids were regularly showing up in school. School attendance is critical for success in the classroom, and success in school is core to health across a lifespan. Children who attend school regularly are far more likely to achieve academically and graduate from high school than those who are chronically absent. In turn, high school graduation leads to better health outcomes, and students who graduate are more likely to have fewer chronic illnesses and fewer injuries, and live longer lives, than those who do not. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter Yet today, more than 1 in 4 American students is chronically absent, defined as missing more than 10% of school days. In some districts, that proportion is closer to 1 in 2. The COVID pandemic widened and deepened a longstanding problem, and now, the obstacles that prevent children from coming to school — chronic illness, disengagement in the classroom and unmet social needs — are wide-ranging. While many teachers and principals have worked tirelessly to get students back into the classroom, chronic absence has become a problem too big for educators or schools to solve alone. Related A new public health framework, developed by education and public health experts at Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Kaiser Permanente and Attendance Works, offers a comprehensive, community-driven approach with three core elements: data, partnerships and prevention. First, school attendance data should be tracked and analyzed on a regular basis by district-level teams of educators, epidemiologists and clinicians who can interpret patterns and target solutions. Key questions include: When during the academic year does attendance dip? At what age does it start to falter? Which neighborhoods are most affected? Public health departments can include chronic absence in their community health needs assessments. Sharing school attendance data securely with health providers can help identify children with particular conditions, like asthma, who are missing school and require extra attention. In the District of Columbia, for example, pediatricians — with the consent of parents — receive regular reports about which children in their practices are on track to become chronically absent. They then can talk to families about what's happening. If children are missing school for health reasons, more intensive medical treatment may be needed. If the problem is disengagement in the classroom, clinicians can help assess whether there are additional educational needs. If there are social factors, such as inadequate child care or housing, clinicians can work with social workers in schools or community services to find resources to assist families. Related Data alone is not enough; partnerships are essential. Beyond health care providers, community organizations, afterschool programs and religious institutions all have a role to play in supporting families in areas with low attendance rates. Such broad coalitions have a track record of success. For example, the Cincinnati All Children Thrive Learning Network is a citywide collaborative anchored by the Cincinnati Children's Hospital and the public school system. The collaboration reviews education and health data and uses it to inform targeted action in the clinic and classroom; for example promoting access to primary care. The results include increased improved third-grade reading scores and reduced pediatric hospitalizations. The third pillar is prevention. It can be easy to see troubling attendance patterns as simply an issue with a truant student, a problem family or a bad school. But punitive approaches are less likely to work than efforts that listen to parents, address their needs and anticipate future challenges. Using data and evidence to guide action, coalitions can take such steps as providing safer transportation routes to school by improving sidewalk safety, creating protected bike lanes, installing flashing lights on crosswalks and offering better public transportation options; adding services to afterschool programs; and expanding school-based mental health support. Communities can also set a widespread expectation that all kids must go to school every day. Encouraging the development of such norms is difficult, but doing so was at the core of other successful public health strategies, like smoking cessation and traffic safety. Related Not every approach will succeed. To sustain progress, it is important to document, evaluate and share what works and why. Research-practice partnerships such as the Catamount Community Schools Collaborative build long-term collaborations among researchers, health practitioners and representatives from districts and state agencies to quickly assess the implementation and results of innovative programs. In San Francisco, youth are trained as researchers to help in such efforts. Most fundamentally, this framework's approach to chronic absence means keeping focus on a measurable outcome and innovating with solutions until every child has the best chance of success, both in and out of the classroom. Like heart rate and blood pressure, school attendance is a vital sign for health. Like weight and height, it is fundamental to child development. Now is the time to prioritize reducing chronic absence to support the long-term health of children.
CBS News
an hour ago
- CBS News
Colorado doctor dismissed by RFK Jr. from CDC vaccine committee offers guidance
This week saw a major shift for the nation's medical community working to keep you safe from diseases. Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Junior dismissed every member of a government advisory panel that makes vaccine recommendations. And a Coloradan is one of 17 people who sat on that panel. Kennedy ousted all members of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee for Immunization Practices. In an opinion piece published in the Wall Street Journal, Kennedy wrote that the committee "has been plagued with persistent conflicts of interest and has become little more than a rubber stamp for any vaccine." CBS News Colorado spoke with Dr. Edwin Asturias, the only Coloradan on that panel, who learned of his dismissal from ACIP via the piece in the WSJ. Asturias, a pediatrician, is an infectious disease specialist. Although he practices at Children's Hospital Colorado and is on the faculty of the University of Colorado School of Medicine, Asturias said that the perspective he offered was his own and not representing those institutions. He is concerned the move by Kennedy will undermine public trust in vaccines at a critical moment, with measles outbreaks now happening across the country. "We'll continue to produce the science but we hope that the ACIP continues to be led by people that have the expertise to make those recommendations and make sure that the public continues to accept vaccines that have been a tremendous impact for decreasing illness in children and families." Kennedy's ousting of the committee's members comes ahead of a meeting of the panel scheduled to start on June 25. The panel was expected to vote on new recommendations for COVID-19 and other vaccines. Asturias says families should look to their doctors and longstanding medical professional organizations for guidance on vaccines, including groups such as the American Academy of Pediatrics. While Kennedy said that committee members had conflicts of interest with the vaccine industry, Asturias said the process for selecting ACIP members was rigorous; the screening for conflicts was a public process, which took up to two years. Asturias said, "It was a long, very rigorous process to make sure that the people that we had were the best people. We're just hoping that it will be incredible for that process that took a year to two to be shortened into two weeks." He said he'll be interested to learn about the expertise of the new members of ACIP, and worries about the lack of transparency involved with changes just as the panel was preparing to issue new vaccine guidelines. "Parents will have some hesitancy of those recommendations. But people need to know also that many of us will continue to work with our professional organizations, with our hospitals and our many institutions to help parents be guided in how they should use vaccines best," said Dr. Asturias. In the op-ed in the WSJ Kennedy, a skeptic of vaccines over many years, wrote, "Without removing the current members, the current Trump administration would not have been able to appoint a majority of new members until 2028. A clean sweep is needed to re-establish public confidence in vaccine science."
