logo
Why I'm still wearing black

Why I'm still wearing black

Spectator06-07-2025
When my father passed away suddenly in April, I committed to wearing only black until after the funeral. I'm still struggling to properly articulate my feelings, but wearing black seems like a mark – albeit a feeble one – of respect to the memory of the best man I will ever know, and a small hold-out against fully returning to real life.
I'm obviously not the first to wear black in mourning; the colour has held a near-mystical appeal for millennia. The Romans used to don a toga pulla when grieving. In the early medieval period, black symbolised malevolence, but by the 12th century the colour was associated with dignity, austerity and moral authority. It was adopted by many religious orders, including the Benedictines and the Dominicans.
Black as mourning-wear was popularised in the 19th century under Queen Victoria. Women and children were expected to forego all colourful clothes for a year following the death of the family's patriarch. The rise in elaborate and ostentatious mourning outfits turned grieving into a business: the jet trade in England, particularly in Whitby, flourished because of the demand for mourning jewellery. After her husband Prince Albert died, Queen Victoria famously wore black for the final four decades of her life, including at her daughters' weddings.
The Victorians had other, more eccentric grieving habits. Covering mirrors was one practice, as was 'telling the bees'. Beekeepers would whisper the news of a death in the family to their insects and would cover the hives in black fabric. A Victorian rector wrote in 1886 that the news should be delivered to the bees at midnight; others said it must be sung to in rhyme.
I understand why such mourning rituals have gone out of fashion, and I can see that wearing black feels anachronistic in 2025, if not a bit pretentious. Most people probably haven't even noticed my new obsession, and my family and friends have been a little baffled as to why I have felt so compelled to do it. My father would probably think it all quite ridiculous. Wearing black to every occasion has been impractical and often quite silly. Rather than being dignified, my attempt at this high-minded solemnity has meant sweltering in the same black suit through successive heatwaves, interviews and parties.
Still, I can't help but think that it's a shame – for both the living and the dead – that we've lost some of these traditions. They offer comfort and a degree of protection when even small things can feel daunting. I've certainly struggled to do anything without thinking of my dad. A couple of days before he died, he asked to see a priest and receive the Last Rites. I was suddenly reminded of his Catholic upbringing, and that he had lived decades of his life before I came along. I have realised I never really knew much about him beyond the fact that he was my dad. Contemplating the decades of life ahead now he's gone seems just as hard to get my head around.
Weeks pass in a rush of hen dos, friends' newborn babies and work deadlines, and April has somehow turned into July. I am grateful for the distractions of day-to-day life. At the same time, I sometimes find myself in panicked disbelief that a full calendar month could pass without him. The funeral has come and gone and I'm still wearing black. While I doubt I will stick to this forever like Queen Victoria, I'm not sure when I'll return to my normal wardrobe. I miss him terribly. Wearing black has turned into a welcome constant – a line of defence.
I've realised that a speedy return to 'normal' life has come with some other strange concessions. There are lots of things besides wearing other colours that I'm not sure when I'll start doing: listening to music again, checking the weather forecast, reading whole books, talking about him in the past tense. But for the time being I will stay in this slightly muted, quietly beautiful world of mourning. I want to keep remembering him.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mysterious coin linked to Jesus' biblical prophecy discovered
Mysterious coin linked to Jesus' biblical prophecy discovered

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

Mysterious coin linked to Jesus' biblical prophecy discovered

Archaeologists have unearthed a 2,000-year-old coin in Jerusalem that was minted shortly before the destruction of the Second Temple, an event Jesus predicted in the Bible. The bronze coin dates to between 69 and 70 AD, just decades after Jesus was crucified, and was made by Jewish rebels during the fourth year of the Great Revolt against the Romans. The revolt, also known as the First Jewish-Roman War, was a major uprising by the Jewish population against Roman rule in Judea, occurring between 66 and 73 AD. Because the coin was minted right before the Temple's destruction, it comes from the exact period when Jerusalem was under siege. Jesus predicted the Temple's fall in the Gospels, saying that not one stone would be left on another. These passages, found in Matthew, Mark, and Luke, are seen as foretelling the Temple's destruction by the Romans in 70 AD. The coin itself carries powerful symbolism, with its obverse side bearing an inscription in ancient Hebrew script: 'For the Redemption of Zion,' expressing the rebels' hope during the final months of the uprising. On the reverse is a lulav, a palm frond used in the Sukkot festival, accompanied by two etrogs, the citron fruit also used in the ritual. The Sukkot festival commemorates the Israelites' 40 years of wandering in the desert after the Exodus from Egypt. Archaeologists noted: 'It is also possible that the representations of the ritual 'Four Species' depicted on the coin were intended to evoke among the rebels a sense of redemption and anticipation of a hoped-for miracle and happier times.' The Great Revolt occurred in Judea, sparked by religious tensions, heavy taxation, and political oppression under Roman rule. The Jewish rebels initially scored victories but were ultimately overwhelmed by the Roman legions. It ended in 73 CE with the fall of Masada, leaving tens of thousands dead and many others enslaved or exiled. The Second Temple was destroyed by the Romans as punishment for the Jewish revolt and to eliminate the central symbol of Jewish worship and resistance, placing the coin's minting in the tense months leading up to this pivotal event. The coin was found near the southwest corner of the Temple Mount during excavations led by the Israel Antiquities Authority (IAA). Yanniv David Levy, a researcher and curator in the coin department of the IAA, said: 'The coin is made of bronze, and its state of preservation is quite good. 'On its obverse side, you can see a model of a goblet, and around it is an inscription in ancient Hebrew script: 'LeGe'ulat Zion', 'For the Redemption of Zion.' The coin was found at a monumental fortification discovered by the team last year. Created by extensive quarrying, the moat formed a massive channel separating the City of David from the Temple Mount and the Ophel area. Cliffs on either side made the moat impassable. While its original purpose was uncertain, further excavations and connections with earlier findings revealed it as the northern fortification line of the lower city. 'It is not known when the moat was originally cut, but evidence suggests it was used during the centuries when Jerusalem was the capital of the Kingdom of Judah, almost 3,000 years ago, beginning with King Josiah,' the IAA shared. 'During those years, the moat separated the southern residential part of the city from the ruling Acropolis in the north; the upper city, where the palace and the temple were located.' The IAA explained that creating the moat was a massive, monumental undertaking, designed to reshape the natural landscape and demonstrate the power of Jerusalem's rulers to anyone entering the city. According to researchers, the project required advanced engineering skills and substantial resources, highlighting the strength and authority of the city's leaders. The moat itself is at least 30 feet deep and no less than 100 feet wide.

VJ Day 80th anniversary: King Charles says heroes will ‘never be forgotten'
VJ Day 80th anniversary: King Charles says heroes will ‘never be forgotten'

BBC News

time8 hours ago

  • BBC News

VJ Day 80th anniversary: King Charles says heroes will ‘never be forgotten'

King Charles has honoured those whose "service and sacrifice" helped to bring an end to World War Two in a personal message marking the 80th anniversary of VJ an audio message recorded earlier this month, the King will vow that those who fought and died in the Pacific and Far East "shall never be forgotten".On Friday, the King and Queen, alongside Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer, will attend a service of remembrance at the National Memorial Arboretum in Staffordshire to commemorate the Day, or Victory over Japan Day, is commemorated on 15 August each year, and marks the date in 1945 when Japan surrendered to the Allied forces, ending the war. An estimated 71,000 soldiers from Britain and the Commonwealth died fighting in Japan, including upwards of 12,000 prisoners of war held in Japanese captivity. Explore: More on VJ DayEx-prisoner of war recalls 'torpedo after torpedo'Historic aircraft to take part in VJ Day flypast The King's message is expected to echo, and reflect on, the audio broadcast made by his grandfather, King George VI, 80 years ago, when he announced to the nation and Commonwealth that the war was will make reference to the experience endured by Prisoners of War, and to the civilians of occupied lands in the region, whose suffering "reminds us that war's true cost extends beyond battlefields, touching every aspect of life". The King will describe how those who fought in the war "gave us more than freedom; they left us the example of how it can and must be protected", since victory was made possible by close collaboration between nations, "across vast distances, faiths and cultural divides".This demonstrated that, "in times of war and in times of peace, the greatest weapons of all are not the arms you bear but the arms you link", he will say. Two-minute silence At Friday's service, a national two-minute silence will conclude with a flypast from the RAF Red will be followed by a reception in which the King and Queen will meet veterans who served in the Far East during the Second World War, along with their Day falls more than three months after VE Day, when fighting stopped in Europe following Germany's to commemorate the 80th anniversary of VJ Day will conclude with a reception for veterans at Windsor Castle later in the Autumn.

Victorian house in south Belfast saved from being turned into apartments after campaign victory
Victorian house in south Belfast saved from being turned into apartments after campaign victory

Belfast Telegraph

timea day ago

  • Belfast Telegraph

Victorian house in south Belfast saved from being turned into apartments after campaign victory

A CGI image of the failed development plan at Annadale Avenue A decision made at the Belfast City Council Planning Committee has ended the long running saga of an application for the proposed demolition of the former Bees Knees Nursery at 18 Annadale Avenue, BT7, by Cregagh Developments Ltd, of Grennan Road, Newry. The controversial application involved the demolition of the existing Victorian building for the construction of a residential development consisting of 14 units. That would have involved nine apartments within a three-storey building, and five two storey terraced dwellings, along with associated landscaping and car parking. The applicant submitted viability information regarding various potential options to retain and convert the existing building to other uses, making the case that retention of the existing building was not feasible. Of six options, the applicant said the only viable one was nine apartments and five townhouses. The application had been in the system for over a year and a half, with committee members attending a site visit to the location in March 2024. Some 21 third party objections were made to the council, including one from the MP for South Belfast and Mid Down, Claire Hanna, one from the SDLP MLA for South Belfast, Matthew O'Toole, and one from the Belfast Civic Trust, a charity promoting good architecture in Belfast. There was also an objection from Green Councillor for Lisnasharragh Brian Smyth and two objections from Alliance MLA for South Belfast Paula Bradshaw. Objectors said the demolition of the existing building would have negatively impacted on the Victorian character of the area, would have been a great historical and cultural loss, and would have set a 'sustainable precedent' for the area. They said the residential amenity would have been affected by loss of light and overlooking, arguing the proposed design was overbearing, with a lack of architectural detail. They added there was insufficient parking provision, no disabled spaces, with access to the road being too narrow. Objectors objected to the planned removal of a cherry tree, said local biodiversity would be badly affected, and added that the development would devalue nearby properties. The Stormont Department for Infrastructure Rivers Division and NI Water objected to the proposals. Despite this, council planning officers recommended the plan for approval, with a list of conditions. A previous officer report on the application stated: 'It is a sustainable location with good access to shops, jobs, services, amenities and public transport. The site is considered a suitable location for housing; the proposal would make effective use of previously developed land and is of an appropriate density. 'No affordable housing is provided due to viability. The applicant has submitted a viability assessment which has been independently appraised, which concludes that the proposal is unviable with the inclusion of any affordable housing provision or commuted sum. 'The design, height, scale and massing of the proposed buildings are considered in keeping with the surrounding character and not considered to impact the surrounding listed buildings.' At the August meeting of the council's Planning Committee held this week, the application went to a vote, with only six elected members supporting the application, all from the DUP, while 12 elected members, from Alliance, the SDLP and Sinn Féin, voted against the application. A representative for local residents said at the meeting: 'We are quite concerned about the imposing nature of this build, and how close it is to our border. The southwest facade is quite overbearing, and we are even worried about our mature shrubs. 'It would be so sad to see this beautiful old building demolished. The incredible Victorian gardens at the back, with sweetpea and apple trees, would be turned into a parking lot.' A CGI image of the failed development plan at Annadale Avenue Belfast History Explained: Who was Mary Ann McCracken? An agent for the developer told the committee: 'Extensive investigations demonstrated that retention was not viable. Additional testing was then documented at the request of the committee, which was also done, and all options were independently verified to be unviable. 'While retention was not viable, the applicants committed to the sustainability principle to salvage materials such as red brick, roof tiles and stone sills for reuse in the proposed development. But importantly, the existing building is not listed, and is not located in the conservation area. A previous proposal for demolition and redevelopment for 14 apartments was granted in 2009.' Alliance Party councillor Tara Brooks said: 'I have sympathy for the applicant, and the situation they find themselves in, but I propose we refuse planning. It does not sit right with me to vote to have this building demolished. 'I understand that it is not listed, and the applicant can go ahead and demolish it anyway, but I cannot in all conscience vote to permit its demolition.' DUP councillor Dean McCullough said: 'The report is pretty clear. We all have aspirational ideas about what we want, but viability is viability. I think this applicant has gone out of their way to do everything they can, within a framework, to make this viable. 'I don't know what else they can do, they have come to this committee time and time again, with amendment after amendment, and are now probably running effectively at a loss.' He said the application was 'competent and sound' and would 'benefit the city'. The committee gave planning officers delegated authority to finalise the precise refusal reasons. Read more

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store