Top climbers from Europe compete in major championship in Gloucestershire
TOP climbers from Europe have competed in a major championship in Gloucestershire.
The European Military Climbing Championships took place at 270 Climbing Park in Witcombe, with elite athletes battling it out over three days.
More than 60 top-ranked military climbers from the UK, France, Italy and Kosovo took part, showcasing Olympic-style bouldering and lead climbing.
The event ran from June 24 to June 26, with free admission, allowing spectators to enjoy the high-level competition.
The 270 Climbing Park, located in Witcombe, offers a range of indoor and outdoor aerial adventure activities and houses one of Europe's tallest and most challenging ropes courses.
By summer 2025, the park plans to open one of the UK's tallest climbing gyms, part of a £7 million investment in the centre.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Timothy Weah's agent exposes disgraceful Juventus transfer structure
Timothy Weah's agent Sam Mbangue blasts Juventus for treating players unfairly despite their contributions. reports an interview where Sambague is exposing Juventus' 'selfish' transfer department. He said: 'It's a disgrace. Weah is a fantastic player and a fantastic teammate. To see people acting like this for money and because they are selfish has disappointed me a lot.' Advertisement A report by La Gazzetta dello Sport revealed Juventus received offers from Nottingham Forest for Weah and Samuel Mbangula for a combined fee of €25 million. The American forward was not named in the Matchday squad for The Bianconeri's Club World Cup game against Manchester City to force him out of the club this summer. Weah and Mbangula posted cryptic messages on their respective social media handles when the developments were happening behind the scenes to show their displeasure about Juventus' handling of players. With Juventus set to raise funds this summer from transfers, they might feel the need to offload certain key players in a desperate move. However, the ill-treatment of players, who have contributed to the growth of the club in recent times, is completely unacceptable. Trambak Bhattacherjee | GIFN
WIRED
an hour ago
- WIRED
I Let AI Agents Plan My Vacation—and It Wasn't Terrible
The latest wave of AI tools claim to take the pain out of booking your next trip. From transport and accommodation to restaurants and attractions, we let AI take the reins to put this to the test. Photo-Illustration: Wired Staff/Victoria Turk The worst part of travel is the planning: the faff of finding and booking transport, accommodation, restaurant reservations—the list can feel endless. To help, the latest wave of AI agents, such as OpenAI's Operator and Anthropic's Computer Use claim they can take these dreary, cumbersome tasks from befuddled travelers and do it all for you. But exactly how good are they are digging out the good stuff? What better way to find out than deciding on a last-minute weekend away. I tasked Operator, which is available to ChatGPT Pro subscribers, with booking me something budget-friendly, with good food and art, and told it that I'd prefer to travel by train. What's fascinating is that you can actually watch its process in real time—the tool opens a browser window and starts, much as I would, searching for destinations accessible by rail. It scrolls a couple of articles, then offers two suggestions: Paris or Bruges. 'I recently went to Paris,' I type in the chat. 'Let's do Bruges!' Armed with my decision, Operator goes on to look up train times on the Eurostar website and finds a return ticket that will take me to Brussels and includes onward travel within Belgium. I intervene, however, when I see the timings: It selected an early-morning train out on Saturday, and an equally early train back on Sunday—not exactly making the most of the weekend, I point out. It finds a later return option. So far impressed, I wait to double-check my calendar before committing. When I return, however, the session has timed out. Unlike ChatGPT, Operator closes conversations between tasks, and I have to start again from scratch. I feel irrationally slighted, as if my trusty travel assistant has palmed me off to a colleague. Alas, the fares have already changed, and I find myself haggling with the AI: can't it find something cheaper? Tickets eventually selected, I take over to enter my personal and payment details. (I may be trusting AI to blindly send me across country borders, but I'm not giving it my passport information.) Using ChatGPT's Operator to book a train ticket to Bruges. Courtesy of Victoria Turk Trains booked, Operator thinks its job is done. But I'll need somewhere to stay, I remind it—can it book a hotel? It asks for more details and I'm purposefully vague, specifying that it should be comfy and conveniently located. Comparing hotels is perhaps my least favorite aspect of travel planning, so I'm happy to leave it scrolling through I restrain myself from jumping in when I see it's set the wrong dates, but it corrects this itself. It spends a while surveying an Ibis listing, but ends up choosing a three-star hotel called Martin's Brugge, which I note users have rated as having an excellent location. Now all that's left is an itinerary. Here, Operator seems to lose steam. It offers a perfunctory one-day schedule that appears to have mainly been cribbed from a vegetarian travel blog. On day 2, it suggests I 'visit any remaining attractions or museums.' Wow, thanks for the tip. The day of the trip arrives, and, as I drag myself out of bed at 4:30AM, I remember why I usually avoid early departures. Still, I get to Brussels without issue. My ticket allows for onward travel, but I realize I don't know where I'm going. I fire up Operator on my phone and ask which platform the next Bruges-bound train departs from. It searches the Belgian railway timetables. Minutes later, it's still searching. I look up and see the details on a station display. I get to the platform before Operator has figured it out. Bruges is delightful. Given Operator's lackluster itinerary, I branch out. This kind of research task is perfect for a large language model, I realize—it doesn't require agentic capabilities. ChatGPT, Operator's OpenAI sibling, gives me a much more thorough plan, plotting activities by the hour with suggestions of not just where to eat, but what to order (Flemish stew at De Halve Mann brewery). I also try Google's Gemini and Anthropic's Claude, and their plans are similar: Walk to the market square; see the belfry tower; visit the Basilica of the Holy Blood. Bruges is a small city, and I can't help but wonder if this is simply the standard tourist route, or if the AI models are all getting their information from the same sources. Various travel-specific AI tools are trying to break through this genericness. I briefly try MindTrip, which provides a map alongside a written itinerary, offers to personalize recommendations based on a quiz, and includes collaborative features for shared trips. CEO Andy Moss says it expands on broad LLM capabilities by leveraging a travel-specific 'knowledge base' containing things like weather data and real-time availability. Courtesy of Victoria Turk After lunch, I admit defeat. According to ChatGPT's itinerary I should spend the afternoon on a boat tour, taking photos in another square, and visiting a museum. It has vastly overestimated the stamina of a human who's been up since 4:30AM. I go to rest at my hotel, which is basic, but indeed ideally located. I'm coming around to Operator's lazier plans: I'll do the remaining attractions tomorrow. As a final task, I ask the agent to make a dinner reservation—somewhere authentic but not too expensive. It gets bamboozled by a dropdown menu during the booking process but manages a workaround after a little encouragement. I'm impressed as I walk past the obvious tourist traps to a more out-of-the-way dining room that serves classic local cuisine and is themed around pigeons. It's a good find—and one that doesn't seem to appear on the top 10 lists of obvious guides like TripAdvisor or The Fork. On the train home, I muse on my experience. The AI agent certainly required supervision. It struggled to string tasks together and lacked an element of common sense, such as when it tried to book the earliest train home. But it was refreshing to outsource decision-making to an assistant that could present a few select options, rather than having to scroll through endless listings. For now, people mainly use AI for inspiration, says Emma Brennan at travel agent trade association ABTA; it doesn't beat the human touch. 'An increasing number of people are booking with the travel agents for the reason that they want someone there if something goes wrong,' she says. It's easy to imagine AI tools taking over the information gateway role from search and socials, with businesses clamoring to appear in AI-generated suggestions. 'Google isn't going to be the front door for everything in the future,' says Moss. Are we ready to give this power to a machine? But then, perhaps that ship has sailed. When planning travel myself, I'll reflexively check a restaurant's Google rating, look up a hotel on Instagram, or read TripAdvisor reviews of an attraction, despite desires to stay away from the default tourist beat. Embarking on my AI trip, I worried I'd spend more time staring at my screen. By the end, I realize I've probably spent less.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
2025 Wimbledon odds: Carlos Alcaraz, Aryna Sabalenka enter as favorites again
The French Open produced a pair of memorable finals, but despite going from the slowest surface to the fastest, the players at the top of the odds boards are largely the same. Carlos Alcaraz is ahead of Jannik Sinner as the tournament favorite for Wimbledon on the men's side, while Aryna Sabalenka remains the pre-tournament favorite, just as she was for the Australian Open and French Open. It's a sign of how dominant the top few players have been, and the shrinking difference between the different surfaces, that the favorites are the same at the French Open and Wimbledon. The budding rivalry between Alcaraz and Sinner is fresh on the minds of tennis fans. After the two went five sets in Paris, a rematch on Centre Court would be must-see stuff. Sinner hasn't won a Grand Slam off of hard court yet, and Wimbledon is the last Slam final he has yet to reach after his runner-up finish at Roland Garros. Advertisement As the two-time defending champion, it's no surprise Alcaraz is ahead of Sinner in the odds. Alcaraz is +115 on BetMGM, while Sinner is at +190. That's not a big difference, but there is a sizable gap after those two. Novak Djokovic is +650 to win what would be his eighth Wimbledon, matching Roger Federer's record haul. Anyone else would be a surprise to betters. There is some variety in the names compared to the top contenders in Melbourne and Paris. Englishman Jack Draper is fourth in the odds at +1600. The 23-year-old has a big serve that suits grass, he's up to No. 4 in the ATP rankings and he will likely have extra energy from the home crowd, but he only has two main draw wins at Wimbledon to his name. Draper put himself on the map with a semifinal showing at last year's U.S. Open, but has lost in the fourth round at the two Slams this year. On the women's side, Sabalenka is a logical favorite, but the field is far more wide open than the men's one. She is +290 to win, giving her solidly longer odds than both of the top two men. Sabalenka is the World No. 1 and has been unbelievably consistent at making deep runs at Grand Slams. She has made at least the quarterfinals at the last 10 Slams she has entered, with nine semifinals, six finals and three titles in that span. Sabalenka has made the final in five of her last six Slams (she did not compete at Wimbledon last year), which in the 21st Century puts her in the company of only Serena Williams, Venus Williams and Justine Henin. A big server and hard hitter, Sabalenka's game should translate well to grass, but Wimbledon is the one Slam final she has not played in yet. Not playing in 2022 because of the All England Lawn Tennis Club's ban on Russian and Belarusian athletes, and missing last year's edition due to a shoulder injury, has played a part in that. The usual contenders don't have a track record at Wimbledon. Iga Świątek (+800) has dipped in form and has only made one quarterfinal in London. Coco Gauff (+800), who is fresh off her French Open triumph, made her name by reaching the fourth round at Wimbledon as a 15-year-old in 2019, but hasn't surpassed that result since. Advertisement Elena Rybakina, the 2022 champion, is the second-favorite behind Sabalenka at +650. She has made at least the quarterfinals in the past three editions of Wimbledon. Markéta Vondroušová, the 2023 champ, is +1200, behind Świątek and Gauff. Defending champion Barbora Krejčíková missed the Australian Open due to injury and only returned to action in May. She is a significant long shot at +15000 (150-to-1). Betting/odds links in this article are provided by partners of The Athletic. Restrictions may apply. The Athletic maintains full editorial independence. Partners have no control over or input into the reporting or editing process and do not review stories before publication. (Photo of Carlos Alcaraz: Hannah Peters / Getty Images)
