Self-confessed robber admits picking up gunman who shot girl in head
The young victim was eating dinner with her family when the rider of a Ducati Monster motorbike fired six shots outside Evin restaurant in Kingsland High Street in Dalston, east London, on May 29 last year.
A bullet lodged in the girl's brain and three men sitting an another table were wounded in the thigh, leg and backbone, the Old Bailey has heard.
Javon Riley allegedly picked up the gunman nearby in a stolen Nissan Juke on false plates before transferring to a Range Rover in north London, the Old Bailey has heard.
The 33-year-old defendant is also accused of carrying out reconnaissance before the shooting and helping the gunman evade arrest.
Giving evidence on Thursday, Riley admitted being involved in various lucrative crimes but denied knowing anything about the shooting.
Defence barrister Tyrone Smith KC asked: 'Do you accept the evidence shows you on 29th May drove the gunman from Colvestone Crescent shortly after he had shot and injured three men and a young girl?'
The defendant replied: 'Yes.'
Mr Smith went on: 'At the time did you know he had shot those people at the restaurant?'
Riley replied: 'No.'
Mr Smith said: 'Were you part of a plan or agreement that a shooting take place that night?'
Riley, who grew up in Walthamstow after emigrating from Jamaica as a boy, denied it.
He told jurors that he had left college at the age of 18 and had three children with two different partners, as well as at least four other girlfriends or 'friends with benefits' living around London.
Riley said he had set up his own delivery business, had an interest in a clothes brand with friends, and made money from 'various stuff of criminality'.
The court heard Riley has a string of convictions dating back to 2008 including for possession of cannabis and cocaine, driving offences, and having an offensive weapon and a blade in his car.
In addition, the defendant said he had been involved with stealing cars, drug dealing and robberies, although he had never been caught for those offences.
He said he began taking cars 'for fun' at the age of 15, going on to steal them to order and shipping them abroad.
He picked drug dealers to rob because the money could not be traced and the victims were unlikely to go to police, jurors heard.
Mr Smith asked: 'What would be the consequences if a drug dealer identified you as someone who had robbed them?'
Riley replied: 'My life would be in danger.'
The defendant said he would carry out between two and five robberies a month, sometimes working with others, and would make anything from £30,000 to more than £200,000.
Asked about his role in the robberies, Riley said: 'Sometimes I'm the driver or the muscle.'
The defendant said that although he would sometimes carry a knife, he would never be armed with a gun because it was too risky and he would go 'straight to jail' if caught.
Riley told jurors he would sometimes sell on drugs he had stolen from dealers.
The prosecution has alleged the shooting was a 'planned assassination' amid an ongoing dispute between rival gangs, the Tottenham Turks and the Hackney Turks, also known as the 'Bombacilars'.
Men seated outside the restaurant had affiliations towards the Hackney Turks and the ones who had ordered the shooting were from the Tottenham Turks, it is claimed.
Riley, from Tottenham, north London, has denied attempted murder together with others and causing grievous bodily harm with intent to the girl, who cannot be named because of her age.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Murder investigation launched after man shot near petrol station
A murder investigation has been launched after a man was fatally shot near a petrol station. West Yorkshire Police said officers received a report at 9.43pm on Tuesday that a man had been seriously injured after a shot was fired from a vehicle on Doncaster Road near the BP petrol station in Wakefield. The force said it believed the vehicle used in the offence was 'on false plates and was stolen in a burglary in Castleford on August 3'. The victim was taken to hospital where he died from his injuries. Police said he is understood to be a 50-year-old man who was living in the local area. The man's immediate family are aware and are being offered support by specially trained officers. Police said the vehicle involved is believed to be a blue/grey-coloured Toyota RAV4 with a grey trim, displaying cloned plates FV53FXT. The vehicle is described as being 'distinctive due to having bull lights on the roof above the windshield'. Detective Chief Inspector James Entwistle, of West Yorkshire Police's homicide and major inquiry team, said: 'A man has lost his life, and it is an absolute priority for us to understand the circumstances of what has taken place and identify anyone who has had any involvement in this incident. 'We understand that the vehicle used in this offence was on false plates and was stolen in a burglary in Castleford on 3 August. The vehicle is particularly distinctive because of the bull lights fitted to the vehicle. 'We are interested in speaking to anyone who believes they have seen this RAV4 following this burglary, around the time of this offence and since. The vehicle may now be displaying different plates. 'Motorists who were in the Doncaster Road area last night who have dashcams fitted are also asked to check whether they have captured any footage of this vehicle. 'The driver was driving in the direction of Wakefield before they have turned around near the BP petrol station immediately prior to the shooting and then driven off in the direction they came from. 'We understand the shock and concern that an incident of this nature will cause, particularly given that a firearm has been involved. 'We are dedicating significant resources to this investigation and our neighbourhood policing colleagues are supporting this with an increased presence in the area to provide reassurance to the community.' Anyone who witnessed any part of the incident or who has any information that could assist the investigation is asked to contact West Yorkshire Police's homicide and major inquiry team online or by calling 101 quoting Operation Ploughland. Information, including footage, can be provided through the force's major incident public portal at
The Independent
20 minutes ago
- The Independent
Policing must strike a balance between transparency and justice
Given the sensitivity of the issue, the high level of public interest, and the clear danger of legitimate public protests descending into mob rule, it is entirely right that the police should be given new guidance on releasing details of the ethnicity and nationality of a suspect in some, limited circumstances. The new interim guidance, issued by the National Police Chiefs' Council and the College of Policing, is, if anything, somewhat overdue – because it has been distressingly clear that surmise, conjecture, speculation, misinformation, propaganda, 'asking questions', and downright lies about serious crimes, can be weaponised by malign agents. Conspiracy theories have generated enormous public concern, and then disorder. Some calm analysis is required. Crime is crime, and criminals are criminals, and crime cannot be racialised. The release of information concerning a suspect's nationality, race, or immigration status (as has been suggested but, for the moment, resisted) cannot be used as an excuse for a riot. An offence is not more serious because it has been committed by, say, an asylum seeker, and an individual is not in some sense more guilty because of the colour of their skin. Except in cases involving a racial motive or incitement to hatred, such considerations ought to be irrelevant. Generally, they will continue to be. That has to be the default position. However, if a senior police team judges that the safety of the public is best served by the release of certain defaults, then a degree of discretion is justified. 'Guidance' is just that – a set of guidelines, not hard rules. The violent summer riots of 2024 were serious enough, but they could have been much worse had the truth about the Southport murders not emerged when it did, and had the untrue rumours about the suspect being a Muslim asylum-seeker who had come straight off a small boat not been dispelled – not that it should have made a difference in terms of criminal justice. As in all operational matters, the police should have an appropriate degree of discretion in the particular circumstances of any given situation they face, and equally, they should be free of political interference – and the demands of certain populist politicians and 'activists' to use heinous crimes and the suffering of victims for their own cynical purposes. These particular public figures don't care, in any case, whether people they don't like receive a fair trial, and are cheerfully contemptuous of the rule of law, particularly the provisions of the Contempt of Court Act 1981. But no democratic society should concede the universal principle of the right to a fair trial, uncontaminated by widespread misreporting of circumstances and motives such that a jury cannot do its job. The Home Office has not written these new guidelines – which is as it should be – but it has welcomed the interim proposals. The home secretary, Yvette Cooper, is complementing the move by asking the Law Commission to clarify how increased transparency and limited discretion for the police to release certain details could affect a free and fair trial. At the same time, the police have to be able to justify and defend their own actions in a world in which corrosive and baseless allegations of 'two-tier' policing, and 'cover-ups', are thrown around with such recklessness on social media and, sadly, by the so-called mainstream media as well. Like the guidance on what the police can reveal about suspects, the law on contempt of court also needs to be revisited. Since the relevant legislation was put on the statute book, the world has changed beyond recognition. Then, it was a matter of ensuring that a relatively small number of domestic press outlets and broadcasters behaved responsibly. For many years, because journalists are not on the whole bent on causing injustice and triggering retrials, the arrangements worked well. Times change. The last year or so, in particular, has proved how social media operates in an entirely different way. It is practically lawless. A very old adage springs to mind when one considers the speed of modern dissemination – a lie can be halfway around the world before the truth has got its boots on. This is an environment in which none of the tech giants take full responsibility for what appears on their platforms, or for the very real harm it can inflict. Vile racial slurs about non-existent crimes or suspects can originate far from the UK, and be amplified by bots and augmented by AI. There is a balance to be struck, essentially, between transparency and justice. That balance requires constant monitoring and periodic adjustment as technology moves forward and public expectations evolve. There will never be complete consensus, or success, often because the radical populists, both online and off, have a vested interest in fostering – indeed, creating – such unpleasant myths and conspiracies. But there is a sense here of a government and a police service being alert to the urgency of the challenge. In an often bleak social-media landscape, that is encouraging.
The Guardian
21 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Daughter ‘disappointed' as court refuses to increase sentence of Bhim Kohli's killer
The daughter of an 80-year-old man who was killed last September has said she is 'disappointed' after the court of appeal refused to increase the sentence of a teenage boy convicted of his death. Susan Kohli, whose father, Bhim Kohli, died after being assaulted by two teenagers while walking his dog near his home in Braunstone Town, Leicestershire, has called for sentencing guidelines to be changed, feeling that the duo who killed him should have faced harsher sentences than they received in June. 'We need to go to parliament to get these guidelines changed, to hold these youths responsible for what they do,' she said. 'We should not have to lose somebody else to these youngsters.' The boy, aged 15 at the time of sentencing, was found guilty of manslaughter in April. He received a seven-year custodial sentence, while his accomplice, a girl aged 13, was given a three-year rehabilitation order with a six-month curfew and community service. Neither can be named for legal reasons. The solicitor general, Lucy Rigby, who referred the boy's sentence to the court of appeal under the unduly lenient sentence scheme, said she believed the case's seriousness qualified the sentence for reconsideration but respected the court's decision, and that her thoughts were with Kohli's 'friends and family, and everyone impacted by this horrendous crime'. The boy's defence team attempted to have the sentence reduced. At a hearing on Wednesday, Lady Justice Macur, who assessed the case alongside Mrs Justice Cutts and Mr Justice Murray, said the current sentence was neither unduly lenient nor excessive, calling it a 'very significant sentence and necessarily so'. She said the sentence was 'entirely warranted by the seriousness of the offence. It is unarguable that the sentence was manifestly excessive.' Speaking after the pair were first sentenced in June, Susan Kohli claimed her father had been repeatedly targeted by youths in the area, with the abuse being racially motivated, something that both teenagers denied while standing trial. She also claimed that the police were aware of the problem and should have had a greater presence in the area. Kohli, who was found by his family after the beating, told a paramedic that he had been called slurs during the assault, which resulted in a broken neck and three broken ribs. He was taken to hospital but died the next day. Sign up to First Edition Our morning email breaks down the key stories of the day, telling you what's happening and why it matters after newsletter promotion During the trial the court was shown footage recorded by the girl that showed the boy, wearing a balaclava, assaulting Kohli while the girl laughed. A separate video showed Kohli lying motionless on the ground. Other footage recovered by police from the girl's phones included a video of an unknown man being accosted by a group of children, one of them calling him a 'paki bastard' and hitting him while the girl could be heard laughing.
