logo
David Archer, let it go. Beavers are nature's answer to our broken rivers

David Archer, let it go. Beavers are nature's answer to our broken rivers

The Guardian02-03-2025
The first time I laid eyes on a beaver was a couple of years ago on the Devon farm of Derek Gow, the farmer turned rewilder, who brought the furry rodents back to the UK 30 years ago.
It was magical. Sitting in the June dusk, the pink-and-purple sky was reflected in the still ponds of the beaver habitat. Suddenly, ripples emerged from the lodge and the head of a kit – a baby beaver – popped up from underwater.
Watching this fascinating, and very cute, creature collect willow branches in its mouth was a heart-stopping moment; it felt like peeking into a secret world.
This scene will, I hope, now become common across England, after the government announced on Friday that beavers can be legally released into the wild for the first time. The rodents were a common feature of our rivers until about 400 years ago, when they were hunted to extinction for their pelts and an oil they secrete.
So this is a return of a creature that belongs here, and that we cruelly extinguished from our landscape. But it's a much more important moment than that. We have royally screwed up our rivers over the centuries, straightening them, divorcing them from flood plains and destroying the surrounding habitats. This causes increased flooding and makes it more difficult for nature to thrive. Beavers can heal this; they are known as 'keystone species', which means their presence creates habitats for myriad other creatures, including fish, amphibians and insects.
The habitats I've visited have been thronging with life, with clouds of dragonflies in the air and tiny froglets hopping around my feet. Why? Because beavers dig ponds and create complex wetland habitats around rivers. Studies have found that fish in beaver habitats are larger and more numerous and that the presence of beavers rapidly increases biodiversity.
The UK is one of the most nature depleted places in the world and beavers can help fix this – for free. There has been a fierce debate about the reintroduction of beavers in England; it has even become a story line on The Archers. While some Ambridge residents have been lobbying for the return of the rodents, David Archer fears they will bring harm to his farm.
It is true that there are those that don't want them back in the landscape. Fair enough in some cases, as the rodents can fell trees. You can spot the telltale signs that you're entering the world of the beaver by the nibbled boughs and discarded, half-munched willow branches. But farmers I have spoken to have managed to avert this with a cheap and easy solution of wrapping chicken wire around tree trunks at beaver height. The creatures don't like getting the metal caught between their teeth. Others fear the rodents will cause their land to flood, which is also a legitimate concern. In other European countries where they roam free, governments provide services where troublesome beavers are removed and placed somewhere more appropriate. This is likely to be the case here, too.
So concerns about beavers in our nature-denuded landscape are understandable. We have wiped out so many of our native species that most of us have not encountered a wild mammal larger than a squirrel. But I believe the worries are largely unfounded, particularly if beaver releases are monitored and managed properly.
Sign up to Observed
Analysis and opinion on the week's news and culture brought to you by the best Observer writers
after newsletter promotion
Beavers alleviate flooding. Their dams are leaky, which means rivers flow much more steadily, and rainwater isn't dumped all at once into towns and villages. It moves at a much slower pace through a beaver system than an artificially straightened river.
The beavers on the River Otter in Devon – one of our free-living populations – have managed to stop the village downstream from flooding. As changes in climate brings heavier rainfall, their flood reduction services will prove invaluable. In the Czech Republic, the government planned a flood prevention scheme involving a dam. But the beavers got there first, building their dam in the exact location planned by officials, and thus saving taxpayers £1m.
Beavers also help reduce the impact of drought. In the dry summer of 2022, when farmers were struggling to grow grass for livestock and plant crops, a lucky few in Devon and Cornwall, where there are beavers, did not face the same problems. Drone footage shows parched, beaver-less land next to lush, green, beaver habitats. How? Because the ponds they dig hold water in the landscape, water that can then be used when rain is scarce. We are likely to have more frequent droughts due to climate breakdown, so beavers will be able to help prevent the worst effects of these.
Currently, England's beavers are mostly in enclosures, where they have been released by conservationists who have been observing the impact they have in a few constrained acres. Some, which have either escaped from these enclosures or been released by guerrilla rewilders, are living wild on rivers mostly in the south.
This moment has been decades in the making. Ever since Gow and his fellow rewilders concocted their plan in the 90s, the momentum has built. Successive environment departments have tried to legalise the release of beavers, but have been blocked because of fears it will upset farmers and certain wealthy landowners. Almost every year, conservationists have been told it is almost time to tear down the fences of enclosures and set beavers loose to fix our rivers, only to be informed the scheme has once again been delayed.
Some frustrated conservationists have taken the law into their own hands, driving around the country with beavers in the back of a van, conducting 'beaver bombings', where, unauthorised, they release a pair at a river and drive off again. It is faintly absurd that normally law-abiding nature lovers have felt forced to conduct clandestine beaver operations.
But this won't be necessary any longer. These industrious rodents will, in the coming weeks, be living free all over the country, with the first expected to be released by the National Trust at Purbeck Heaths in Dorset. I urge you to go and visit, so you too can experience the magic of watching wild beavers.
Helena Horton is an environment reporter for the Guardian
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE: 'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'
EXCLUSIVE: 'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'

Daily Mirror

time4 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

EXCLUSIVE: 'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'

A Danish zoo, which caused international outrage after asking the public to donate their unwanted "healthy pets" for predators, has defended its actions, stating that the animals need "fur and bones." Aalborg Zoo in North Jutland posted a plea on social media for live rabbits, chickens, and guinea pigs to be donated, which its trained staff would "gently euthanise". The zoo explained that these animals are "an important part of the diet of our predators - especially the European lynx, which needs whole prey that resembles what it would naturally hunt in the wild." Aalborg Zoo, which is home to 1,500 animals belonging to 126 species, also sought donations of live horses under 147cm tall with a pet passport. Furthermore, it mentioned that if pet owners need to rehome animals "for various reasons", they could bring up to four small species at a time. It comes as a millionaire hunter was gored to death by 'Black Death' buffalo he was trying to kill. The zoo's statement read: "In zoos, we have a responsibility to imitate the animals' natural food chain - for the sake of both animal welfare and professional integrity," adding, "Nothing goes to waste - and we ensure natural behaviour, nutrition and well-being of our predators." Pet owner Kristina Meincke recounted her experience of surrendering her rabbit, which was then humanely put down and served as food for the carnivores. She commended the zoo for the "super nice" process. Her feedback was positive, writing on social media: "This is such a fine arrangement. I have delivered a rabbit to you, and it was a super nice and professional experience."

'I walked 111 to the City Chambers and want to share a few hot takes'
'I walked 111 to the City Chambers and want to share a few hot takes'

Glasgow Times

time4 days ago

  • Glasgow Times

'I walked 111 to the City Chambers and want to share a few hot takes'

Together with my friends, Gordon and Anne, and my kids, Edwyn and Ivor, I had completed the first-ever round of The Glasgow Way—a long-distance walk Gordon and I created which stays entirely within the Glasgow city boundary and visits every council ward. We hope that others may be inspired to follow in our footsteps. Perhaps The Glasgow Way could be a new addition to Scotland's roster of incredible walking routes? An urban version of the West Highland Way; a big walk where a bus pass is more useful than a Berghaus jacket! I thoroughly enjoyed planning and doing the walk and it has helped me appreciate different aspects of Glasgow. Some thoughts will benefit from further reflection over days and weeks, but for now I wanted to share just a few 'hot takes' on what I have taken from it. 1. There's loads of nature on our doorstep and we should celebrate that more. Glasgow really is the Dear Green Place, and it's a dear blue place also. I'm not talking about football, but about trees, parks, nature reserves, canals, rivers and burns. I reckon around 75% of our walk was in green or blue 'corridors', with some sections several miles long. Highlights included the Claypits, Possil Marsh, the Seven Lochs Trail, Dams to Darnley country park and Garscadden Woods. These are great ways to escape the hustle and bustle and it's important we keep looking after them and support nature in Glasgow. 2. If our natural environment seems to be doing okay, too many of our buildings aren't. The sight of buddleia springing from our heritage buildings is all too common, as are other signs of disrepair affecting our traditional tenements. But more recent developments show signs of poor maintenance too and there are modern designs which aren't standing up well to increased rainfall. There's a need to address immediate issues and strengthen requirements on owners to maintain buildings, as well as making sure our next city development plan means we design buildings that last. 3. We are learning some lessons from the past but need to keep focused on creating healthy and vibrant communities. There are great signs of a new Glasgow taking shape, including the new Sighthill, but still some sense that while we're delivering better homes, the amenities and connectedness that make these places where people live well aren't always given the same priority. 4. The coverage of our public transport network is pretty good. Each stage of the walk was easily accessed by bus or train. However, having everything under one, properly integrated transport authority, like most major European cities, would make a huge difference. 5. People still make Glasgow. Everywhere we went, those we spoke to were hugely supportive and gave us loads of encouragement. That included helping us to raise almost £2,000 for a charity, Tumour Support Scotland, which helps families like mine that are affected by the rare genetic condition neurofibromatosis. Huge thanks to everyone who supported us. I'd also love to hear from anyone who could help us develop The Glasgow Way.

'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'
'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'

Daily Mirror

time5 days ago

  • Daily Mirror

'I let a zoo feed my pet rabbit to the tigers, it was a super-nice experience'

Aalborg Zoo in Denmark asked people on social media to donate their unwanted pets and horses to feed their predators. However, it prompted a furious fallout from across the globe A Danish zoo, which caused international outrage after asking the public to donate their unwanted "healthy pets" for predators, has defended its actions, stating that the animals need "fur and bones." ‌ Aalborg Zoo in North Jutland posted a plea on social media for live rabbits, chickens, and guinea pigs to be donated, which its trained staff would "gently euthanise". ‌ The zoo explained that these animals are "an important part of the diet of our predators - especially the European lynx, which needs whole prey that resembles what it would naturally hunt in the wild." ‌ Aalborg Zoo, which is home to 1,500 animals belonging to 126 species, also sought donations of live horses under 147cm tall with a pet passport. Furthermore, it mentioned that if pet owners need to rehome animals "for various reasons", they could bring up to four small species at a time. It comes as a millionaire hunter was gored to death by 'Black Death' buffalo he was trying to kill. READ MORE: British man's final row with daughter-in-law before 'trying to drown her abroad' The zoo's statement read: "In zoos, we have a responsibility to imitate the animals' natural food chain - for the sake of both animal welfare and professional integrity," adding, "Nothing goes to waste - and we ensure natural behaviour, nutrition and well-being of our predators." ‌ Pet owner Kristina Meincke recounted her experience of surrendering her rabbit, which was then humanely put down and served as food for the carnivores. She commended the zoo for the "super nice" process. Her feedback was positive, writing on social media: "This is such a fine arrangement. I have delivered a rabbit to you, and it was a super nice and professional experience." ‌ Despite this, the zoo's social media call-out went viral, attracting thousands of comments from around the world, with numerous pet owners expressing outrage over the request. The zoo, which has 375,000 visitors each year, had to shut down comments and restrict interactions due to the onslaught of criticism. Pia Nielsen, the zoo's deputy director, was compelled to justify the appeal, stating it was "necessary" to supply the animals with "meat, preferably with fur and bones." ‌ She told The Mirror: "At Aalborg Zoo, we have always had various carnivores. Carnivores represent an important and diverse group of animals in nature. They fill a central niche in ecosystems and play a crucial role in the balance of nature. At the same time, predators evoke both fascination and curiosity – and help communicate important messages about the connections in nature and biodiversity. "We have both large and small carnivores in Aalborg. We place great emphasis on the animals' health. We monitor them daily, have daily veterinary checks, and assess their welfare based on these daily observations. ‌ "For many years we have fed our carnivores with smaller livestock. When keeping carnivores, it is necessary to provide them with meat, preferably with fur, bones, etc., to give them as natural a diet as possible. "Therefore, it makes sense to allow animals that need to be euthanized for various reasons to be of use in this way. In Denmark, this practice is common, and many of our guests and partners appreciate the opportunity to contribute. The livestock we receive as donations are chickens, rabbits, guinea pigs, and horses." ‌ Dr Mark Jones of Born Free, an international wildlife charity dedicated to rescuing and safeguarding animals from exploitation, has slammed the zoo's recent appeal as a betrayal of their supposed commitment to animal welfare. Speaking to The Mirror, he said: "Companion animals have a particular place in human-animal relationships. The very idea of a zoo offering to take unwanted pets in order to kill them and feed them to their predators will horrify most right-minded people. "Moreover, Born Free has always maintained that big cats and other predators don't belong in zoos and should be phased out. Zoos cannot provide for the complex needs of these animals, and the idea that feeding them former pet animals will somehow compensate for the poor welfare they experience is preposterous. "This announcement by the zoo undermines any claim that animal welfare is their top priority. Anyone who cannot keep a healthy pet animal should secure its future through established rescue and rehoming organisations, rather than giving it to a zoo to be killed and used as 'fodder' in order to perpetuate the keeping of wild animals in captivity for our entertainment."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store