Cong must rein in loose-talking leaders; put party on right path
The Congress seems rudderless—a ship adrift in the choppy waters of Indian politics. It became evident, as the top brass had to reprimand its senior leaders to not make controversial or insensitive remarks on the Pahalgam terror attack that left dozens murdered and the entire nation shocked and angry. For instance, Karnataka Chief Minister Siddaramaiah said that there's no need for war. Another senior Congress leader and former Union minister Mani Shankar Aiyar said that 'the unresolved questions of the Partition reflected in the terrible tragedy... in Pahalgam on April 22.' Senior party leader from Kashmiri Saifuddin Soz made an even more offensive remark, urging us to accept Pakistan's 'word' that 'it was not involved in Pahalgam.' Naivety soared to new heights.
All this at a time when people all over the country cutting across communal and caste lines are seething with anger over the barbarity of jihadists at Pahalgam! In a damage control exercise, Congress general secretary (communications) Jairam Ramesh tweeted: 'Some Congress leaders have been speaking to the media. They speak for themselves and do not reflect the Congress' views.' But the damage has already been done.
The GOP's inability to present a cohesive front on the Pahalgam tragedy has exposed disarray and divisions within its ranks. This gave the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party another handle to beat the grand old party with. Senior BJP MP and former Union minister Ravi Shankar Prasad said, 'Do Rahul Gandhi and Mallikarjun Kharge have no control over their party? Or did both of them make pro forma comments while letting others speak as they wished? When the world is with India after the terror strike, be it the US, France, or Saudi Arabia, these leaders are making such shameless and irresponsible remarks.'
This latest episode underscores a critical challenge for the Congress: the urgent need for disciplined internal communication and a coherent, principled stand on matters of national security. In a country where terrorism has repeatedly caused pain and suffering, such issues cannot be treated lightly or be left open to the whims of individual leaders. National security must transcend political affiliations and be addressed with seriousness, consistency, and unity.
The Congress leadership must realize that it cannot afford to let its leaders indulge in loose talk, especially on issues as critical and sensitive as national security. Every word spoken by a senior party leader carries weight, not only in domestic discourse but also in the international arena. Irresponsible or poorly timed statements can undermine the nation's unity, embolden adversaries, and weaken India's diplomatic stance. The stakes are too high for casual remarks or personal interpretations of grave national threats like terrorism.
However, the control of rhetoric and consistency in response can only be achieved if the Congress, as a party, has clarity over its fundamental approach to national security. This clarity, in turn, must be grounded in a coherent and contemporary political philosophy—one that reconciles the Congress's legacy of non-alignment and peaceful diplomacy with the harsh realities of modern-day geopolitics and asymmetric warfare. A mature political ideology must be able to distinguish between advocating peace and appearing weak or ambivalent on matters of sovereignty and security. What the party needs is direction, discipline, and a renewed sense of responsibility—before it's too late.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
‘Delhi is a true picture of unity in diversity… a melting pot'
In the last three-and-a-half years she has spent in Delhi, the city has become like a second home for Ina Hagniningtyas Krisnamurthi, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the Republic of Indonesia to India. Not just food, she loves the diversity of the city, but also its food. In her career spanning nearly two decades, she has held various diplomatic positions and has held various other government posts. She is an MA in International Studies from Griffith University in Brisbane, Australia. She speaks to The Indian Express as part of a series of interviews with Ambassadors about Delhi — a city she admires. Excerpts: One place in the city that you like visiting often. Delhi for me is like a second home. It's not easy for me to pinpoint one, but I often visit Nehru Park or Lodhi Garden… very friendly and green. What has stood out in Delhi during your stay? In Indonesia, we have this principle of 'Bhinekka Tunggal Ika', which loosely translates in English to 'unity in diversity'. I think Delhi is truly a picture of unity in diversity. When I arrived here in 2022, there were 152 diplomatic missions. Now, the number has gone up to 180. The city is a melting pot of diplomats, especially from many faraway countries. I was posted in New York before…there are 193 missions there. Secondly, when you talk about food, you can find cuisines from all Indian states. Unfortunately, Odisha Bhawan is now undergoing a renovation, but that is one of the places that I frequent because I love Odisha's food. It almost has a Southeast Asian flavour. Thirdly, even as Delhi is not my favourite Indian city, it has a character unlike many others. The past and the future come together. It's so colouful. You can say that you can understand Delhi, but you cannot, because every corner of the city brings out a different side. My favourite place is Chandigarh, and another city for me that I fell in love with right away is Visakhapatnam. Memories or encounters in the city that you'll never forget? One was the G20 Summit. The lockdown during the G20 Summit for three days…it was all so beautiful, my God! It was very romantic. I cannot explain in words. Second, when Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto came here as the Chief Guest of the Republic Day parade this year. In October, when the decision came to invite my president, I was doubtful that we could do it. India made it happen because you're so unbelievably good at extending your friendship. Favourite food in the city? The South Indian food in Malcha Marg, and I also love fried fish. And also, Dhaba in Claridges, because I love the butter chicken, and also the garlic naan. But the dal, I think, Bukhara is the best…by far. The dal is unbelievable. I just buy the dal and eat it with naan or roti. That's it. I can eat that forever. If you have to introduce Delhi back home, what will you tell them? First, unity in diversity. Second, the warmth of the people. Third, even Delhiites can't fully know the city… because if you go to Old Delhi, every nook and corner is different…Every time I go there, I go okay, how come this is here? I did not see it before.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Amit Shah praise for CM Yogi Adityanath on hiring record 60,000 constables 'sans bias'
Amit Shah praise for CM Yogi Adityanath on hiring record 60,000 constables 'sans bias' LUCKNOW: India's largest-ever police recruitment drive in UP to hire 60,244 constables, 12,048 of them women, goes beyond staggering numbers to restore public faith in the transparency of the selection process, establish inclusivity, and build on the state's transition from a legacy of lawlessness to "robust" enforcement under CM Yogi Adityanath 's stewardship, home minister Amit Shah said Sunday at an investiture event in Lucknow's Defence Expo Ground. "Goons no longer dictate terms in the state. The rule of law has been established," Shah told the recruits, 15 of whom received their appointment letters from him. "Each of you was selected purely on merit from among 48 lakh applicants. There were no bribes, recommendations or caste-based bias, unlike when other governments were in office." The home minister's fulsome praise for Yogi in public effectively scotched speculation by some about the equation between the two. Shah commended the Yogi government for reserving 20% of the advertised posts in the constabulary for women, saying he was particularly delighted to meet some of those young recruits and see "confidence and determination written on their faces". "UP now has the largest police force in the country, equipped with command centres, AI-based tools, PCR vans, and forensic labs on wheels. This is in stark contrast to the scene before 2017. The Modi-Yogi governance synergy has since made the difference," he said. With Sunday's induction, the strength of the force stands at nearly four lakh personnel, which includes around 36,000 women. Shah also spoke about Operation Sindoor , saying PM Modi had unequivocally conveyed to Pakistan that "anyone who dares to shed Indian blood will be punished".
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
The other war: Fighting fake news
India's latest four-day border clash with Pakistan, designated 'Operation Sindoor' in May, saw more than missiles and drones crossing the Line of Control. It also witnessed a parallel, invisible war playing out in the information sphere, across social media platforms and mainstream news outlets. .The news media, a powerful tool for discourse, can also be weaponised for propaganda, censorship, and even direct involvement in conflicts. Information warfare involves the use of propaganda or politically slanted half-truths, as governments and military forces attempt to shape public opinion, promote their narratives, and justify their actions. Censorship often accompanies this effort—especially in wartime—when States may restrict media access, suppress critical reporting, or control the flow of information. Equally significant are the ways in which stories are 'framed' — through language, visuals, and cited sources — to influence public perception and opinions on the outcome of military a first, Karnataka cops to deploy agentic AI to combat fake warfare undermines the very basis of good journalism: credibility. While the media's role is to report and analyse current events for the public, including newspapers, television, radio, and online platforms, its relationship with war is complex. It doesn't merely observe; it influences. It shapes public perception, steers political discourse, and even impacts military strategies. .US academic and Pakistan Studies specialist Christine Fair states, 'The highly polarised and nationalistic nature of the information space on such topics in both countries means that few official statements can be relied on at face value, and disinformation has been used to flood social media on both sides.'.Across platforms like X, Facebook, Instagram, and YouTube, verified accounts played a central role in this information warfare. Information did not simply circulate—it metastasised. On X, of 437 misleading posts, only 73 were flagged. This implies that the vast majority remained unchecked, spreading fake news. The information warfare attempted to mislead and demoralise the citizens on both sides of the South Asian political and ideological divide, using doctored videos and false imagery of supposed enemy air strikes—often borrowed from unrelated Indian officials were still pondering over their response to the crisis, Pakistan's political leadership had already reached out to international media. For instance, within 48 hours of the terror attack in Pahalgam, Pakistani cabinet ministers like Ishaq Dar, Khawaja Asif, Attaullah Tarar and PPP chief Bilawal Bhutto had given over 25 interviews to major global channels. .In a democracy, the principle of 'right to information' often clashes with the demands of national interest. Citizens naturally want to know: How many IAF aircraft were lost? How many Indian soldiers were killed? However, in any military operation, truth is often the first casualty. All belligerent nations practise information modern warfare, military operations and digital propaganda operate in tandem. Disinformation is not an adjunct to war but a part of it. The media must stop treating platforms as neutral sources. Fact-checking must be integrated into the editorial process. Journalists need new protocols for digital verification, particularly during crises. Information warfare is designed to destabilise, provoke, polarise, and obstruct rational policy making. Credibility remains the crucial element. Lies succeed when they are loaded with some truth.. As citizens, we must ask ourselves: Are we being fed truth, or simply someone else's version of it? With so many competing narratives, we need to ask ourselves if the war is over or if the real conflict, the one for our minds, is just transparency and the 'Fog of War' do not go together. Operation Sindoor and its Pakistani version, 'Operation Bunyan al Marsous' (Wall of Lead), had only two belligerent nations, India and Pakistan, in the kinetic war. However, in the information sphere, there were several participants — Turkey, China and Malaysia, and Western industrial democracies. .Pakistan's information warfare apart, Indian television headlines screamed: 'Indian Navy Destroys Karachi Port!' 'General Asim Munir Arrested After Coup!' 'Indian Army Takes Over Islamabad!' As a democracy, the Indian news media should not lose its credibility, which differentiates it from Pakistan, where the political and military leadership muzzles the media. The Indian news media cannot afford to become a weapon of mass deception..(The writer is a member secretary at the Institute of Contemporary Studies Bangalore, a security studies think tank)
