Irish politician detained again by Egyptian authorities
His partner has urged the Irish deputy premier to intervene in the case.
Paul Murphy, a TD (MP) for People Before Profit-Solidarity, had been detained on Friday while attempting to march to the Rafah crossing into Gaza as part of a large demonstration to deliver aid into the blockaded enclave.
He was one of a number of Irish people who were expected to take part in the march.
The opposition politician said his phone and passport were confiscated before he and others were put on a bus to Cairo airport, where they believed they would be deported.
All Irish people who were detained were then released but some did not have their phones returned.
On Monday, Mr Murphy went to a police station in the Egyptian capital to retrieve his phone.
People Before Profit said this was done on the advice of the Irish embassy.
He then sent messages from the station that he was concerned that his passport had been taken again and was told he could not leave.
He then attempted to leave, but the party said he and others have been prevented from doing so.
'I have been detained in the Abdeen police station in Cairo,' the party quotes Mr Murphy as saying.
'On the advice of the Irish embassy, I went to the station at 12.30pm Egyptian time to enquire about my phone that they took.
'They took my passport again, had me talk to the secret police and left me in a room with an interpreter. They claim they are looking for my phone.
'I just attempted to leave but they said that I cannot leave. I understand that other march participants have also been detained.'
Mr Murphy's partner and Dublin councillor Jess Spear has appealed for the Irish Government to intervene.
'I appeal to Tanaiste Simon Harris to intervene urgently with the Egyptian authorities,' she said.
'The Tanaiste must ensure that Paul and all the Global March to Gaza participants are released, have their passports returned and are allowed to continue their humanitarian mission to try and get aid to the people of Gaza.'
The Global March to Gaza is a civilian movement that aims to march from Egypt to Gaza to deliver humanitarian aid and increase pressure so that vital supplies to the besieged region are unblocked.
A blockade on Gaza was imposed by Israel when it ended a ceasefire with Hamas earlier this year.
This has deepened fears of famine, while a new Israeli-US aid system has been marred by violence.
It comes as Israel's 20-month military campaign in Gaza continues, during which an estimated 55,000 Palestinians have been killed.
Israel launched a military offensive in Gaza after Hamas-led militants killed around 1,200 people and abducted 251 hostages on October 7 2023.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
10 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Has Israel begun its Gaza City offensive or will there be yet more ‘approvals'?
Has Israel begun its offensive to conquer Gaza City, or is it hype? Following several weeks of threats of a new large-scale offensive, strongly opposed by the majority of the international community, Israeli officials have made announcements daily saying the plan to conquer Gaza City has been 'approved'; it has been approved by the Israel Defense Forces, by the security cabinet, by the defence minister. Later on Thursday, in an event with the Israeli military, the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, will also proffer his 'approval'. How many times, one is tempted to ask, does one plan need approving? As so often in dealing with Israeli officials, and Netanyahu in particular, filtering out what is true and what is not, and what is calculated misdirection, is a complicated business. While Reuters reported a junior defence spokesperson as suggesting that the operation to take Gaza City had begun, quotes from that briefing paint a more complex picture, including a reference to the second phase of Operation Gideon's Chariots, the Israeli military offensive that began in May. In reality, however, recent military activity in Gaza was depicted as being 'preliminary' to any new offensive. For his part, Netanyahu's office put out an opaque statement saying he had asked for planning timelines for the conquest of Gaza City to be accelerated. Given the profound divisions within Israeli society, with about 400,000 people demonstrating recently in favour of a ceasefire deal and release of the remaining 20 living hostages in Gaza, and continued contact between mediators and both Israel and Hamas, unpacking the politics of what Netanyahu is up to is tricky. On the one hand, far-right members of his coalition have threatened once again to walk away in the event of a ceasefire, demanding the conquest of all of Gaza and Jewish settlement of the coastal strip. On the other is the fact that ceasefire talks are continuing. This week Hamas said it had accepted a ceasefire proposal that would allow for the release of about 10 living hostages in the first phase of a 60-day pause, while senior Israeli officials – but not an official 'delegation' – have met with mediators even as Netanyahu has dragged his feet over giving Israel's reply, reportedly delaying a cabinet meeting at which it would have been discussed. All of which leaves big questions unanswered. While some Israeli and international analysts have speculated that the current moves on the ground amount to pressure on Hamas to improve any deal that might just be emerging, others – including Ronen Bergman, one of Israel's most authoritative security analysts – suggest that Netanyahu would like to push on with fighting for years in order to delay his ongoing legal cases and ensure his continued political survival. What most agree is that any major new campaign is likely to have serious consequences. For Israelis, including senior figures in the defence establishment, one concern is whether living hostages would survive, an issue motivating mass demonstrations. Others point out that to all intents and purposes the deal Hamas to which has agreed is one Israel signalled its agreement to only weeks ago. Any offensive would be seen by the international community for what it is: the most cynical of moves that would lead to an even deeper humanitarian catastrophe – if that can even be imagined.
Daily Mail
37 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Labour hits out at Israel's settlement plan to 'divide a Palestinian state in two' - as Benjamin Netanyahu issues fresh blast at Keir Starmer
has condemned Israel 's controversial settlement plan in the West Bank that would 'divide a Palestinian state in two'. The Foreign Secretary criticised the approval of the E1 project as he warned it would 'critically undermine' hopes of a two-state solution to the Middle East crisis. He demanded the Israeli government reverse its decision, claiming - if the settlement plan is implemented - it would represent 'a flagrant breach of international law'. Settlement development in E1, a tract of land east of Jerusalem, has been under consideration for more than two decades. This is despite Israeli settlement construction in the West Bank being widely considered as illegal among the international community and an obstacle to peace. An Israeli defence ministry committee on Wednesday approved plans for around 3,400 homes in E1. Israel's far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, who was sanctioned by the UK in June, said the idea of a Palestinian state was 'being erased' following the approval. It came as Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu issued a fresh blast at Sir Keir Starmer's vow to recognise a Palestinian state next month. Last month, Sir Keir announced the UK would formally recognise Palestine in September before the United Nations General Assembly in New York unless Israel meets certain conditions. This includes agreeing to a ceasefire in Gaza, making clear there will be no annexation in the West Bank, and committing to a long-term peace process that delivers a two-state solution. But Mr Netanyahu repeated his claim that Sir Keir was 'rewarding' Hamas in the wake of the terror groups attacks on Israel on 7 October 2023. He told the Triggernometry podcast: 'They [Hamas] commit the greatest savagery against Jews since the Holocaust, and the Prime Minister of Britain says we will reward you with a de facto state which is committed openly to repeating the October 7 massacre over and over and over again. 'And they say we recognise Israel's right to defend itself… as long as Israel doesn't exercise that right. 'Let's imagine, what would be the response of Britain if about 15,000 people would be butchered in one day, and you'd have, I don't know, 2,500 hostages taken. 'Would you say, 'Oh, well, we should give our attackers a state right next to London?' Of course not. He added: 'The standard that is being applied is not merely wrong, it's just downright dangerous. 'Because you're really rewarding these monstrous terrorists with the greatest prize and that's because of weakness.' A two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict envisages a Palestinian state in East Jerusalem, the West Bank, and Gaza, existing side by side with Israel. The UK has opposed the E1 settlement project due to concerns that it could undermine a future peace deal with the Palestinians. In a post on X/Twitter, Mr Lammy said: 'The UK condemns the decision by Israel's Higher Planning Committee today to approve the E1 settlement plan. 'If implemented, it would divide a Palestinian state in two, mark a flagrant breach of international law and critically undermine the two-state solution. 'The Israeli government must reverse this decision.' On Sunday, during a visit to Ofra, another West Bank settlement established a quarter of a century ago, Mr Netanyahu said: "I said 25 years ago that we will do everything to secure our grip on the Land of Israel, to prevent the establishment of a Palestinian state, to prevent the attempts to uproot us from here. 'Thank God, what I promised, we have delivered.' Mr Smotrich, who unveiled the E1 plans last week, welcomed the approval of the project. 'The Palestinian state is being erased from the table not with slogans but with actions,' he said. 'Every settlement, every neighbourhood, every housing unit is another nail in the coffin of this dangerous idea.'
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Israel invades Gaza city after calling up reservists
Published: | Updated: After a clash with Hamas fighters south of Khan Younis on Wednesday, he said 'We will deepen the blows to Hamas in Gaza City, a terror stronghold… 'We will deepen the blows to the terror infrastructure above and below ground, and disconnect the reliance of the population on Hamas.' He added that the army 'is not waiting' and that 'preliminary operations are underway in the area' with Hamas now 'battered and bruised.' Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has told the army to 'shorten the timelines for seizing the last terror strongholds and for the defeat of Hamas,' according to a statement that did not give new dates. Last week he said expanding the assault on Gaza was the 'best way to end the war.' He said Israel had 'no choice' but to 'finish the job' and 'defeat' Hamas in Gaza City and the coastal camps in al-Mawasi. The military has already launched initial operations in the Jabalia and Zeitoun districts around Gaza City. The Israeli statements signalled Israel was pressing ahead with its plan to seize Gaza's biggest urban centre despite international criticism of an operation likely to force the displacement of many more Palestinians. Defrin said troops were already operating on the outskirts of Gaza City, and Hamas was now a 'battered and bruised' guerrilla force. 'We will deepen the attack on Hamas in Gaza City, a stronghold of governmental and military terror for the terrorist organization,' the spokesman said. Israel's military called up tens of thousands of reservists on Wednesday in preparation for the expected assault on Gaza City, as the Israeli government considered a new truce proposal. United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres urged for a ceasefire in Gaza, warning the new operation could bring a 'catastrophic' humanitarian toll. Speaking in Japan, he said: 'It is vital to reach immediately a ceasefire in Gaza … necessary to avoid the death and destruction that a military operation against Gaza City would inevitably cause.' World leaders condemned Israel's decision to move into Gaza City. They warned that the move risks a humanitarian disaster and undermines the hopes for peace. Israel's expansion of settlements in the West Bank, including approval of a large new project in the E1 area near Jerusalem, heightened international criticism, with many saying it destroyed any chance for a two-state solution. Hamas
