logo
Hawaii Legislature pumps up nonprofit grant funding

Hawaii Legislature pumps up nonprofit grant funding

Yahoo05-05-2025

Hawaii nonprofits stand to receive a lot more grant funding from the Legislature this year due to expectations of federal aid cuts by President Donald Trump.
State lawmakers gave final approval to two bills Wednesday through which up to $80 million is being directed to, or set aside for, charitable organizations statewide.
Over a third of the funding, $30 million, is to be distributed to 121 nonprofits through the Legislature's annual grants-in-aid program, which is the same sum distributed in 2024 but down from about $40 million in 2023 and $49 million in 2022.
But because legislators and nonprofit operators fear cutbacks in federal grants to charitable organizations this year, an additional state grant fund was approved in Senate Bill 933 with $50 million to be distributed to nonprofits that are adversely affected by federal grant decisions and may apply for funding later this year if the bill becomes law.
'We are responding to a very special need, ' Rep. Daniel Holt, chair of the Legislature's Subcommittee on Grants-in-Aid, said Thursday.
Prior to Trump administration moves to reduce or cut off funding for a wide variety of nonprofit endeavors, Hawaii charitable organizations were already seeking more state funding support with applications mostly submitted in January.
This year the Legislature received 402 grant-in-aid applications, up from 322 in 2024.
Applicants this year sought $192 million to help fund operations or for capital improvement projects or both.
'It just shows the need that the community has out there, ' said Holt (D, Sand Island-Iwilei-Chinatown ).
Of the $30 million approved for this year's grants-in-aid program, the biggest grant is $800, 000 for a Hawaii Foodbank solar power project.
The smallest grant is $10, 000 for Hilo-based Hua o Lahui, which teaches how to make stone adzes and carve Hawaiian canoes. The nonprofit, which also teaches filmmaking as part of its canoe production work, primarily tries to serve Native Hawaiians but also veterans, active military service members, first responders and the general public.
Grant-in-aid awardees are typically nonprofits but also can be for-profit businesses if the funding is for a public purpose. Most organizations are involved in health care, social services, arts, education, environmental stewardship and culture. Applicants often receive less than they seek because lawmakers generally want to help as many applicants as they can with a limited pool of money.
It is not uncommon for nonprofits that seek grants-in-aid awards to also rely on federal funding.
Aloha Harvest applied for a $200, 000 grant to help it carry out its mission to feed the hungry with food that businesses including grocery stores, farms, distributors and restaurants do not plan to sell. The organization was approved for $140, 000 but noted on its Jan. 16 application that a $195, 010 federal grant was pending.
Hawaii Foodbank said March 27 in written testimony on SB 933 that critical federal funding represents about 20 % of its revenue and comes primarily through U.S. Department of Agriculture program contracts administered by the state.
'We are working hard to understand the implications of changes that are happening with federal funding and federal programs for our families and neighbors facing hunger—as well as our network of hunger-relief partners, ' wrote Amy Miller, the organization's president and CEO. 'Looking ahead, if all federal funding were to stop (excluding food ), we could face a potential loss of $3.8-5 million in revenue.'
Close to 80 nonprofit organizations expressed thanks and encouragement for an early draft of SB 933 before any amount of money was proposed for use.
'This critical financial bridge comes at a time when the federal administration is putting millions of dollars at risk with on-again, off-again federal funding freezes in grants and contracts to Hawaii's nonprofit organizations, ' Melissa Miya ­shiro, president and CEO of the Hawai 'i Alliance of Nonprofit Organizations, said during a Feb. 26 Senate Ways and Means Committee hearing shortly after lawmakers converted a blank bill to provide grants after this year's legislative session ended Friday.
The alliance, known as HANO, in written testimony cited USAspending.gov estimates stating that as many as 250 nonprofits in Hawaii received as much as $300 million to $400 million in federal grant and contract funding in the 2023 fiscal year.
HANO also said the nonprofit sector makes up nearly 12 % of the state's workforce, which if significantly displaced could cause major negative economic impacts.
Senate President Ron Kouchi (D, Kauai-Niihau ) said at a Wednesday news conference that the number of Hawaii nonprofits that have great missions and do great work unfortunately have financial needs that outstrip what the state can provide.
Kouchi said it will be hard to prioritize 'because $50 million will still be far short of what they need, but that's what we could set aside.'
Several members of the House of Representatives on Wednesday objected to or raised concerns about the final version of SB 933, which was produced Friday by a conference committee of three House members and three senators.
The conference committee determined the $50 million appropriation sum and decided that two House members selected by House Speaker Nadine Nakamura (D, Hanalei-Princeville-­Kapaa ) and two senators selected by Kouchi as Senate president would make all award decisions not subject to public meetings.
Rep. Kim Coco Iwamoto (D, Ala Moana-Kakaako-­Downtown ) voted to pass the bill but took issue with four legislators having total discretion for awarding $50 million.
'Although I'm really excited about the end use, I want to make sure that we're providing more transparency and more accountability for the selection process, and I just think that taxpayers may want more input, more accountability when it comes to allocating the $50 million, ' Iwamoto said before voting.
Rep. Dela Au Belatti (D, Makiki-Punchbowl ) also voted for the bill with support for the appropriation but raised the same concerns as Iwamoto while going further to say the bill does not comply with House rules or the Hawaii Constitution requiring that decisions on matters referred to a legislative committee shall be open to the public.
'This is constitutionally deficient, ' Belatti said of the bill.
The full House voted 44-5 to pass SB 933. The no votes were from five of eight Republicans in the House : Reps. David Alcos, Diamond Garcia, Lauren Matsumoto, Christopher Muraoka and Elijah Pierick. The bill passed the Senate 23-2, with two of three Republican members voting no : Sens. Brenton Awa and Samantha DeCorte.
At a Wednesday news conference after the bill passed, Nakamura said the Department of the Attorney General was involved in producing the final draft of the bill.
Holt said Thursday that the setup for grant decisions under SB 933 is similar to a scaled-down version of the grant-in-aid program, and he's confident that whoever is appointed to the evaluation and selection committee will make virtuous decisions.
SB 933 and the budget bill, House Bill 300, containing the grant-in-aid program appropriations are still subject to consideration by Gov. Josh Green, who can sign them into law, let them become law without his signature or nix the appropriations with vetoes.
TOP AWARDS Thirteen nonprofits were selected this year for legislative grant-in-aid awards of $500, 000 or more :—Big Brothers Big Sisters Hawaii—Blood Bank of Hawaii—DIGS—Elepaio Social Services—Hana Health—Hawaii Foodbank Inc.—Hooulu Lahui—Kauai Economic Opportunity Inc.—Lanakila Pacific—Makiki Christian Church—Papakolea Community Development Corp.—Rehabilitation Hospital of the Pacific—West Hawaii Community Health Center Inc.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Sona BLW shares fall nearly 2% after Bernstein downgrades stock
Sona BLW shares fall nearly 2% after Bernstein downgrades stock

Business Upturn

time7 minutes ago

  • Business Upturn

Sona BLW shares fall nearly 2% after Bernstein downgrades stock

By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on June 10, 2025, 09:24 IST Shares of Sona BLW Precision Forgings Ltd fell as much as 1.9% on Tuesday, trading at ₹514.35 as of 9:21 AM IST, down ₹7.00 from the previous close of ₹521.35. The decline follows a downgrade from brokerage firm Bernstein, which revised its rating on the stock to 'Market Perform' from 'Outperform'. The downgrade comes amid growing near-term risks that Bernstein highlighted, including tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk, as well as ongoing trade issues between the U.S. and India. The brokerage also expressed concerns about the increasing competitiveness of Chinese OEMs in the global electric vehicle (EV) supply chain. Bernstein noted that Sona BLW has significant exposure to the U.S. market and a large portion of its order book is concentrated in EV components, making it vulnerable to geopolitical disruptions and sectoral headwinds. The stock's recent pressure comes despite its strong year-range performance between ₹380 and ₹768.65, with a market cap of ₹318.23 billion and a P/E ratio of 51.67. Sona BLW remains a key player in the EV component space, but analysts now suggest a cautious outlook amid global macro uncertainties. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Stock market investments are subject to market risks. Always conduct your own research or consult a financial advisor before making investment decisions. Author or Business Upturn is not liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote
What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

Hamilton Spectator

time12 minutes ago

  • Hamilton Spectator

What to know about inspections of Iran's nuclear program by the IAEA ahead of a key board vote

VIENNA (AP) — Iran's nuclear program remains a top focus for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency, particularly as any possible deal between Tehran and the United States over the program would likely rely on the agency long known as the United Nations' nuclear watchdog. This week, Western nations will push for a measure at the IAEA's Board of Governors censuring Iran over its noncompliance with inspectors, pushing the matter before the U.N. Security Council. Barring any deal with Washington, Iran then could face what's known as 'snapback' — the reimposition of all U.N. sanctions on it originally lifted by Tehran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, if one of its Western parties declares the Islamic Republic is out of compliance with it. All this sets the stage for a renewed confrontation with Iran as the Mideast remains inflamed by Israel's war on Hamas in the Gaza Strip . And the IAEA's work in any case will make the Vienna-based agency a key player. Here's more to know about the IAEA, its inspections of Iran and the deals — and dangers — at play. Atoms for peace The IAEA was created in 1957. The idea for it grew out of a 1953 speech given by U.S. President Dwight D. Eisenhower at the U.N., in which he urged the creation of an agency to monitor the world's nuclear stockpiles to ensure that 'the miraculous inventiveness of man shall not be dedicated to his death, but consecrated to his life.' Broadly speaking, the agency verifies the reported stockpiles of member nations. Those nations are divided into three categories. The vast majority are nations with so-called 'comprehensive safeguards agreements' with the IAEA, states without nuclear weapons that allow IAE monitoring over all nuclear material and activities. Then there's the 'voluntary offer agreements' with the world's original nuclear weapons states — China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom and the U.S. — typically for civilian sites. Finally, the IAEA has 'item-specific agreements' with India, Israel and Pakistan — nuclear-armed countries that haven't signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty. That treaty has countries agree not to build or obtain nuclear weapons. North Korea, which is also nuclear armed, said it has withdrawn from the treaty, though that's disputed by some experts. The collapse of Iran's 2015 nuclear deal Iran's 2015 nuclear deal with world powers, negotiated under then-President Barack Obama, allowed Iran to enrich uranium to 3.67% — enough to fuel a nuclear power plant but far below the threshold of 90% needed for weapons-grade uranium. It also drastically reduced Iran's stockpile of uranium, limited its use of centrifuges and relied on the IAEA to oversee Tehran's compliance through additional oversight. But President Donald Trump in his first term in 2018 unilaterally withdrew America from the accord , insisting it wasn't tough enough and didn't address Iran's missile program or its support for militant groups in the wider Mideast. That set in motion years of tensions, including attacks at sea and on land . Iran now enriches up to 60%, a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels. It also has enough of a stockpile to build multiple nuclear bombs, should it choose to do so. Iran has long insisted its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, but the IAEA, Western intelligence agencies and others say Tehran had an organized weapons program up until 2003. IAEA inspections and Iran Under the 2015 deal, Iran agreed to allow the IAEA even greater access to its nuclear program. That included permanently installing cameras and sensors at nuclear sites. Those cameras, inside of metal housings sprayed with a special blue paint that shows any attempt to tamper with it, took still images of sensitive sites. Other devices, known as online enrichment monitors, measured the uranium enrichment level at Iran's Natanz nuclear facility. The IAEA also regularly sent inspectors into Iranian sites to conduct surveys, sometimes collecting environmental samples with cotton clothes and swabs that would be tested at IAEA labs back in Austria. Others monitor Iranian sites via satellite images. In the years since Trump's 2018 decision, Iran has limited IAEA inspections and stopped the agency from accessing camera footage . It's also removed cameras . At one point, Iran accused an IAEA inspector of testing positive for explosive nitrates , something the agency disputed. The IAEA has engaged in years of negotiations with Iran to restore full access for its inspectors. While Tehran hasn't granted that, it also hasn't entirely thrown inspectors out. Analysts view this as part of Iran's wider strategy to use its nuclear program as a bargaining chip with the West. What happens next Iran and the U.S. have gone through five rounds of negotiations over a possible deal, with talks mediated by the sultanate of Oman . Iran appears poised to reject an American proposal over a deal this week, potentially as soon as Tuesday. Without a deal with the U.S., Iran's long-ailing economy could enter a freefall that could worsen the simmering unrest at home. Israel or the U.S. might carry out long-threatened airstrikes targeting Iranian nuclear facilities. Experts fear Tehran in response could decide to fully end its cooperation with the IAEA, abandon the the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty and rush toward a bomb. If a deal is reached — or at least a tentative understanding between the two sides — that likely will take the pressure off for an immediate military strike by the U.S. Gulf Arab states, which opposed Obama's negotiations with Iran in 2015, now welcome the talks under Trump. Any agreement would require the IAEA's inspectors to verify Iran's compliance. But Israel, which has struck at Iranian-backed militants across the region, remains a wildcard on what it could do. Last year, it carried out its first military airstrikes on Iran — and has warned it is willing to take action alone to target Tehran's program, like it has in the past in Iraq in 1981 or Syria in 2007. ___ Associated Press writer Stephanie Liechtenstein contributed to this report. ___ The Associated Press receives support for nuclear security coverage from the Carnegie Corporation of New York and Outrider Foundation . The AP is solely responsible for all content. ___ Additional AP coverage of the nuclear landscape: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .

Why Trump's Deployment Of Military in California Is So Controversial
Why Trump's Deployment Of Military in California Is So Controversial

Bloomberg

time14 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Why Trump's Deployment Of Military in California Is So Controversial

President Donald Trump ordered the California National Guard on June 7 to dispatch at least 2,000 soldiers to the Los Angeles area as thousands of people demonstrating against immigration raids clashed with security forces. After vandalism and violence broke out, the Pentagon escalated the federal response by also mobilizing 700 active-duty Marines. The president said on his Truth Social platform that federal agencies were to take 'all such action necessary' to stop what he called 'migrant riots.' The rare move by a president to mobilize military forces to quell domestic unrest was quickly condemned as unnecessary and counterproductive by local authorities, including Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass and California Governor Gavin Newsom.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store