Bidayuh leader Dago honoured for steadfast leadership, historic role
Dato Sri Robert Jacob Ridu
KUCHING (May 18): The late Datuk Amar Dominic Dago Randan is remembered as a pillar of quiet strength and integrity who played a pivotal role in uniting the Bidayuh community during a defining moment in Malaysia's history.
Former Sarawak Legislative Assembly Speaker Dato Sri Robert Jacob Ridu paid tribute to Dago, highlighting his significant contributions during the formation of the Malaysian Federation in 1963.
'Dago was the first Bidayuh elected as a Member of Parliament in Malaysia, and he stood as a unifying force for his people,' he added.
'He leaves behind not only a legacy of leadership, but also an example of how strength and true vision can be carried forward with gentleness and resolve,' said Ridu in a heartfelt statement honouring the statesman.
'He knew what he stood for, and he conveyed his values with clarity, quiet dignity, and a deep sense of purpose,' said Ridu, describing Dago as a man of conviction and wisdom who made a lasting impact despite often staying out of the spotlight.
Recalling their early acquaintance, Ridu shared how he first met Dago in Kuala Lumpur during a dinner for the establishment of the Malaysian Federation in 1963, hosted by the then Sarawak State Financial Secretary John Hepburn.
'I had the privilege of being introduced to Dago (at the event). He was a young man – not quite 30, and an independent Member of Council Negri representing Serian, while I was just 19 years old – on my way to United Kingdom to pursue my study then.
'I had a tremendous sense of pride that we have a Bidayuh flag bearer, and we had it in Dominic Dago. Imagine a Bidayuh from kampong, not far from mine. When I returned from the UK, I immediately joined the flag bearer in Parti Bumiputra.'
Ridu extended his condolences to Dago's family, loved ones, and the wider Bidayuh community, noting that Dago's enduring contributions would continue to inspire future generations.
Dago passed away at the age of 91 on Thursday morning.
His funeral service is scheduled at 9 am today (May 19) at the Holy Trinity Church in Kampung Pichin, followed by burial at the Kampung Pichin Cemetery. Bidayuh community condolences Dominic Dago Randan Robert Jacob Ridu
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
30-05-2025
- Borneo Post
The elusive butterfly of Dayak unity
Photo courtesy of St Thomas's Cathedral Kuching shows the Gawai Dayak being celebrated during a church service last year. YEAR 1966 was a turbulent one for the newly-independent, under Malaysia, state of Sarawak. Its first chief minister Tan Sri Datuk Amar Stephen Kalong Ningkan was appointed on July 22, July 1963. He was ousted in 1966, firstly in Council Negri in June and then, by the federal government in September that year. He had only served three years of his full five-year-term by then. Kalong Ningkan was of Iban-Chinese parentage and was born in Betong in Sarawak's Second Division. His successor was Dato' Sri Penghulu Tawi Sli, an Iban from Lingga in Sri Aman, who served until July 1970. Tun Datuk Patinggi Abdul Rahman Yakub, a Melanau from Mukah, took over as Sarawak's third chief minister – serving from July 7, 1970 until he left office on April 1, 1981. Since 1963, when Sarawak became a part of Malaysia, the Dayaks as one racial entity have been fractionalised into a number of political parties. The 'Dayak Nation' itself comprises many different groupings, and the best description I found was from Wikipedia: 'The Dayak are the native groups of Borneo. It is a loose term for over 200 riverine and hill-dwelling ethnic groups, located principally in the central and southern interior of Borneo, each with its own dialect, customs, laws, territory, and culture, although common distinguishing traits are readily identifiable. 'The Dayak were animist in belief; however, since the 19th century there has been mass conversion to Christianity and to Islam.' Wikipedia has estimated that latest statistics show a Dayak population of 4.2 million, of which 3.3 million resides in Indonesia and 900,000 in Malaysia. Christianity is the main religion for 63 per cent of them, Islam for 32 per cent, and the rest are 'Kaharingan' / animism. In Sarawak, 'Hari Gawai Dayak' was officially gazetted as a public holiday on Sept 25, 1964. It was celebrated officially for the first time by the Sarawak government on June 1, 1965. The Dayak community in Sarawak held a grand celebration attended by Kalong Ningkan on the eve of June 1, 1966 (the third annual festival) at the Sarawak Union Club which at the time was the most prominent community hall in Kuching. In his speech, he spoke about the theme of unity. 'As we celebrate this 'Gawai Taun', and when we greet each other during this happy day, let us be mindful of the great and continuing need to preserve and strengthen the unity of our country.' Kalong Ningkan was ousted just three months later, in September 1966, by some of his very own Dayak politicians from within and outside the now-defunct Sarawak National Party (SNAP). The quest for Dayak unity in politics has been a never-ending vision and mission, which started long before Sarawak had gained its independence in 1963 from the United Kingdom. History has shown us that from the very first political party started in 1959 – the Sarawak United People's Party (SUPP), and although there were some Dayak leaders who were among the founding members, the feeling on the ground even then was that it was more of a Chinese-majority party. Instead of forming one major Dayak political party to unite themselves, their leaders at the time, with their own personal political beliefs and agendas, had fragmented into a number of parties like SNAP and PESAKA. Wikipedia has the background of Dayak's political activism best: 'Dayak political activism in Sarawak had its roots in the Sarawak National Party (SNAP) and Parti Pesaka Anak Sarawak (PESAKA) during post-independence construction in the 1960s. 'These parties shaped, to a certain extent, Dayak politics in the state, although never enjoying the real privileges and benefits of chief ministerial power relative to its large electorate due to their own political disunity with some Dayaks joining various political parties instead of consolidating inside one single political party.' Those of us with an interest in the political history of Sarawak since 1963 are very much aware of the many twists and turns, betrayals and backstabbings, and also the many cases of party-hopping especially after state and federal elections. Many times in the past, ordinary citizens like us felt either disappointed or even betrayed by the acts and antics of those politicians whom we had voted to power, only to find out that these victors had quickly became turncoats not worth the principles or the promises that they had espoused and uttered at their pre-election rallies and election manifestos. Such has been the politics of the day from the late 1960s right up till very recently. Archive photo shows Kalong Ningkan delivering his first Gawai Dayak speech at Sarawak Union Club on May 31, 1966. — Photo courtesy of Sarawak Information Service It had appeared that most of our citizens were only interested in politics when there were general or by-elections being held. The running joke was that such run-ups to the elections would always involve the general spreading of wealth around to the electorate – in the forms of generous grants being 'donated' to those in the rural areas in need of general maintenance like road repairs, laying of electrical lines or water pipes, and even bridges to be built over rivers to access villages. The images of 'blue fibreglass water-tanks' embossed with a certain political party's logo would go viral on social media and be seen as the most common form of 'getting the voters' out to support the donors come polling day. The sales and consumption of consumer items like outboard engines, roofing materials, and especially beers and other spirits would increase manyfold. To a large extent, however, this is no longer the case. The times have changed, and the majority of the voters today are more mature, sophisticated and street-smart. They are now able to think for themselves. Still, many will still knowingly participate in order to reap the benefits: 'If it's there and free, why not?' Nonetheless, our present generation and our current group of leaders are now more mature, experienced, better educated, and much more in the loop of what the electorate wants and demands and their expectations are much higher than before. Most of our leaders are now more altruistic as well. However, there is still no sign of a true and a formidable united Dayak front as the politics of the day is still being played by a few dissident and divisive personalities who have their own reasons for creating such continuing disunity. There are a few minority 'fighters for independence' and those who will always be against a federation of states 'controlled' by a central government. There are those who feel 'left out' in the cold either due to past personal clashes or perceived slight and may feel that they are now viewed as 'outcasts'. The reasons, excuses and perceptions of why all Dayaks cannot be fully united will never be easy to resolve, but I say with all honesty that right now, right here, Sarawak is in a pretty good place. There is political stability and there is economic wellness, with the country being at peace and we being blessed with racial and religious harmony. I also wish to share this favourite song of mine from 1966 by Bob Lind called 'Elusive Butterfly', of which the lyrics reflect best what I pray for Dayak unity (in the song, the butterfly has become a metaphor for transformation and hope; across cultures, it has become a symbol for rebirth and resurrection, for the triumph of the spirit and soul over the physical prison). 'You might wake up some mornin', 'To the sound of something moving past your window in the wind, 'And if you're quick enough to rise, 'You'll catch a fleeting glimpse of someone's fading shadow, 'Out on the new horizon, 'You may see the floating motion of a distant pair of wings, 'Don't be concerned, it will not harm you, 'It's only me pursuing somethin' I'm not sure of, 'Across my dreams with nets of wonder, 'I chase the bright elusive butterfly of love.' I take my leave by wishing all my family, friends and readers who are celebrating this festival a very happy and blessed Gawai Dayak! * The opinions expressed in this article are the columnist's own and do not reflect the view of the newspaper. Dayak Gawai Iban politics sarawak Stephen Kalong Ningkan
Borneo Post
28-05-2025
- Borneo Post
Former assemblywoman slams dismissal of public scrutiny over S'wak leaders' overseas spending
Chang says more concerning was the Speaker's remarks that the travel costs were a 'pittance' and 'triviality' compared to the investments brought in by these overseas trips. SIBU (May 28): Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUN) Speaker Tan Sri Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Nassar's decision to disallow the question raised by Pending assemblywoman Violet Yong on the breakdown of the Premier and state Cabinet ministers' overseas trips expenses is an outright assault on the principles of transparency and accountability, which are the fundamentals of good governance. In stating this, former Bukit Assek assemblywoman Irene Chang said more concerning was the Speaker's remarks that the travel costs were a 'pittance' and 'triviality' compared to the investments brought in by these overseas trips. 'This rationale is deeply flawed and reflects a dismissive attitude towards public accountability. These overseas trips are public expenditures and funded by taxpayers' money. 'Every sen of these taxpayers' money must be subject to scrutiny, regardless of the amount,' she said in a statement. She also referred to the RM100 million being allocated to the Premier's Department for overseas duties in the latest Supplementary Supply Bill. Chang said the notion that the trips were necessary and the cost incurred did not need to be revealed because they were 'small' or offset by future investments was a dangerous precedent to the unchecked misuse of funds. 'Claims of investment returns do not, and cannot, in any circumstances negate the public's right to know how and why the public funds are being spent. It is therefore totally justified for Yong to request for the expenditures incurred from these overseas trips to be revealed to the public. 'This is to ensure transparency, to prevent misuse, and to protect the public interest. Denying this right not only disrespects and undermines the people's mandate for the elected representative in question but also erodes public trust in our democratic institutions.' Adding on, Chang said the DUN should not allow itself to be reduced to a rubber stamp for executive decisions, and must remain a platform for honest debate, scrutiny and accountability. She added it was the very place where legitimate inquiries, such as the one raised by Yong, are encouraged and not silenced. 'As it is, denying this request for such crucial information could further erode public trust in the current government.' DUN Irene Chang overseas travel expenses
Borneo Post
28-05-2025
- Borneo Post
Dismissal of motion to review Premier, Cabinet's travel expenses a ‘planned charade', says Chong
Chong says what the Speaker did earlier today has undermined the function of the DUN on providing an oversight on the Executives. – Photo by Roystein Emmor KUCHING (May 28): Padungan assemblyman Chong Chieng Jen is unhappy that a motion submitted by him at the Sarawak Legislative Assembly (DUN) was dismissed by Speaker Tan Sri Datuk Amar Mohamad Asfia Awang Nassar. In a statement, he said what the Speaker did earlier today has undermined the function of the DUN on providing an oversight on the Executives. 'The main reason it has come to such is because of the overpowering 80-2 majority the GPS (Gabungan Parti Sarawak) enjoys in the DUN sitting. If such unbalanced government to opposition ratio continues, more extravagance and wastage of public funds will be kept from public eyes and swept under the carpet,' said the Democratic Action Party Sarawak chairman. He was referring to the motion seeking review of the Speaker's decision to disallow the question by Pending assemblywoman Violet Yong on the detailed expenses of the Premier and Cabinet ministers official overseas trips. Asfia had cited multiple procedural and substantive breaches under the DUN's Standing Orders in dismissing the motion. Chong was also unhappy that Asfia allowed Wilfred Yap (GPS-Kota Sentosa) to speak on the motion without even allowing him, the mover of the motion, to start debate on it. He described this as a 'planned charade'. 'He (Asfia) seems to have subscribed to the claim by ADUN for Kota Sentosa that I should go and ask the Prime Minister on the expenses of the Prime Minister and federal Cabinet ministers' official oversea trips. For the information of the Speaker and the ADUN for Kota Sentosa, information of the expenses of the Prime Minister and the federal ministers' official trip has been made public in a parliament answer. 'If the federal government can reply such a question in Parliament, there is no justification why the state government cannot reply such a question in DUN. The Speaker's reliance on foreign investment to justify the huge oversea trips expenditure of the state ministers is misplaced,' he said. He pointed out in the supplementary supply bill for 2025, it was mentioned the Premier's office alone needed RM100 million as its 'rental for air-chartered service'. He said that figure does not even include the expenses for official oversea trips of the other 10 ministers and 26 deputy ministers. 'Last year, the Ministry of Local Government, Housing and Public Health alone, sought additional RM3 million for overseas trips. 'Even taking the Premier's office's RM100 million rental of air-chartered expenditure alone without counting the overseas trips of other ministries, it is still too extravagant given that the whole of the federal cabinet's oversea trips in 2024 was only RM44 million,' he said. Chong was referring to the ruling by Asfia on May 26 in dismissing a question by Yong concerning the overseas travel expenses. Asfia had stated that the costs involved were merely a 'pittance' and 'trivial' compared to the billions in foreign investments the state has successfully attracted. 'If we compare the foreign investment, the country attracted a total RM378.5 billion while Sarawak attracted RM14.12 billion – 3.7 per cent of the country's FDI. In contrast, the RM100 million is more than double the RM44 million spent by the whole federal cabinet on oversea trips,' he said.
