At least seven civilians killed in Russian attacks across Ukraine
On Friday, Russia launched nearly 100 drones and missiles overnight, with air defences intercepting 63 of the drones, according to Ukraine's Air Force.
Four people were killed in the Kharkiv region, two in Donetsk, and one in Kherson. Seventeen people were wounded nationwide, including a child, with widespread damage reported to homes, a school, and other civilian infrastructure.
Russia has been targeting Ukrainian cities in daily aerial attacks, which have intensified significantly over the past months.
According to the UN Human Rights Monitoring Mission in Ukraine (HRMMU), the number of civilian casualties in Ukraine reached another three-year high in July.
With 286 civilians killed and 1,388 injured, the July casualty number was the highest since May 2022.
HRMMU said the use of long-range weapons such as missiles and loitering munitions accounted for nearly 40 per cent of the casualties – 89 killed and 572 injured.
Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, HRMMU has documented the deaths of at least 13,883 civilians, including 726 children.
Targeting Russia's defence production, Ukrainian forces struck an oil refinery in Russia's Samara region and other Russian targets overnight on Friday, Ukraine's General Staff said.
The refinery is located in Syzran, Russia's Samara region, which lies about 800 kilometres from Ukraine's border with Russia.
Kyiv said the facility is one of the largest in the Rosneft system, Russia's state-controlled oil giant. The Syzran plant produces a wide range of fuels, including aviation fuel, and supplies the Russian Armed Forces, Ukraine's General Staff reported.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 hours ago
- Euronews
Protesters oppose Trump's Alaskan summit with Russian President Putin
Protesters gathered at a park in Anchorage on Friday in support of Ukraine, unfurling a large Ukrainian flag and chanting "Peace to Ukraine," as US President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin held face-to-face talks. The high-stakes summit in Alaska could determine the trajectory of the war in Ukraine and the fate of European security. The summit gives Trump a chance to prove he is a master dealmaker and global peacemaker. For Putin, it's an opportunity to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders were not invited to participate in the talks. The meeting could have far-reaching implications, with foreign governments watching closely. "I don't think any solution without the Ukrainian's input is going to end the war in a just and fair way," said Peter Casey, a resident of Anchorage. "I think that Trump and Putin want to make a deal for themselves that benefits them and doesn't bring a just end to the conflict," he added. Many residents of Anchorage questioned Putin's motives in these talks, arguing that he's long displayed a pattern of only pursuing his interests. They also believe that a peace treaty, in the event that Trump is able to eventually broker a ceasefire, means very little. 'Putin doesn't want peace. He wants Ukraine and anything that doesn't push him away from Ukraine will not bring peace because he won't stop,' said Blake Severson. 'We've signed peace treaties, Chechnya signed a peace treaty, Georgia signed a peace treaty, Ukraine signed a Peace Treaty. And Russia has been invading them for 11 years.' Severson added that a 'a peace deal is not going to do anything to stop Putin', instead asserting that the only real counter to Putin is 'bloodying his nose and fighting back against his aggression'. Many were also critical of Trump for inviting Putin for these talks in the United States, stressing that it was highly inappropriate to play host to a man wanted by the International Criminal Court. 'I wish they weren't here,' said Julie, 'I think inviting a dictator and a war criminal to American soil is a little bit much.' Julie noted that she believes Trump directly communicating with his Russian counterpart is a good initiative that may bridge the gap and inch Kyiv and Moscow closer towards peace. She however remained cautious, noting that Trump has made many promises in the past which he's yet to deliver on. 'I think Trump made a lot of promises during his campaign that he would end the war quickly, within 24 hours, if I recall. And he needs to show that he's doing something about it, and so he's got to do something,' added Julie. The talks, which took place at the Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, lasted for around two-and-a-half hours. The two leaders said in a press conference following their private talks that the meeting was highly constructive. Trump and Putin also stated that the Alaska Summit is a first step and that more direct talks are needed in the future to hopefully come to a peace agreement. Trump has expressed his desire for Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to participate in future rounds of talks. It is not yet known when the next round of talks between the leaders could take place, but officials say it is likely to happen 'soon'. The Russian leader suggested Moscow as the venue for the next meeting during a joint press conference with Trump following their meeting, to which Trump said 'I can see it possibly happening'.
Euronews
15 hours ago
- Euronews
Pushing Kyiv to give up land 'will force Ukrainians to the streets'
A possible deal to end Russia's war against Ukraine will include 'land swapping' from both sides, US President Donald Trump said, which in reality means territorial concessions for Ukraine. Kyiv forces do not occupy any of Russia's territory, meaning there could be no deal regarding returning Moscow its land. All of the land in question is the territory Russia has occupied in Ukraine since the first invasion in 2014 followed by Moscow's all-out war in 2022. If Trump pressures Ukraine to relinquish its territory, he would not be convincing Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Instead, he will have to persuade the people of Ukraine. And unlike Trump, Zelenskyy understands who will have the last word, just as he knows that even he cannot convince the Ukrainian people of what they reject. The county's civil society demonstrated it well enough, including just weeks ago. Anton Liagusha, Dean of the Graduate Department of Social Sciences and Humanities at the Kyiv School of Economics, told Euronews that if Ukrainian authorities are pressured into territorial concessions, 'it will force the Ukrainian people to take to the streets.' 'This will not so much be a story of protest against the authorities, but a cry from the Ukrainian people to the whole world to be treated as a great country in the centre of Europe, and not just viewed by the US as a piece of land," Liagusha said. "Ukrainians are a full-fledged nation, and Ukraine is a great state with its own legislation.' Liagusha explained that ever since Ukraine became an independent county, the society has clearly established its decisive power when 'during the Revolution of Dignity (in 2014), and before that the Orange Revolution (in 2004) and before that the Revolution on Granite in 1991, we saw that people do not accept power in terms of authoritarianism and clear hierarchy.' 'The president in Ukrainian society is not a king, meaning that his will does not determine the will of the entire Ukrainian people," he pointed out. 'We all hear what society says' Since the beginning of Russia's full-scale invasion in early 2022, this balance of power has crystallised even more clearly 'when we see in Ukrainian society that almost every family has been affected by this war, directly or indirectly," according to Liagusha. 'People are fighting against the aggressor, for democracy, and for our country to become a member of the European Union and be part of Europe," he said. And so, whatever decisions are made with the participation of the president, it means that these decisions can be confirmed by Ukrainian society through direct street demonstrations.' This was proven yet again in July when thousands of Ukrainians took to the streets to protest against the bill that could have effectively eliminated the independence of the country's anti-corruption institutions. Thousands of Ukrainians demonstrated until Zelenskyy proposed a new bill only days later to restore the independence of the anti-corruption bodies. Nationwide protests forced the government to overturn the initial bill in a move widely seen as a win for democracy in Ukraine, even during Russia's all-out war. Demonstrators made it clear that their anger was directed solely at the bill, and their demands were limited to restoring the independence of anti-corruption bodies. But after three revolutions in just over 30 years, one of which resulted in ousting the pro-Russian Victor Yanukovich in 2014, Ukrainian presidents and authorities are very sensitive to the voice of the street. Having signed a new bill, Zelenskyy himself said, 'We all hear what society says. We see what people expect from state institutions to ensure justice and the efficiency of each institution.' Zelenskyy surely knows what to expect from Ukrainian civil society should there be pressure to cede territories. But Ukraine's foreign partners, specifically the US, do not seem to comprehend it. When asked why, Liagusha said the reasons can be explained by the level of comfort of life. 'Life in the United States and many European countries is more or less stable and comfortable," he explained. "These societies have long lacked experience with large-scale protests and the high level of activity seen in Ukrainian civil society.' Liagusha also points out that Western democracies primarily view Ukrainian civil society as self-organised groups of people that are created or organised to solve specific tactical problems and issues. 'There is no understanding that the volunteer movement, civil society for the protection of human rights, and activists in various fields are truly such a society and are the creators of the new Ukrainian state.'
Euronews
17 hours ago
- Euronews
Trump-Putin Alaska summit: High stakes at historic meeting
As Donald Trump is hosting Vladimir Putin for a historic summit in Alaska, Ukraine and Europe are holding their breath for what the meeting can bring. For the US president, the summit represents an unprecedented opportunity to establish himself as a peacemaker and push Russia to a ceasefire. For Putin, this is a chance to change tack despite his unwillingness to engage in direct negotiations with his Ukrainian counterpart Volodymyr Zelenskyy. Ukraine's president has not been invited to the summit at the US military Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson in Anchorage, but Trump hopes he will be present for the second round of talks. The question remains, will there be a second meeting after the negotiations in Alaska? Follow our live updates as Euronews journalists around Europe bring you the latest developments in the blog below:
